Loading...
045 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOvVN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL " IN' L,- .'"l,ppea l o. """":,;?"'""""".".",,.. Date ".3./.1.4./9.9..",,,,,..,,"'.."',,..... A 11 -. '~G' ;',.,,, T ,., 'DD ~ppe ant .,~,~,'-,.~..','".,N..,:...,..:.-!,,,,,.\-I..9,,....\.!."'.,~.\ ......"".."'''"."'''"..,.....,,,,,,,,.,,...,,,...,,,,,.,,, Address TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: 1 "1 "r;:'"v Doc'~- 'Qo"'d ;:t~DD."" F 11 1\-. Y - 1 ..""."..""""':,~.-::-..'::',::~.~~.\......,;';......'::',,::.,,.:-:,'..,,.'?'..,:-""".....~.9:~"..,,::,~~g~J...~..,,,.. a" , S, l~ ew o.r ~<:: .... .......... ............................................................................................................. ................u.............................................................. T (T'T"'\ l.c/:.=W X8.B'r J. C ,l';::m I f~ d: . , . .I.. .::...vJ """'''"..".."''''''"."".."''''"......."",;-:..""..,,,..,,..,,...,,.,,,,,,,,....,,..,,,,""....."".."'".."'".""..."...,,., appea J. om a eClSlOn of tne Zonmg (name of appellant) Inspector, dated ....""...."......,........"",..,......,....."",, 19"..:".,,'''''' and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of A..ppeals ror: [J A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, m AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check praper ) . " h . I d f: lb' p '--;:;' , ~ 'One , m connectlOn WIt premIses 'Ocate at ...",L"""an.Y.."~..Q9..Y..".7.~.Qa.Q."..."..".......".,,..........."..........".""."~1~2'O'"..,,....... (street & no.) (lat no.) (zoning district) 'f' 'W' NTY ~ awn a... appmger, 1. . 1. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 4:16..,..o35"..ar"d"..!+.1.6..a.o3.4- - Seed en 416t 05, S e c. #422 ~0-:xZt:.';~'XLtt)).::n(XIit:nJ' (ind:caJe if ~Xj.q.Y.l.g.~.....9.+"..r0.?+, r..,. ..l,Q.t.....l..1,ne.,."0,f:.,..1.6.f.:t,,.....a,nd.....:i.:f.....n,e,c.,e,$..s.ary....l0....ft......v..ar..{,anc.a....o f article, section 'Or subsection and paragraph) front yard. 2.. TYPE OF APPEAL (Camplete'relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the follawing reasons: , r) Strict application of the Zonipg Ordinance would p-raduce undue har~ship because: Pe'~.: t~ O1':.e:." presen~~y conQUC~S a grocery B~ore on her sa~d prem~ses oy v~rture of a-non- _ cOnfOi."2~l1g use. Because the State, under -its pO'.'Jer of em~nent dOL,a~n.,. ~s tak~ng a port.:on of her property, pet~t-ionerls store bu~ld~ng w~11 be deuol:she2 and c.est:c'oyedp.,.." COD$8QUently, unless she ~s Derm,.~te;; to erect.a ne,:, s,tol~2,.bu-ild~ng on ~ler-2) L'1e harcishlp created 1S umque and IS not sharea DyaD propertIes alIKe 111 the Immecilate 2:e:.:2. ~ n-" ng vicinity 'Of this property and in this district because: __ land,she Pettt.:oneT has the only grocery store bus.:ness ~n the v:~ll oe area ~n quest.:en, ana such bus~ness w411 be completly destroyed put out unless the Var.:ance -is granted. of bus -i sf3 8:11t variance would 'Observe the spirit 'Of the Ordinance and would nat change the character of the district becaus'e: Bus~ n"'!ss use oi'- prell-i ses has been C8.rr~ ad on for at least 15 years and ex~st-ing non-conferm~ng use would not be changed, except w-ith respec~ to locat.:on of store bU-ild-ing.- Tfl fact, proposgd new bu~ld4ng lQ." ~~ ~n~~ ft+~~~n+.v~ ~n~ COM"ac+ +~an ex.s+.n~ o~e -and ~~~el'~~+ ~.'l ..... ..l..j'- we ~..v..:.. c: C. II t.J..:.. .;;:,~ v'"t \.,;;< 0..1. '-4. .-.}l......... v v.l.... _., \.I.,... c ....., _... Cl.}.MJ_..; ..:..ctJ..J.l...J ~I......... con.r,ly ';-,T.'r-.. ,'O-n.,\r ~'"~.'''' 111."'''''' ""e..a~"prJQ"'~ .....such ':lS sCl>.ean.:no et", ~ D. .A. S?ECT}{L US.t. PEKlY1IT 1S KEQ u'"E,:, ll!lI pur::"'ua~.t'lt to af6cfe .....:".