377
...
EtVEQ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
OCT 18 1977 TO\VN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
377
Appeal No. ....................................
D d October 18,1977
ate ................................................ .
EUlME H. SNOWDEN .
Ferdinand zippr ich 332 Myers Comers Road
A ppellant ............................................................................................................................ Address.................................................................................
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 .
.................. uun ..... ..u... ....._................. ......... .... ...... ",.. 'n....... ....... ....... ,..,........ ..................n.........t....... ...".. no. ............ .... ...... ............ .............. ..........-........ H..............~.....
.' October 11 77
At a meeting of the ZonIng Board of Appeals on ..............................................................................~..........................,.., 19............,
. !,-ppeal No......~.??............ was considered and the following action on~ the request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
E9 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE)
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
\
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was detenni.ned that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question 0 would.D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
. .
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ...................................................."...................:.:..:.:__............................
.................................................................................................t......................:..............................................__...............:.__..........................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..........;.......
... .......... ................_... ...... ........... .......~. ....... ............... ..... .... n...... ............... '" ...... .... ................... ........ ...... ............... .......... ....._.._................. .........._...._...n...................
...............................................................................................................................................~............................_.....................h__.___..._.".............
Co The variance 0 would 0 would not .change the character of the district, because: .....................
..........................................................................................~....... ............................................":.-..........--..-.--..-....-..-....--.....-..
-.................................................................................................... .....................................................-...........-........-...-.......-..-.-.......-..
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer D be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: l}y resolution of the Board it was determined that the request Eor a
Special Use Permit ~ be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
_........._........) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore) the decision of the En-
i0rcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ............~~!~.~.!...~.~~....~::.~..:~~~._~~~~t.
................................................................................................................. ........ .....u..........................u...............................................................__..._............IH......
_......__..........................................................h...............................................................................................__....._..__......_....._1'...._..._.................
. .
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your app<;al: ....................................................................................................__..
............._............................................................................................................._........................................................._.._......_ '1' n 1 1 .._
......................................................................................................................................................................-..-...-..........-.-.................--..-.....-....
.............................................................................................................................................................................-........----.....................-.-.....-.--
... AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
ttnn - - · &.
...........c:a.1 ................................................................................................... ........."........................................--.........--..---.-.........-..............-.-...--.-
_.......................................................................n................................................................................................-.-......................-................___.___.._...__
.............-..................................................................................................................................................................-..............-.....................-.-..--......-
zn. .'. ~.l...) :c-t' .
............ .. ._~4_._.~_-d.~.y"",...... ..
~;i.nnan~ Zoning Boartl of App~ili.._..--
. .
I
.:--.'"
APPEAL * 377
Ferdinand Zippr ich
The Special U.e permit i. 9ranted subject to the following
conditions I
1. parking shall be moved onto 'the property of Ferdinand
Zipprich.
2. Sip shall be located on 'the proper'ty line and shall not.
exceed three square feet. in si...
~..u<37/
\
TO~~ OF WAPPINGER, N.Y.
APPLICA~ION # ;7~~
.~
RECEIVED BY/!J. A~ .~ L
FEE RECEIVE~ 0-0 ,t) lJ
OOTE
DATE
.,
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PE~~IT A~~/OR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
.
Title of Project:
Residence and Professional Office
Name a~d Address ofApplic~nt~
Ferdinand Zipprich
332 Myers Corners Road,Wapplnp:;ers Falls,'New York 12590
Intended Use: Residence and Professional Office for
Certified Public Accountant
Please specify use or uses of building and amount of 'floor area
. 'devot",d to each: Residence A,pprox. 875 s. F.. t Garage and
-
Storage S7S S.F. ,Office 300S.F. , Screened Porch 200 S.F.
Location of Property:' 332 Myers Corners Road, Wappingers' Falls, N.Y.
zoning District:
. .
R-40
Acreage:
1.01+ Acres
_. ~Ant.icipate~ No ..of Employees.:
. No. of Parking Spaces Provided:.
2 Max.
5 (Five)
...
...... ,.'
..~~~~(.~
App...~can.t .... --.
. , , DATED : --, #/$;/ h(: //.7 7
SIGNED:
". -,
T.
;
I'
Attached Site Plan Dwg.'A-1 Dated Sept. 29, 1977 Prepared
by Robert A. Arnouts, Architect