476
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS v'
iI~EN...J TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
~ MA( t 4 1980 ACTION ON APPEAL
App:::ti No. .._~_..A.16,......_...
D:1ted M.?.Y....J~.4t].:l.J~_)~:!.Sio
"
A ppel1ant ~.,..g~.~~.~.:.~.~~~~~~;'...................................._.......................,..,... Addres&...........E?.!..Q.~.....~.9.~...}.?...?_.__......__
.......E.i sb.kil.L".. .NY.......l25.2 4.... .........~.ThQx:n.ton.....T.e.'x.a.c.e....&...Ma.ur.er:....T.er.r.a.c,;;_.N.o..c.tb..).......__..
At <, rnecting of t\e Zonjng Board of Appe:lh on _.....................k.tg.Y.....l~,.t.h...........:.._.............................-........) 19...~.Q...)
Appe:ll No.......4.~1.6............ was considered and the following action on the requ~t for: ill A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDl~AN~)
o AN .:\l).PEJ..L AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCS: By resolution of th~ Bcar-d, it W'.1S determined that strict :J.?pliCltion of the Ordin;mce
o would [J would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a.. The property in qUQ'tion 0 would 0 would not yield a r~nable return if limit:d to the
.:use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ~.............._....._....__..._..._._-_._..----.:....~
__..4.._____...~...,...._..U..................._......U............._+_......_......................................_...._...........__.....
b. The hardship crelted 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be sh:l~ by aU
. . properties alike in the vicimty of the property and in tnesame use district, beo4se: .,......_~
. . . i .
._.........u_..................,........"............................u..~.....................____.._......................................-.............-...."...._._.--..._.._....._.r-....~..___..
....__.........h~...__........,...................h................................._....-...~_................................................._.....h.._.._........._.._....~............__.....'_._..~.__.__
.',
!
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 WlJuld not cbange the character of the district, because: .................._
--_...~...~..........-..........~.., ,.............................."........................."-' ................................................................-..........--..................----.-'!'"'-...----
....u~............................ ..........,..........................................._........_....__. ..............................................................._.....................u......._...._....._..................._
Tnerefore, it W;'l.S further determi:l~d that the requested variance KJ be g!";'..:1:ed EJ-be--~~r,"'"t.-d and
that the p~;~vious decision of th~ Er.-tvrct:::1e:1t OHicer G'b:::mn&1'l'led [] be reve:'sed. PLEASE
SEE ATTACHMEN'I'.
2. . SPECIAL USE 111::Ri\tlIT: By resolution of t:.e Board it was dete:-m:;:ed that the n~q1.le$t for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be: denied, pursuant to article ......................, section or suosection
...................." p-angraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore) the decision or th~ En-
:.forcement Offic:;r 0 be reversed 0 ~ confirmed, because: ....................................._..._......_...___......_.
...........n.............................................._................_..u.......u......................_........... ....._,.. .....u..........._u.......................__.....___..~____........_...._,;..___
...._........................................_.._....... ........... ................................... ..... .........,._...__~._.....u.........~.............. ..._...................._...____.._~__.........................__.,........ ."
3. INTERPRETATION: The Boa7'd adclpted tl1e follovring resolution wh:cn stated its int:::r-r'etation
of the Zoning Ordina..'1c~~ as requested in your :lp?t:::tl: ..........................................._._..........._...................... ...._......._._.....
. ..... ..........._.. _...' .... ............ ....... .,. ... ... .... ................._... .n......... ..................................._............._......_...
........................................................................................................................................4H......................
.......................................,................4..............................
· (..r-nI,...~.-c-) y)~.,...,C'r-'''T(S'
.j... f',._J\.J1.\. 1:, y,'..l .1. l'.J(.J__h'l .):
1) t r r ~ ", J..: .- r r~: ...'., po B . .. i ... 1 ~ r", ')',- ,_.: ., .-. r:.. r: ': r" .,..~ ~1
J): .e'SOldc.u.: j. ,_..~ '.1,llC, Lf;,~ 1e, ,a"...,:; ,-._~.::>.un ,":l::; mJ....;; on your
:~p ;J::.8.1: ............................................
