575
~ -.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \V APPI~GER
ACTION O~ APPEA!;CEIVED
.' OCT 1 5 1981.
Appellant ___?y'.i ..~~9.!:!-.!.."....._..__.......___......_.__.................___ Address.______~~_ P l_~a . Road
ELAINE H. S~IOWOEN
......_..wapping.a;c.s..~lJ.s.,.....~.......1.2.s.9.o.-.-._........ ....---..-...-.-....---........-....-...........-----
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ........._.............._.......Qs.:J;.g12~.f.....;b.~.:tlL..-..... .) 19..~)
Appeal No.._s.:z.s.___;. was considered and the following action on the request for: to A VARIAN~
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ~ONING ORDINA.1.~~
D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
~
,.
Appeal No.._ 571:\
D.tc:d ....Octo'Qer 15th. 1981
..
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applic.cion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
. a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, bec:a.use: ...----- .
------.......-...-...--........--.--....-.-
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in'the vicinity 'of the property and in the same use district, because: --
__ i
---.----.--.-...------...........-...--
-.---.-..-e:---...-.......-.-..........-...................---..---....--.--..---.....-..-..--.----
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ... -..-
..----..-..--.----...........-..-.............-.....................-...... ...............--....................-...--.-..............-.--.--..-
.-..-....-.----.--..........--...-.--..............-.--- .-....-.....-...........-----.--..-...---.--.---
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested variance []: be granted Bbc;darn:d and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-ee~ffied rn be reversed. PLEASE SEE.
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ...................-..., section or subsection
____..) paragraph .........._.___............._ of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the deosion of the En..
Igrcemeni: Officer 0- be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................-..---....
/ -'
-......-.--.....-..............---.--.......-.................................................... ........ ........................................-.....-..........,,;....-......--.......---.
.............---...-..........--.-.-..-.....................................................--....-...-........-.-.............-.---.......--..-
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follaMng r~olu:ion which stated its interpretation
of the Zo1"'lng Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..............,....................................................--....................-..._._....
......................................_.h.........................................................................
.........................................................................................................--........--...
......................................................................................................................................................'....... ......................................................................................
.................................................-..................................,........-............. ......
...... ...............................................-...
4. AGGRIEVED PERSO~ (S): By resolution or t:.-:: Beard, the foilow:ng 'decision was made on your
ypeal: ........,... '.................".... .,,,,,.......,,...,,.,,..,.............,, "....." .........."... ..", ............,................................ ....".................-.....
';';t:;ivil1~
~ Z~ ;..rr 'D--~d f .\~...~",' ..................
. -', ..:1'''0 DU"J.. 0 '.\;,i~:td
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 575
-2-
October 15th, 1981
At the October 13th, 1981 meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, M~s. Waddle made a motion that the requested variance
be granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - absent
The motion was carried.
~{/&~L
_I
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
br
J.'iV.I. ..."-'..... '-"-
-
f)S--. //d0~/
Address-t1~ Rt-zA .~J
" I
'~'<\
.......
,I'
....
2Vl
~~AI~
\
Appellant
.'
2. TYPE OF APPEAL. (COl}\plete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
~ qiU~ ~~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
5"ev tt~. ~~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the characte~ of ,the district because:
~,~~~
b. A SPECL~L USE PE~lIT IS REQUESTED pursu2nt'to article # section
or subsection # paragra,?h of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above p~emises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is :requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requeste~ ~ec~use:'
3. Ctr:-:!:? Rl~~.~:\R}~S:
(Use ext~a sheets if neces3~ry)
,......
/
, ~ ( I
SiSr-.:it1.:'::--:: {:>'\. (~/Cf~>\/f' ,.
1 . ~A-ili
t!!'.! ~;-otiLe of Ap?eal.
* 'r~)~ required pIa!"", [(lU~t ac;co:",?~~ny
7,i,~~'."r. ""'PC"" ...v<:" vr.{""~n"sT~-'" FO.... .-.--. "',...~-.~
...~...-_.._~__~..L....... 1\.....~.....l,:,JL'- .f.. l...L~...... . to;. l':l.'J ..........1.-'._.>
..' .,' ".~. 1.<....... .:,". J-~.~ .
..,..~'r"'.......,.--..
~ _. I ", I _~.1 .:... u
~:: ?~~~r.1S~!1~':G
,..........-
!, ';..~
:-~:~l! !:~:;o')
,
,
..
,
.~ ~€.. :f ~
~i ~+o'~\
U~~cn-~
~j^..~ .
~_ -~ tM~.
7-. ~- ~ 'Lt:~ ~
at 1\& )k.Jt(M'1- 1 ~ u \
[>>AdrtiMJ;~ ~1~ · r~\ "
l0-&A'~ ~ ~ r~ ,'.
3. l~ \J~~ ~ ~
~ ~ 'vw, (04; ~ -tlAQ
~~ ~ :l-~~,
~T':p.;J l4 Q ~ ~~)
"