037
<<
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
~ ~'7
Appeal No. .............;.;....................
D .. d 0/9/65
aLe ...:-:...........................................
A p p dlan t . ...... ...... ...~::: :'.'.~: .~~ .~~... ~ .':.... Tl.~;.~.~.~':.:.?. ...~.~.~... .~.~;.?... ....... .:.......-.. ..... ....... Address... .~.;!.e..!..?~.~....~.?.~.~... ... .... ....... ............ ..... ........
.... .......... ..... ......... ..... ....... ..~.~:.~ t .s.~~.~ .::.1..~ .~. ...~.o~.. T.~~.~:~.~l.~.... ... ............... 0, _.. ... .... .................. .... 0' ....... .~. .... .~..~~.P P ~ .~g ~.~~. ...f~ I,'..:? 11... .r;.~Y .~.. .... .....
A . r h Z . B d f A. 1 S6-.~",,,,,':i"'" ">1' c.::
t a mectmg or t e onmg oar 0 .: ppea s on ...............................~,:-:.~~:-:::::...~:.....:::.....?........................................., I 9...':.~....,
Appeal No..........::?]............ was considered and the following action on the request fo~: 0 A VARL1.NCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, GJ AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would D would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question D would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created D is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..........................................................................................................................................~...........h..........................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Ther~fore, it was further determined that the requested variance D be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer D be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., p~ragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
:}. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
r h Z . 0 d' . d. 1 Tn r.""~'~''''''e'''c'''' <'0 A"-e"'l # 37 '<:"i "rJ
or L.e orung r mance as requeste lI1 your appea : ...........::'::.~.:-:-.:.....~.....~....~.':-.......~-:~....'::'.......'.':.............:..~.......~.~.........
1 r..~~:::' :~,t .(;;:~ .~.~ .~i..~.;:;. ...9 f... .~. ~.~.'~:.. .:?9~:~~~. ~ g. ..9rsj. r.;~ D;~... ~1.ry....~.9.n. r~~~~.~.Q;J ...~:-r.~ .;b... ~J~: 9...~ l~l~ J..1..~.~.~1.1J5~y....~!~...~.h~
St..:::c>i s~ G~j 2c.::::1 a-t1 Ci";S to th~ di 'J~ si C:-a c,f the nrc;:~rty of Edttt:::rd Thcrn~ 2nd
........................................:0."';...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
t..~.~~.~ ;;.';. ~~.:~. :~. 9...1 t~ :;:r. r~;",.... G.h:~.J..~~~... R .9.t;:9.~...~} ?:.Pl~.i..n g~~r:?.. ..f~.l.".~ ~....N.~ Y. f.?j....j.D.:~.;:.. .:~.~~~9.. .p~.r~QJ. ~....~glDE....._
("'O"'~'~ yp...,.-: c-" !""'elF of !",\",(,!,> ,
'V '.....1;..4'""""-"_ '. w_ t"'" r.-U...;.o!---/
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
. . appeal: ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.,...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
. ...../~c'd~;?z;;L~~p;;J;m..........."
(conti t~L:e::::
~,....' " 2. Gc:'ccd th'8 2 rd d~y of t.::y ~ ]951, as e re~utt of a su:"v~y
::"'~_ SCr-'i~::-r;~::."~ ""'~_ ?..a:.cst, PC'..1shkecps c; No'.' Q:) 10t CCr1\;.:ycd ,by ~..tcry ro?t~la ';0
~ (:;:.C:'~_':::' L>t~~~ch.J ~,,":':;:J ~:-1 C:-(:~'lC\:; LY:--lCh Thctne, a~t:d Edi',,~2-rd Tho:-r~e-ll# ;Rc'7,zt'r1 t:g to th3
~C':;C(:'l Of. .. <!~':~:cd t?s 1'0":: # ).? it is the cpinic:-: 01: ti-:a Lon5iig 8o~:rd -o~? Ap::~,,~als
~: ._.;. sc:: d ;;:::'c..::i '1 S 2; r:or:-confc:-rsi ng use ex; st'i r.g pri cr to th:;. en2:ctr:.:::nt of
bc'~:-~ ~;!-~e L=r:cl Subtiv!s1cn R~su~atiGns of the. Tc~'~'n of tllappin9cr~ 2r:r?~cv~;:d Gy the
-f"c....\...~ CC2~'*d, J~:-~e 8, 1961:; ar~d the Zoning Cj-dinancc. of th~ TC!~'m of '-1J~c:,jir:ci~r/!)
