570
>9~~/1I. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Sfp 1. . ~D TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
1. lfi
il.4/Nl '81/ ACTION ON APPEAL
II, SNo,
'/l'OEil
Appellant ...Lis.a....N~.ls.on................................................_._........................... Address.......J,.f?....G.~9.9.E.....~.. .0...11 s ..
.. ...........-.......---
............~.g.P.p..:!.ng.~.;:.~....f..~J.1.~.t.....!;'l~~...X9.!'.~........!.?:?.~.Q........................:........................................................._...MM._.__M___...
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .................................?~.P.t..~~.~F......?.t.h............................) 19.....?.~.)
Appeal NO........2.7..Q.......... was considered and the following action on the reqUe3t for: G3 A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PE.RMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE)
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
~ Il~S
Appeal No. ...._....~.1Q..__.....
"
Dated 1;?~p...t~.mP.~.Ll9.:tl1, 1981
I. V ARlANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ...........................................-..-.........---._M__.---:-O-
..................................................................................-...--..-....................................................................--..-..-.--
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ............._..
..........................................................................................--.......-..............................................__........._.._..~~-........._--_.. t. T1
....-............-.........-..-...............................-............................................................................................................-.-......-.....-.--.--.....-
c. .The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ... ._........_
.-.............................................................................................._-...............................................................-............-........._..._-..-.~
..........................................................................................-............................,.....................................................-..........---...-.-....-....-
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance@ be granted Bbe=aeni=ed and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [j=ue~uii1tliit;tt eg be reversed. PLEASE SEE.
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .................................._........._................___...__.._._
..............................................................-.............................................. .....~... ................................................................-..-.--.......-..- ..
...................................................................................................................-..........................................................--......-.................----....---..--.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution whkh stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................... ---...................................................................................................................-....--
.-...................................,..,. ....................................................................................
..............'.".. ...."....'............. ...........................................................
~ Appeal # 570
-2-
September 10th, 1981
At the september 8th, 1981 zoning Board of Appeals meeting,
Mr~ urciuoli moved that the requested variance be approved. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Roll Call Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - aye
The motion was unanimously carried.
~??ia~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
TOWN OF i~PPINGER
Appeal No. S70
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
Appellant ~(~ ~~OAJ
/J J9/JP JNS ef'C T.(Jl t.J
Horne Mailin~ // /;'#'VIu. J...L ._4/_
Address . #/0 L~~~
f) f:j J
/;< r) 0
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, .~ ~~
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated
g,. 1'1
, 19~, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:U2rA VAR~CE,r=lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t=]AN ~TER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
proper one), in connection with premises located at #/~ Aks-SJOi Po<:i.(
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
RtrJ r' - -.:;
(zoning dist.)
,
b / S ~ - /) :2.- b,) 3 6 yr ~
(grid no.)
. ,.':' ..
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~L~_ \ V - ~ L/~I
~ I .
10 I4,.L(<JiAJ f1.~ CON/IN(JIIf1'N OJ:;' fl HofJJE ON MJ 7:JtIsv-JN(J J:OUNDitHdN
(article, section or subsection and paragraph) ·
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Corp.plete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: Wt,. tJ IdS e 20AJ1NS ~KIsr-<C1) pR./D7'(
70 2oNtN6-
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
~ /9.U!. 051 ~ c!:.
p ec)p~
lAJt 'rl+ p/Z)OI11~ ReA-a
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of/the district because: ~ ~~Jj~}
~A:luz-7 ~ t:::..;:~ ~-:(~=
b. A ~~P~I~ED pursuant to article . section
or subsection , paragraph of the zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
L~
* The required pl~n must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
;, -pDELV\!,iTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COS7S I~'VOLVED I~ PUELISIn~~G The R2QUIRED
::-.,:-, ~TO':'TCE IN TEE LOC'AT, "r;::T,'lSPAP,,\R.