525
<t
RECEIVED
FEB 1 2 1981,
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF '\V APPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No..- 525. .._
DatedF~QEuary 11l" 1981
..' t
,. ,
" -
ILAI~E H. SNOWQEN
Appellant ~~X R;g.9.~E-~'~'NNg.~!l'!:':!N-:.~~~.;:.;.9..~:t:HN~2E.P.N'!"'_'" Address.g~.~.....2.f...jf~.p.p.j.n~~;.~ :r ~11 s, NY-
_.NN..N_c;L Q 'a9~....m......Q1N9.....S.qYbx.QQ1sI_G..onn.1' .064~2..N'~N__'_NN_'N_N_"__"'_" .
At a. meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on "N.f.~1?E.~YN..J...Q.th'''''N''''''''''''_N''''''N'''''N'_) 19. 81 ) ,
Appeal NO...2.?..2__...._ was considered and the following action on the request for: fK] A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)J was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ BoardJ it was detc:rmined that strict applic::r.tion of the Ordinmce
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these rea.~ns:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
. use permitted under the Ordinance, because: _....N...._............_.N.......
. -
..l. . -" .' ....
...._..,. 11 , 1111 14
o.. ."
.. -. ,'. ,'. .;'-.~ ....:.
. ....;.._~_.....-;-,..:...].::.~~-...~:..
. ;.....::....:..-~~~.i.~,.._,.'
. . .
.....,'.:.,.- -,-.
'_' ..;0..:.-,:..
'. "- .
'. .' .... - '. ;'-~-. .', ,., '.-
.'
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same us: district, because: _...._
. JIJ.. J.41..' 1 __.._~_.......___.._.__................__................._.._..'I .. T' ._.........
-_..-"':"----_._...._.....--...~_....._-_...__...~...............-.......-...............................-.---...........""
n ....__
c. -The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the .ilistrict, because: __........-:...
----.-.....-.--........-.......-....-.-..........-.....-..-.. :........................................................-----..----
..---......---..--.....-.-...-..-.......-.-...--.......- .~.............-._...._...............................u...__._....-.........._.. "1" ......-
. .
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested varia.nce Ii] be granteci~.e and
that the previous' decision of the Enforcement Officer 8~&O~.;.l:R~B be reve~ed.
. See Attaclunent
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special'Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be deniedJ pursuant to article ........................) section or subsection
_'N_'___J paragraph __._.._NN....N_....... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En..
lorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................N.......N....._...N___N_...
J IW..._____..._..._______...__...._.._.._.....____ ......_ .............__._....._..........._.......-.;......__......_.
_..-._.__.._..._--...--.-..._._...........~.._..........._._-..........--.............-.........................-..-....-...-.--.....-...........
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follmving resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .........................................................................___.N_........
................-..-......................-....................................................-...............................I............_.........................~........._........._..........._______._
.............-..........-..................-........-.........;..........................................................................................................._.....~.........~......................--..-........~.-
.........................~._.......u........_.................................. ................. .........~........... .......... ................... ...............................................................----.............~....._.._
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
~pea.l: ................................................................................................ ..........................................................................-..................--.......-..._..........H.
......................................................................................................................... ..........................................................~.................................-...-.....-.-..-...
.- ........-.........-...................!.................................... .......~... ...............~...-.............. ..........;......-....... ...... ....................................._...................._-~_...........-.---
...~~.{fu\x=~_.~
. ....... - ..-..-
Chairnun, Zoning Board of Appeals
....
.- -.' ...-', -...~____-..-~..-7.--
. .
,-- '''-''-~'---' _.-
/7/ E!>l.AClC. OUTLINE.,"'" FeAT
(, 1=bRT1~ OF S,CoN Fill.c::a, "'crT
C)I..J ~UR.NS OF
NAC.E. Iw40ULD
/' -
,
-1
1>'- 3~ ---1
I
I
I
n~--T ยท
i j
I
I
I
Itd'
I
I
,
7!.l,"
. I'
-t -J----
''-G' -r......
-J. -It-
aYl..
_..~---s
,DRIV~,]HRU
~5~i'
I
I
'O~6.
I!i' x.lY >< !Ire:-..JAU-
sn.. lU_
4' x. 4!' HAND HCll.e. I"O"R
/2/ WIRINCO W/ cove."R. ~
/ ~ 1'2.0 V. SERV. -yo slq"-l'"
/ /1/ FINAL HOOtr::-UP_NOT P.W
I CClL.1,.-e;:
I
4'~' I
I.r
1--
II 1-' ---
II ,I
. 111[,~==~
-----hLJJ
~~~~-:t
DIp PYLON SIGN ~TYPE"3'DT
~ SQ ~TAa~ = 48 SQ. FT. r.
