422
ONli\G BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \V APPINGER
u . RECEIVED
ACTION O~ APPEAL
/,;J .-1 t<- / t5
f.J.
Appeal No. _.....~.1:2..~...~.:......_
Dated .p'.~g~m1?~.F.....1.?~nl .1978
..
-
OCi' '1' P 1C7Q
1.::.t) C) ,::::It l)
A P? ~lb.nt ..R;:.lI....L.?:\W.~g.D.G.!?....c.9.h~n...~... p.:r..~:...g?:t~1.....S.9.hJttiMdfi~~wrrv;!fur~.l.:p'~.;r;.j;....~.~....RQQ~!:'t..?.~. E sq .
........R.Q.s.~nlo.....C;t'.?:\Xl~...&...WQ.l.t.~~n....-::.....ll...~\!?-.F.K!?.t.....S..!:f.~.~t.....7.....r..Qy.gh!.~.~~p..?..;t.~..c.....trl........lf..~.Ql~.....
At a meeting of the Z041ing BO:lrd of App~ls on ..................................p.g.Q~m:b.~J;'.....12.th..M........................j. 19...1.8...)-
f\.?p~al No.......4.2.2........... was considered and the following action on~ the rcqu~t for: 0 A VARIANCE1
lKJ A SPECl:\L USE PERi\11T, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE)
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
\
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict ;,.ppliC2tion of the Ordin-:tnce
o 'would 0 would nut produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question 0 would.O would not yield a re?...son:l.ble return if limited to the
use per'm'itted under the Ordinance, b-eca'.lSe: ............................................................................:..:......-...........................
.,
...
............ ....................................................... ............................ ..~......................... ..............................:.......-..........._............~..._.._...._-...-..........
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique ~d 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .....;....~.._..
.................................................................................................._..................................................,_........_................u..._............-........._........._.............
..................:..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .._....M...........
...... .......... .......... .... ....-.. ...... .... ...... ,........- ................ .............. .. ... ...... ............... ................. ...........................-.-.....-..-...........--......--...---.......-.-
.......... ......... ..................... .......... ............. ........... ........ ........... ...... ........................................... .~...u.. ._....., ...~. .............. ...~...... n. .... ..-. -........-..............-
Therefore, it was further determind that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous dec1:;ion of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
9.. SPECIAL USE PERTvlIT: l}y resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit lKl be granted G-be-deft.,~, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....~.?.~......., p?ragraph .........;I;-.?..................... of the Zoning Ordinance ttn-cl;-the,."'efo.re)H-re-tke1sien-,of.~E-1'l;-
~~~ -Offu:-€.':!' 8-00-re:v-e~8-OO-c-eft~rrrtedr~e-: ...p.1eas.e....see....a:t.tache.d....she.~j;'......
...........~..h................................... .... ........................ .., ... ....................... .. ...... ................ ............ ... ..........................1>.............-...........-..........-.........-............_.......-.f....
'. ...................................................................................................................._......................................._.~......_.......__...._..._...._._....M..~.___.....M.._...
~. INTERPRET ATI ON: The Board adopted the follO'wi ng resolution which stated its interpretatioJi.
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your app~al: .......................................................................................-.....M.M........
..................................................................................................................... -..................................................................-.................-......-........--..-.......-..-
.. .... .......................................... ... ..... ......................... .... ..... .., .................. ........ ..... .......... .... ............ .... ..... .........._.................................................."_..__._...u..'_'..
......................................................................................................................................................................-..............-...--.............-...............-..-....-.---.
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S); By resolution of the Board, the following decision was m:l.de on your
~peal: ............................................................................................... ...............................................................................-..................----..--.---.
-.....-........................................................:................. ....., ................... ..... ........ ....................... ........................................................................--...-...---.....--.
..... ........-..-......................-.....-.........................................................................~................................................--..-......-...--...........-.....,......-.-....---.--
~~~-
_........f).......~/...:...............~.._...~..._~....~~~...U~... . .
Chainnan) Zoning Boord o{ A~~;';I;-"--
1
Dr. Cohen & Dr. Sohn
-2-
December 18th, 1978
.
.
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE
~
TOWN OF WAPPINGER HEREBY RECOMMENDS THE ISSUANCE OF A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT to Dr. Lawrence Cohen and Dr. Paul sohn to establish medical
offices in an existing building located on New Hackensack Road, being
parcel # 6158-04-555308, consisting of 1.556 acres, in the Town of
Wappinger and subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the Town of Wappinger Planning Board shall
be obtained.
2. A work permit shall be obtained from the Dutchess County
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a building
permit
3. Any signs to be erected shall comply with the requirements
of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance. If said proposed
signs do not comply, a variance would have to be obtained
before signs could be erected.
4. Building plans shall be supplied to the New Hackensack Fire
Company prior to the issuance of any building permit for their
review and comments.
br
cc: Richard G. Barger, P.E. & L.S.
Dr. Cohen & Dr. Sohn
Dutchess County Dept. of Planning - Referral 78-229
Dutchess County Dept. of Public Works - William E. Bathrick
Rudolph E. Lapar, Engineer to the Town
New Hackensack Fire Company
Albert P. Roberts, Esq.
Robert G. Ruit, Bldg. Inspector/~ng Admin.
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk~
Town of Wappinger Planning Board