Loading...
035 ZONING BOARD OF APPE~i..LS TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. .........3.5...................... Dated .........~!?.I~?....................... :0 ..... Appellant ............. ........~.~.~?~.~.?...9.~~~...................................................................... Address...~~~.~.~.~~...~9.~~.......................................... v!2~)oinac;-s Fal1Si> NoV. ............................................................................... ~....................................................................................................1.............",............................IIIf.........................u At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ............................~.~.P.:~.~E:~.:?r...~..L........................................._, I 9..~.$....., Appeal ~o..........J$.............. was considered and the following action on the request for: DD A VJ..RL-i..NCE, o A SPECL-i..L USE PER)'-HT, 0 A); INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, o AN APPEAL AS A:\ AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance lZJ \vould 0 ,~ccld;<n..~:produce un~ue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 mJlliu: IKJ would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: .................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... b. The hardship created [K] is 0 Y-;oXt'..ct unique and 0 wnutd!8J would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity 'Of the property and in the same use district, because: .................. .P.~. ??~.~.:~.y.....1..~....~..~:::~ .~. 9.~~~:~...~~~~p.~..f~~....~.~.g~~:::~.~::::-::~r....~y..~~....~~.~~.:..:.~....~~:.?.~.:.~.......................... .f.r.('~~;~. :~.r.:~.~.Q...... ................................................................................................................................................................................................. c. The variance O;w.oulrl !KJ would not change the character of the district, because: ..................... .............................................................................................................................................................................;................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 00 be granted 0 1D~xietri:ed and that the previous decision 'Of the Enforcement Officer 0 ha~l1fu-.merl IKl be reversed. 2. .SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection ....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En- :farcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3. INTER?RETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretatian of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4. .AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on you:- ~P?~l: ...............................................................................................h.............:................................................................................................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....-.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 ~. .........&~~;?i~1~-?;p~;J~m_m l' .... ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOvVN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL -"-. --- /. A l'T ,~,I" ppea 1" O. ..................................... C'" . '-....... . J -~ Date :^~.~12];......c.?"JJ..J..'i.~-~ A p p ellan t ... ','.., ':".tT.. ~:..~;:.:~ ~~:... C~:. S :;...... ............. ....... ................. ............... ................. Address.......C.l.f... .c':::.~~:J.:. ~ ..;::..V-2~~-:~i) .... .................. .....~."' 'J ~ (..--.:-j......:.... .~.. '.' :J"" .~. ''''::'.:J''' '; '~-~,;J,;,J..:-t.;:..,?:.:::. ..... ......... ... " ................ ............... .............................................. ..... .... ..................... ..................................... .., ............ ........ TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I (we) .................................J.:..:,.::;>~0...;2.~::;:~............................................................................., appeal from a decision of the Zoning (name of appellant) Inspector, dated ............:..:::;...:..;;:.:;.......::0..............., 19..65......., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: G A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper ) ; .' 'th . co' 1 ted t t:" -. .-,,!. ,'.;:" -. ~ i~ (""'" <; ('c.... ~',~ -,,! -', .", ~ one , .n connecClon WI preml..._s oca a ....__.'--".....................;...l..i..............'-".."'~..,,~,~_...........................................,..,.....:;:'.:;............. (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district) Town of Wappinger, N. Y. I. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .................................................................. ..;,,=:"'.c~=.~.. ..::~,.~'"'L2."'5.....................2::KQ..A..........'7.0..tv./J.m..t.J.ii!..(i~~:t:...m.m , article, section or subsection and paragraph) 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).* a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: t: .~5 S~j~:Jb'; fc~'" \;:1<.:; CC:JZC/'~..z.:t'~0n c/; c) i".c~~i(1C;"1::C sc::-~:~~;:~~cj ',__,., '.... D;! r:~L'~C'~'')c~ty u.::-~=J b/ CC~~';,~"wl ~J:....1SC:i G:JS Sr ::(;C'~:"'~~ C~..;>o :' .~-"".~,.';;:. ~2r,_.JJ -1r~(;:LJc~ ':l~C;:;::::' to 1o'~ C\}':::~ Cc:~'""~r~~!~-:':..:i:;C:1 ~:';~J6G-")(:;~J.lt~/\J 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared' by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: .' .':' Q'-'~"" ....".., ,} .~ :'".~ ,...,...., .....,..,.;j t, .~. ~ ..~ ~ ~~ ,......t <'!',-;." -: "? r:~ -, r.- -~''''''', 7. t:": .~ "" i,... ~~,,~ ""'~.~ '" ....,_..._ \,.;..\...".......1;. ....~_.. ~lIo..o.)....~ ..f ...,~'Y'v" _to ,,",,"-Iii ~\",io..... ,.. v.~~ u.I.;,,;.......O b. A S:?ECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec' tion .............................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. I::\TERPRETATIO~ of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTI-!ER RE~1.:\.RKS: .... .... ..............................................~..........;.... .................~......................................................04........................... ... .......................................................................................................................................................u... . (Use e.'~ra sheets if necessary) Sigrutture.......~..~...:............. >:< The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. .. .. SUPERVISOR RICHARD H. LINGE JUSTICE OF PEACE VINCENT FRANCESE WILLIAM BULGiER COUNCll.MEN GiEORGiE A. ROBINSON LOUIS O. OIEHL TOWN Cl.ERK AND COl.LECTOR SUPT. OF HIG;HWAVS HELEN L. TRAVIS ROBERT LAWSON TOWN Cl.ERK'S OFFICE MIl.l. STREET ASSESSORS TOWN OF WAPPINGER VERNER CHRISTENSEN. CH. JOSEPH FULTON BERTHA RECCHIA WAPPINGERS FAl.LS, N. Y. 12590 OFFICE HOURS 8 A. M. TO 4 P. M. SEPTEMBER 9# 1965 ?lE.~SE T.!\!'\E NOTICE TW\T THE ZONING BMRD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF W.'oPPINGER, fJEU YOO;(,WIll HOLD A PUBLIC t:!S[\KIliG uN AP?EAl # 35 PURsu;rrr TC sccncr: 28c" Of THE TC\!N LAW AT THE REQUEST OF REt-t'\TO ORSI OF 647 CEAAlB AVENUE, G~OO!<lVN 16. NEW YOR!{. FOR A VARIANCE TO PERHIT CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIOEtJCE ON HIS .LOT ON CHELSFA ROAD, T0H;~ OJ: ~l'\??INGER. NEW VOR!(# WITH ACCESS ONJ.Y BY RIGHT.OF. W;'l,y. SAID HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE 21st DAY OF SEPTE~aER, 1965, AT THE WAPPINGER TOWN r~ll BEGINNING PaT 8:15 P.M. AT WHICH TIHE ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL ~E GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HE~RO. DATED: r SEPTEt/ISER 9, 1965 SIGNED: DAVID N. KOFfSKV, cmIR:'l~N ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS