534
,-A
;IS
~.
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. _ 534
"
Dated .liav 14th. 1981
.' , RECEIVED
Appellant ~~;:.~at~2;:E.~L~Q.;.ID~!LlI2h.~.n.~~.n................." ~ddrMA ~~f1Y.l'g8r.P.,,, F,?O~~.__.
---Shop, Rot:\t!e''9, ~inf]~'F8'i,*5;-'W--ooi~O' , .-..-.---1.. _
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...._.....__.._..May. 1 ~I.E....~.~~~~~. ). 19....a~)
Appeal No..-5.3.4..__.... was considered and the following action on the: request for: U A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
.O'AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was. taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined th:tt strict appliation of the Ordinzntc
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ...._..........._.._,......
.,.
.. . I .,.ll._.._____.__._" ..T' ..r-........_...._.._____....
. .
"
;. .
-;...;~ ~~-~-
.
b.' The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would D. ~ould no~ be~ha.red by all .
.' ."' properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same'~diitt.rc~)~.bC&use:;...."_
. '.!-'....:.:-,..;.-".
.......-------------..-.-....-........-.-.------
----='--.-...----.--..----.-.........---...-.......................-..--..---.--
, .' '. ~ .
c. ~The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of th~ district, because: ._..._...-:..
:', 'P'" ~'. ...'" '.~ :". i.> .:......
...-,----~._...---_..__...-._.............._......... :...................................-...-...--.------
...~
Therefore, it was further detennined that the r~eel- variance :IQf be granted Bbe-dl;;u~~J and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [3-be~d ug be reversed. PLEASE
. SEE ATTACHMENT .'
2. SPEClALUSE PERMIT: By resolution ~f the Board it "'"as determin~d that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ...........,...........-) section or subsection
............--J paragraph .............--.................. of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
iEercement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ......._........_..__.__ __
-...........-..-.-----...-......---.-...............-......-......... .......- ..................................-...........-..-.----..-
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution wh:ch stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..........................................._.................._......_......._..........._....
._-~
...................-......................-......-..............................................................................................................................................._...............--.._~-.-.._-
.0.. ..........................................................u........... .... ....... ........ ..... ........ ..... .... .... ....... ....... ...... .......... ..... ........ .....................................................___..............___.....
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following dec:sion was made on your
~ppeal: ...............................................................................................-.................................................................-......................_..._...........__..
.0... ............._.-.......................................................... ......... ..... ...u................... ................ ............ .... .:...04........._.........................._.....___..__...__._.........._._
.d..-.-...---.-....--.--.--.-....--......'..h::l?lll:;;;~--
Ch,~~ning Board of Appeai~..----.
,. ... . "'. .,',
. '. .'10;. ""..' . ""'.7""~ ." .. ..
._--"'-~
'" ;;;.;r~~-.,e,~',-:,~~~", ~:';:::'~~olSF>';'> ,;; . ,:,>,;",.I~:",l.,,:.::./:~:..~,~<!t1~'~:$::'.i..../,.;~),;::.~,.J-,,;;>... ,;,;;",} ~k'-'~' ,-". :>'l.~;:'~-.:",:~!$~~~_ . ..
;,:.,.:~.~..'~V.;4,~;;:Z,;~;:::::'"~~;;~1.~~_,tf,~~~~s;tt '
"'.,._:..'%-:'i,},)~:,;'i,..,
..
Appeal # 534
-2-
May 14th, 1981
At the May 12th, 1981 meeting, a motion was made by
Mr. Cortellino, to grant a variance to permit a 32 square foot
free-standing sign to be erected at a setback of at least '.'
fifteen feet from the curb with the stipulation that the
temporary signs and the building signs be removed. The mot~q~
was seconded by Mr. Mc Millen and was unanimously carried
by those members present.
.J..~ ~'.. ..~~ . J;
.
.." .:
hf2~
Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
,~",""~'.' ~_L ...,__............. "....... .~_..,...." _ ...,c........:_......___'.. ,...~.,.;,_, ~ ,;;... ,;..,...,., ^ ~ .' . .
