169
>'~
RECE:,\~~a
o C\ \. 1972.
'ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ..........1:.~~...............
Dated .Q9.~~~!-....~.!.....~!'2
Appellant lti:.8nen....hi:lde~...,.....IMh............................................. Address..~.;l1...~9!.!.~....~~.~.~....~.~~.~.......
.......w.-.iftqe~.....aJ..l,........M.. Y-..........125.9O'............................................................................................................................................
~.yP:"'.. . . 3 72
At a meetmg of the Zomng Board of Appeals on .........................octo.H:r.........................................................., 19............,
Appeal NO.......:l~9.......... was oonsidered and the following action on the request for: tJ A VARIANCE,
('
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 11
U
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution ()If the Board, it was determined that strict applica.tion of the Ordinance
IiI would Q.ar__nld ROt produce undue ha.rdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question G~ ~ would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use per~itted under the Ordinance, because: .........~.~~...~~~~~:.....!.~~~.:':............................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by ,all
properties a:lik<0n the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because : ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................-...............................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance Cl be ~ra;nted crbtCkni~7rand
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer (]15!'Mi'll'Fmea [j be reversed.
I.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
$pedal Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to arti~e ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
iercement Officer '0 be reversed 0 be confirmeq, because: ................................................................................................
.... ............ ... .~......... ................ ........ ....... ........ ......... .... ....... ............ .... '" ........ . ... ...... ...... ......... ...... ......... ............... ......... ...................... ........................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .............................................................................:..............................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................~......................._...
. .
......................................................................................................................................................................................................10...................'.........................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................'~............................................
. / '\>
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
.,pea1: .............................................................................................................................................................:.................................................................
..............................................................".................................................................'....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....~~~1E ....~
Klassen Builders, Inc.
~
Appeal # 169
Appeal # 169 is hereby granted by unanimous vote of the
zoning Board of Appeals on the basis that strict application
would produce extreme hardship if the house now constructed
and occupied had to be removed.
~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. .....~"..'l...........-
9-25.12
Date ............................
Appellant ......~~..~~...D.~!.~'-~.~.f......l~.~.~....................................... Address..~.I.!.....~.!.\.'-~t~....~Jl.....~~~,...
............~~J9~.M...!~....r.~.~:.\~.'-.....~.~..Y..~.....;.?$..~................................................ ..... . ..................... ...................... ........ ........
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) ...........~~~.~...~~~~~~.~.~~.....~.~................................................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ......................................................, 19..............., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: EJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at .....~.!....~....~.............................h......~~............. .............~/1l.20
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ..............
.1,"101. tv, SeG'lJ._ 422...t'A9T.... I
(indicate
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEll (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict a~cation of the Zoil ~ould produce und~rdship because:
Y.QO 111.., 10 1 ... . "'R1E to or oe~*"Y
baa __ 1.... lily .. B'td.14I.. ..........
2.) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this Rroperty and in this di!~t =~: ... '1 ....._ ... _ ...... ~110._
'I'M .cr.- In..~* .. __ -'"'" -........ .....~-
....l.1.la9 vas ....,.1...
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the district because:
't'f)f'.t ~ll. u.., i. e),"j.su..,.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursUant to article .................., section or subsec..
tion ............m................., paragraph ............................ of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
.u____._____uu...u..n___...u._____._____..........................~.u...u....._.._.__.._........_...__.__.._.........__.................................__..__.................._.....u...........u...._....._...
__.___.._..__..__.....___u_...__._..._.....___..__._.....__....-..........___.__.____.._..u_.....__._.....__...._......__..._u.h_____.._..__.._____._..............._n..........n...........n....._........._.............................._..___......_.........__n__.............
~~:Jt.i>.... :~,~.1~
,'j iJ .," ", A.4I
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature.....'m.'....~....m...._:....~._\,_.~~~:::..,:;':.::l_,..~~f.:.ft:'.............m
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