~.:?.L..., ::;e-celOn 'Or subsec~ tion.............................., paragraph......,......................... of the ZOlling Ordinance to permit the following use an the above premises: ~,1. 'J~: '-: ~\1 G B 0 ~\l--=tD v c.- ::.:~>>~EI~::?:.R::s;f4'f~)J 'Of the Zoning--~~n.1ffl~rs requested because: The prpsent bu~ :!.d.: ng ~n ~h-'ch t~2 p~=3Gnt non-conform-ing use is-locatea ~s be~ng -involuntarily cOITve~tsG &2d a~ ~nterprGtat-'on of-the Zon-,ng Ordinance of the Town of ;'."-,)..^,.,.,'.'.~'" ~'.-r:'_ft ~"." .'1'10 '0' Y' ~-y..." ?on.'nO' "oP'Pd-.s ':"lr.::cessary +0 "110'" ""econs+r"c- '''L.oi.:... ~.J-' ......;..::;;;;:;..:.., c......~u. C1. ..... v.":"" .1c v..:..l.c; ..:..J~.... - -....0 D '........ ., .l....._ "" '-"- \;;. .. u U. +.,...,01": """.:- .:-:......., ~~,j,.'1rl.~r: f""''Y"'I; ryrl-t-.+.~V'\,~..(...lC'l r ~ .~.n;Y l<'jr'l.~ v, ....." d~j~ AG'GRIEVE~D"1P:2Rs'ON'~Syan~appeai i:r reqligstecl~5~cfuse-~~~u 3. OTHER REMARKS: T,t"..should....be....no.te.d....that.....the....non-co-nf.0-rm~.ng....us-e....w.,..ll not - -- -" ---_c. -----:,r ,.c.]'" '.~';" -SE:..:S::::'~"::; (:.. .0:.:' -..s:: 'j -'.eo. ;"..:6 -2::9' "0 U"C'" T::: .1+., DS -. C?~l":..,;?e.d:....on....{Tl....C~....::G':.:.5.....:::0:..' 2 attrac~::vc s~ructura~ relocat-ion Of-S2-"d ~se be-"ng =ada necessary by afora- conds~n2t~on proc2ed-"ngs. Su~ely, ~t liQuId be unreasonable to use str~ct aDnl-'cat~o~ of ~~e zon~n~ or~-"n8.nce to destroy a grocery store ~hen there are . - (e se extra sheets if necessary) Signature _........ .. ....~..,..,...... .................................................................. S t -' -ry.-'J // "-.:... Ii ~ ' * The required. plan must accompany the Notice 'Of Appeal. 4 gna U?~ ,- /O/1'~' {/' . /,.;" ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL ..-,,::., /i Ii _-:.:.- _ ~."' '- -'__ '- .f . Appeal N o. ..........:-::::..........1......-l~ Date , < Appellant . ~_ U~;:: J.. C.:.\.7.D Address.........~.~.:~.~.~:!..-...~~.~.~.:.~....~:.~.~.~.~..... ...... .............................................................~:..~:??~.::~:~.::.?.?.~~.~?...~......~.~:.~~~....:!..~.:~ ................................................................................................. TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I :(;;;.:0.) .............}::I.:.;.~:.7.~::..//....J..~....g.:.7P;-.?..........................................................................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning (name of appellant) l,-I Inspector, dated .......~.?:::~:??:.~....??..'............., I 9....~?...., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (c~~ck,..proper one), in connection with premises located at .~::.~1?~.~~~...??~.~~....~~.~).~~.~..'............................................................~~:.~~.~............. (street & no.) (lot no.) (zonir:g district) Town of V\Tappinger, N. Y. 1. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED \"'6 ,,"\,,",\~.1 ...l-L . v.;;;; ( indicate article, section or subsection and paragraph) 2.. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: I) Stfi~.t.~pp~isat~?r:,~J ,~~~ ~9.ni~g,.9!d41~RC~ ~ouJ)1;gr381Wcyun8Je 88ttS~bp.::s~S'-rte_:l ~JJ:-OC0~d.::'r-=::; .:::.~~C::: i':, u i:~~::~::; :L~~~.,~~-..,~~~l~ ,_ ~.".;I..=.))~..._~*~~;~.;~;O ,,)~;~~~t t~~ ~~n;~~~~O~~:;l~ ~~~~ t'~~,~ ~;. ~ ~ :"'':C~~'C :.:>~.:.3::..~~:~..~.J~.? ---~--- _. - ..... ......- _ ,.' . .~, ~ r. ..' -, ~, . ..:..:-.~....J.:':~-:..:..._,,'., ~~~C 0 2.) The hard.ship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this prop.er..~Y .?-p,cUll. t~)~, .slis~.i~~~b.ec~llsoe.:.,.,.. ",'''",i'"",,,,,o',,, .' 'n .l.'~ r:" 'Ii'" .~., ....,., ':-"..,. ...:...0i!..J..l.J.......;.,,;...:.v ......~~,j ..,J}..-.._.y J.J v ..L......, ...I\~.\,.o....J_......VlJ..jioJ ~.-... v.L":'~v .....v_..._ V.,j "-~.-" .:~,~:..,...,~~'c,'"'\.":"',c-;~ \"'<1":; 1."-,~ c~",~~"!""l'=-';,+"~''''''';J rli;~,-~..:-,"'f.o"';~rGd. ur.loss t":c vc..:~it;:l_cc ~ ......_..."-' U~_..l.,.~qV""''''' ..~_ _ j...,tv v...._.~J_-..J V"""-4/ __t-I...._ .) ..- - ..:; :~~ ,-~:-..."G <.; (.'~ a 3) The variance would 'Observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character .of the district because: 111110 bt:sin0ss t~L;O oi~ p:C.C:~:iS88 ~:''':''8 b88~1 C8.~':r~i.(.;c on ':".-.-........ -;-~'" ""'~.;-'- "'C.:;- .~4~_.._.,....,...~... \~.'-<"--_ftn~" ,y~,.,.~ .O'~o...,~ ....~: ......-,.....\{- ...U.~I.-'.'~ c:...r:,~.....,;:-.....",~~w t~....-,-" r~"-:lv ^'--\~"~-'7;"'> ';"\--'wO,. .....'--'~..,;v ~....!-~v0v,;"J. J'v;";"O'......:J ~~u \i.. U.!..\....:. .l';'V\J __ .:....~......i.;.;.u~") '_~ v......_.... \..Io-...........-""\...J....... ~" .. ., .'.. '1' ......'""'; ,-":t, ',-,~.J, n"I;C:; ("c.-:"..~.~.- 1'\" J,-~1'~:> c.:":-,-;:.;,,C i ~- .~.~,...,:".::"'-:,..C~ SO C.~ ~t.~,,~~.-=~~ ~~ ~~~~L;~~ 2~;~~:~i~o""~-- u.. yv~ ~~-J -oJ U..'J ~ V.- U ~ ~_w.. - - b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec' 60n .............................., paragraph ............................ of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) an appeal is requested because: &~)O\r0 38t ZO:c~t~l. o'Z 8011 ~ ~"I:'""! v..._v ::8 use rlU 0'" ~ER REMi\.RKS S:':'::..::.:. ;;:c';:';':-!Gl.r,<3 of: t:li::. ::::t)~lic&t;icn to allo'\:i c..-p:')cll..:.n".:. to ~'_. ._~.fi_ -<. 1_.. ~ .'. : ...:..;.:~~.1.~;.....:r.~.~.......;~c....~:;~:.:.;~....1:;6....(io{~i:;:i;:;~6.i1iDl......fo....o..S:::~cr;i....8:~~a:...'\;iI'ii 00 > "~ ."- - -- - - --' ;,~, ~-: -- ---. ~.~,~. ~:.~__.~... ~:: <.',.~'._,~-.. ,-. '~~:~"'" ,', ,~, ..,~,- ',::. '::.'~.;,:, ...:. :..:2.....-'-.~.:_.;,~,:.......:~;.;:.i::.:..:.;.~.'..~~..........:', "~~:... ~... \~..:.:.:...c:: :;..~).. ~:..:- .._~ ..._.'-....,.~.:..>,>'.~..:....,~~~......:.:.:..~:.,:..:~:......~~~.:...~<~.:..::.:<.:.;..'.0....(>~:.. ,-,. _ ......... -. - ....- ~ -..-...... - -- - - --~ -- .-- -... ~ "-'- \......~. v..... .;':~:?C'~:IC~ 0\.'1'1(;::'-"'8;. "_~~' ~ 'c~:::...r: , . ~, ::~c ::"~SC<.'--J ~C.::~; :::-:~:.-.._'~ ~.".'~" -'~"',": .....'-.....: : :~~'?','",.: ~:~r' ~ vl0 ...... ..........,.;,...... .......__""'- _"-"'_...... ~_ ......_v 0~' . , ~c-.::C; :i...:;" '_:J:':C ~ _ ::'.~v:j' . '! (1' / ~ """ ,: 1/ . . (.. " . '--'9-'" u.r .,;::r;;, ~,-' (Use extra sheets If necessary) SIgnature.. ...../... ..?(I.,:~y."'''''''I''(,..,. .:: __.................. ............. _ J>.......'...~l::/-- u. )vJ..,I."~ >,< The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ~ eU'-IUtvteo" RICHARD H. L1NGE .JUIITleE 0... "EACIL VINCENT FRANCESE WILLIAM BULGER COUNCIL..MI!'N GIORGE ... ROBINSON LOUI. D. DIEHL TOWN CLERK AND COLLECTOR HELEN L. TRAVIS TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE MILL STREET TOWN OF WAPPINGER WAPPINGERS FALLS, N. Y. 12590 OFFICI HOUR. . A. M. TO 4 P. M. JANUARY :3, 1966 PLEASE TAKE. NOTICE THi\T THE ZONlrlG 8MRD OF' APPEALS OF' THE TOWN OF \rt\PPINGER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 416.0)5 OF THE TOWN ZONING ORDINANCE. APPEAL" 44 . REQUEST OF ~RGARET CARD SEEKING ^ VARIANCE TO PERMIT RE-lOCATION OF A LEGALLY NON.CONFORllING STORE ON HER lOT LOCATED AT ROUTE 9 AND F'OWLERHOUSE ROI\D. SAID HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JANUARY II, 1966, AT THE wo.PPINGER TOWN ~LL BEGINt-IING AT 8.00 P.M. AT WHICH TIME ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL SF. GZVEN 1I-IE' OPPORTUNITY TO BE !lEARD. I SIGNEO a -- SU"T. OF HIGHW.Ava ROBERT LAWSON A"8"..On8 . VERNER CH"'RTFN!lEN. C.. J08EPH FULTON BERTHA RECCHIA DATED. OAVlCJ N. KOS'FSKY, CHl\IR~N ZONING BOI\RO OF' APPEALS J^N~RY 3, '966 A special meeting of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order on Thursday, March 3, 1966, at 9:29 P.M. at tee Town Hall, Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York , . Members Present: David N. Koffsky Thomas Graham Gordon Hi rt Richard Jacobson Frederick Koehler A motion was made by Frederick Koehler, seconded by Thomas Graham, to postpone the reading and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting. Motion UDBnimouSly Carried A motion was made by Richard Jacobson, seconded by Frederick Koehler, that the application of Margaret J. Card for relocation of her presently non-conforming grocery store on Route 9 be dismissed without prejudice. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. James R. Brown, jr., attorney for Mrs. Card, stated that he felt this was ridfculous. He stated that the Board is acting on an erroneous conception of the law. . Mr. Koffsky stated that this application could be resubmitted, but there are two things that the Board would like to have eccG~pany the application. The first would be a written indication frG~ the State Highway Authority that access will be allowed as shown. A motion was made by Frederick Koehler, seconded by Richard Jacobson, that a letter be written to Mrs. Card and her attorney informing them of their decision and informing them of the two points that were mentioned. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Charles Card came before the Board. Mr. Koffsky explained to him that the Board will require written indication frG~ the State Highway authority stating that access will be allowed as shown. Also, he stated that the Board will review any plans submitted in'both conmercial and residential aspects. He stated that with these two facts in mind he would recommend that Mr. Card discuss any plans he wishes to submit with the Zoning Inspector. A motion was made by Thomas Graham, seconded by Frederick Koehler, to write a letter to the Town Attorneys requesting that they give the Board more cooperation in this matter and indicate to our attorneys that they make our legal position clear to us at an early date and that these opinions be in writing. Motion Unanimously Carried A motion was made by Gordon Hirt, seconded by Thomas Graham, to adjourn the meeting. Motion Unanimously Carried Meeti n9 adj ourned at 9:45 P. Me Respectfully submitted, Susan J. Pike, Secretary Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals sjp ~-_. _.~ .JOSEPH D. QUINN, .JR. HAROL.D H. REIL.L.Y QUINN & REILLY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 44 CAN NON STR EET POUGHKEEPSIE, N. Y. GROVER 1-5330 March 9, 1966 Board of Zoning Appeals Town of Wappinger Town Hall Mill Street Wappingers Falls, N. Y. Gentlemen: Recently we furnished your board with an opinion letter relating to proposed action contemplated with respect to an application then pending before you and made by one Margaret J. Card. . Our opinion was conceived in good faith and represented our 'best professional judgment in the matter, based upon research and experience in the area involved. It has come to our attention that you acted on the subject application in compliance with the terms and directions of our letter to you. It has further come to our attention that at a meeting of your board held on March 3, 1966 a resolution was adopted which had the effect of reproaching us for the position which we had stated in the opinion letter. The terms of the resolution appear to indicate that our action had been untimely and that we had failed to give you full cooperation. We trust that the resolution was adopted without full knowledge of all attendant facts. We therefore feel it necessary to inform you of the facts that were before us at the time of the writing of the letter and of the events which preceded our action. We would advise you that early in the month of January, 1966, Mr. Ludewig, the Zoning Administrator of the Town of Wappinger, contacted us with regard to the Card application. He furnished us with a copy of the papers which the applicant's counsel had submitted to your board. We examined the papers and found them wanting. -1- -~.--l.--- -. We made it our business to personally explain the patent defects in the papers to the applicant's counsel. We invited him to come to this office for a conference so that we might fully explain our position. Our invitation went unanswered, although it was again extended by this writer and by Mr. Reilly of this office to counsel on several occasions. During the month of February, 1966, we fully explained our position to your chairman in a telephone conversation. It is our understanding that he related our conversation to a member of the firm representing the applicant. That firm member was Mr. Albert Hecht. Despite our attempts to be of assistance, counsel apparently refused to correct his papers and proceeded on his original tack. Under the circumstances, we had no alternative but to furnish you with the rather strong letter which you received on March 3, 1966. . Our only motive in writing that letter was to spare you the embarrassment of a possible judicial reversal. It would appear that you have misjudged our position. It may well be that your actions are the result of poor communications with this office. For this reason, we suggest that we be permitted to confer with you in the near future so that there may be an understanding as to the powers and limitations of a town board of zoning appeals and the prerogatives of town counsel with respect thereto. We would be most appreciative of hearing from you with regard to this matter. Joseph D. Quinn, Jr. JDQ/el CC: Town Board of the Town of Wappinger -2- Re c '01. 11!t01Ch /0) / q G,' S' M 4--~ y. {)LkL , -----.-----.----..- SUPERVISOR .JOSEPH H. FULTON oIUaTICIE 0' THe PIi:ACE VINCENT S. l'"RANCESE WILLIAM J. BULGER TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE MILL STREET WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 12590 ELAINE H. SNOWDEN TOWN CLERK AND COLLECTOR OFFICE HOURS S A. M. TO .. P. M. March 7. 1966 Mrs. Margaret J. Card Route 9' . Wappingers Falls. New York Rea Application of Margaret Js Card Dear Mrs. Card I Upon advice of counsel. the subject application is dismissed without prejudice for the reason that it is insufficient in that it does not specify the relief actually requested. If you desire to resubmit your application, we suggest that you discuss this matter with the Building Inspector. Hr. Joseph E. Lude~g. befere doing so. We feel that subsequent difficulties may be avoidod by this expedient. Very truly yours, David N. Ko'fsky, Chairman Zeni ng Board of Appea 1 s . DNKasjp CCI Quinn & Reitly James R. Brown. Jr. Joseph Es Ludewig . . COUNCILMEN LOUIS D. DIEHL LOUIS C. CLAUSEN SUPT. OF HIQHWAYS KNUD CLAUSEN . . . PAGE 2 OF MOTTCE OF APPEALSBY MARGARBT J. CARD (cont~nuat~on of sect~on #3 OTHER REMARKs) ~n the Sames general are~, several bars and taverns ~n operat~on. S~gnature ~aAt/.,,,;-fJ" Q~A'....f' . . " / TOWN OF WAPPINGER ~ .UP'I:RYf,O" TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE MILL STREET WAPPINGERS FALLS, N. Y. 12590 EL.AINE H. SNOWDEN 'JOSEPH H. FUL.TON JUttr.cl' 0'" THI: "~"CE VINCI!N.T 9. FRANCESE .WILLIA... J. BULGF!'f TOWN CLERK AND COLLIlCTOR O.....CE HOURS SI A. M. TO 4 P. M. t+\RCH 14, 1966 PLEASE TAKE: NOT!C~ THAT THE ZONING BG\RD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER WILL HOLD A PUSUC HEARING PUlStJt\NT TO SECTIONS 416.05. 416.0;4. 416.035. AND 422 OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ZONING ORDINANCE. APPEAL II 45 - REQ.UEST OF HliRGl'RET J. CARD FOR AN INTERPRETATION. RULING. AND VARIANCE OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF ~PPINGER ZONiNG ORDINANCE TO PERMIT RELOCATION OF A LEGALLV NON-CONFORMING STORE ON HER LOT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 9 AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOWLERHOUSE ROAD. INTERPRETATION AND RULING ARE SOUGHT FOR SECTI.ONS 416.0;4. 416.035. AND 416.0S. ALSO, A 16-FT. VARIANCE 'DR REAR LOT LINE REGULATIONS, AND IF REQ.UIRED, A 100FT. VARIANCE OF THE FRONT YARD SETBACK. SAID HEARING WI LL BE HELD ON THE 22ND DAY OF K'\RCli, 1966, AT THE ~PPINGER TOWN HALL BEGINNING AT 8.00 P.H- AT WHICH TIME ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ,WILL BE GIVEN THE OPP~T~UTY TO Sf HEARD. ":~!;NE'ns :,._ti';.~f ~~II :'~,~r:~~y, .:;...:.......,. Zenf n; 8o:ard 0' Appea I, DATEO. March 11ot, 1966 "r' . . COUNCILMEN LOUIS n. OIEHL LOUIS C. CLAUSI(N SUPT. O'F I-lfQJiWAV. KNUD CLAUSEN ,'" - ..:~ 't J,. aUPQVlaoR TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE MILL STREET WAPPINGERS FALLS, N. Y. 12990 ELAINE H. SNOWDEN TOWN C"."I( AND CO"".CTOR O....IC. HOU"a COUNCI"14EN .JOSEPH H. FULTON ~U.TIC. 0.. THE PEACE LOUI. D. DIEHL LOUIS C. CLAUSEN VINCIENT .. "'RANCESE WILLIAM oJ. BULGIER 8UPT. 0" HIGHWAya . A. M. TO . P. M. KNUD CLAUSEN April 4, 1966 Mrs. Margaret J. Card.: Albany Post Road Wappingers Falls, New York Dear Mrs. Card: A special meeting of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order on Thursday, March 31, 1966, at 9:30 P.M. in the office of the Zoning Administrator, Town Hall Building, Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York for the purpose of taking action on the appeal of Margaret J. Card (#45). Members Present: Da~'id No Koffsky Richard Jacobson I Frederick Koehler Gordon Hirt Thomas Graham Others Present: Joseph E. Ludewig, Zoning Administrator Susan J. Pike, Secretary The following is a transcript of the action taken: Margaret J. Card is the owner of a store on the Albany Post Road, Wappingers Falls, New York. This store is located in an area zoned R-20. The building and the use to which it has been put since 1955 constitutes a pre-existing non-conforming use. The Card store in its present location has been condemned and taken by the State of New York under its power. of Eminent Domain along with a substantial portion of the property on which it rests. ., !:- Mrs. Margaret J. Card -2- April 4, 1966 , J- .. A parcel of 78 x 200 ft. remains. Mrs. Card has requested an interpretation of Sections 416.034, 416.035, and 416.05 of the Zoning Ordinance, which relate generally to the destruction and continuation of pre-existing non-conforming uses. In addition, a rear lot line variance of 16 ft. and if necessary, a 10 ft. front yard variance from Section 422 of said ordinance has been requested. From the evidence presented at the hearings held on this matter, it is found as follows: Re: Section 4~6.034 - That the non-conforming use has been in existence prior to the enactment of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, adopted January 29, 1963, and the building is being destroyed rather than moved as required by this section. For this reason, Section 416.034 is deemed not to apply. Re: Section 416.035 and Section 416.05 _ The involuntary conversion of the Card property and building located thereon is deemed to fall within the provision of Section 416.05 "Restoration of damaged buildings" wherein it is stated: "If any building legally non-conforming in use shall be destroyed by any means, it may be repaired or reconstructed to the same size and on the same