Loading...
557 RECEI'IE.D AUG 1 3 1981, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TO\VN OF \V APPINGER . ACTION ON APPEAL ~ Appeal No. .222....__ Dated . 8 (~ 1/81 : E~JNE H. SNOWDEN A ppellant H.H.._..........~E~e_b.~n9.:~.y.~~_._........_......................_.._......._ Addre3S..._~l.._<;..~.=:E.?.!.~.__l2..~~. wappinger Falls, NY ..............-----..-....-.....-.-...--......... ............................-.......-...-.....-.....--..-. .. . .---..................-.--. At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ......._...._....._..............._.___~_1?:9..~.~.~....lt.._............__......) J9~, Appeal No._.....5.5.7.......... was considered and the following action on the request for: E3 A VARIANCE, o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was take:t: g VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determined thlt strict applic:l.tion of the Ordinance wuuld 0 would not produce undue hardship for these re:1sons: The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasona.ble retur~)f limited to the use ermitted under the Ordinance, because: _...._~..._.._... __.. '. . b. The hardship create is 0 is not unique and Q/~d 0 would not be sh~red by all properties alike in the vicI' of the property a;1O in the same use district, because: :"....._ c. aracter of the district, because: _........_ -.-.........-..........----. ..--.........-......-..-.......................... :...................................-.-. -...-...........----....--.......-...--------.-- ...--......-.-...--- -.-.--................-.-.....-.........--...--..-...... .......................................-.._....-~.... .-....-..................."....--.......--"":- Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be granted 0 be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed. 2. SPECIAL USE PER...l\1IT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection -.....-..--....., paragraph ...-......__.................. of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En.. :forcement Officer 0 be reversed D be confirmed, because: .......__................__.___...... -...-...---..--.-.-..----.--..-.....--......................-.-........-.-...- -.-..- .-........--.....---......--....-. .......-..--...-.--...-......--.---.....-..................................................-..,..................-...........................---..-.... 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ................................................................._......._._................_ ...................................................-................................................................................................................-....-..................-........................----..--.-- ...........................................-.................................,....................................... ...............................................................................................--.........-.......-- .............................................................................................................................................................,........................................................................................ 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision ,vas made on your 3:?pea1: ................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................._... .... .................................................................................................................. ...........................:...........................................................................:.~...:~::::d~ .............-..............................-............................................... ........7..-...~.~- .....}rA.......-..----....-- ~..W~. - - , . .....................C'h.~i.~~~~..~i"~.~.i~.~.~.;d.~f..Ap;~;l~.........._..