499
/~..
,; .
l
'/
V
. RECErVE"r
SEP 1 2 1980
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 499
D;ltcd ."__ 8/20/80
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
A ppellant ..Xl.:1J...1_~J!LUJ.....{?J;'~~*-__J.G.;:~"~;r;.....~y'l;?~;r;J:l.l.......... Addr""..3S...._~t..!._..9..I............._.
.......jY.s.12P_~!.~ fa 1 :j.._!?..,_~.~ X.t.......l.6..~.~.Q..........._........._._................................._......._............_....................
At a. meeting of the Zoning Board of Appe:11s on ............_...~.!::.P.~..~.....~.~h........._......_..........................._) 19. f30 )
Appeal No...4~~L._........ wa; cOnsidered and the following action on the requ(:3t for: ~ A VARIANCE, -
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO~ING ORDI~ANGE)
o AN APP . AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)) was taken:
J. VARIANCE: B lution of th~ Board) it was determined that strict applic:l.tion of the
o would 0 would produce undue hardship for these re:1sons:
a. The property in q ion 0 would 0 would not yield a. re2S0nable
. ~e permitted under tll Ordinance) .because: _....................
- ,- .
~ . .- ~
. ..
b.
. properties alike in the vicirnty of
e D would 0 would not change the character or ~he distri , "cause: _.._
-_.-......-.._..........._........-.........._......._...~. ...........................-...............................---..-..............
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance IKI be granted 0 be de..,jed and
that the previous deci~ion of the Enforcement Officer 0 be cOnfirmed [] be reversed.
See Attachment
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the requ:st for a
~pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................) section or subsection
......._......_.., paragraph ........._......................... of the Zoning Ordinance and) therefore) the decision of the En-
iforcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because; ...........-.....---.__
.......--..-..--.-.......-..-..................-.....-..--...-................--.----.-.........................-...----.-----.--
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follo'i't;ng resolution wh:-ch stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................ou..........__._..__._
................-......-...........................................................................................-....................................................-.........................................--.-.-....--
............................................-...................................................................... ...................................................................................................--...--.....---
......................~....................._....................................................................... ...........................................................................................--....---........--
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSO~ (5): By resolution of the Bo-<lrd, the follow:r:g decision was l:llde on your
.~pd: .................................................-...................................................................................... ....................................................._....__......_....
... ................................................... ................ ...... ....... ................................. ...........................................................................................--.......................--.
. ..........................................nu....u........................................................... ..............................................................................................._.... ..._.._.........._
,
~ .~ .
.................... . ........ ..................... ............................ ..--......-......-..-...-
h.......... z. ;...-? _ri t- ~,....'.. .
at. ....:1:1, 0:1'''6 .::::AI"":l.... (; Ul"l'-;U~
7'
;
Sept. 9, 1980
Appeal #" 499 - A motion was made by Carol A. Waddle, seconded
and unanimously carried that a temporary variance be granted
for six (6) months. Sign should be placed ten (10) inches from
Toyota building. If decision is made to re-utilize Subaru
showroom, the existing sign may be returned to said Subaru
showroom.
'A'
11(-- ~.. -
"
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
..)
, .
\.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ~9 ~
Date 8:/~(' /Y-C)'
. ."7
Appellant t,'..):' 11;0 m
tJ. t>-.,ey-'(jruv~bd(l}ddress IN?
WClfj); :)IC, f'iS
. U' J
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: J.
I. .l) ://;01,.1 1/.. fir € e .-- . appeal from a~;;:cision of the
zoning Inspector, dated ~ '^ \1. \8.'. ' 19 <2St>, and do hereby apply to th~
zoning Board of Appeals for:~ VARIANCE,r:!A SPECIAL USE PE~~IT,t:JAN INTER-
."
~/Is
PRETATION OF THE' ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S). (check
proper one), in connection with premises located at
J:)-<b - \ A ,
(zoning dist.)
~ /s?~a~-sss IotJlc
(grid no.)
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
"fty.1t~A('~ Sec,~~
~~ 2;~ 6 ·
--4lb.5~ ~.
(artic
2. TfPE OF APPEAL (C9~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARnu~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce ~ndue
, .
hardship because:
S e ~ ~./IIc.~d!" <; ~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all p::-operties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection I paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OT?:::-:R REN..."'\RKS:
!Use extr~ sheets if neces3ary)
. ,/2 -----~:?
..ft'rtJn~~"""" ,-:;;~
7 Th~ required pl~n must accompany t~ ~otice of A?92a1. _
~.??~:"~"'..~'::'S F"?4=: P..SS_"~'.!~!3r-'S .,.,....~ 0"... tn._ r._~ ~(;r::':"~ T',....,.,,"'r'..,.~~ T'''' "",.~- ~ ".T~"'''''' -"'-
_ - - - - ----_ ..4.:''f."...J~''J.....1l,..1 ..:..;... !:..JJ..J..'J.....l....11..\..7 I_~ ~.:::c.:.~,i~~~
.~.:-~, 7 ...-. -~ .:..~, r~~,~_~ - :~l-_""\::-J ';~.,.!~~-'::. ~J"_-""~. 4 * .-'
n.
"
The following is an explatnation of my request for a
zoning variance. The existing sign on the Subaru building
is 4' x 24'.' This sign is in violation of the sign code.
However, it has been O.K.'d on the existing tuilding. Since
I have relocated my Subaru cars from this buildLlg to Greer
Toyota I request to relocate the Subaru sign to a temporary
location under the existing Greer Toyota sign. The sign will
not be attached to the Toyota building but will be mounted
on two supports and will be erected an-proximately 10" in
front of the now existing Toyota building.
The reason I want this tem~orary move is that I have
an agreement with Subaru that in ~arch 1981 I will either
add to the now existing Subaru showroom or Bake my permanent
home for Subaru at the now existing Toyota bui15ing.
I' have been to the Planning Board and will add an
addition to the now existing Toyota building. At the com-
pletion of the addition to the Toyota'building, I want it
understood that I want the option of 1"llacing the sign ner-
manently on the addition or retu'l1ing it to the now existing
Subaru building.
Therefore, my reqaest to move the Subaru sign would be
a tempora~J mounting until approximately March 1981. If,
however, the Board of Appeals decides not to allow me to re-
locate my Subaru sign, I will then leave the sign on the
existing Subaru building and put uu a te8norary new sign
within the code.
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL.
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12S90
TEL.. 297-6257
LEGAL NOTICE
PLEASE TAI<E NOTICE THAT THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 513
OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE.
APPEAL # 499, AT THE REQUEST OF WILLIAM H. GREER (GREER SUBARU),
SEEKING A VARIANCE OF ARTICLE IV, SECTION 416. 52 OF THE TOWN OF
WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE, TO PERMIT A FREE-STANDING SIGN LARGER
THAN 25
SQUARE FEET TO BE ERECTED ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
CORNER OF ROUTE 9 AND OLD ROUTE 9, BEING PARCEL # 6157-02-585606,
IN THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER.
SAID HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1980,
AT THE TOWN HALL, MILL STREET, WAPPINGERS FALLS, NEW YORK, BEGINNING
AT 8:00 P.M., AT WHICH TIME ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL BE GIVEN
AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.
SIGNED: JOSEPH E. LANDOLFI, CHAIRMAN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DATED: AUGUST 26TH, 1980
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12590
TEL. 297.8257
August 21st, 1980
Mr. Richard Birch, Senior Planner
Dutchess county Department of Planning
47 Cannon street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
Grid # 6157-02-585606
Dear.Mr. Birch:
Pursuant to General Municipal Law, the Town of Wappinger
Zoning Board of Appeals herewith refers to you, for recommendation,
Appeal # 499.
The Public Hearing on this Appeal has been scheduled
for Tuesday, september 9th, 1980.
I am enclosing all pertinent information regarding this
Appeal. We would appreciate your recommendation at your earliest
possible convenience.
Respectfully yours,
~~ '#
.. ~' '" /
~~.'/ (/~ ~
(Mrs.a;1BettY-Ann Russ, secretary
Zonirtg Board of Appeals
br
Enclosure