489
toy
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \V APPINGER
ACTION ON APPE.l\L
Appeal No. 489
Dated A:ygus1;. ;J.3th. 1980
titS ~
~ . .
Appellant ...~~.Qrt:i..s~._~Q.n.s..tJ.::Y.~:t..i.Qn...~QJ;:P-""H"'H'"'''''''''''' Add:-~......_P._o._....Bax... 26
.........~9.P.~J.1...~J.1_~s:..tJ.g.Q.,...H~........;!...~.~L~.~.............LLQ.t._9.....::;'.....~at"..c~.L.il...6..3 S h -0 1 - Q t) t) R 1 ~ )
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on _...............b.y.gy~t_l2.t.b._.......m._......._._.._-) 19...s.o..,
Appeal N~..__~.~~.......__ was considered and the following action on the r.:quot for: Qg A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT1 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDI~AN~
o AN APPEAL AS .AJ."'l AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
J. VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determined that strict applia.tion of the Ordin2.ACC
would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property' . would 0 would not yield a r cd to the
,use permitted , cause: -......-...........
....-.-.-..-....--....-........-.--.............-
.. --:- - .......
-....
b. The hardship ___Ll..&~~:...nA..--="f'_...,.~BA....."..Ma~~..J.~.~~.hA+Jt~~~Atx
. .~ItiIPIJ(l{~!](~~d{~}ClficaUL~)i;~J;~]U~(jU(>>~~~~.~):~jDtilM.~~~~M. io
- , .'~. .
sstlf..::..CJ:e.a.t.ed......_App.el.l.ao.t....di.d...na.t_sllb.m.it....:t.he... r E'qll ; red of 01 m r'!:=l t ; on
. .~~!.y.~~_!!l._q.~.9.Q.J;-'~~.n.<;.~....1c?Ath...T.o.~;aLQf....w.ap.p.ing.er._.bui.ln i n Cj r ~'l1 1 i r.em.eil t s .
c. 'The variance Kl wouldi!i_lmil.iu _ . change the character of ~he district, because:_....__
.. ..s.YU.Q.UP ding....haIlles....in....the.....aJ:ea...me.e:t....;t;.he-......set:.be.~ r equ iir 9ilu,m ts--
_....._......._...................................M......_....._......_............__.. .....................................u......._._h.....__.._...---...-
..-
Therefore, it was further determlned that the requested variance ~J).~3~>4""'''''~ ~ be d:n.ied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer IKl be confirmed~J~.......c.....el..
z. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it w-..s determined that the request for a
. S.pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to art:cle ........................, section or subsection
...............~_) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .......-...----
.........---.-....-........--.--................---..............-...-....--- ..- ...-....-..--.............-...-
...-..........-....-..............-.-.-.........--....--.....-..........-.........................-----.-.....................-...---.-
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follO\'J;ng resolution wh:ch stated. its i.ll:erpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..........................................................-............---___
.................-............ .................................. ................................... ...........................................................-..............--......................-.....---...
....................................................................................................................... ..................................................-.....................................-.....-...---..-...--
.... ................................................................................................................. ........... ................................. ....................................................---.---...-..--
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the folbw:;;g dec:$ion was IT:.3.de on your
~ppe:ll: ................................................................................................. .... .................... ........... .. ............................................................--.....---.
....... ............... ... ......... .............. ............ ............... ....... ... .... .., ....... ........ ..... .-.... ...... .... ...... ......... ...... ........... ............-............... ................ .......-----..-....--..---.
.. .. . .............................................................................. ....... .................... . ..... ....~ ..............................................................---...--
or c. .:J.,-4~.
. ........... ...... . . .... -... .,. . '" ......... .. . .........................~_.._.....~....._....--
RECEIVED Ch:l:'-:::l::, Zoni::g Boo:-d or A??~:lh
AUG 1 3 1980
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
I~
\ '.'
NOT ICE- OF APPEAL
Date "h:;,/r.
