438
,
ZONIi\"G BO)...RD OF /~PEALS.
~ ..P RECEIVED TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
lZ' JUN 18 1979 ACTION O~ APPEAL
Appeal No. ....._4.3.8.......~.~......._
D:Ltcd _.J}Jn~L.l5.:t.bJ.....l9. 79
..
. D~~~~ f. JNOWDEN . . .
A pp elhnt ............................................~.....9.~.~l}g.1?. ......:... ......................_......... AddreS3............5.3....Mar.:t.J.n...nr:~v..e._.........._.
..........................................W9J?P.j,n..g:~.:j;.s... E.al.ls.~.....N.Y.......12 5.90...................... .............................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoaing Board of Appeals on ................J.une.....12.th..._......................................................) !9....~.g.."
;App~al No........4}.~.......... was considered and the folbwing action on./ the r-equ~t for: Ql A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO)iING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO;\,(S), was t~kC'L:
\.
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Bo:!.rd, it was determined that st..r-ict ;o.pplic:ltion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would nut produce undue h2.rdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would.O ,muld no~ yield a r~_~n;;.ble retum if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordir.::.nce, b-ec-a:.l.5e: ................................._..........._..._...........~.........:..:....._...........................
.<.
..~........ ~....... ....... .................. 0.0 ...... n... .......0................ ............. heh'..._........... ~ ......... 0........................ ... '0.......... ........ un.__ .....:. ...._ ,_.... _... ......_..... ........:..._..___.......,........... ......
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district} because: .....:....::......
.......,.. ................~...... ...... ......... 0' ............... ....... ..... ...... .............. ....... _ ....... ....................... ........................ .._......._........u_........ _ ........._.........._.............................
... ...... ........... ................. no.. ...... ................................................................................ ... ~"""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''' .... ........ '.' _. '~".'."""""'" .... ..... ._._.. .......................~........._. ._..
c. The variance 0 would 0 ;vould not change the character of the dis-trict} because; _...................
..' ...... ..... ..... ............ ............. ........-. ..-. ...-._. ......................4......._.______............_
.....;.................................................................................................
..................................................................-...............................................-................-
Therefore, it was further determined that the ~~ variance llil be granted G-be-4m~ and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Offic~r [3-he--<'€flltFf:"'-T;,.-"cl KJ be reversed.
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: l?y resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
$pecial Use Permit D be granted 0 be den.ied, pursuant to article ......................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance <J.nd, therefore} the decision of the En-
!orcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ......................._..._...__._............_.........._.._~.......~.........
................................................................................................................ ........ ...................................................--..............-..........-......................-......-...-..............
.............................................._............................u............................................._................................._.........__.__.._.____.._..._..........._..___.______............
1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follmv~ng resolution wh:ch stated its interpretation
of the Z:ming Ordinance as requested in your app~al: .................................._........._................................................_...........
....... .... ......... ............. ................ ,. ....... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .~......... '" ......... .......... -.... ................... ... .... .... ......................................-.......-..............-.............._......-.._~......_.-
. ........ ..... ........... ............ ...........-.........-........ ...-.......'............................----......-...
.................................................................................. ................................... ... ,.. ....................... ..........~......u_......._..._P_...................................._._....___.._.._.
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolutio:1 of the Board, the following decision was made on your
!;pp eal: ....... ............................ .......................... ...................................... ......................................................................................_..__.....__._.._....
,..... ..................~........ ................ ...... ...... .e. ....... .................,.... ......... .......... ..' ....... ................... .. 'p' ............ ..,......._._ ...u........... ....................__.....___....._._.._....__..
.."""...".._...;...~"~"-"~~"-~;;;>::~~:::=~.~~
Chairman, Zo:1.ing Boord of Appe:t.ls
-
Daniel V. C~~ings
Appeal # 438
-2-
June 15th, 1979
,-
Variance is granted to permit eight (8) foot high stockage
fence from ~he back of the house to the back property line on the
side facing the right-of-way (open side) .
. - . . ... -~--_._--.. .---- -'
. ;.
'XO'WN OF \VAi?PI~GER',
,. '
, ". ~ l\OTICE OF APPEAL
A?p'd No_
Th~c
. ,
. ,
." -.
. ...- .
.... :''' ;
..
'.
-,
Ap;J::n.....~
Daniel' V. Cummings
}'JP.-;~-, 53 ~1artip D~~ve . .:~~
---.-.-....----...