~ -'..;.. - ~... ...";.,.;,, . ~.,. .. ....:. .-. . .
....~.".._, ..."J..,3 ~
Appeal No. ~I~ ~
ril'~;~
Date (/ " / c- 1/
3//7/?'/
,
TOWN OF HAPPINGER
, .
..
\ .
NOTICE OF APPEAL
. ,/;-,:-:1.r-<:-- 17/).?-';C?
/\/ 7 ., AC-.J/ .. '-./.....
..,;- --
Appe 11 ant /\/!}.--(~ d A/'/O $~j:Y /V
,
Address co2 9
t:U/r.:>vL, ./5 :C)
-'A rJ
.: E .x~ ,.
~
. LV /l ~3t-?~t 't~ E k)
S'9l.l S
/\ /,c.:-L,--L) V C) .~I(
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
~ ., /.~ /.7 /i l./;j L/A 4./5EA. /
I, . If .. ~'. " .r"7,A... (./
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dateU~'~~ Z- , 19~, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for: OJ< V]\.RI&~CE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIE"vED PERSON (8) . (check
413
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION (S). OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED~(C::or: ~~
G.73 4 \~.~ ~Li Ctllcw t\ ~"" hVl '. S ''^ 4t ~ 5h>1I.t ~:<<k'"e{L vJl~1"'L
.".(article, .~ section" or subsect,i~n and para}3'raph) 'n "
2h {ett-l) ~ w.r~ hv-z.~ ~ t\ \l'd"-,) 51.~f'JS ^,,"'f\...f.. mvd- ~~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
,b / 5)1-- tJ 'I - S3 .J 3 () ~
~ T- 9//4#0 Y -s/l)/'
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one}; in connection with premises located at
vJ\-.t~ ~,., '\vt..
r€f~\W
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would_produce undue
hardship becau,se: /3 ~1/sJ.-Ic'-s<""::> /~ 1,,'/0 r vis/ALe r'D
I' t/ dL- / C /-//&//-:'-''/1 y .
2) 'rhe hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the iI~~ediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: ~r ~A;f(p~ 13 vsh'E.5 /!A/c) r~&"f> .6CJ/// /,0
r/I~- J..lO.R//-/ ,14/,-/>) ":;t:?l-/7// tJr sro/E
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:o~ ~~t.I~~ ~/~~~
jclEXt /-0 'Slt:;.R~ o;r/ ,/Jt"'7/! ~I/)e-s dJ;::: /;://.J~/c /7'12{11.hWAY~
1
b. A SPECL~L USE PERMIT IS
or subsection
to permit the following
.I;f1/1rr Ie. [J/,.-I ~T. 9
REQlffiSTED pursuant to article
, paragraph of the Zqning
use on the above p~emises: /I '$ (!PM
?. /) c.... /1 T/ IJ/.../ IJ ~ 'S ./.t' /E?c-- .
, section
Ordinance
.$)-10 t,A-: .I ~/t.
1
t
c. IN'l'ERPRETA'fION of 'the Zoning Ordina::-lct3 is requestec1 because:
!
!/'.
\
~.
.,.
~.
l
Jr'
~
r.,t.
<c. i'.GGRIEVEO PBRSON(S) an app~al is requested beC%~~c ..~../~~
, r/lf. ~ t ~~
(U.,,, extra sheets if necessary) .'. S,lTqn~ t_ure___ ~..(. ~'r"'''-d /;~I _.~:
Y :':',-:: reauL.. .:;d plan r;'.ust accomoanv L;1~' 1.ot1.Le 0, ....no_<.. ~~ 1,
' .. - -- -I' q
~~DD::~~=..:'.~~;-r2.'~ J'.~'.::: ~).:~:S~C~TS~~BL~ P8~ T~:~ ~cs':'.:-: :~~'''C::-J~~?~~ T~:r !'~~~~""'''''''T''''''''''- --r_--. ____
.t"
~'"
~.
'/\.r
.,
.J .