247
......-/'
~'l'
RECEIVEOzONING BOARD OF APPEALS
~ 9 1974 TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appeal No. ...~..:...:........................
~
Dated !,..i>..::.C..i:...L...:..................7 "'.
Appellant ......,.l........;..,;;.......~.l:... ............."'....... ....,\10... '" ...... ..... ............. ...... .... .... ...... Address.. ..? :..!..A.. ...'..:.. :...;..,.. :... ........,.~. ;..~ ...'c.. .... ...<;~..J.....
~" .. ,~',.,'_~". r l .,0. ',.r.,',,'#, Y(>l~- 'l2S't.O
............................-..................................k............ ............................................................................................................................................................................
A '.f h Z . B d fA 1 .; . e'~' '. ~ ,'. 'I
t a meetmg 0 t e onmg oar 0 ppea s on ....................................:..:..::.;....::!..:.:~.....;..........................................., 19............,
Appeal No....2.:;..'7.............. was considered and the following action on the request for: LJ A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o WIOuld 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicini,ty of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance f:I""\\'~ ~ would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted E3 'be ti-enied" and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer ~n&rnred. EJ be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
S,pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
I@rcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
]. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
a;ppeal: ....................................... ............. ......... ......................................... .........................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
\
r--- \.-
A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. 0l._p~2..uu_
SEP. 27 1974
Date 'UU'UU" ....u u..... .u. ..u.. u... u u.. ...
Kenyon K. S. Luo, M.D.
Appellant uu........tfapp~ieti~.;~iI~.~.~i.:.~.:~~2590............................ Address................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) ..........uu......~~~.~....~~!..u...:.~..r.:t.~......uPuuu.........u....uuuuu....uu.uu...uu, appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated .............u..uu.u...uu.pupuP.uu...., 19.......uuuP, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: EJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper "'
. '" OO_~r o-f J.U;.:lntJolo ~t(l. !h UillTOi.:; ,'!r1'V~
one), In connectlon WIth premIses located at ......u...uu....u..uuu..uuuu.puu....u....u.u.u......u.u..u.....uu.uuu.u......u.....u..........u......u.........
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .u..........u
....~~.~.~~~~.u.~.t....~~.~~~....-!~.?#.....p.~~9.~.~P.l.\....~.
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
.................. ....... ...... .........
(indicate
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
Ink\blltt,. of :rw. J:,.f~~;r.:ittentG to looct,te oftiee.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this !>.t<>perty aDd in ..this clistrict becau~:. . ..t.,.
I' _1,. .rJ:'"~O~,tr. Ii:.'-. "I.O~,J,. ~v ~,.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the district because:
f;~h. ~Ji6D wotll4 be ,"f.a~S.0t);\\1 .~81 ~4 not ob,PJt,!""..tCt
t......':floi O!.tt~ll ~nplo :;14. BUltop 'O"v...
b. A SPECI~ USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ...................., section or subsec,
tion ................................., paragraph .m......m.....p.....p..m. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
....--. -...._--- ........---.......--... ............................. ...... ......... ................ ... .......................... ............... .................. ..................----...
. .................. .................... ............--.......
.. .......................... ...... .... ....n._.h... ..... ....... ......... ....n....... ............... ..................................................... ....... ..........__........
(Use ertra sheets if n=ssary) Signature................... .... ................. ...................... .... ...:.L.,...':'-> ....().
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.