_--:-------
:-----------:-,- -'
- .
TO THE BO_~?~ 0:::: APPEALS:
.. --
I (\1~) ~J_~iel V...!.._~roi ngs _: ~
:. , "en-2m;: of 2.pp::lb.~t)
-
.! _) 2p?~1 froril ;? d~ci~ion or the Zoning
....
Ins.?~:-':~;-7 cb.t~d. --.-' , ,'_-----, 19 . ,_) 2.:1d do h~rebl f:??ly to tn:.: :?=oni~g Eo~rd of App~~:;
f~r: Q A VARIfu""IC~.r 0 A SPECIAL l!SE p7R\lir; 0 A~ l~TERP~E~ATlqN OF 'tf-IF.
,zo:;:'n~G ORDIN/)..~CE/D AN .ji.PPEAL l:3 ;-'U.~ AGG~IEVEDPERSON(S),~ (check prop t: r-'
- . ' .' .'. ~'J. ,\ -' -, 'f ' ~.-, ,lJ-r i>-- . '. ,',1(-.'-( ;"/p~ '.
O!l~), H: cO~.....~QQrt '\-nth p:-;::"'1'!.1~ l0C2t~d '2.t ~_.rn..k~lL~:,,1,,~ ,.:-.---:--,,:.:.':-_' - .. .'.U ....fJ":J:J;.
,," " ,,', , (s:r~(:~ & r,o,) .,. (lot no,). . (:z:o;ung ilis~cict)
... t: "r.::V .' 1'\.. Y. , " , ': ' . , .... ,
.....0,,'" 0.:. \1 2....UplL12.:::r~ .1.',_. .' . :' '., ,", -,', ' " -
- , ... '\ . . .. . p ~ . .... ---. "
, ..' ..' .:: . . 'f' , o. .:'.", ,'::- .,00:. - ':00 .:.: ;"-: ~.;:';. ~:,
P.,..-.n-;nc-oO"'tC'S)' 0" 'T'Lf"C T"1'O"~I'l\.~~ O.....,"-x-:-.vr;:- ~'P'P~tl..L~D . '.:, ". ,.',.'. . .
.-. I _ 1..,-U )' .J...:J J.. ';'."' ;:;.1---:IJ,.J.. L- !. , .l'...:: ~.!.:. '\.r.-i.. ,,--- tiJ:. -- -... -... ~----:-..-"_."-,,--~,---:"'"
, . . ''':-'' .. :' . 0 . ..- (indict- ......
11 "~_'.l):?: '.'.:, :..,..:..0" .." , '. ". ',: :.:.,!".... ~'.~;o:-.:~::
~ -----------.---. ---..--------..--
2r""Jde.1 S~ti:>n. or subs~cti~:1. 2nd p1rig;-z.;:h)
...:
... -,
...
. 0
- .....-..
..... ".. ..... ...
: .. .' -.:...:' .. ~
-. :-. -. : .... ... . -'. ..
...
'.
.. .:
2. !l'"PE OF .t'LPPEli.l.. (Compl~L~ rcl~va:'Lt S::':"~0~).* " ~" '..': ,. ',~ (.'~ ~~~.:.~-:':
I .., .' - . ...-' .-
lz, ; A VARI,lliCE IS REQUESTED fo:.- t:-.~ fo!low!:!g re:2.>OZ'.S: :.:' "0 .:.,;;.
/' I) S~-1ct ?ppE:::2tlo:1 of the Z0,:ing O.~~~,:-::~ y,~ould. p:-c:lu,:~ undue h:?rdship oc~~~:~ ..' "
.' '
,S ~ \.: ,..-1 ~...... e 1 '4.tl '-', c Ir, (/1.1 I' ,,\ 1 :. .' " ' '.' i. '. .~
., ,
",) The h~_.1-f...~p rr~-:>'cd 1.5 "~:ql'=- -....-' :- or.,r,~o <:.\.,-->.~ ~" .,11 p-O:J=-r""'t~ ..,1' h '. 'cE
'" ","0..::>.,.' _.C:...l L,,.:.~ ~.'..:. ,:;, _ _.l:"_~ UJ <'--~ . .._':\...'J ~_i..:e: in t ", .'m~- ~.,..
