502
· "it
V
RECEIVED
SEP 121980'
. ZONING BO:LTID OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 2-.02
Dated ~.~~. 19, 1980
(l~ltIE ,*,. SlOWIEI
. .
A ppellant M~.?::::~~.?:~.?_~~_~.~~.~::~.:::.~_:r:.:.._.~.u~p ~~....~~.:R..:.. Addr-..3S..........~.!.:..:-.-:..~_ ..
..........w..~p..EiUg.~;.~~J;.~.c..~.N.:' X..~......~.f_?.2.Q_...._..........................~............................~........_........_._._.
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .._.:.............:?.~.P..!;.::.....21;h......._......_......_.....~..__....._, t 9.?..Q....,
Appeal No.~_.?.Q~_.__...~_ wa, considered and the following action-on 'the request for: e A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDl~ANO!,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
J. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determi.ned that strict applio.cion of the Ordinance
g Wil .}..1 l!J would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question lliI would a 1I1t1H -11 yield a. reasonable return if limited to the
. .use permitted under the Ordinance, PO_UhA _........~__..____~
'.'-'
-
I A. .,'''~''_,,_''_,__,_''"&,
-...............-.....--.....
. b. The hardship created~.129 is not unique and ~ would.Q..- 11 t be'shar:d by all
. - properties alike in the vicimty of the property and in the same use district, y.n~"...: ._:
Further, the -Zoning Board of Appeals feels that a larger sign at ".
-..--.-.-......-.---......-.....-----......-.......---..--...........-.........._....-...._......~--
a les'ser setback could hazardously distract drivers along Route 9.-.
----..-..-=---.-..--..........................................---..-...................................................---.---...-.
c. 'The variance IKJ would ~ _ I d "k change the character of the district, 1se&._.
'. ---.........:...--...........-.......................-.-...................-..-. ..................................................--...-.----.-.-......
.......-........-..................-............................-............-......--.-.......................................................-.......--...--.-.......-.-.
Therefore, it waS further determined that the requested variance 1;;3 ~! ol~. lid KI be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforce:::lent OfficerE be confirmed-E3 \31 rr"^-ullil.
2. SPEClALUSE PERLVllT: By resolution of the Board i,t was determined that the request for a
~pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ............._...._._) section or subs~ction
...............-.., paragraph .............-..................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
;!orcement Officer 0 be ,reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ..........._......._____
........----..........--....--....................--................-..-...--..- -,- .......--.--..-..........-......-..- ....
.......-.......-..-............---.-.-.....................-..-.-.....................-.-.--........................-...__.__..~-
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution wh:ch stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as reque~)ted in your appeal: ..........................................._..........._..................__..___
.............--.....................................................................................................................................................................-....-............-.-...---.-.-----
.............._..........................._........................................................................ .................................................._.......n.._.....~................._...____.___....__
..............................................................................................................................................................~.................._...................................-..--.-..-
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolut:O:l or the Board, t1:e follow:r:g c.ec::iion was m:!.d~ on your
~;Jp~l: ............................................,.................................. ..... ..... ... ,,-... '.. ... ..... .................. ... .... ... ....................................................._....._.__.........___.
.. .. ............................................. ............. ....... ....... ....... ........ ...... ........... ...... ........... ...... ................ ......... .... ........................ ....................-.....-.--.......-......---.
.. .... ........................................................................................-..............---......-
.~~, ~~i~~;d;..--
,
TOWN OF ,WAPPINGP
, \ ..~ '
\~~.~,::, \ '
NOTICE OPAPPEAL
Appellant Mid-Hudson Contr. SupplY Corp. ,
AddressRte. 9
Appeal 'lCJO"-S---O~
Date A ug. 19, 198(
I
.'
Wappingers Falls, N. Y. 12590
'TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
"".
I.
