141
..
~ " ,^J
, 1.'
j/
I
RECEIVED
2 1972
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ..........141...............
Dated ...Mar.ch....28.....1.9.72
ELAINE n. SNOWDEN
Appellant ........ViDCEt...C......blley...................................................... Address.........8...n11lon....cOW;,.t,.....................
..........'H~PP.WK.....r.all.........tIew...yor.1t...................................................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ......................................Kar.c:b....28........................................, 19...."12..,
Appeal No.....~4.1............ was considered and the following action on the request for: iii A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution ()If the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
[) WIOuld ~<IWt produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................,..............................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alik!e in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................'"
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance ~ [jI would not change the character of the district, because: .......b.....
.~~...~Q.P.......9t.....~....hou.....wil1...r._iD....t.he......................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
~herefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be gra:nted G..e."ietland
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer Etbc ())ft~rrr=J.<<J be reversed. (S.. Attached)
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
S,pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
larcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .......:....................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ........................................ ................................................................................................. ......................................................................................
~q;cA:[~om
/'~ Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
;.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal NO'.
Date
.........11/.....
I
Appellant ..................................................C.~.....k..~ll.~:.:y;.............................. Address...;;;.: ....Zb.lM).;'.{.....~~...~......
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
y
I (we) ....j</f.:.f:..~It*.:l:l.t.....~.!.....K.f':'.lt~,.7"................................., appeal fram a decisian 'Of the Zaning
(name 'Of appellint)
Inspector, dated .....i-;;~:.l;:;.......J.,!;j..............., 191:..:1:..;...., and dO' hereby apply to' the Zaning Baard of Appeals
far: ~ VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check praper
one), in cannectian with premises lacated at ....~'ir...z;:::,~:I!..,.......c...r-:. ......................./<:..~4f?
(street & no.) (lot na.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .............
( indicate
......................... ............ ................................
article, sectian ar subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Camplete relevant section).*
a., A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the fallawing reasans:
I) Strict application 'Of the Zaning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all praperties alike in the imme!iiate
vicinity of this pr9perty and in this di~trict because: /"''1 J'1u:III,,.,. t"'; In ,'I';I,y
t.t,.~ Ii" IHft' .1ft IIIYS ~ifI'#" t...r lA,. ,;;;;;,.,,<1 d'" V"".''''S ..$' t"".f''::..,_
f(!,t "" ,,~. l"..",,,(. ,., ""':":,/1#"~ /I"''J~''. tyrjil)y I'~>r ,;: J##-" .,
3) The variance wauld observe the spirit of the Ordinance and wauld nat change the character 'Of
the district because: . r~"., iiltltlbe ij '*1;(; "..~#+"'# r')'''/ ~,f"\T~ ~'J*~"y.
f../~'" 16. ~"'';'$ q,lif/14 w..; I~E ''l~':;tA'd. Iw7' 1''' ': Vf!'h ~~ \.!PE;." 11..e ,
b. A SP~il!&t p~;~ii~E~ti':::= ~icl:~~::~o~ ~r'su::tl
tion........................., paragraph...... of the Zaning Ordinance to' permit the fallawing use
an the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
]. OTHER REMARKS:
. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .
...................................................................................................................
."
.............................................................................::::;../~:':........................................................................
~ f \_-/'.
,# , x: '
(Use <JOtra sheets if necessary) SigflJJ.tufe/f<~~/!It!!?-:~...
* The required plan must accompany the Natice 'Of Appeal.
/'
..
.
vincent C. Kelley
-2-
Appeal # 141
At the March 28, 1972 meeting, the zoning Board of Appe~_s
further stipulated that once the need for the variance cease&
the residence will revert to a one-family dwelling unit.
't
,