523
I
L
..
m!C:evED
FEB121981.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 5~3
Dated ~~~ruary 11, 1981
.'
WlME H. SNOWDEll
.' .
Appellant .....s.a.l.J!9.t.QL.h.t.....B.~,gJ~I............_.........._.._..............-............ addr~..@_J......smi.1;h.t;;.QWJl_R2SJL-
Fishkill N.Y. 12524. .
....._........_:L__.M 1ffT1 . .111'" .._...._ .......-...~_.._----.......--_._...._--.-.--
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ....~~:b..;.y.~;t;Y.....lO.:th..-....-_._....._-) 19.a1-,
Appeal No.5.23..._..._ was considered and the following action on the reque3t for: @A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determi.ned that strict applic:Ltion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: _......._oc... . " ..........
......u
, . . ',,,,"'."..
. ...--.-........ I' _.. II III
," .<~~:-;:..~.~-.~:.
-~ '. #'. -..... - .
.,.
',-. .-:.- .. :.
_..-....J.~. y'.
" 4 ...- -,
b.. . The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all ,,_., ~_. .
. properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: __ ... ~
. . .... ".......___.._.____.........._._.__...____......._..................._.. ... I
...---....-..-........-....--.......................................-...-...-..-......---- ..
Co. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the ilistrict, beCUlSe: ._~
~ .------.-.....-.-.....-----.-....-...--.-..:-...............................-.-...-..-..-
.......------...-.........--.......................---.--..........................................----...-...--...--.. .....
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance-B-l>e~~be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer~ be confirmed~.c~. as Appellant
should seek other alternatives such as a rezoning request to the Town Bo.ard.
2. SPECIAL. USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied,. pursuant to article .-........-.--) section or subsection
--'''---J paragraph' ._.............__._......_ of the Zoning Ordina.nce and, therefore, the decision of the En..
imrcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .........-.--.........-..---".
-..-----.-......---..---...----......-...-......-.-...- ......- .........................-....-.--.....--..-
.............__.._.._._._........_............._......._......._..........................._........_.._.._.............._..___.__.._ ..t.l
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ...........................................-..................-...-__..._.__ .
.........................-.................-...........................................-.......................................................................-.............---.-.-......-.----.-
..........................................._......................................u......~.......................... ............................................_..............._..._...._.........-.._....__._.._~
..............................-....................................................................................... ....................................................-.......-..-.........................-..................-..--
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ................................................................. ............................... ....................................... ...................................................-..............._.__.
...................................................................................... ................................... ............................. ........................................-.............................--...........--.......-.
..... ............-.-..............................................................................~....................................;....................................-..................._...---.........-..---.--..-..-
':....~1:1:~_~ "- ()~ bt
tJ....L?.._...J!..L~ ~ __
Ch:1irrmn, Zoning Boa:-d or Appeals
. ..
. .' . .
.....v,'J.~ '-'_ ........ -"'----
r
..
'""
\ '
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
!!;M
/ Ii L-J.,/ S /
, /. I
,
,.,
..',....1 .f ...'! ~~., {~.l
'''\
~' \
Appellant
,oj
~
t-'
Address { "
.. .r
" ",
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
.
f\
,.. ~ t
f'. appeal from a decision of the
I .
)>.,' 4'. ).:-:;., ,
zoning Inspeetor, dated
.' ',\
"
, 19 , and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:[2lA VARllu~CE,r=IA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,I:]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (8) , (check
l,:.~;~r on~) '.:/p, cO.~iE!ct:i~n ,'with premises located at
..}.
"f -, ;,>" ~
~, ,I ,.' \,'
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
, '
(zoning dist.)
(grid no.)
.~. ';"
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALSD ~
,/~
~'h./V\ 5 t ,. ,\-,', " h(-'~\ ,1' i\
(articlEf." se..stion or . s~bse.,.ction.. ~nd par graph)
10 ~ \ (fu.N\ Lt,~ 'Z..h 7 (G)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
fir -he k. ~l
tt S' \ 2~. ;v-S" \,;vV\.~\
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardshiJ? .becaus~: ,~
~1,:.J. ~".'f':' 1 It/.,;. ( ,.'"-,
'. i:.. ~~.~ 'f:~'~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: .:..1
,;" ,
v'.1,. .
.f
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance ,and would not
change the character of the district because: ';'
'j;
I d" :; ~.: .
t-.,\.
b. A SPECIAL USE PEru-lIT IS REQUEST2D pl.1rSuant to article
or subsection , paragraph of the
to permit the fallowing use on the above premises:
, section
Zoning Ordinance
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance 1S requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal 25 requested because':
3. O'l';-::::R RE~.J\,RKS:
(u~c extr~ sheets if ncces~ary)
Signature
* T~le l-equired pIon lIlust a(,,:co~pdny the Notice of i\pp,=al.
7". i:' ?::: .LL \:/r~ ;\RZ 1{E~?C~lS I~LE rOt{ ';'-EIZ CO:;~3 ~~:-:;O~':J.=iJ
::.; ?~7~T.lS~!T~':G
,-....-
l"'""!~
?::J\J fR!:r:>
~~:0.~ 4.'_'_ .., -:CS :-.~r
~.~J"t.""..~. :\;?",,;:;?~.~.J~'1.
'''''.'. ,~~ ..,..... .'. -.. ...... . ........~~...... ....,,",-...~....~. .' .. ~'"
I'
.
Fishkill, N.Y.
Decembrr 12, lqRQ
Mr. Hans Gunderud
Zening Admini~trat~r,
T~n Of Wappinger, N.Y.
Dear Sir:
With th1.9 1('> t,t l"Y' I make a formal a pplic.ilt ion fa f' U re-
he~ring ef ZBA appeal # 512.
At, t;his rfl'-l1e:4.ring I propose t. call te theattr ntien
of thr Board certain mat0rial facts, which, if knGwn,
may Wf:'" 11 have m.eri t ,"d a favorable dr cisie1\.
Yeur att,"ntilDft +'0 this .tt~r will be gr~atl:v ~l.pp",~ciatf'd.
V!::.ry .~::.;uly yours,
(. /' ~ ( ,~ - "
--""r-7-\' \(~;.; vi." ..-/~.
.__ S ~t. R 1';9; a ,
RD # 1. Fir~hk.il:, N.v.
(1 '1))4)