569
~
~ECEIVED ZONING BOARD o'F APPEALS
/'1<!,fP 11 19811 TOWN OF WAPPINGER
f . ECA,NE H. · ACTION ON APPEAL
· SNOWDEN
Ap pellant .Dr...._..w.a~teJ:...:w...D._....E.eaJl.ey............................................ Address.....56....All...Ao.g:e.ls....Hil~...RQ.ad
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
~
Appeal No. .........-..56.9..-........
Dated ....se.p.tembe.t:...~.Q:th, 198
..........u.........................._...._.................................. .............................................,..................................._...........06.............................................._...........................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...............................S.ep.t.emb.er....B:th..............................) 19......8,],
Appeal No......5.6..9............ wa, considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, rn AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict appliC1.tion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ....................-..-...................................................-.................._:_.....
................._.................................................._................................................................__..._.......u......................................._...__.......,..........__
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
.....-.................-.............................................................................................................-.-....................................................-......................--.
.....-............::..-.................................................................................................................-..............,.......................................'-............\................--
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change tr.':: character of the district, because: .....................
......................................................................................................-..................................................................-.......................-.----.......................-..
....................-....................................................................................................................................................................-..........--.........,...............-
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En.
:forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ..............................................................-..._.....................
....................................-....................................................................... ........ .........................................-............................................-..........-...-................-..
.........................................................................................................................................................-....-......-........................................-.-...,..................-.......
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follmving resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ord~nance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
......................................................P.LEASE....SEE...ATTAC:H11ENT...................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Bo~rd) the following decision was made on your
;~)pe3.1: .. ............................................................ ............................... ........... .... ..................... ...................................................................................
.~J2!l2~...-
. .... . ....... .. .. .... .............................
Chairrna:1) Zonir.:J' Ec1:-d of ..bJeJ.l"
::: ..
Appeal # 569
-2-
september 10th, 1981
r
c.
At the september 8th, 1981 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting,
the following interpretation was rendered:
It is the interpretation that a chiropractic office is a
permitted use in this zone subject to proper site plan approval
and safeguards and restrictions as determined by the Planning Board
and the Zoning Board of Appeals.
~VIkQdft
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Appeal No. '5 &~
-- "
'.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
, , ')
, ) J /', / '.:'" , 1 I 0') '-
/'-'! I i" t.. .;-/-:: "
L.,.' I I \ (.... \.. ,.
-;; /.J
,0/' C
.J' 0.-'"
I /
t c: ,.I..' /1 /,:::- ,,/
f:-:..",' I I V:_ /
/\;C ;
I '
Home Mailing
Address . S--G
/l/J-'/()
'// / ,) I JLI'!.'
/- I .i-' d/,/ '-', , I /
~. I 1/' Of ...Y"----c../ :>, / / I ...
.
. -.,...." Q It) :)
~_':)"Oellant ~~ ,,(j ,":
. - '" .
t~~2 [I) })/
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
---;;--./.....,
~,.
-'8"
I, ~I !, -:/l?,;,/ (. i/. >>, f~,,/Y;'t''''~'7/ , appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated E? - 1- ! / . 19 &// and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:c:lA VAR~CE,r:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,~AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,OAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), (c:heck
'1/ / /l// 1
in connection with premises located at /-(I( I-J;fl(;"'':'-~!s ,if>/( /();) ,
, G 2Sr?_{)LI-j~O '3 )OcS-: Town Of(~:;;~~g:r~o~:y.
(grid no.) ---'., .':; ;'.
proper one) I
r<. L/ 0
(zoning di st . )
.---"
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED /,i(l/
{j<~ 1
(article~ section or subsection and paragraph)
.' I -
.-!...-JL.,-.- ~., (:/ ~./- ")-'7
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS
or subsection
to permit the following
REQUESTED pursuant to article
I paragraph of the
use on the above premises:
, section
Zoning Ordinance
-:, -
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
( ,', l'
- I " .- /' " ) , I
,.,', 1" i
, J
- ('I} J
i I
I ,
i-i .
; '""7' . . T" r'. {.,I ~ '{ ;- ;'. "':.- '.' " ' J . '... . - / / I --
,./., ' , ; 0'1 - ,.' { ~ ,.;: / ~. r: ", ., "(, i ," '(,'
j'd. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) an appeal is requested because:
I '- . "
< )
3. OTHER REri\ARKS:
/
,{
'j
,.
,1..
I '
(Use extra sheets if necessary) signature J //(>(',<<.! )/
".
- 'y
L
, '>#
,)
~~- >-... -........
* The =cquired plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
\/
d
~,J??LI_~);7S .n.R::; RESPONSIBLE FOR. TIIE COSTS INVOLVED I:J PLL3LISHIl~G THE R2QUIRED
. ~,::,"S ~:O":'TCF. IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER_