572
.. .__.~___.'__'''''"''__''__''_'_'.____~'_ u_". _...".__._~_.. _.. __..
. ... ~
~.-'< :...?:...~~- -::'~:""::...~;. -:..
.. ~ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS . ..
. TOWN OF \V APPINGIMCEIVED Appeal No. -5.12 .,
ACTION ON APP~T 1 5 19~ated ..Q.s!:.ober ,15th( 1981
.' ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appelhne ....J.9.hn_Ls~}.;'.~n~~_--._.---......-.__......_.._-.- Address._..RD...~_=-~~...c.i~
.......__g.Q..'!g:h1s.~_~~.;\..~..._~......J.~.2.Q.!.._.-....~..._-....-----......................-....-...................-..---....--.
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .._._..._.._.......Q.S~.Q9.~.;:....!.~.:tlL...-_....___) 19..l!.!-)
Appeal No........5.1.2......__ was considered and the following action on the n:quest Eor: [ID A V ARIAN~
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ~ONING ORDINAL~CE)
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I; VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was dete:mine~ that strict appliCl.tion of the OrdilWlc:e
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
. a. The. property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to'the
use permitted under the Ordinance, beause: -.-----.-.----.. .
-..--.---...---.--......-.......--.-.......----
-..---.-......-..--
b. The hardship created 0 is D' is not unique and D' would 0 would not be shan:d by all
properties alike in. the vicinity 'of the property and in the same use district, because: _.~
-..--....-----.-......--.-..--..-.......-..
--..---....- ,~.."..
....-............--:0---.-.....-..--...........-...................---..---...-.........-......--...-------- ...' \ "~'I
c. .The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district) because: ....M......__
...---.....-....-..---................................................-....---...- ....--......-..................................-........--..-...-...-- .. ......--..-
....--........----.-...............---.-.--............-..------.--...--.----._.....-.._..._....._-.._.__._._......_------....~...
Therefore, it was further determined that the l'eCpl~ variance tXl be granted ~1fttl---
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-~emtftt'R\ed [) be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be' denied, pU1"SUant to article ..............-........, section or subsection
__....__.., paragraph .........._......_............. of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En..
~orcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .....-...........................---..-..-. .. ..__
......-....--,...................-..--.-................................................................ ....... ...........-..-....-.........-.................-....,..............-.-..---.--.....--
_...____._~...................___._....._._..........._.........:......................._....._........_..~_.__...........----.-...--.-.-.....--.---:---....--._M....-.
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follcr;o.ing TC:$olution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ......................................................................-........_.................._.....
... ................:..................._............... ........ .............. ........ ........ .......................... .... n.................. ...... ......... .................................................................................._...
..................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................-........................
. .. .. .. .......... .......................... -..................:...........................................
~. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of ::.~ Board, the following "decision was made on your
~pe31: ..................................... .................................................... . ... ... ........... .......... ..............................
'''r ............................................................
...............................................................-....................... .
._m...(7)m_.mm...._...
~.I~.. i~Q~
~) Zoll'lng Board of Appeals
CHAIRPERSON, ·
.
.'
TOWN .oF WAPPINGER
~~a? NO...J-7 /
.
.)
\1
NOT ICE .oF APPEAL
Date
Seut. 81
.
;"_ppellant
John Lawrence
Address R.D. # 1 KelleyCircle
Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
12601
. "
TO THE BOARD .oF APPEALS:
I,
John Lawrence
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated
. Aug.
, 19 81, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:fX1A VARLMTCE,r:!A SPEC~ USE PE~~IT,r:JAN INTER-
PRETATI.oN .oF THE Z.oNING .oRDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERS.oN(S). (check
proper
one); .. in. connection with premises located at Rte. 9
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
HB-2A
,~~ -01, ~ 1, DQ1.,r
(grid no.)
(zoning dist.)
1. PR.oVISION(S) OF THE ZONING .oRDINANCE APPEALED Sign location & Size
~\e$ ~ 1:1(;"10 OtU~ l1~5~,.Jt~h~ S~~ t 5bS[Wuc{eetCt~
. ". _ ~article, se.ction?r subsection and paragraph) ." ..
. . \r ~ z,) % ft- (S ~~ l1ted ()t-r~. ~+- C\ l~sev setk~ ~AN ~e"M\ W
2. TYPE .oF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). * .
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED "for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship be~ause: A 2S~ set back from the propertyline would
"locate the sign 85' -90' f'rom the edge of' the road. As per plan
. "
. the R.O.W. is 60. wide. With a660' set back I would like a sign not less
than '10 sa. f't. in size.. d' t h d b 11 .
2) The n~rdstt~p createa 1S un~que an ~s no s are y a propert~es
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The " variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph . . of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning .ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
A sign with a set back of' 60' f'rom the edge of' Rte.(9)
smaller than 50 sq.f't. will not be seen by cars
speed of' 55 mph.
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
the
* 'T'l-."", ...."",..,... ....e~ -1....... -........ ~~co.mpanv th""" NO.......;.~
.......- _~~'-"'t""''' """ l:' '-".. ""\,.4~t- a"""'.I. _ ."1;;:0... _~
Appeal.
n~~
::'"PPELL2\NTS ARE RESPO~7SIB!.:E POR T!!ECOSTS INVOrlE= I:1 P:J3:.::::;:-r::~;c
~~GAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
T~
')' \""'"
A" ..AIlJW
r:::y .
,.
, I
0_4___
- ....~--:..__. .-. ------:'.: .1 '
!
, . ,.
~:: Jl
.... : ~
\1
!
,
I
I
/
/1
\\1 . "
__ V~~'owJ~f7lC~ ~l /' ~
. .\\.~? W '6 ~ St;f1: .
'.
I
.~
()
~
1
I
-t .
.. ?
,. . '" .~
. . ~ ., v-"')..;.& rr
I.
I
.T
L-L-
- LAWRENCE=.c..
I \ II FA~M~",;eo
1\ l
.
') oc
... .;')~ Jd
. I ;
.. .' ....,~-
... -
..- ... .. 'i I
I' '
J J l : ,
At .." ~
1 0 ~
) ~
~J I ' l'
i wi ~
:;...f "J .S
t' . .) .'J"
J '~,. t~).
~. ?II ~. !I. lI!l'" --..
p ;;.OI?i _Oilo.. .~l ; ;~
L' _-_'. . ~,._.~..~-~.~
..:.........:".~".:~""~~,.-"
......~.-..--_...~'
/
/
,/ '
./
~. - ~ ..--- - -- --.----............
'.
~J.
"-0 ~"'~c.: .
'''':'~.
.....$
" '
~
--
--
-
, I
..,,~
~-- --
-........
,
,/
..,." ---
.......'
;1'...
,
I
\
\
I
i
r
.'-4--
J
l
',.
'\.
\
\
I
I
I
1
i I
} I
/ .
\....1-.../
.
I
.
\
J
!
~
;
~7!
;:: ~~U~
.I
/
,.
/
-- /.
>.,
,/
_...-/' !
.--
,
\
"
'.
-~
:~
\ "'-
.\.".
-~ ,~'-- ,
." ......
.. .~. -."'-':", .-~
.;.-. . ,
..-
/'
.-
/"
I
/
/
./.
/
.' .:'..: .:.
/'
~.JN~~ \-.
./
/.
. /'
.'
... . . ~ ~...
\.
/'
"'- ------
, ).~
/-
~..;)~
I
r
I
j
I;
X
I\
t \
\
\
\
\
.j 1-....... :.~:. n'~'
'.j'( __ ,oJ.... "
:7'::, " ,('/. .i,1 I
J ... -..- . 'K!j !'- ~A"~
~ ~'n.S ~.
. .....flA... - '.
I"" - .
1--
i :. .-
. - .
..
, .;,
\ i -
,~-....... J ,-
-~'. ~ .
\.
. \..
j i
....
-07
~
~,...a ~ 1'~' = \\~... ~
~. ,
h). $0'
...J
~. .,. ~
, ,"""''''''
, .
:~
~~
..- - ~
.;.~
I
--
!Mwr&ce,
.5l~\4
~(v"'S
~-k p{rA,J (~')
5d-~~
..
Sly^
Appeal # 572
-2-
October 15th, 1981
At the October 13th, 1981 meeting of the Zoning Board o~
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, to grant a variance
on the setback of the proposed sign, the setback of the sign is to
be approved by the Building Inspector prior to its installation.
The request for a variance for increased size of the sign is denied.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortel}ino.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - absent
The motion was carried.
~VttJ~--
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
br
.