156
I
u
'.
RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
J U L 1 2 1972 TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .......1.56...................
Dated ....J.uly.....ll.......l.9..1.7
.
II<
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant ....~.~.!....~:~.~.~.....~~~.~.;................................................................. Address........l....~.+..~~.~....P~;.v..~..................
.........:.;:.~.p..P.~.~~;:.~...f..~l~..~.*.....~~!....J.Q~~.......J?$..?9............................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...............................;J'.~l.y....JJ...................................................., 19...7..';..,
Appeal No........}:.?~......... was ronsidered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, lID AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution ()If the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hairdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
.............................................................................................................................................................u...................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................'...............................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be gra:nted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request fora
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
fercement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ -.....................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .....~~.:~:....~~.~~:~~...........................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-..
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
IiPpeal: ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......~....m........mm.
Chairman, Z ning Board of Appeals
Attachment to:
""
Zoning Board of Appeals
Town of Wappinger
Notice of Appeal
.
Appellant: Rita Ruder;
June 8.. 1972
.
An interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance regarding a specific definition
of "~auty Parlor" is requested in order to permit the following:
Install a small office in a portion of my home sufficient in size to
handle a single client at a time and engage in the home occupation
of cosmotology and hairdressing. I do not plan to operate a Beauty
Parlor as conventionally understood or defined.
It would seem that engaging in the occupation of cosmotology and hairdressing,
a profession "in which I have been licensed for the past twenty years, in a
portion of my home on a single client basis falls within the definiti,on of
"customary home occupation" and is not in conflict with the general purpose
and intent of the zoning ordinance regarding secondary use of my dwelling.
An individual.. such as myself, engaged in the public practice of cosmotology
and hairdressing, qualified, licensed, and regulated by the State.. and offering
skilled services to clients is a professional in every sense of the word as
are Chiropractors.. Doctors.. Engineers.. Lawyers, etc. As a professional
I feel that I should be able to pursue my profession in my home within the
other Articles of the Ordinance as do the Chiropractors.. Doctors.. Engineers,
Lawyers.. Etc.
An early reply is requested so that I may proceed as petitioned.. or if
refused, to carry the matter further with the aid of legal counsel.
^.'
ae~JUne8.
1972
Rita Ruder
1 Ardmore Drive
Wappingers Falls.. NY
.'
1
~;/
~ . '. ) . .~
/-< ' '/ - '...
/"
.-
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ......I..~.,..........-
Date ......~~.~....~.~......~.~.?~.....
/
..
Appellant ..............~.~~~...~~.?.~.~............................................................................ Address.......~.....!'!:-!:.~.~.?~.~... P~.~y..f!.............. ........
Wap. Falls. NY 12590
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) ....................................~~.~.~...~~.~.~~............................................................................, appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ......................................................, 19..............., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, l!] AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at ....~...~.~~?~.~...P!.:~.y..~.~..}.~~...~..~...~~.:p..#..??7.~~....~.?.~.~.~..~:.~5
. (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ..................................................................
(indicate
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2.. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2.) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immedia'te
vicinity of this property and in this district because:
~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the dist,rict because:
See Attachment
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion ................................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
:'
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: ~,
See Attachment.
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
........................................................................................................................................................................................
See Attachment
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
Signature....~.....~m........m
Rita Ruder. 6/8/72
lvi!' 'S'. hi t
7'" :')oc cd, ~
f,uder
156
...2-
July 11, 1972
In regard tOAppe~l ~; 156 seeking i1j definition of a
Beauty Parlor:
It is the unanimous opinion of the zoning Board of A9peals
thi'lt a "beauty par lor It is a business or establishment '-lhere a.
woman or possibly .::'\ :tnl'!tn ma.i' :c",C-:'..l.\ _ ;;:, hairdo, manicure and
other benuty tre~tment regardless of whether this OccUP^tion
is COlh.1JCi':.o'!.i on a y.,in<: h.t O.t' multJ.pl.y client basis, the services
and skills performed by definition shall not be de~ned
j',n()j..e oc.:un;4i:ion" and" t.he;r:efore, subject. to auidelines set
forth in Section 220 of the Town ot wappinger ~oninq OrdLn,mce.