207
. ~ RCP''''
...
SEP 1 ~ lY/3
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
A 1 N ".",...,
ppea o. ..........h....'.j.................
".~ ~... t<),,.,,!,'... ,~;)~,. .....-'
Dated ...~.~7:.p.....;':':~:~.~::-:.....::-..~...t
1973
Appellant S.~f].n...~........fiiir....J..~.g~.t..9....f..~.:':.. ...~.~.~:~......................... Address....l~f..~}.~.~$.....7l.....~:~9.~.q...........................
....~.~...Q.~!.f.:..~~~}...J:~!.A.J..~.,.....N~ ...X9.,;-.K.......1.l.~.(~.1................................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .................................s.__Pt.~~lb.~:+.......J....1................................, 19..1.'J.....,
Appeal No.......?~.!........... was oonsidered and the following action on the request for: tJ A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applica>tion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hairdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 WO'uld 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to' the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
...................................................................................................,..............................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
TherefO're, it was further determined that the requested variance r:toegriii.Te'a e:J be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B be confirmed [j"bereversea:"" '*
2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request fora
S,pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to' article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
:(@rcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following reso1ution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................,...........................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
." bec".nl::~ t.l1i.':' hOUl"'ti: c:'.r:r,ot
dencribed \-JJ.tllmlt vl.olt'\tl.n(~ t.b{~
:<oning or,:tin.:mCi.::.
@(~()~
t. t:.t'in<:l"" ....... ...... ........ ..... .,. ..... ... ..... ......... ................. ...... ...............................
. . . Chainp~ ; ZqtJ,in& !\Qar~ .?,f A,pgeals
c..onr;.f..ruc,.t..~(' 0",1 ......1;,. .' c.t .. <.
~?utb;:1C~: ;Ct..'(,.'l\i::,,~L:8n;::f:: c
c
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. .......c2..0..-:?...-
g' ,
. '/ / ,J ,', :t .
Date .. ...?ly.tZ5..../d]'- of
Appellant 5(dlL.L"'l!..d..~d.!.fb.fl...&(:Z:J.l1rlLl Address/~..:.;?J:'.........Z(...gaLi,..
...............kkU.....U(lLlc:!1...../t.../6..r...A!.....i.........../1.~..?.7....................................................................................... ..........
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) 5tt(!!.....J~......~y!/..{......j/.ti/t!J......A....J5ff'/1..I.1.cJ....(J......, appeal from a decision of the Zoning
j name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ...............J/.ly........~./........, 19...7..3...., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for~~A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZO~G ORDINANCE, D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one) in connection with premises located at ....../?I4..~,...Jf.J~d.......d......./(/.............ddddd..Li!.e..dd
, (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED.dt"t;(!C(g
. -1" . (indicate
..........::Se..c.tI..QO............((~..~Z..................................... ....................... ......................................................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: /01- /.s
loctlle>c{ Ol} j//1/J;'~11e 5:(/'~el;' ;,t/I'fh /)0 /;'o/Jla,je ?"J
)'Jdh II C 5f/-f'-t' / O/~ AI:Jh U:/~UI'
2) -r:h.e .hardshi~ created is uniq~e a~d i~ n?t shared by all_ properties alike in the immedia~e. /
':"IClmtyo~ thIS property and III thIS distrIct because: 6(c:ue-a:-p/?T' //'cy:)(,,'~T'I /OC?(te.:;{ 0/7
/~t-({Yp'C .51/.e"rTt-t//c,( moST' //'C~P//1!/-es.. /n-lhe //h//7(-<:;I'.I'4/C'
J//C//J/ <:I 0/ -/-h/,S //\::/7e'/'''~Y ~ /Jd -:/7 //7' 50 /1/51",/ C 7' .a..fe ,/ar-e! /- e'':'/ Ch';?
J:h/jJ//C Sf,^,,,>d's m~eT'/;'lq Zc:.?/J/.I7q /t"'~<</rt' /77t't;;/:
/3) The variance wouIa observe the SPIrit of the Orfiinance"and would not cliange the character of
th~ district be~use: a/I ,'?7/Jt->~ 2c'/J/'.nj' d/)i< .6t.I/k/~~ /,?hO/-€/)Jt/,,7'--.:;
,P.// l>c' .-0t"'J; ~-'x("~/y/ //cnr'Cij'e c"-/ /::>/,/c'/-/<T~/ tb', 1/ ~c c:.:/!
/'-'/~/t,d r:('" Sf /'("'~';; /k' .-,t. /?<t" b;:'c S-//"'~e T d /' h~A' u.'li Y.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion ................................" paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
~ . / . A . h~ /0) .
3. OTHER !ffi~RKS;/'/(i<<5.r..~...u/...//..I.)c::....$..(.~.i.. ..Jr::L...d,(;!....gktfz:.:b.'!/.1..(.:i.L2...!....Z.....:....:<..~L..Li:I;; /
~l.-..r;.9..l.t.....fr:f!?J.,...lc.(!.?t...~.l.l/.1.e.......,..sQ._..1i~l....I.:../!...j![,:.~~.f!:./~:~...l.::.~:~.(/.~/j...(,~L!..f.t.'I.::..(~<I
n, / _I j ..Ie rtlt:.U( k f /A..-" 1/ ",-n-e"f'" /' Z", Ai .l'1J'" /'7t:</ /("'.07--"'("-/';77:.5 /}
(u extra h . f )' /1 i.., // I~'/
. se s eets 1 necessary Slgnature..................n..........................................L.r(,:~.v.r....,(: -.""4c'.J"- -;1<-1"<':,'<-',
* The reqUtred plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. /