332
...
. : J--
(IUU-A RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
~/
JUL 231976 TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appeal No. .........~.~~.................
Dated ...,1..yJ..y....~.~.;.~A....)..? 76
Appellant ................~~.~!~9....~.!~9.~!~~.!.~.......................................... Address...................~~....~.!!......................................
Hughsanville, New York 12537
............................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..................................,~~y.....~9.~9.........................................., I 9.....?.~.,
Appeal No......~.~~............ was considered and the following action on the request for: [j A VARIANCE,
o 1\:~1'I~C;11fl.;~~J.Vll~L1~'NIF1tt'Jtmr~~~~rm.~Cl:=
,
'. ,0 ~'N'~~~5'~-xe~~~~~~~j,'rt!~n-:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would riot yield. a r~nable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, ~cause: .........::.......:::...~...:.....................................................................................
....n............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would.. 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because ~ ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
." ".J" ,
. '"
...............................................................................................................................................................................................,.................................
c. The variance ~mmt ~ould not change the character of the district, B!tm,~ .....................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested varjance ~ be granted ~and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer ~ff~ be reversed. * Plea..
.ee note below.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
l'tppeal: ................ ...... ....... ........................................ ........................ ......................... ...... .................. ............ ....... ........... ........ .................... ........... ............
............................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............b ~I.-......~:...~.&.:......................................
O"""'(J;;i:man, Zoning Board of Appeals
* Said variance i. qranted with the condition that the free-atandinq
siqn not be erected until the traffic liqht at the intersection of
Route 9D and Hopewell Road become. operational.
....
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No." ....J.3...~,..,....-
Date .......6/c:l....:l/Zf?.
Appellant ....8.~.N..TJ.!Y.~........Il.~.~.~..L......................,.................... Address....8...~.'!':::....3././......................... . ......... ....
JL v He"'-. \.~/LL.E- i N..~...~...............!..~...~~..~.7......................................................................................... .........
u.......ffY."".......""".~.t!:...................7'......... 'I"~
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) ..........i3.~T!...~.~......6..S.~.~..~............................................................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
'. " . \ v N e .2..".. 7 (", d d . ''1:." b I h Z . B d f' AI al
Inspe~tor ated ....\J.............................................., 19..............., an 0 nere y app y to t e omng oar 0 ppe s
, " f
for: A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPREtATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRlEVED PERSON(S) ~eck prz~
one), in connection with premises located at .........f?:T~.....9..~..:p..._.,......Q~P...l#.~~.l-.~.........??...*':......... -
. (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y. -. _--7 ~
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALEn)!!!e.~.............~4.............
(indicate
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................~..................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
':x:tST/~ Ser~'J!. })duN, ~tJ-W -F.kJNI r~LS~/))AJC.
Si~,J.
.~~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because: I":JJiJ.U hi /.nSfttr1P ~tJSIN/!flC"S.
IN hl<1i.~ ~. --, 1/
..
1
,
'';''\;.~'
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the district because:
i/?J IM/I2tn)I/h16AJ-r (AJ(1JJLb aE. I<I!f'At/ft l>
8y /#JTIN(,. ^ (l~ P~~lsS~(J7Vfn- S/&'N
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion ................................, paragraph ................................ of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
........................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................
.....................................................................................................
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Sig'"'turerJ,.L.t:LJ.----.~--..-.-..--..
* The reqUired plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
I
l