.................................................................n......
.....................................-..............................-...................-...
.............. _ n.. _. .................. ............ .._. ... .n.......... ............ ............... '.'nn..~.. ..............
. .....J~;r!~=-.~J~. mmm.
C'11'''-''.1'"' Z.---..nl'"1rr O.i""l""~ or' ,\.............."'1...
..~ u..~ .... ..) ............:, .............. ~ .. ~~....1..:.;)
Appecil # 476
-2-
:'lay 14th, 1980
A motion was maJe by Mr. Cortellino to grant the requested
variance with the proviso that the dwelling unit in the carriage
house is to be occupied only by Mr. Maurer's father-in-law and
mother-in-law and when the uses of the unit by said in-laws ceases,
the kitchen facilities are to be removed.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Mc Millen and unanimously
carried by those members present.
(\. _...L
O~r.~
t{....~. ....e.A.#1 ,-
'to '1:::f''''tK~~ -,'"
.. V""
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
/
TmiN OF v&PPINGER
Appeal No. 4/ 7~
\ "
\.
NOT ICE OF APPEAL
Date ~~?(~/Vd
Appellant
HUGH J. MAURER
Address
PO BOX 335
."
FISHKILL, NEW YORK 12524
TO THE BOARD.OF APPEALS:
I,
HUIiH J. MAURER
Zoning Inspector, dated
, appeal from a decision of the
, 19~, ~nd do hereby apply to the
L. A VARIk'1CE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
Zoning Board of Appeals
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) " (check
proper one), in connection with premises located at
~( "~d' .)'
zonJ.ng J.st.
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S)" OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED -A~~J-f. -:JlI- ~~ f1.1
520
subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce ~~due
'hardship because:
SEE LETTER ATTACHED
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
~~ l~1h~ ~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
~~'icUl)tS-h;c~
b. A SPECIAL USE PE~lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above p~e~ises:
c. INTERPRETATIO~ of the zoning Orcin3nce is requested because:
. ,
HUGH J. MAURER
P.O. BOX 335
FISHKIll, NEW YORK 12524
April 29, 1980
Office of the Zoning Administrator
Town of Wappinger - Town Hall
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Attention: Mr. Hans R. Gunderud,
Building Inspector & Zoning Administrator
Reference: VIOLATIONS OF TOWN ORDINANCE
Dear Mr. Gunderud:
Our need for the variance is extremely severe as my in-laws are very elderly
and unable to care for themselves. My father in-law is almost totally blind
and in order not to be completely incapacitated, needs to be in familiar
surroundings. They both need care but he, in particular must have constant
care, and could not receive this attention any\~here else.
Neither one of my in-laws can drive now and depend on us for transportation,
particularly to get all their food, supplies, and medical care.
If they were forced to go elsewhere, I believe there would be grave conse-
quences to their health and, therefore, it is with deep concern for their
welfare that I seek your indulgence and ask for your help.
HJM/rm
cc: Thomas logan, Assessor
(
(
(
"
OFFICE OF THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
TOWN OF WA~~INGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 12!590.
Ta.. 287.eZ".
April. 16, 1980
Hugh J. Mauer
P.O. Box 335
Fishkill, New York 12524
RE: Violations of Town Ordinance
Dear Hr. Mauer:
It has come to my attention that a "carriage house" on your property
~tax parcel 6257-04-781006) was converted to a residence. The':"-e
appears to be three (3) violations of Town of Wappingers Zoning
Ordinance. 1). only 1 single-family residence is permitted oa a lot
in your district. 2). no building permit was issued for the alteration
and 3). no Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the lawful use of
the structure as a residence.
Please attend to these violations
on my part will not be necessary.
~ b..v~ ~. rJO~ \lr
,~ Jt'~J
immediately so that further action
~:erelY, 0
1!!:: ti~~~
Building Inspector &
Zoning Administrator
HRG/dlh
CC: Thomas Logan, Assessor