354 . ZONI~G BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF. \VAPPI~GER ACTION ON APPEtU. Ap;>eal No. ..........354................ Dated ~p~!~....~~.;..h.f.....~.?77 Appellant ...~...~~...~!.~.~.~y..~.....~.~~.!.............................. Address.................~?....~~~~....~~.!!.~................ Pishkill, N~ York 12524 .~ '" _... ..................... ...~., ....... ........._.....H........ _0' ,he ....... '0' ... ..... .0..'... ..........0 ....u... n. .0_. .... ......0..0 .... ...... _ ..... ..... 00.. ....... hO... .................... ........................... ..............-..................-........ At a meeting 0: the Zoning I)oard of Appeals on .................................ApZ'.U....12.tb.........:..........................) 19....1..1.., A ~.,1 "'54 . ..,- ..".:rl,..,...~d d tt. f,,'l,,::.'r.. -'_.:"'"l ~.' "" 1 t f . JlIn A V' RI ~ ,TCE ;>;>~'" J.,,~............................ '\\..~ C'....:>.~... an .lie vJ..~"".O <'.~.....- 0" lne r.qucs or. CJ Ii.. h..1"\ , o A SPECIAL USE PER~'1IT, 0 AN INTERPRETATIO~\ OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE) o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO~ (S)) was ta~en: ... '" I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance' o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ........................................................................................................r.-..... ..u....................................................................................................................-............................................-.........................-.........-....-........-.-.... b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ................... ..............................-.-,.,.-...............................................................-.............................................."'.......................-..:...........................-....,...........-.- ........... ....... ....... ......................... .....h........ ...... ... ....... ......................... .......... ........ ............... .,...............-............ ............................ .............................. .... '.... Co The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ...................... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................~............................._.- .................................................................................................................................................................................................-."'....-...............--. 'f.herefore, it was further determined that the reques~ed variance-B oc ~l A.lttcd [Jbe denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [!J be confirmedB 88 J'e':efsea. . SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request f S,peCl mit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article .......................: s..' r subsection .....................) p2.ragraph .................... ...... of the Zoning Ordinance an ore, the decision of the En- forcement (>.fficer 0 be reversed 0 be con, ........................................,............................................................... ......-..........----.....-.....-.... .........................................-.................................................................................................................-...-.................-....-......--..-....-.... . . '. ERPRETATI~N: The Boar~ ad.opted the follov,;ng resolution which stated i~:~pretation .- of the ZolUn ce as reques..ed In your appeal: ................................................~~........ s~~:~~=~~~~~ 4-. ~ON(S): By ~olution of the Board, the following decision was n your appeal: ....................................::.:::::~~........................................... ...............................-.........-...........-.....-.........-.-...- . . ~..... . ~~==~:'::=:~::::::~:~::::.:::::~~ . . _.~..._._~,._.~:.....-... (ju.. Chainm.n. Zoning }y)ard of Arr~--.._.....- ~ .... ~;...- ~.., ..- t , ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF \VAPPINGER NonCE OF APPEAL Appeal No. .!3..~5:...:i.._' Date ...._3.-:.'1:.9::1.7.._.... ........-.._ Appellant ... R?~E~_~~R~_ R~~ TV. I ~~-=-~~_~~_.~_~ t te r_~.~ res . )Address.-2.~.._~a ~.~_.~.!.:.~~i s h~~. ~..:.~.:.._ - -.-.-..---....--- . . -.-....-.........--.-.-..................-.--.....---.. .....__.-:_.__.___._...._.....__._.._....'......_....,....__."z.' TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I (we) ..,.~.~.f..~...~.!..tt~r........__._._.._---_........_....._...._.__.._----.---, appeal from a decision of the Zoning . (name of appellant) . . Inspector, dated ..............9.::.12.:-:......__..........., 19..:1.1......., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: fi] A VARIA."'lCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper on~'~~ l:6~~aJ ~tR ~~Sl~ted at ...Lot....#.6..,.CO+AeJ:.~....L..dss.a-.la~e.-~._.~9_r:!.~f~~_~...~?~~....--...~ES . . ;; .---N' ..-_:_- .' ~_s;~~~no~' {lot-_mr.-):~: ~onin&.distrietl':_ ~'-:~-;~:.._: . -~~~~~~~~";~:;;;:~~'i=:_~;;...:~~._-:,~..c" _.~_..~..~ - .- \'~~~_.~~.~_.:;'. .._~.. . __', _~.~~~:~~~,' . I. PROVlSION(S} OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ___....._.._.._.n..___~: .. . . .... -- ... . (indiCltC- VARIANCE' _.._..._.....______.__...._.a.....__..__..._._....._....__....__.._._...._...___._.._._-__.____..__..__...____' article, section or subsection and paragraph) '., ~~, . ...;.:. 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship betause: In order f~r th~_sign to be readable from a passing car it should be 4' x 6'2!" (25 square feet) " 2) ~h.e .hardshi~ created is uniq~e a~d i~ n?t shared by all properties alike in the immediate ViC!.".ltv nf thl!; oronertv and In t},IS dlstnct beCl.use: .. .....- This a sub~division and the problem would only be applicable to sub-divisions and there are no ethers in the immediate area. 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: . this request for a sign is temporary and would be removed upon completion 'of sales or 1 year date of approval of variance. which ever comes first. b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ..-.--::....-.., section or subsec.. tion ...................__........., paragrCLph ...........................,..... of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: . c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal i~ requested because: J. OTHER REMARKS: ...............-......-...................................-..--......_~_....._.~~......_._..~...._--_._-_.---...._.._..._._---..- .-.....--.---..-.--.......-.. (Use extra sheets if necessary) S' ~.:._.,., Ignature.......... ยท The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ......":C-.....; ....... ~ . ! ~.._~..... ..."- .. - ..,.,.....~ :-,-.... - _. . - . . .----.- ~. . -..,-.--- ---.- Ye1tenity y{i;,m,ej, .Ale. P. O. BOX 204 WAPPINGERS FAllS, N. Y. 12590 Phone 914--471-1234 Unit #44 ... RICHARD W. REISSLER President 3/26/77 Town of Wappinger Falls Zoning Board of Appeals Gentlemen: , Please be advised that Mark Ritter, of ROBERT-MARK REALTY, INC., is acting in my behalf and at my request as the appellant in this notice of appeal. ~or. - .chard Reissler Serenity Homes, Inc. ROBERT-MARK REALTY INC. 3-26-77 RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR SIGN VARIANCE - SERENITY MISSION PROPERTY I. Sign is to be set ba:k at least 35' f rom center of Mont fort Road. (fac i ng 110ntfort) on Lot #6, Larissa Lane, Serenity Mission Sub-division. 2. Sign shall look like enclosed sample and be constructed of plywood measuring 4' x 6'2." and be supported by 2 x 4s and be between 4 to 5 feet off ground. I \ \ :.1 , i l\ I: \\ Town Of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals 4. no illumination I .1 1 3. 24 hours of operation Mark Ritter President I l ~ \ ' ~ Q .2 '\"- , ... S FE ~ /3JI.J 1Ft {'(II $./ ON tJ6W SfC+lOtJ JJ()W of!J.> g, (,-1 (.0:> e fA slaIN HO"fJS II lI/t1lAJ). MAIN OFFICE (EVE.) 6 FL.OWER HIL.L. ROAD POUGHKEEPSIE. N. Y. 12603 {9141 462.6606 BRANCH ( DAY I 39 MAIN STREET FISHKIL.L.. N. Y. 12524 (914) 896-7600