location, or at the location specified for new buildings in the district in which such use is located. All repairs or reconstruction for such non-conforming use shall be completed within two years of the date on which the destruction occurred." It is deemed that the rebuilding of the Card store on the remaining portions of the parcel falls within the provisions of Section 416.05, and that the term "on the same location" is construed to mean on the same parcel. Section 416.05 is deemed to dominate over Section 416.035 by reason of the fact that Section 416.035 refers to voluntary removal of buildings. The variances should be granted to the extent requested. To deny this request would preclude the continuation of the Card business and would render an unriecessary hardship. Con- ditions have been placed upon the new site plan which will effectively protect adjoining property owners. At the above special meeting, a motion was made by Frederick Koehler, seconded by Richard Jacobson, and reads as follows: To interpret the above mentioned sections of the ,. ,-. Mrs. Margaret J. Card -3- April 4, 1966 ordinance to allow continuation of the non-conforming use of the remaining parcel of the Card property, and to grant the requested variances based upon the above findings. The granting of the variances is expressly conditioned upon the construction of the site in conformance with. the plans shown on a map prepared by Anthony T. Rowan, P.E. & L.S., dated March 9, 1966, and revised March 14, 1966 and March 28, 1966, and entitled "Site Plan, Card Store, Route 9, Town of Wappinger" and the following conditions: 1. Entrances, curbs, and malls along the Easterly boundary between property line and new road location as shown on site plan shall be completed within 6 months of highway completion. Any work not done by Highway Dept. shall be completed by the applicant. Permits for entrance to Route 9 shall be obtained from the New York State Dept. of Public Works and any conditions imposed in the issuance of permit shall be as if herein written. 2. Parking area shall contain four (4) dry wells as shown on plan. Parking lots shall be graded to drain to dry wells, and dry wells shall be interconnected by pipe so that the water collected shall be evenly distributed among the four (4) dry wells for subsequent leaChing. Dry wells shall be constructed so as to provide leaching on bottom and sides of structure and the excavation around each dry well shall be a circle of 8 ft. min. diameter which shall be back-filled with brol~en stone. 3. Car bumpers of precast concrete curb, or decorative railroad ties or bituminous curbing shall be installed along the Westerly line of parking lot securely pinned to the base at such distance from wall and fence to prevent cars damaging fence and. dropping over 'Hall. 4. Proposed fence as shown on site plan labeled 3 ft. rail fence shall be 3 ft. solid fence of the Stockade type or basket weave type. There shall be installed along the entire Westerly line of property a stockade type fence 8 ft. high and the evergreen planting as shown on site plan along said line may be eliminated. s. The site plan shall be revised to show the applicable modifications as noted above., 6. Any signs to be erected on the property shall be in complete compliance with the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance. '" , Mrs. Margaret J. Card -4- April 4, 1966 .. 7. All items except Item 1 shall be completed prior to ,the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Voting For: Mr. JaCObson, Mr. Hirt, Mr. Koehler Voting Against: Mr. Graham Abstaining: Mr. Koffsky Motion Carried Yours very truly, '#~4}' q~ David N. Koffsky, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Wappinger DNK:sjp