.L. . \..;0. ..........".._""' ~'"
. ."ty c:..,. _' ,......,.,. , ....,). ..":- ,1:....:"::'..... ~>,..,..,-~.
Y1Ctnl... 0.. J11 ~ p. vp~rt) 2,;.... In d1t:> ,--,:>.. ,~.. ,,-~-:>-. . .
) , I (' i
__~' i! t .tl )_ <) .J .{{ If C (1. 1'~,l .I:",' T .
.' ...
. . ,
. . . ..
\ 3) Th;:: v2.,i;:J.~c~ Tiould otr3::n;~ th~ ~P!~t c~ ~::e O:-cEri~;",:c 2.r1d w'ould. 'no~ c:h~n('Tc ~hc ~haI::1c:t-' "
l l _':.."' .. 0 , ... ....r <
tile UJ3tnct D:::C2.~~: ..' .. .. "..... . .. -. . .
5 e '
_ - t.
r+:I
~.
/." ,~
, ,
/) 1-...; ~~'. t..v, J"'V1~;j J-:{. 'f
-\..(_ .':..1- \.... .. L
,"
- ,. --
, "
. "..:. .". ...
. . ;.. '.... :
, '
,.
.. e'_
..:
.. '-'.'
.....': .-:
.' ..,w
, A S'"O-r;-C.l~ /', T US4' pY'O"R-:--r.IT IS REQl' T"r.'=.T""'D "K':'"~''' t '"l-~cl~ -".. ..' -. '. .
u, _ ~ ~ ~ .1..:. , ~_,-Lh _ 1 u......oJ - 1:... p~. :>-,..:.. ~ ...n. - -_..~ sect10n or- sub-s~
tt0::1 ...,.._,____:-._""'? P~~'p'h _.....___.-:.._.__h. or th~ ZO:1~:lZ O.ruL!::..r.ce t~ pe~t the foilowil~o- t:
onth:: 2.bov.:: prc:rLm~: . " . _ ' .':,'...: '" _,'. '.". :' . V
.. . . ....... eo .. ": . ...-.....
..: '"..00 --. .:-
... . . .. .
. ... :-": ....: .~ .'...:
. .. ." ..
. .. -. ..- ,".
. .........
IN-r~RP.'1>'r""'-"-rTON f' 'Z .' 0 .' . '''t:, .
C. i .t.!: r....c.~' ) I 0 to'" fj~"'?' ---1o:12--rp IS -....(,.,;;S~". I V;~r-:US""
____:.... . _ ':;'" .." ..0 .\.J.-.. ....""- .1,..... j..- ..........'-"" ............... -. :..
, ,
.. .. ..
" "
, ,
, .
=- - -.. . -
~. .
d, AGGRIEVED PERSOl"'(S) ;?n :lpp::.:.l ;"5 r~q'~:s~=:c b-::C2.~5C:
" "
- .
. ....
. . ..
".
3, OTflER RE~1AR},~.s:
, . (\
.........-..-......-.-.---.-.-----..-..-.---.-.....--._.__....._...._._._..._--_.~_.:..------
".
._..._._.._...._.._._._ _. ......__........_..._.... ......__....____._._."_ ..:.... ......_.._ ___0____.._-_0._-
---"""---.-
-
NOTICE: Al?l?:::LLA~TS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS iiNODJED ,IN ~....
PUBLISHH:-G THE REQU)RED LEGAL NOTICE IN TEE tOCAL NE~'iS~APER: '" ~ - :' --~
I -, 0
.. :<
. :
,;'
.
,
Attachment
- D.V. Cummings (request for variance)
1) Our in-ground pool is no longer adequately protected because
of the storm sewer installed last year in the vacant area beside
our property. That area has become a playground for children who
play in and around the pipe. We have already had instances of
children climbing over our existing five foot chain link fence.
For that reason, we feel the existing fence does not provide
sufficient physical protection. Furthermore, we have lost the
privacy we once had in our back yard because the children are there,
and because the ground over the pipe just beyond~our property line
is at least two feet higher than it was before the area was re-
graded (as a result of the pipe installation). We feel an eight
foot stockade fence inside the chain link fence will solve both the
protection problem and the privacy problem.
2) There are only two properties adjacent to the vacant area. The
other resident does not have a pool and his property is not
affected as much by the new grading.
3) The fence will not directly adjoin a neighbor's property nor
the public street.