Eugene. Lois
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated , 19_, and ,do hereby apply to ~e
zoning Board of Appeals for:r:za{ VARIANCE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN: INTEl,
. ,
PRETATION, OF '1'HE ZONING' ORDINANCE, DAN APP~ AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) . :(c;h~,
proper one), in connection with premises located at
-=J:W, -2. , 10/ S'7-tJ:J.. -h ~~ S- ? 9
(zoning dist.) '(grid no.) ;
1. PROVISIOlll(S)...;~",t ~qN~NG ORDINANCE APPEALED-Mt)Ee -rsr: '~
,4i~{~; ,.~'f'~ ~,,~ 01 ~ S-~N~t~ ~l~ -tn ~c.eeJJ~
(articl&"i'" s-eC't1on or subsectiol'). a~d paragraph~ ' " i'
7/; ~~ -ro~-r 4l"'eCt ~:r\u. ~\A \~M -eJt . " .
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Cor.Pplete rei~ant section)., *, '
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, B. Y..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produ~e Undue
'hardship because: The Appellant would like.to i~st~ll a free'~,
standing sign of forty square feet in front of h~s bu~ld~~g, s~ t~~t,
;~:sI~~a~t~np~~~en~;u~~s~;e~~~ b~:i~::~sW~~;~ ~5 :~~:r~b;~~~sisOtooo:~all
a ~tg~toba~J>s1.ft~\>neclseJ'le8ifs n~~~~e 'and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this distri(
because: Most of the properties along Route 9 fall into one of '.two
catgories: They were either quilt prior to zoning, or prior to the widening
of Route 9, therefore, either the sign or the building is more visible to
pass~hg traffic than ours. Many of the others are recognizable national
brand names a~ Texaco, Chemical ,Hess, et.c. andclOt.notof~H}uireas m1J~h vi.sih-
ili ty3) The var1ance woulQ observe the Sp1rJ.t: ofne QJ:nance ana-WOU.LQ nr,
change the' characteJ:: of the district becaus8': The Appellant feels
that a 40 square foot sign would not be so large as to adversely affect
the charac~er of the district.
b. A SPECIAL USI:; PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , secti
or subsection. , parag~aph of the Zoning Ordinanc,
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature~ ~
* Toe required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
i-\Pp=:Ll..I\~;'rS ARB HESPONSIBLS FO!l 'TH~ COSTS INVOLVED I~ punr4ISHnTG
,
&!t/Y
TH~ REQUIREO
..,.,.......,- -,. ~'--' ~"-".r,",,.'" '~-,:,..",-,,,'''''''-"'':'''~
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12590
TEL. 297.6257
LEGAL NOTICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 513
OF THE TmVN OF WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE.
APPEAL # 502, AT THE REQUEST OF MID-HUDSON CONTRACTORS SUPPLY
CORP., SEEKING A VARIANCE OF SECTION 416.52 OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW A FREE-STANDING SIGN TO EXCEED THE
25 SQUARE FOOT AREA SIZE REQUIREMENT, TO BE PLACED ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON ROUTE 9, BEING PARCEL # 6157-02-624589, IN THE TOWN OF
WAPPINGER.
SAID HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1980,
AT THE TOWN HALL, MILL STREET, WAPPINGERS FALLS, NEW YORK, BEGINNING
AT 8:00 P.M., AT WHICH TIME ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL BE GIVEN
AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.
SIGNED: JOSEPH E. LANDOLFI, CHAIRMAN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DATED: AUGUST 26TH, 1980
ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FAL.LS. NEW YORK 12590
TEL. 297.6257
August 21st, 1980
Mr. Richard Birch, Senior Planner
Dutchess County Department of Planning
47 Cannon Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
Dear.Mr. Birch:
Grid # 6157-02-624589
Pursuant to General.Municipal Law, the Town of Wappinger
Zoning Board of Appeals herewith refers to you, for recommendation,
Appeal # 502.
The Public Hearing on this Appeal has been scheduled
for Tuesday, september 9th, 1980.
I am enclosing all pertinent information regarding this
Appeal. We would appreciate your recommendation at your earliest
possible convenience.
Respectfully yours,
/1
f)Jaty :i[7-7j
(Mrs.Y;~ettY-Ann Russ, secretary
zonin9lBoard of Appeals
-/")
/
)(:2:~
br
Enclosure