119
~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ..............lJ.9............
Dated ........Jul.y....1.,.....l.9.?l
,
Appellant ...........Pe~eI!'.....ncI....UyiO....Iku!9..801.i.................. Address......................OJ.d...aOVt......g...................
........r1.hk1:1.1.,........,....'YoI!''k...... ........................................... ............................... ............................................................. .....................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ............................................Jul.y...2 7-....................................., 19.1.1....,
Appeal NO..........}.lt....... was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, kJ AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
Ii] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applica-tion of the Ordinance
o WIOuld 0 would not produce undue ha;rdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
...................................................................................................,..............................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
S,pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
:Eercement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................. ............. ........ ..............................................................................................................................
........................................................................................... ..,....................................................................................................................................................
J. 'INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ....I.t....1.8....th....op.1nio.n...o.f....t.b.~....~~Jng
Board of ..~.al......th.at....t.h.....tU'm.....~..m....V...~...........g...4.....$..;n....s....~.~~....4.~J..!!.~....~.~~....~.~....~~fined
in S.ctJ.on....2.20.....40.....no.t....apply....1n....tb..i.8.....,inf1:t.Me.-............Tb...~.......~".i.;;.~.J:.'.,...M.......g.9n:~J~...~ed
cIcae.~1Q....~.......m4......~....tb..........v......DQ:t.....I:...tx.i.q~....~p.....~...~~....~~J~~~....!~ the
Town of Nappinger, it 1. a peraitted u...
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: .......Utl4...!:....tb... ...~.~.~.~...~.~c:..~~.,.....:i. ~.... ~..lIJ.....i;~.......~p!.~.:1.9.~....9.~....~~~....~~~.~~.9.............
.......8Q..,,~.4.....Q..f....APPI..l... ...~b~.t...y.o.~ ...b.~.V" ...m>.t....~..."....~gg.r..t...v...~....~....'-....~...~.~.,.~~....qf
..........tb.......~o.n1ng:...^~.,,~..~~,.~~~.~................................................................................................................................................
~ci-:~~..~(.....
--
A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ...........ll..r...............
Date J~~f....~.'....~~.~~.........
Peter and Livio Burg'azzo1i Old Route 9, Pishki11. lC.Y.
Appellant ........................................................................................... ................................ Address....... ............... ............................................. ............"
.......................................................................................................................................................................................,.......................................................
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) .....,~~.~....~~....~'!.~~...~9.~~:!~.......... .............................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ,~~.~.....~~.!L......................., I9.~....?'~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~ AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, liI AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at .Q:1,..c::I....~~~....?.......................................................... .......~2
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
See 421 Para 17,
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ....................................................
( indicate
See 421 Para 3 (also definition of fara uae and definit.ion or .tab1e)
..................................................................................... ............................................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the dist.rict because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ...................., section or subsec'
tion ................................., paragraph.......................... of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: It is felt that the
zoning AdIIlinistrator was wrong in granting approval to keep bor.es
on this parcel.
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: Permis.ion va.. given by
zoning Administrator to keep horses on property adjacent to our
residencea.
See attached.
J. OTHER REMARKS: ........................................................................................................................................................................................
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature.......f~.......~~.~......
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. / ~ ~~
.
ill
, .
Attachaent to Notice of Appeals
The property adjoining ours was recently purcha.ed by Mr. Robert Kowalski
to house hi. .eltagh Enterpri.... Mr. Kowalski i. remodeling the building
on the property zoned ccmmercial and i. using it commercially (a furniture
bu.ine..). Be maintlain. three hor.es on the premises and stables them in
a building on the property. OUr interpretation of the zoning ordinance
i. that at least ten acres are nece.sary to harbor hor.e. and this
parcel is less than two acres.
Mr. Kowalski has verbal permis.ion fran Mr. Ludewig to stable the horses.
Mr. Ludewig interpr.tes the u.e of the land as a farm and therefore
hor.es are allowed. This i. the reason there is no need for a variance
according to Mr. Ludewig'. interpretlation.
The horses are a nui.ance and have jumped over the electric fence
twice in the short time they have been there. The last time they
jumped the fence (June 30, 1971) they went into Peter Bur.azzoli' s
garden and ate the carrots and letteuce and are thus now destroying
property besides being a nuisance.
We are requesting clarification of the legality of Mr. Kowalski to
maintain horses on the parcel and feel Mr. Luc!ewiq was wrong in
classifying the land as farm use. The major use of this property
is to donduct a business and no one i. on the premises at night
or on w.ekends and no one lives on the premises.
..
Appeal :# 119
-2-
November 9, 1971
Mr. Hirt moved that in relation to the Appeal of Peter and
Livio Burgazzoli the ZOning Board of Appeals qoe. on record .s
reaching the following factual determination upon the .vid~nce
presented at the original public hearing and upon the evidence
presented at the subsequent public hearing held on October 19, 1971:
1. That Robert Kowalski or aeltagh Enterprises, Ltd. did not use
the horses, which the Board has cla..ified .s dome.tic pets, in
relation to any cOJI1Dlercial acttvity.
2. That Robert Kowalski or Beltaqh Enterprise., Ltd. doe. not
u.e .aid hor... for rental to the public or in any manner relating
to a us. pertaining to a public stable.
3. That said horses are used by Robert Kowalski and hi. family
for their own recreation and pleasure.
'l'h. motion was seconded by Mrs. Waddle.
Mr. Gr ahem - aye
Mr. Hirt - aye
~r. Ralaka - abstained
Mr. Jacobson - absent
Mr.. Waddle - aye
I-lotion Carr led