032
..,
"
ZOl\T0;G BO_-\.RD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Apped 1\0.
Dated ...~;.-?:';' .\...;:;.........\.,..\.c~:..':-':.c.
P...pp~11:2.nt
i\ddress.... ..c: ::~... \~~ .\.'~ \ ~~~~ (I, (",.S:}. ..:.......
.-,~ ,.','
\-::;:::,,\\.s... :....\: .\. ~. .':~..'
... ........... ............... ....................................... ,-. ..... ............. '...... -, ..........-....
fl.: a rl-::ec:ng c~ the Zoning Board of Appeals on\.............................................:d:.~>;.;(6............<:~...~1...................., I 9/:::~.,
j~)p~2l :-\
. , -1 1 h i: 11' . , r ~,,,yo T) T , ,. C~
,yaS CO:1SlCereu anc L,e LOlJ.owmg actIOn on tile reques"C tor: U [1. ! .-1..1\.....:-....:." .2.,
;-, "::D~C"'" TT"Y' '-::."n, .fTT ""\ 'T IVT~npnT'T.\ ~'O'T OF TTTT' ZO'TT'TG onnT,- \ ""T"'
L..Jr~...J.....2 ..:...:-1...:.......\....)::,2...:..1.:......'-....\"11 ,~..."1..~'\ ..L'\ .t..';''\...r.....i.."\.....r:. ..:."'1..11~" rJ..2 ...'\1...." .....\...l...Jl...'\..."1..-'\\........c...,
o A::\ .~_:J")P2AL AS :~-,N' .-\.GGRIEVED PERSON' (S), was taken:
Y7,-'-''-..'''''~ l' r, B l' d ., 1.' 1" 1: 0"
u V fL'-.l."-. \ "-'2: ny reso.:.utlOncI tile ' oarc, It was etermmec tnat stnct app lcatlOn o~ the rdma::ce
~ , , - ld . , 1 h d . f '
LJ \VOUlC. L wou~ not procuce uncue ar shIP or tnese reasons:
~. ..l he prcpeny in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use perr:1itted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b.
_.:1C lurdsh:p created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be sh:m::d by
Pl'opertics alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: _..
,.
all.
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. .:..~nc. var:::.nce 0 would E21 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
~""~",.,,::O'.~ 1'" "'''''' r-"I'.her determl.11ed,~!.,.-,-,"-),.:.C1_-~..,,.,..c----~!,.d V-..'."~-. .--. ro:--J~l,e O"r~".,,_rn .-.....,..1e";"..:; '1"d.'
............1"......'-'.... ..."", ... \Y",,"v ..I.u. LJ..l _.........._\... l....c:..:."""---'-"[U-~,,l-........... '-t..~_----...:-.....;..:.:j v .:::,.......t......l....i,...~-L-J UI"... u .........\""\.:.4 ~
;:r,::.tLhe previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be connl:med g] be reversed.
:::., S:':2CIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board It was determined that the reques: for 2-
S;~(;c:::.: U::;e Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ......................., section or subsection
..., p:::'agr::ph .................................. of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
:"..-.,.."'''" O.::::~.,- n '" ' dO b' 1 n~ db""
.u. ~""...""... l.l,-~L L-I 0" reverse c CO.1 nne, eCa.u~e. ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ............................. ........................................................................................................
...,......,...........".,..,...,.............................................. ..............,..................................................................................................................................................
3- Il'\T=~c""'=(E~f_~ TION: The Board adopted the following resolution ,vhich stated its interpretation
or the Zoning Odinar.ce as requested in your appeal: ..........................................................................................................
.....,.......... ../.'". ':.,' .-. .-,...... /::'.~. ~:..::.<:';.~
. / .
:~... ~- .~.:. . ..;;~,~:::'?:~~;~ ~'.~.>~..;.-;'~~:~;-: :;~~. "G:. {.: .'":-1. '. ..;./:~.... ,,-?7:..::>:.~-.,::;::~.:~~;~.;.~. :~-:::".7:. .:.-../.. .Z::::.:. !.-.--I..... ;::~?:... (.:.-;~ ,:.;:.7"::... .~:~~~..... ;':\:. ::-.':, .::.'. -;:. ~..
...:........../:....'.~~..~:..;O.........~~.~..=-r.~c.....a/.:.:).-:/.,,:/.:</!.:......y......-..7~:..//<~.~..................................................................................
. ................ ... ...... ......................... ~'''''''''............" ............. ..................... ... .. ........................................................................................................... ......... .....
1.., AGGR:EVED PERSOX (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal:
...................................... ...................... .................................................................................................................................................................
Chai:-man, Zoning Board of Appeals
----~-_.- -..---.---
i/'
....
SUPERVJSOR
TOWN CLERK AND COLLECTOR
RICHARD H. LINGE
HELEN L. TRAVIS
SUPT. OF HJGHWAYS
ROBERT LAWSON
.JUSTICE OF PEACe:
TOWN CL.ERK'S OFFICE
MIL.L. STREET
VINCENT FRANCESE
WILLIAM BULGER
ASSESSORS
COUNCILMEN
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
GEORGE A. ROBINSON
LOUIS O. DIEHL
WAPPINGERS FAL.LS, N. Y. 12590
VERNER CHRISTENSEN. CH.
JOSEPH FULTON
SERTHA RECCHIA
OFFICE HOURS
8 A. M. TO 4 P. M.
t1ay 25, 1965
PLEA$E TAKE NOTICE n'lAT n'IE ZONING BOARD OF APPEl\LS OF THE
Tm!:! OF HAPPINGER, NEW Y9RK, WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT
TO SECT!ON 422 OF THE ZONING ORDU~;NCE ON THE FOLLOWING PROPOSITIONa
A?PE:~L # 32 ON THE REQUEST OF JM1ES W\RSHl\LL, FOX HILL R<l';D,
r-CR A W\R!AtJCE OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO PERmT
Ail ADDITION TO HIS RESIDENCE WITH A 40 FOOT SETBACK INSTEAO OF 50
FOOT.
BEING A VARIANCE OF ARTICLE IV, SECTION 422, FOR PROPERTY mlfNED
8Y H!i'1, SUiUATED AS FOLLO\<JS: SOUTHERLY CORNER OF FOX HILL Ro.~D, LA:\E
O:lIAD, SECTION I, \1.l\PPI NGERS FALLS, tJ. y..
SiUD l":EARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON THE 8T1-I DAY OF JUNE, 1965, AT
T:~::: Tc~m H"'\LL, :-lILL STREET, \~AP?INGERS mLlS, N.Y., BEGINNIl\:G AT
8 O'CLOC{( p.r'1. AT WHICH TIi1E ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ~JILL BE GIVEN
n:E O?PC~TUrJITV TO BE HE.!\RO.
BY RESOLUTION OF THE Ba~RO.
Dated: M~y 25, 1965
Signed: David Koffsky, Acting Chairman
Town of WappingerZoning Board of A~peals