464
RECE/V~NING BOARD 6F' APPEALS
..d~APR 9 19aOTO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
C/' ACTION ON APPEAL
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appeal No. .........46.fi...._......_
Dated .ApJ:ll.....9.t.h..._.1980
A ppellant ...........~.h.~~.2!}....~9.E.l~.s:...................................__.......................... Address.............E9.~.t.~.....}:Z.2.........._.........__......
........XY..~.P..Bin.gJ;tt.JiL..J::.aJ..l.~........N.S!w....YQb:k................_.12.5..9.Q.....................................................................__..._........_.__...
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .....................Apr.il....8;t.h....................................................., 19....80.)
Appeal No.......9.-.Q.4.......... was considered and the following action on the request for: rn A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AJ.~ INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applic:z.tion of the Ordinance
8'1lmttkl fD would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question Ii] would Q~.QQt yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: .............................................._........._......... A"_'--:-
....._................................................,..".u.........._.._..4........._..~~~.
hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be
properties 1 . of the property and i s ct, because: .........~~_._.. .
.....................-...--....................-.---.-..........-
......_..........._.:-__......_._............................................................_. .............................................u........nu.'u'. ,................_..........._.._...
c.
would 0 would not change the character of the district be
......-...................--...-...............-.-
.........................__........................................._.......u............._........~........~......................................................................................._...._...._........_...
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 8 L 0' _..t~d tQl be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer @<be confirmedB b~ 1 r;y.... ;)\;.d. as rezoning.
of the property & surrounding area would be the more appropriate avenue of relief.
ECIAL USE PERi\tIIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request
Special be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........... n or subsection
....................., paragraph ............................. the Zonin an ,therefore, the decision of the En.
20rcement Officer .........................................._................._..___
/"
.........-......-.-......-
..u.__._.................._.............__u..............~.............................................__...._............................................................__................_.._____._...._..
ERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its int~"t-:9fP'
of the Onl <:> ce as requested in your appeal: ................................... ~....................:........._.........................
.-
..................................................................~.........................................................__...
............................................................................
1-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By fcsolut:on of the Board, the following decision was made on your
~}J peal: ................ ........ .... ........,......... ................................... -......... ...... - ............ -...............,............. ............. ... ................ ............ .......... ..........................
. ......................................................,..... ...,.............................................". ".- ............,...........................................................................................................~.
.. ......^._............i........~:~......:;"R...~~.~.;..~.....~......._,............................
)tft"""'r~ ~.;;;J'~7j~
......U................................................. .................................................-..
Chairman, Zoning Boord of App~als
,
,
Appeal No .1bl-f
Date d-/u /~
I
1
~
f.
,
TOWN OF ~~PPINGER
,
..
\ '
NOTICE OF APPEAL
':
;\ppellan: AS h Ii i{~ IV
LJ ff P p IIJ Cd t; (( s,'
;) /:
A fJ-/2/,-{ U
tit L I g) 12 Y
Address'? r
37C
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
~R L/~
Zoning Inspector, dated(.; t~ I::; I 19 tu, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:C8lA VAR~CE/[],~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t=]AN INTER-
I,
.3// }}/20N
____, appeal from a decision of the
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,r=l1L~ APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
proper one), in connection with premises located at 1lr 37t:.
(' _ (street & no.)
.u.c.. '11 {'Joe; 9-, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
I,
i
r
I
t
~
I
~.
('
t
i
Pr-
(zoning dist.)
,
G '3S'F-Cl/
(grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF Tfm ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
~.. LI:J. '" I.fl ud:u.J !r z;
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the follovTi.ng reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: It would necessitate the closing of an existing
business which provides livelihood, create economic loss of sizeable
investment, and would bring about use of property which is not in
keeping with surrounding area.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: of all reasons mentioned in 2A-I hereof and also because
property is isolated from any and all adjacent properties by town line,
power lines and roads so that it is set apart from all other properties.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the char~cter of the district because:
Planned Industry which is now allowed would not be attractive-or
fitting as is the present use of said property. Likewise many
b. A s~t~~ett~~8~~%II~ToTs~Q~EYJ~1~1881~~~u::~mt:a~:ti~~~erty are p:e:::~~~n
or subsection , paragraph of Ule Zoning Ordinance
to permit the fOllowing use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER RE~~RKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
I
/
/ r
~ '--:- ~-..( . --:7-"":'.
'_./
'---I 4 (7 { r ,/
* The required plan must accompany t'!1e Notice of l'\ppea 1.
APPEL!...!\!\TS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBI.ISRING
'I'Ir2 P"2QUTRED
-,:~C~_~. ::.. ...: ->..~"t-:>~':~~ I~; r.;:,;:: .[,i~(':~'\L ~:;::;~,,:~!~0.. ?~? _