- I ~ . Page 6 Mr. Stella pointed out that Mr. Price has maintained the road to his property. Mr. Price stated that a builder is waiting to see what the Zoning Board of Appeals decision. Mr. Landolfi pointed out that the Board warns property owners who build on private roads of the additional expenses to maintain those roads. Mr. Price responded to Mr. Landolfi's question regarding the additional expenses with the septic system. Mr. Landolfi also questioned Mr. price regarding the extra expense in educating his child. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone present to speak against this appeal. This appeal was closed at 9:05. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Appeal #539, at the request of George and Esther Hulsair, seeking a Special Use Permit pursuant to Article IV, Section 421, paragraph 18 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to permit them to convert their existing dwelling into a two-family residence on property located on 269 Myers Corners Road, being parcel #6258-02- 970580, in the Town of Wappinger. Mr. and Mrs. Hulsair were present. The Town Highway Superintendant gave recommendations by letter and Mr. and Mrs. Hulsair agreed to abide by his letter. Mr. McMillen made a motion that Appeal #539 be approved. Seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Passed. Appeal #545, at the request of John Montfort, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 421, Schedule of Regulations for Residential Districts (R-40 Zone) of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance and relief as an aggrieved person as kitchen facilities in a guest house were denied by the Building Inspector and were excluded in the building permit application for the property located on Cedar Hill Road being parcel #6256-01-405807, in the Town of Wappinger. No one was present to speak for this appeal. The Board recessed for a short time at 9:10. When they reconvened the following motions were made. Appeal # 554 -Mr. Landolfi made a motion that this appeal be granted. Seconded by Mr. cortellino. Vote was unanimous. Appeal #555 - Mr. McMillen made a motion that this appeal be tabled for further study. Seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Vote was unanimous. Appeal #556 was wi thdra~,.l:.: by the appellant. '" . hppe2 'V:.)57 - Mr. McNiL:.(';.'. made a motion that this appeal be / I NOTICE OF APPEAL Appeal No. .6-57 Date.--.JJLy ;1.'2",0 L'I~I ',.-- .... To~rn OF ~~PPINGER Appellant PJtf,{ ~Rt?/UL'j LIJJ(Jf,! V(?K , Home Mailing Address ~2 C;J/?!?oll. PI'? U.)/9f/PI.lj~eH5 rhUS. IVy TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I , M R S. J t<? I?pF LI1 flX5"h (J/~e-<.. , appeal from a decision of the zoning Inspector, dated ~ ~. , 19M, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals .for:~V~:rANCE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER- PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) . (c;heck in connection with ~remises located at~2 &vvV ~ ])r- , . . (street & no.) , be1. 5'7-1)?L - f? 4.5"' 1./ 81 , Town of Wappinger, N.Y. (grid no.) ~ 01 IS- 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALEDjtr~2h ~. 5e0~4v) q ( (a"W CWt nt ~t1'h q + o./~ sen- hc-G/\- ~\a-K- 3S! .~ . (article, ",se tiC?n or subsection and para raph) l> ~ CiU?j>cflj IS 3{,rl" rPo,,,, C/}I(f/fJ(' O/<. e=1>4tC"a::- ffN~ re>lV\~ 2.. TYPE OF' APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). * proper one), t~~ (zoning dist.) ~. .." . . . ~ .~"~. .. .~.: ~ ~:.: a'-VVAR:QlliCEIS REQuESTED for the following reasons: '1) strict"application of the zoning.Q;'~nce would produce undue hardship because: .~'I? 1:!t?J3I.:=;U1,.c)N (~%q~RJ ItUCJu.Jt:?V 1J7t3' P(}/LPI.';R jO tJ()I' OA- eM po,. r 16 { 1.2 <>'" 11"- 'Y. I Ifll _t,<-> ,"'- "''':' PILl Fj) <>" r SIGAl <,0 19'-' j) ./J1'f'''''' Il D. /l C.i::U:CKo;=' IIIO.~O c.v.4s PhlP ~e)J:! )>.l-~~/7.:. /I1/J. ~/G'J3(rJePfIt~r~iQ 1-1<5 W(N/~ O;tlopq,..:p ",o/GIN;UG f'1?