No preview available
231 (I .... RECEIVED ...... APR 26 1974 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. ............2.J~............. Dated .Apr.i.l....2.G.......l'.74 ELAINE H. SrmWDEN Appellant .........JQlIapb1n......c.ftWiaoo................................................. Address......~.g.~....~~.~.~.....~.!.?...~................. ..................ftQ.p..~~.~.l....J.~g,.~Q!\ ,.....~~....y~~........,:.~.~.~.~............................................................................................................... At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .............................~p..~.~l.....~.~.................................................., 19.?.4...., Appeal No.......t..3l.......... was ronsidered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, o A SYECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRlEVED P~RSON(S), Was taken: I . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was deternl.ined that strict application of the Ordinance D WQuld 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: .................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. b. The hardship created D is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ..................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be granted l3"be-rl'enied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer ~15'eooiUirmed ~ be reversed. a.. r...r.. .lei.. 2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a S,pecial Use Permit D be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection ....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En- :fercement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................ 1. INTERPRET A TION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .......................................................................................................... 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your .pea.l: ................................... ...... ........................ ........................... ....-... ... ..... ........ ... ......... . .... ................................... .... .......................................... ~ APPEAL # 231 The variance is granted with the following restrictions: 1. Building plans shall be submitted and approved by the Building Inspector and these plans shall stay within the general framework of the sketch submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. The variance is restricted to the use of Josephine Caggiano, her immediate family comprising of her mother, and her sister and brother-in-law, Mr. and Mrs. Scher. When the use ceases to be needed, the building must revert back to a single-family house. ... .. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL Appeal No. ....0)..0.../.......... Date .......0/oJ...s..I?~. ,... . ~. C ~/ . .' ..IA A II . , . t { l t; . ,'" (::- {<' flV'" Address _~:~~,l;:'~;/:;::,~:y:~:::"":~,~.:'~"i".:'~;::;;::W.....t...t ... :::t:;,':.":':..:::y,':::::." .... TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: J;. ,,~.- I (we) ........:.......f?..~.:.~~.~.~~..............~:...:~..~....~~Jd..'Y!..~~.................................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning (name of appellant) Inspector, dated .I.!1A#...'....J.'-':...I................, 19..7'1..., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper buG' N' !, to" ., .:-< ~ ';;1 one) in connection with premises located at ................?.1.:...........f.':.::~!.U..:;......................':....I............................f.:-,....\"'........ , (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district) Town of Wappinger, N. Y. I. PROVI ONeS) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ................... .... .. .......x::ie,~I~,j article, section or subsection and paragraph) ( indicate 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: I r IJIiJIJ;J,.d Keep At;Ji SIS16A f1/.N€~ IffS8"INb -,r1t,~1 lWl/i. A't;ItIflfIlUY SIK'CG SHt I7A5 7"6 de WtTN (wR /HOlliE/? WHILE I fiM "r W,oRt. LIVING Uff;TAlrlS SHe CA4I 7II/tc CA Rf OF HeR Halite v- srI'" Pcofl/l.y A Hllt~'MINlIrf- AWlty. IN AbbIT#(JAIt I-Ie- I~ IeCTI1P1iVf; ,. f"N'e ALrfllltrlQ,v WdUt.t> /Je- lESS IE)/PENSt~E 1'1I1U,/ ~ 1701.1$6: 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: ()JJA. MOTHE!J IS it CAI21>fAC Rc-~v"l,,(G C()N~'rlJlVr CARE II NT> CAN" 0 T IJ C t.G P r IU.Clt/e-. 3) The variance would observe the s~irit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: /Ift'l S,/S"'~<" Hel/. HvsIJII~1 /Plio 'fAvE 110 CJlll.l>.ReN HAVE /JE"EAI S7~YI"'6 IIFflL WEEt:'E~S.. V.felfnoN!", if ,4k)IfT/fS oF TN!" Y~A~~,':;"A. AtfGl.IT f/7yc-AIS .-.14 (l e !CHOW'" n ~S'f QI iI't'~ IIE~ HIJoN.r" I F7#i- "UE RIt T1cA/ IS 1II'I'Ifo'tl4'/), W~ PI..IfIl JO''''r OWNE~SHtl' of 'THe (Jl/oPt'"It7"'X b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec' tion ................................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON{S) an appeal is requested because: J. OTHER REMARKS: .....!E.....(!f!~'!C?..~~.~.l.........!!!!L....!:.~.~~.....~...'!!..~~.~....~~...'!!r......~~~.~.r. Ii;" ......-..-.................-----...-............"....-.......................-................................___n......................................._........................._n...............................................___.......""...nnn_.. .The~se~~~~of~~~'+-_t:.~-