,
APpellantCJ.<D1)~~~-n2Uc.\1CJ~CoePAddress ?o~.~
~a~.L S"c..:, '0.,1 \dS33
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
, appeal from a decision of .the
Zoning Inspector, dated ..j u ~)t;; \3 .' 19 '20, and do hereby apply to the
Zon~ng Board of Appeals for:~A VARIANCE,E:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,I:]AN INTER.
PRETATION OF THE. ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (5) . (chec
....
......
R...'::O
in connection with premises located at Lor-#- S l'fK:x:Cffil J t-+l LL
(street & no.) $u...B..
.t: W .
, Town o~ . app~nger, N.Y.
proper one),
, '~5~- ~ 1-6S-5"l?'~s
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
. .'
1. PROVISIONrS) OF THE ZONING. ORDINANCE APPEALED A-Rnc..u;: \\.1. ~\(o,j 4.:
~r'lf>rRD~~"\I?>F\C\<:' O~ 3Q I W~l2E:..,""S \-5 RE~\~
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (CoI;lplete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~TCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
~. -\-\-G1A..sE"" ~~ ~~I\. CCXn~lL~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
\ ~ t-buSE l ~ \ ~ HW b~ t'0..E1-JT \'\J \ IK Tl-TE
Dn\ER. ~S'CS 6N ~'C ko'Pi!)
b. A SPECIAL USE PEro1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
,
I
!
!
~
l
~
~
I
I
A
1
i-.
"
~
S
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER RE~ffiRKS:
I
~
~
t
I
JL !1/},
(Use extra 3~eets if necessary) Signature ~~ ~
* The required plan nlU3t accompany the ~otice of Apgeal.
i". DO):,T'r?\ 'rrl"C n OP n'C'("''Cln'~.:::''Tn... 0::- pnry ""'rrT:> "'n("',.,.,~
~"- - -.-..._"- -- -.-..- _"JO..~""'"", ..........w.-...#_.......-...._ .,a,. "".... ....a.~ ""'v.......-v
~.:-:c;.~_!.. ~~-.-" -c:: ;~'" iF'"";--'\ ~_Cr:-~\T.J ~':-:::"':'/4.;"?\?:::"2..
~'T"'7"''? lrT:"'" .,....... '9'"\9"--- _ _...._........,
...L.;'.," ._.....~............. "':"..111 r: I,,;) .... ':'~':"_'f\'"
~...-
.L :.!.:~
? :::Qij l.? t: D
./l
..
:~
......-'^-~.~.,-~.....--~-..,_.
,--
A
C t'.) r ,A/~ /~
;!.---
-5 g
" EXI5'T/,A/c-, ;t:1.,$ CJr::-
:ORRECT TO:
A/,4PP/N062
"70Jlt/N .0/ ~;4j?PhV4g'~ p.e",4/,A/,<I&d #;t?~t!T;I'7~"""rr
:--.-:=::..;:.;:..:. -- ===- -- --
-=--
~
........,.
L. c.) 7" ~~ 8
~
~ re.&o fa} if I s>o
t) ~-\-"\~ ~b~(:
~ V(\\fG~ ~~-l>>
U'Vl ~ , -\- ..e-?~! l(~
ZONING ADMIN S~ATC
TOWN 06 . A I GEF
Tow ~
Wappin$!ers Fall . N. Y. 1
.~~.
.~:
8~ ':40'.",,'W /O().OI '
.
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
, ,
~
4"
I\)
, .
~
o~
'"
~
'"
)
.~
\l-
. .
\9
I't)
II'
'l-'
~
~ J"'~'
. - q~'~
/00.00'
,eA",It:H
3?'t
()
0,
- - N85-'/}. O()d'"
(
Pr?/2/t! H'/L.c.. P2/V&
w ,].J y.I
-------
-=- -= .:= -=- ~ -= -= -=-:...=- $;;',) ,.-;:;, -;.~w;,,z 7 -
.....--.
MAP OF SURVEY'
LOT NO.:L
MOCCAS\N H\LL
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
SCALE 1"=50'
DUTCHESS CO, NY
clt/"II/6' /8/1180
RICHARD G. BARGER, PE. B L.S.
