No preview available
138 ~..~ ,-. cY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. .................+..:?.e......... Dated ~p;J;::.;j,.l....J.l........l.9..7.~ Appellant ...M.~..~....M.g,;J;::.t..i.n...Lg.Rk.Qw.......................................................... Address....Rout.e....82".....B.ox....2.5..7................. .........~9.P..~~~.!..+.....g,~.9.t!9.n........l.;J.~W...YQXk.......12.5.3.3........................................................................................................................ At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .................................................Apr.il.....ll..,.....1.9.7.2........, 19...7.';..., Appeal No......l..3..8............. was considered and the following action on the request for: 00 A VARIANCE, D A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: I . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance o would 0 would not produce undue ha:rdship for these reasons: a. The property in question D would D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..........Se.e....at.tache.d...r.eso.lution..................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. b. The hardship created D is D is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. c. The variance D would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ..................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 'fIherefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be gra:nted 0 be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed. 2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request fora S,pecial Use Permit D be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection ....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En- J1ercement Officer 0 be reversed D be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................ '..................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution wfti€.ft~its-~~fetQ4;ie9 aFtIW~~~raiiiiriCeis~e(4.~~&1t ....and....fur.the.r.....rei..ter.a.te.$....i.ts......... ..P.;J;::.~.Y..;i,ous....de.ci.sion....to...:wit.......................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................-.............................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................,.....,................................................................................................................ 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your a;ppeal: ..................... ...................... ........................................ ............................................................................. ............................... ......... ....................... .....................................................................................................................,........................ .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ RECEIVED A.PR 1 2 1972 ELAINE H. SNOWDEN Chairman, oning Board of Appeals f~ .. . Martin Leskow -2- April 11, 1972 A motion was made by Mrs. Waddle, seconded by Mr. Cortellino, to adopt the following resolution: The variance is granted subject to the appellant following the recommendations of the Dutchess County Department of Planning which consists of changing the existing roadway pursuant to the Dutchess County Department of Planning Letter dated February 7, 1972 and the attached map, which will alleviate the traffic hazard along Route 82, lessen the line of sight problems entering and leaving Route 82, and alleviate variance requests for the other lots with the exception of Lot # 7. The variance for Lot # 7 is hereby granted. Motion Unanimously Carried