SCALE; '~ e
-t ~ 4'
. . .
u aWN i CHaC"ED
...:-=~ft.' -4...0An I Hec'''"ION I BY
:-'-="~Cl=~"~CO ~""='O, I
------r--- -- ---+--
'I '
--t-- I
I
JIInl810N i DA:~IVN 0"'''';' DE:~C"I"""IOH
I
I _:-+-__
--; :
___L_L_.
I
1---
_;..._.1_
COl..O~ KiltY:
NO I - VE:LLOW "10 ~H
"PMOS -1'2.?'
NO, "2 _ O"RAN<4E -n::> t.o\ATC.t-t
VU'2..'5
NO 3 - RE D 10 "-\A"1t:.H
VU40Q
NO 4 - e.unN, O~ 1't:>
MATCI-j ",."""'" '!5q
NO ~ - 'e:oR0Vv'N -,0 MATCH
VU 55 (O~U&:D_)
Ct1r.CM;J;tl
.'
<CD.
COLITE
1-----
,-------
228 ~"R1I30N ST.
J'
1 r
NOTICE uP APPE."-L
Date
",--,') ,~, .
. /.;/ ,';- /
l~ { I 1;/ ~ ) .-
, /
C /' // ~j- ,-/,././... .*"
/
"
..
-
..'
1\Ppe1ladt
')
U( c I
I
}
)( L: -ilL, , -
/
/'/--:?tf~ A. ~ ~ ;7/-
(~,( r Address)!...:?' oy,,)';'"
"
/' 1" .,Ie, /V~
/.' /. ~ /' Jr>
TO T~3 BOARD OF APPEALS;
I, 'J'tl/,?, t'" A~~~?/J4'IY
('(! r.>-, ~-": ).:."?e: .~ ".: ~ .;;~t. j'
. / ~
Zon~ng Inspector, dated
- ..J'H~ / /-Ol. NA/t'/II',/fi appeal from a decision of the
/
, 19 JI, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:C8]A VARIhNCE,[:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t:]AN INTER-
PRETATIO~. OF THE ZONlNG ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
SC-,
(zoning dist.)
,
~ I 57-()d - ~41 ~ j-S-
(grid no.)
i.' t ~l
(street & no'.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one), in connection with premises located at
1. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED-1\v-lt~Xx .0-= ~~AA.:~-.,\
41'\~
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: .s (" (.' ,,-1 7//1 Ie /.-c (' ;;:-"/' ..<~ ."..<" ,,'
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
. s (' (
/) I / rJ /. /.: ~ /
/ .' L
/~: "/ A. .d../. ,~~ /" ,; -,
'.- >':,/ ~...,..,,,.,,
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the characte~ of the district because;
,/?
~.... .",,!' (.
'.,f ", '
-,... ...
/.' -:J ' ,'0\ .......,} ~..
b. A SPECL~L USE PEro1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant'to article
or subsection , paragraph of the
to permit the following use on the above p~emises:
., section
Zoning Ordinance
c. INTERPrtETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
c. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested bec~use: .
3. (;,l':~sr. f~I:~.~_:\RKS:
~--.-
.'. /
S. -. -. ~ ,- _\ .;:..-:.::--.~ /
l.g..,:'-u....~ ',-.t', /", I
//,...r
(Use extra sheets if ncces3ary)
,-
/' .,.<.
," ," ,.1--;11,. -,
* T~'l':: requi.red pldl:1 must a(;Cor-:p~1ny
/
the ~otice/ of Appea 1.
/'1(: <" ,'_ /.--.
.:~i.?'::;L.~\:~T$ .\..~S BESZ'O~;ST~T~!: rOK '~Et= C03~:; r:--:10:."1=-U ::.;
?~;~T, lS~~ [~.7G
r--"_
! ~~.
?-~:~l! ~~~f)
_-; -,. ) '. J :..:.~ .-< .
~. ..~. "",~'"",,--"-
/ ..
, Appeal # 525
February 11th, 1981
"
At the February 10th, 1981 meeting, a motion was made by
Mr. Landolfi, that the requested variance be granted as follows:
1 - Drive-thru sign, not to exceed 10 sqoft.
1 - Menu Board sign, photo on file.
1 - pylon sign, sketCh on file.
2 - signs on building (Ion front, 1 on back) 26" high by 1413" wide.
The motion was . seconded by Mr. Mc Millen.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. prager - absent
Mr. cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - aye
~ A'Vr~ ~
Chairperson, zoning Board of ppeals
