550
.C" ,
\; ~ )
RECEI\~ED . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
, '_ ,TO\VN 'OF \VAPPINGER
JUL 16 198)~, ACTION ON APPEAL .
Appeal No. 550
Dated -June 24tlh -1~81
"
,
. ..' ELAINE H.. SNOWDEN ,
App:l1ant Nussbicke};~ Bro,~~~_~!.tt..~qE.E.=-_.__ Addms. Rout~_._~.L._.:+.own of Wapp.,
, Fishki11 NY
..--...... . 1 t.. .
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on' .JulY l~tP "__"'_) 19 81 )
Appeal No- 550 _ was considered and the following action on the requeSt for: fQ):A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL U5E PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDljSANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS ,AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (5), W:1S t:1ken: .
. I.. ..VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was detcnn~ned that strict applic.tion of the Ordinancc
B would 0 - - l produce undue hardship Eor these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 ~ would not yield a. re:1SOnable return if limited to the
. use permitted under the O~ce, beause:, ~_._-~--
".' .. . - . . " . . ~ .:" ....- . '".
-' .
'. -.":.; . .
TI
".,... .
.... ,-. '.. .-
.,
. .. ..
.. -.' .'
. -. ~., .. . ,-
....... ...~:.:... :... . ". ~
:~ . :-:.1.:.-. -~.;~_~,.
.. . . -. .
.. '-, '-' ~", ',- : -... .... . - . . ,
", ....:.... .
.....:: .. .....
. .
, b.. The hardship createdtBJ is D. L unique and 0 ~would not be sha...-edby al1.:_~...:~'.
. . , ~ properties alik.c. in the vicinity of the property and in the same us: district, hed.use: · . . -. ~ -
____' r"lll .__._"l
.- . .'"
..~......._..-....._......~......-.-..--- ..
","
- .. ,.,. ...
...... .. .. ....
. ;.-
." .. .
. ..' .... -:'.
. 'k .
... .- ...
: ~-, - . .' ~~: - '.:. . ..
. . ....
c. "The Variance' 0
. 'T f9: would not change the character of the district, because: _---:.. ': .
, .
..____._..__._....._........."-.._..._ l
. -
--.......----.-.........----
Therefore; it was further determined that the requested variance~ bev-an~e4 0 ~ . 1 and
~at the previous' decision of the Enforcement Officer [].J.. n ' ~be 1 a nrsed..
_ .:. f . . .
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the :Board it was determim:d that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ----, section or subsection
~) paragraph' .___ of 'the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
lorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ....---.
"
t__.__....:-- ____t
. ,
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your 3ppeal: .................-.-...-.---...----.-.--..-___
-...........----..--...-......-.--.--........................._.....................~....................._.........._.........-........-----
_.....____..___..._._..._._.__...._...._.........u............................... ............................................_...._........__........_.._...........
.............-.-.......-.-.....-........................-...................................-..........................................................................-.............-............----....---
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was mad:: on YOUl".
2!:ppeal: _..__...._._.............__.........__..............................:....................................................................-...................-....-..-.
-..........-.--...--....-..................---............................................................ ............................ ....................-...........-.--.......-..................
-.-------.-----.-..-.--..........--..-.'-.-----:.....-...-.~-.-..--.-.._..7?~~
k~l.---..-.---
- thilrre:lO, Zoning Boa:d of Ap?=!3
-:- J.
~ . :.:. .
. ..~ ... '-.,.-"
. .:.. . ~I
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
/' .""
Appeal No~ 3-S' U
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date_ .h~ Y/S::;L
i:-":-i).--_~lant Nussbickel Br'os. Realtv Corp.
Address Route 9. Town of WaT;>Dl.nlier
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, j)a.ul Nusstlc:ke1, Sec't. of NllsshiC'kel :5ros. Rpi'lH9orli' appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated
June 17,,__.__., 19_.a, and do hereby apply t.o l:ht:"1
/
for:~ VARIANCE, [:I A SPECIAL USE PERMIT,[:]AN INTER-
Zoning Board of Appeal~
?RETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,r:lAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check
--1.1(1) 2-
(zoning dist.)
,~s1. (:2--7ht1.,tf- ' Town
(grid no.) -'~4'1Z~ . 1~')111
1. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEAIIED~1g_:.Jf:
one), in connection with premises located at E/S Route 9. - Int. of Old
(street & no.)
of Wappinger, N.Y.
Rte. 9
proper
se< ~""' 4-7 ~___
'1
~{ ,
.;....
i": [/iU', .o~ .t~,,;y~ l.j (/l,j";}i S< t\/nL~' ~ (c'r 10 \1.. t ..,..)\\~i t.
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
..,
.,?('
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
n. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the followinq reason8~
1) Strict application of the zoni.ng Ordinance wOHld produce undue
hardship because: Unusual shape of the parcel and its topography preclude
["'i3.sonablC? utiljzation of the land by tllP subject use if yard setbacks are str.ictly
E:>1iorc(;,j.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: Configuration of th.,; subject property is not one shared by otber
occupancies in the immediate area.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because: The present use of the
property remains unchanged and the extending of one wall closer to the rear
property line does not intrude on the view of properties across the road or to the
South of the subject parcel.
1_,. /\ SPECJJ\L USE PERr-lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to (.;\. t.ic:le _, sClction
or subsectJ.on , paragr aph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
.~
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
See accompanying statement.
)
. ,.1(/~1 }f ?>';-J:I y'
(Use extra sheets if necessary) SJ.gnature(' t{r:~_.( /4'(~L~~ 't~~_I
I <Y .....__.,
* ~e requir~d pl~n ffiust occc~pany the Notice of Appeal. 1~ )~~
~. DPELl)l1\[TS ARE RES PONS IBI.E Fon. TE~ ':OST3 I~rvO:::'VED I~J P!TB~,ISJIn:G TH7-: l(~~n~W-\
T T ..~....." -r ,''',,.,, ',. ,...,.. -ow...~ _...__ _ _ __ _
~,'
.:~i...u.
__._'!J.~
.
louis battoglia associates
arc hit e c t s
24 Bedford Avenue
Fishkill New York 12524
TeI.914-896-6771
June 16, 1981
Board of Zoning Appeals
Town of Wappinger
Dutchess County
New York
Re: Proposed Addition to
N & S Supply Building
Route 9, Wappinger, N. Y.
To the Board:
The proposed addition is for the storage of plumbing and heating materials,
many of which are presently, of necessity, stored outdoors on premises.
The addition will consist of insulating metal panel walls, similar to the
existing facade presently facing Old Route 9 and, except for the decrease
in rear yard from thirty-one feet at present to the proposed eleven foot
di~tance, will create no change in appearance.
It is respectfully requested that the Board give favorable consideration to
an appeal which is necessary in order to permit the efficient and orderly
development of this business property by a Company which has steadily grown
and so continues.
Very truly yours,
LE/js
LOUI9 BATTOGLIA ASSOCIATES
C,.~/ / 7> .-.' .,.
~~~ 1-'l..j}[tt/:I''1t-\.f---
Louis Battoglia, AlI.A.