509
.,
t/J5
RECEIVE~ONING BOARD o'F APPEALS
OCT 15 1980 TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ..............5.Q.9............
Dated .Q.c.5;.9.!?~E.....~M?.t.h.,.. 1980
.",.,
'....,~
Appellant ..s.choanmak.e;t;....HQme.a~J.Q}:l.n....s.t.~.;i.D.P..~;t".g...... Address. ................~....~~.~.~.~.?.'!......~~.:~..............
...........N~.wl;t~gh......!i~):(...,X.Q~.Js...., ............................................a ......................,............................1.............1..........................................."..................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .....................o.c:t.Clbe,l;.....l~tb............................................. 19...8.Q..)
Appeal No.....,.?.Q.~............ was considered and th, following action on the request for: E9 A VARIANCE.
iiJ. .B81.~ 'lfSE FEftI.llT,g:] AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
ii-Mf ....P.t.... .Ai _~J LCQRUv.'Ii:g PIiRiWI(&)J :vas taken:
I. V ARlANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
[}-wwkl11l would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. Tbe property in question IXk would GJ-wouW...et yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: .......e....UD.91. e.-..~.ii\m.i.l:i.....Q..~.~1JJ.n.9.............~........
...m.s~..:Q~.....s;;,Qn.~.'!;:!".y.g~.~g.u~...u....................................................................................................................................................-.....
. created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be
. al'k .
. propertJes 1 e In t rlct1 cause: ..................
..................................................-...............................................................................
,.
..............................a.............................. ............. .............. .......... .... ........................ .............................'u.............................,................................u...._...
c. The variance ~ would B-wou:ld~t change the character of the district, because: .. g.....t.WQ-
....f..~m~.!y.....~.~.!.!.!.ng...':1.9..~J.9....P..~....S.f.~.g.t..~4....J.!}....g.....l?~.ng.:t.~::.tg.m.!:ty.....~.9.!tl?...~..................
.................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................H
Therefore, it was further detennined that the requested variance [3-be-gnnted []I be denied and
th.at the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer rn be confirmed E}be-l"C'Ver$cd::
. ECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the reques a
Sp ~ gran~d 0 be denied, pursuant to article ................ or subsection
....................., paragraph ........................... the Zoning Or . erefore, the decision of the En-
&rcement Officer 0 be reve ............................................................................................n
"
..............,......................
.........._...........................................................................a..............................................................................................................................................................
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..r.h.~....~.9.n.~D.g....f}.Q.?.!:.(l...Q.f....hp..P..~gJ.p...........
.... i.nj;.~;t".p'J;.~.t..s.....tha:t.....t.b.~....~ns..t.g.lJ.!;l,.t;i..QD.. ..Q.f....!;l,....J;i.~.~.Qng....k,i.:t.phen.....i.D.....!;l,....g~~J.JJ.ng..
.....9.9..Q.f?t:J..t.y.t..~.{?.....a...mul.ti.:7.f.ami.ly...dw.ell.ing.~. .......................... ............................ ........................................................
~
.........................................................................'............u....................
. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ........................................... .................... ...................... .............................................
....................................................................""". . ....................
h;'v ~ ~.
..... ~ .....Ch.~i~~~~i~.~i.~g.&~.~ci ~fApp.~~i~...................
_.___.._..l-.__...__..,__.._.~_.",..._._._~_-.o:-___,.
.,
"
TOWN OF )MPpn~GER' Appeal No. ' . ~(
. ~OTICE OF A~PEI~L . Date ffl1fb.
, L /: ~f ~C ' f)'. J
;;'11#- MAJ 7/b~ /Addr~ss/ "tlJ~Y I'A~I'; ;tI~,.f~~)I
~
.'
~ . ....'.
Appellant ({'~l1t1~et.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
-::JoIIJJ ~7'&/A/.&d6- jJ;f.
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated
, 19_, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VAR~CE,r:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,~ INTER~
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
proper one). in connection with premises located at /1),/#50/ 4,f,f~h7J1E
(street & no.) .
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
~
(zoning dist.)
,.Ja.J.. "i1- 1>2- €I S ~ ~ :J ;L
(grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
"
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TY'PE OF APPEAL (COlJ\plete relevant section). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for 'the following reasons:
1) strict application of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: 5 #, 1I-1-'/fc/l ,tE/J ?~7~ or- .E x/~'/lAI' /J p/(}'tJ
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the characte~ of the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
f~e frrl/9C//c..l tG 7~ Or ~,( /?/P/ll"" //CJM'
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
._ s~.gc.~t&--~~{)C;P
c.n~ .:..\jOl:..l.<.:e or: h.ppeal. .
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
* Tna required plan mu~t accompany
!u<:'.:.LL.'\S1'S A9.E Rt:S?O~lSrBLE t:'O~ 7iS CO:;:-:>
.....-. ~ -; ;'\.-~.- -.,<'"l!',,:!, . ,:'\~:y,:r;-.:.:-:" r ::("",\r '~,l-':: Jo., "'".)::-':>
I:~;"C:"~)':::J I:: ?~.rn~ 1:S!iI~:G
,...,-,.-
l .l~
R2QU!RED, .
,\1.;;;'J'.o
~chooomake~J!!2!!l~ -
I 1 Holiday Park Road, Newburgh, N.Y. 12550
Telephone: (914) 562-1500
Septanber 24, 1980
Mr. Hans Gtmderood,
Building Inspector
Town Hall - Town of Wappinger
Mill Street
Wappinger Falls, New York 12590
Dear Mr. Gunderood:
In reference to our application for a BuildiDg Penni t on
Carroll Dri va. please be aware that the dwelling is to be
co-habited by be married couples. Mr. and Mrs. John
Bertolini and Mr. and Mrs. Olarles Wian wish to occupy the
bare jointly.- Mrs. Wian being the sister of Mrs. Bertolini.
Of the four proposed occupants, three are retired and Mrs.
Wian is approa-c.l1tng retiranent. Because of their advanced
ages, they feel it \\'OUld be advantageous to live together.
'!he second kitchen is provided in the house so that the Wians
can eat separately - this being necessary since Mrs. Wian works.
Mrs. Bertolini's son lives in RockingtuD'Q FanIs, \IDich is one
of the reasons they chose the developnent. '!hey feel it is
important to be close to a relative in case of an ane~ency. We
are first requesting a zoning interpretation, but would like a
variance if that is required. We feel that based on their
family canposition, they should be allowed to build this home.
It should be rrade clear that they plan to use the home jointly,
not as separate and distinct living areas.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to
contact IDe.
JSJ:mjk
Very truly yours,
~A:~AA/tR.
j{. ) President
Cbpy: File
"
*
OFFICE OF THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FAU-S. N. Y. 12!590
Ta. 2~7.e2B.
DATE: September 25, 1980
Schoonmaker Homes, Inc.
1 Holiday Park
Newburgh, New York 12550
Dear Mr. Steinberg;
Your request for a buildinq
basis of Section 421 paragraph 1
of the Town of Wappinger which stipulates:
permitted principal uses: one family detached dwelling, not to
exceed one dwelling on ~ach lot (and Section 2~O - definitions qf
dwelling, dwelling unit, dwelling ~ one family, family and dwelling
unit detached)
permi t is hereby denied on the
of the Zoning Ordinance
You have the right to appeal this decision to the Zoning Board of
Appeals. Proper forms for appeal may be obtained at this office upon
request.
rL1~
Hans R Gunderud
HRG/dlh