Loading...
325 I 0 L./ (} I /'JI1--' .Ct,h' RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS , APR 14 1976 TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL ELAINE H. SNOW DEI Appeal No. ......3.2.5................... Dated ..Apxil....14tb.......1976 Appellant .........~f.b~g...q9.~.!J.~.~.~.................................................... Address...........!....~.~~...~!.~....~.~~............... .......~~P.P~.~!....~!.~.!!.".....~...:r.~~........!~.~.?9.......................... ... . ...... ... ....................................................................................... At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .........................Apr.11....13.tb.............................................., 19......16, Appeal No..........3.2.5....... was considered and the following action on the request for: [] A VARIANCE, o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applicllition of the Ordinance o would 0 would not produce undue haf'dship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: .................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the sa,me use district, because: I .................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. c. The variance 0 woold 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ..................... ..................................................................................................,.............................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance [J be granted es.J~.':_j ..nd that the~evious decision of the Enfor~ement Office~ .LtlM"~ ~ be revler~ed. Var1lU)ce 1, contUg_t UpOn a oval trOll the BIl91ft... t.o 'fOWD Ul --ne. 911Way Su~j,ftt_ dent to 1DaUl'e tha there ue no Town e.a__ta an the property. z. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection ....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En- forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................ .......................................................................,..................................... ...................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..,..................................................................................................................,.............................................................................................................................. .... AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ........................................................................................... ............................... .....................................................................................;,.............. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................,.............................................................................................................................. ~~~fZ;;~Ap;;;j;......... .. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL Appeal No. ...<3cJ.....s.~.. Date ...M.a..r.~t.l...~.1.., ~ 9.16.. Appellant ....I~.~~.~n,g..Q.9.~.~.~!~.........................,.................................... Address.....1....~~.~~Jt~H.J~.~4.~.......... .........hWa.P.p.ing.~r....F.'.U.fi.....N.~.:?o....Y.Q.~k... ...........,. '.. ....... ............ '.... .......... ............. ............... ....................' ..... ........ ......... ........ . TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I (HI .............~.~.~.h~.~g...G.~.~.~~.~.!~~.................................................................... ., appeal from a decision of tbe Zoning (name of appellant) Inspector, dated ....................................................., 19..............., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ua A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at .....~...~.~~..~.~~~...~.~.".~......~~ep.~~~!.~..~~~~s.....~.~.:\YX~.~~... (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district) Town of Wappinger, N. Y. I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .......................................... (indicate ..tr.o.m...S~.c.tlQD...42.2...(Al.etbac.k...re.q!Jire.me.nl...)...... article, section or subsection and paragraph) ................................................................................................................ 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: See Rider A ,tacbed 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: See Rider A ttacbed 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: See Rider A Ltached o. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ...................., section or subsec' tion ................................, paragraph ..................,.. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) a'll appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: ........................................................................,......... .......................................................,................................................,...'.... / " , .,,/ 4.r~ RIDER 2. a. (1) Strict application ot the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hard- ship because the applicant is employed by a sales agency in Kingston, New York. The nature of his occupation requires that he perform a substantial amount or paper work at home. The isolation required to accomplish this wor cannot be atlorded in his home as it ia presently constituted. The applicant contemplatea the renovation ot his existing garage into a study or work area. This would alford the requisite amount of space and seclusion lor performance of his work. In order to protect his vehicle, the applicant proposes to build a car- port. The only Ieasible place to erect the same is the front portion of the residence as shown on the plans submitted with this application. The applicant's practical dUflculty is that it 1s the only 10caUon to erect such car-port to allord him protection tor his vehicles when his present garage is renovated into the necessary room. That, 10. order to construct the proposed addition, the applicant requires an area variance ot 25 teet on the set back requirements of the ordinance. b. The hardship is unique and is not shared by all properties aUke in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this distrIct because the layout ot the applicant's residence and the nature ot his employment requires the con- version of his present garage into a study and the construction of a car-port to protect his displaced vehicles. Also, the physical nature or the applicant's property precludes the construction of such car-port without the granting of a variance from the set back requirements. c. The variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not c~e the character of the district becauaethe<pretniseil wouLd sUll be l.Uied exclusively as a single family resIdence and a substantial set back would still be afforded.