/'tl<4llr TITe: Fe:'d:L.Ol.YI<(j(.,v.C)"Y~/!-lfl)f i";/f.>. -I7feAJL~ L/.1M~flUt=1< It-h-l n- }~t?'~''RT ........., '.\ f"!t),!,vJA:>C . ,., I c,"~olnrJ'V /J~v rlhJc'-hifj3t1~'" i-IJPiJL~ Pl.--oPtJ-II{/A:I",,JulP /P .,./~c;/' i-U,A)r~T/"'If_ /2) IThe hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties ;/ alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: j-/ov,St.:; Ill) rife- ()rU{,y OIU/? 0.0 THt?" J3LCC.t<, G The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: _ CPtl4'6-m ~ rt-~wrt~ (,.\Ses b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Or.dinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature MpAL ~~"AL * The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ~~;:~tANTS ARE RESPONSIBLe FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PL~LISHI~G THE REQUIRED ,'" '....f"'\rn.,.......,~ -,.. 1'T't'!,..-:t -.""""I"'~- .....r"";"T.1~""'~'l""'tT:"""" -.- 1:) ,1/,j?J( _ .-..: ~T ~ 1~-r.fY ~l>Y~ 4"'l;e -6r0~'\~ 3>-_'0\-1'. W U"_~_._~ !> M...Jt-1( ~ 4"'~-':"""~--- . ..... - --. ---'- ,-----_.- B~ ~G INTnT.:iT.'1~1 BtJil;.u~l'" --- -1. ;;'.:; 1:!;\:.f_ . ~l fo" _'J.'QWl'i~J::"~~~" E -.. C~"WY.t ~Pp. Falls, N~ Y. - _._.. -.~~ __ 1- ~;( C~)( .--.-.--.1----.---. -:--.--..----------- ,. st~~.---__--. ---' lA1HOI-l"- ~t,..;LAv...v" lJC--- _ ~{- \1l~ ~ ..L ....,. /~... ~ -,;fa "'-[' ""0' /'. ,'-'-" .. l/t-o _~ ... V' ...-.-.......-....---.-..--- -. ..-.-...-Q'..1 'syf /.) _ \~lt 0 c.... 6 ~ _0" t p. B -. ... ,-' - '0"- 5- ---- .. . ......,.---. ----, _ ..__...___._M ~ntv\ .~ ~_.__._--'_......'.. ~ .i.J------- -- __. _..__.__.__ _. 0'_' _ i^- ___ .___. ___..___ _ ..- . - - .- ..--- -- ~1-tf p~ts----..--. . lX..L~ .-- - - - ~_. .--- ~-_.- -.'-'- ..,._._._--~~-~...,_.. -----.-..,- ,.-- -~--,.......__.'~,_....-~..- --- -~.. -_._-~----- . . .._._---~---_...:.__.~._._-_._--_._.--:-..~.~_-..:.:....._-_._- - .._._._._-:-_.~_._..- -_.- ---.-------.--:-o-~~. '---'--'-'~""'-" _ __._...____~.... ___._______ .t.l.ov-------------Slge-' ~ lJ\ \ i($ --l' \..J l. t.,...V"-I---- ?, \a .---....-.. ..... . .---- C/ 21 - " . .... ...00' - _. .. -.' ......; .-.-. l~' - --- --'-- . --. j 1 i \6l? 9>\' - - ~ I . ~ ---.J\-ll ..... - -.. --....--- ----------- tl . . -I .\ j . ._-----; .--....-..--- .._~__l___._o_____ . _' _. _ II i\ n 1'J. c. ~ fI ~ /VdlUK -rot' Vl ~ ~ - TOWN OF WAPPINGER PLOT PLAN - ...... ~ - a. I ." ..:! ~ ~ fronl. DATE ..J J L 'I 'j IJf / '1 ..,. I T Rear YanI 1 ~ Set Back 4V It. 1 STREEJ/A VENUE REC. VOL PAGE tJUllDIHG PERMIT f LOCAnON~S SDE Gf\-U.L~ ~i'.'~ \JA,,~ E W HOUSE NUMBER . LOT NUMBER OWNER Of LAND__(\/\~ L-A1\f4~ v~ B '1 ZONE R 40 (20. . .t. ;'. -...... - --- It. . BUILDING I: SPECTOR TOWN OF APPINGER Town all Wallpingers Fall N. Y. 12590 Sid.yard .. 1\ fr >. IL..: ~ y~ ~. ~~ NeareslSW' 1)61 LG?L W INDICATE LOCATION of WELL and SEWAGE SYSTEM and THE DISTANCE of EACH FROM HOUSE , " / " / " / '" / " MarIe North Poln' (,f\-f4-DL--( -/ ~ WHITE SHEET - Office Copy YELLOW SHEET - Applicant's Copy InSormatiolt Supplied. by STREET b~ J IJ~ TOWN OF WAPPINGER, N.Y. _~,Q;< /l!M-~r TYPE OF APPLICATION tJ IJ L '/ :J I J..T I ? :r I APPLICATION # 5't.jyl ZONE5.l{u Iz:;:, PERMIT # D'J-- Js-to NAME Plt'l Yl'!l'5 fflelJP thN~ptll:~/< I ADDRESS Liz C"4.t?/.'tlll LJ//. TYPE OF STRUCTURE NJ~tJp . OWNERHOF LAND & BUILDING ml1, L/J/!~FtJP/<. I TEL.# ADDRESS OF OWNER tJ'!J.. C/'JI:'t't1U PI? .. ~ , II. ,_. NAME OF BUILDER ....JAd< (l,f?I.5JerlF ADDRESS OF BUILDER $'/1 mIJ-/rtJ .f7. PtJuttlKI!FfJ.tlt! . FRONTYARD SETBACKS .~ J2S~~~YA~ SIZE OF STRUCTURE 1).)( IL ESTIMATED COST -.If I/fJtJ, 190 SECTION_fa ~~1- otf DATE RECEIVED 7-- ~ /- tf-I ESTIMATED VALUE ff~ t9t7. 610 . FEE .~>~ ' tfJ' /:7 (/~/.,-;;:/. L~/:h" J' -./-1.(" LOT # ~~4-BI. ~ IS- ..... /7 I /'7 -J/ //l~l/ .(", J..J)16 " ~ATURE OF APPLICANT WHITE SHEET - Office Copy YELLOW SHEET - Assessor's Office PINK SHEET - Applicant's Copy