NEW HACKENSACK. RD. .
\tVAPPII'JGERS FALLS, NY.
.. ........
...
. \. ~ "- ",,'.
o-,~ ,1~',',
... ;f. ~'i.... ~......~ ,--~.
fj _.....J ,.', oJ.'" ..;
. .,';. -/7' '.' ~.,
,--
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12S90
.......,~
TEL. 297.62S7
LEGAL NOTICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 513
OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE.
APPEAL # 489. AT THE REQUEST OF CRONISER CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
SEEKING A VARIANCE OF ARTICLE IV, SECTION 421. FRONTYARD SETBACK
REQUIREMENT, R-20 DISTRICT OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE,
TO PERMIT A NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE TO REMAIN AT A
FRONTY'ARD SETBACK OF 30 FEET WHERE 35 FEET IS REQUIRED, ON ?ROPERTY
BEING LOT 9 OF THE MOCCASIN HILL SUBDIVISION, BEING PARCEL # 6356-01-
055835. IN THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER.
SAID HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY, 1980.
AT THE TOWN HALL, NILL STREET, WAPPINGERS FALLS, NEW YORK, BEGINNING
AT 8:00 ?M., AT WHICH TD'lE ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL BE GIVEN AN
OP?ORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.
SIGNED: JOSp:PH E. LANDOLFI, CHAIRMAN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DATED: JUNE 24TH. 1980
'''';'..r.:;
j!$,C>, .
'. ',::~~)y!r"
I ' ,,;:,,::-..!'>~c ~.;;;.
. ..:rd)i,.
,~:,,' '.;:'i~~~tj~~:{
::':-~:-:1;:", ;';',' .
.. >,~\.:~:t>.-,
{.f.~::~~%.~:r~~;.;;;
Tax Map Parcel No. 635601-055835
To:
Zoning Board of Appeals
80-149, Town of Wappinger
Referra I:
Re:
Croniser Variance Application
The Dutchess County Department of PlannIng has revIewed subject referral
within the framework of General MunIcIpal Law (Article 128, SectIons 239-1
and 239-m) and fInds the decIsion In thIs matter prImarIly Invelves matters
of local concern.
The Dutchess County Department of Planning, therefore, recommends the
decision be based upon local study of the facts in the case.
The Dutchess County Department of PlannIng does not presume to base Its
decisIon on the legalitIes or il legalItIes of the facts or procedures
enumerated in subject zoning action.
Dated:
June 26, 1980
K~n~Ath R. Toole, CommissIoner
r'j'-chess County Dept. of P I ann I ng
By
acw 'fL;d\-
Richard Bi rch
Senior Planner
...--.
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12890
RZCEIVED
DEe 1 0 198U
ELAWE H, SNOWD[~.'
TEL. 287-6257
December 10th, 1980
Mr. Hans R. Gunderud, Bldg. Inspector/Zoning Admin.
Town of Wappinger
Town Hall - P.O. Box 324
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
RE: Appeals # 487 ~t the request of Croniser Construction
Corporation.
Dear Mr. Gunderud:
At the December 9th, 1980 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting,
a motion was made by Mr. Mc Millen that upon reconsideration the
requested variances be granted subject to signed affidavits by
the purchasers of lots 8 and 9, said affidavits to be acceptable
to the Attorney to the Town, and these are to be submitted prior
to the issuance of certificates of Occupancy and further, that
all required approvals be obtained and any work that remains to be
done is completed prior to the issuance of the Certificates of
Occupany.
The motion was secQnded by Mr. Cortellino and unanimously
carried by those members present at the meeting.
br
Very truly yours,
(~= ::e~r~ ~
cc: Jon Holden Adams, Attorney to the Town
Raymond croniser, Appellant
Francois Cross, Attorney at Law
William C. Gross, Attorney at Law
Kenneth stenger, Attorney at Law
William P. Horton, Highway Superintendent
Rudolph E. Lapar, Engineer to 7he wn
Thomas E. Logan, Assessor
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Mr. & Mrs. Nolan
Mr. & Mrs. Schwartz