533
.. <.' ~
:; '~:.._:.....~..... ~"-;:_' .,..,r'~ '., '
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \V APPINGER Appeal No. .-5.~
RECEIVED
~cnON ON APPEAL-. Dated .l:1.a~ 14tll. ;J,~81
MAY,141981
.
App:lIant Ba..t: p. w~.lli~.s.LN~l'!...Hst~k~~s.S:1s_~~~.]l_~:!1-1!~.f.}s~~Si:l.~~ ,Pl~za,
---Rou-t.tit 376 '- M~],Qne.y-aoaQ,. ,.2cl]g:b1ceep~ie",-~.12g.Q.L__~,
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ., '-."--May4~'eh---'-'M"'__) 19.....(3ol..,
Appeal No_..5.3.3_ was considered and the following action on the request for: Gl A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PEIUV1IT, DAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
...
h flS
.'
t. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was dete:nntned that strict appliccion of the Ord11W'lce
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: .__MM...._...M..M__
~ '#II ...
-
" -
._.rl u..
., ... ...: '. "..-
. . ;.., .
.,.:-',
~._, , .
~,
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not u...uque and 0 would D{..li..q~9.. ~~~be .~ha~~ by all .
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use dist..,ct~ . because: . ......_
r__.__._...._.______._.........................._....._._....__. . '" ,._....,
. . . ;~~'P'r. ...."'...~ :.~ . . .
. . '. ".. .
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the cha.racter"of ih~ district, because: ...._........_
---.-.....--..-....---.-......-..-..-.--.. :.-......-................-....................-....---...:..---.----------- .
--_.._~_.........._....-.__._._....._-_....._................................................._._--...................-..---...~
Therefore, it was further determined that L:l-te ;e.quested..variance [X] be granted G-be-denied and
~at the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer Etbe-c.unnrmed [l be reversed. PLEASE
. SEE ATTACHMENT. . '.
2. SPECIAL USE PERiV1IT: By resolution of the Board i,t was determined tha.t the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ............-.-...-) section or subsection
_..__) paragraph .._..._............._ of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
Iorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed) because: ............................__...__...M_.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your :lppeJ.l: ..........................................._........_................_......_...........~.__
....................._....._.................._._....._.................u.....~.............r.._................__u..n.~...............................................................-;.._.._.........._____..___
u~........_....___.......n._....__.__._._.....~...uu..........~......._.............~.........................................................................................._..............___._..._...__
... '.' .. .......~......... ono .........~......._........_.n.. ........... .... '.0 ............ ...... ....... '... ...,..... ..., _.. ...,....... ....... ....,... .... .............................................n........~..............._..............__
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following dec:sion was mad: on your
~p~l: .._......_..................................................................................-__........................................................................__......................................_.__
.. . .._...._._~......_._............................_.......~~..................~. .u................. .....u..~~..~_.._ ............................'................................._.....u.._._..................___...__......_....__
.-----...--..-..-..---.-.---.......-.~~7?~:-=-
._....................~......~...~._.........................-.-....-....--
Chairman, Zoning Boa:-d of Appeals
-......c,._..... ~
.....::';1:~:..~
...~~~,~'::!'-:...:..;
"'. ' ,:',~~':-';;'~-~
'....;;0..:.......:.."-, . ' . ~. ,,,~
1 .
~','--
.l:tJ..,... ~..~_. ~.
. :-.~~'';:i:: :..
,'10
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12S90
TEL.. 297.62S7
Page Two
May 14th, 1981
.,.
At the May 12th, 1981 Zoning Board meeting, a motion was
made by Mr. .Hc Millen, that: variances be granted to the New
Hackensack Pharmacy and Arnold' s Health Food st011'a). ..to.~r.ini:t; .
'. . .. .'..
window signs to remain for a period of six months. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Landolfi and was Q~animously carried by
those members present.
~V!a~~ -
Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.i
, to
-.~
\,
NOTICE OF APPE.i:\.L
On behalf ef New Haekeneaek Pharmacy
l~: ~Pf~.~ P~krr,'~~ In.
,_ .. 1\/1 _ i. j ~ '.' ! I / , ,'.I I '
Address
~~
D::!P:#J67?;~
J f, T1
rte J7' and Maleney Ri
Pek NY 126GJ
Appellant
"
TO T}~ BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
i \ :
~ ;
....
,
" J'/ " ,I ,',t"
" l j' . f. I ! ',.>
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated
I
I '
.....,. ! ~
, 19~, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:~>.A VARlk~CE, OA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
, 6:XS'l., {) ~- 5'30 ? 1/
(grid no.)
.'
f" ,>',';' c..:i "/i" "!I '.. I>.. "
'. j "' E .' i j , \ ..., t I. r J'
(street & no.')
, Town of ~vappinger, N.Y.
proper one), in connection with premises located at
(zoning dist.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINA}rCE APPEALED
~ -I :rJ!- // /:;. 6'
(article, section or subsection and parag~aph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (co~p1ete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the follo...7ing reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance \'lould produce undue
hardship because: we dlre at IlitN busl.C1ese trji.n{. to eestCiL'.li:::'lfl""
~"} ,Lee.vi th t he lecaleo'ill'lluni ty. We uee our signa to show we
:Jr:ertite lit fr~e 1.L):);.l ,,'1"("':-',u["'" ,'li.!lic at. our expense, t. .hew we"
~p~rate a }:oet office, te hlciClil.te R phw.crniOl.ciet 9n duty ;d t all time
HS '^lell a!l adv~rt)si.nl! s:.:.]~ rr~<~~c:,,;~~ndise.
2) The hardsh~p created is un1que and is not sbared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: th1B e~ntf"r i. in bai tii.repair and financial trouble.
We must let peeple knew we are here.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the characte:r: of the district because: the spirit aheul. ...
t~ f!.ter a healthy business en~ironment and t. maintain an. ereat,
new Jeba fer the lecal tax payin~ cemmunity.
b. A SPECU\.L USE PER1-lIT IS REQtJESTED p'.lrsucmt. to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. IN'l'ERPt1E'r'ATION of the ZoniwJ Ordinance is reql1csted because:
d. i\GGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested becC\usc:'
:3. 0'1'I:~::r Rr::~.~':\l~}~S:
I "
/) -::I /', n
A.