441
.'
RECEIVE~ONING BOARD OF APPEALS
/, S E P 1 3 '1979 TOWN OF \V APPINGER
-.(': Ij t:..... ACTION ON APPEAL
f1/ r /ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appeal No. ...........441..............
Dated .$.~Pt..s~~~~.2r......J..).t.h , 197 S
A p p~llant ...H.~.i..g.~I!.grr;::J~....R.......G..e.;l;'.P..~.i.................................................. Address.............2B....B a1.d:1.in...Dr.ive...........
........wapp.ing.e.r.s...Ealls.~.....NY ......l25.9.0.....:............... ........................................................... ...................................................................
At it meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .................:...septeI:l:\p..~;J;....JJ.t.h..................................) 19...1.9...)
Appeal No.......4.41........... was considered and the following action on the request for: IX] A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO:\ING ORDINANCE) .
D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 \,"ould not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted. under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................~...................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district) because: ..................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district) because: .....................
.................................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................................
................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested variance Bee-~l'!:.-ftt-ed 00 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer lKl be confirmed [3-be'fev-er~:- PLEASE
SEE ATTACHED SHEET.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By re$olution of the Board it \vas determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied) pursuant to article ..................., section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and) therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed) because: ...............................................................................................
............................................................................................................. ........ ........................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................,...........................,........,...,........................................................................................................................
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ...................................................................... ..................................
.........................................................................................,....,......,.............. ...,...........................................................................................................................
....................................................................,.................,.... ...........,.............,.................................................................................................-..........................
........,............................................ .......................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal :............... ............ .. .. ...... .. ....... . ..... ................... ................................
.. ................... ............................... ...................
. .
. .
~~.
I' ..
... . .....(i;ir~:l~;"i.~.~i.~g~~rQ ~f.A~~~;i~.................
''iI
t
. . Appeal # 441
'"
-2-
september 13th, 1979
The requested variance is hereby denied effective
January 1st, 1980.
All operation of the retail business presently being conducted
on premises located on 28 Baldwin Drive must cease by January 1st,
1980.
, .