~ .. w ,
2:(::~.t.:cl J':'~~U~H.:l 29;t 19Q3-.,-
-~-----'----~
''"
"-
"
"-
"-
"-
""''\.
"-
\
\
\
...... ..
. I'"
,~ ; ~ : ;
/;'! ..
\
\
Petitioners ask for an interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger by the Zoning Board of Appeals
pursuant to the power vested in said board by Article V, Section
543 of said Ordinance on the following statement of facts:
Petitioners are contract vendees of certain premises
shown and designated as Lot No.3 on a certain map entitled I~ot
conveyed by Mary Popula to Florence Lynch, now Florence Lynch
Thorne and Edward +hornefJ, dated May 23, 1951, and by various
revisions thereof, the latest being September 10, 1959, attached
hereto and made a part of this application.
Petitioners have made application to a local lending
institution for a mortgage on the aforesaid premises and counsel
for the lending institution raises the following question:
Are the premises part of a tract of land
presently being subdivided?
The premises in question, along 'with the other parcels on the
aforementioned map were acquired by Florence A. Lynch (Thorne)
in 1951. In 1953 Florence A. Lynch conveyed the entire tract to
Edward Thorne, Sr. and herself, Florence Lynch Thorne.
The premises were divided for resale in 1951 as in-
dicated on the aforementioned map and sales were made by Edward
Thorne, Sr. and Florence Lynch Thorne as follows:
Parcel B - to Mario and Michael Olivieri - 1956.
Lot 2 - to Michael J. and Harriet So Delaney - 19590
Lot 3 - to Harriet S. Delaney - 1963.
Lot 4 - to Donald H. McMillen and wife - 1965.
Buildings were erected on all the lots sho\~ on the map
prior to 1960, except lot No.1, which remains vacant, and a
right-of-way was constructed for the use and benefit of Lots 1,
2, 3 and 4 prior to 19600
Petitioners' contention, therefore, is that the entire
tract was subdivided in 1951 or no later than 1959 as indicated
from the dates on the map sho\ung the initial drawing thereof and
the revisions thereof, the fact that all buildings erected on the
entire tract were completed prior to 1960, a right-of-way over a
private road, twenty feet in width running from the premises in
question to the Chelsea Road was created for the benefit of the
lots fronting on it prior to 1960, all before the adoption of the
TOvffi of Wappinger Land Sub-Division Regulations on June 5, 1961,
or the Zoning Ordinance on January 29, 1963.
Petitioners, therefore, respectfully ask that the
Zoning Board. of Appeals find that the premises in question were
part or a subdivision or land accomplished prior to the enact-
ment or the aforementioned regulations.
--------------
~
-- "'"
"
-,
...-0-:, ....
"
.~~c.. r.'i~ ~~:-_
-~, .-;
,""
~
:".J
: .
/~,~
'-,
'",-
,....;
.,,,......;.
,
J
, -,-:
I <:. ,
! 1.~
i1-:; "
1'::1;~
.f?
,. .
..........
.;
~.
- ,
,",
\ .
u,....
;", '''-
;"J
:-';
(\
:....1"'.
.".J
'\'.
\
. \ '''' \,
\f/\
It i
/C' '\
I 'I
/ --:\
/ -:..
. ~?:
(:. -;-
"'\: ~"
~ 1l
~ S ~\
\.:.~.~'(t\
, --:- "-:::: ~
\'C .:, ~ <::.-t
\\~ -~ ~, -~
\ \;' -< "\'
\ ::",
\ ~,
,
;
-</
~ '-"- -
V
..:;; ~. .;-
-:-j
r;
-
3
; C"--S' E~? ~.. :; '1
''''-'
.\ :.. '-/. ::;.
c..
-.
,"\,
r
- , :; - ~.: + :-'
~) ~ '"
-."..'
"
-'-
,~
.....:.,..
\-.
~"',
, "',""
~. , ,-:', ~, 0.
r7': .J'~,..... "....) -...
'-', ':',~
\
J
K Z"/.. <:0;":\,/ ::"'{;.'... ,\.~ (..;..
-"" - I',
'.~ -
~<, "':.
/1~~
'/' ~
<"- -
/'~ -',
. ....:,
1/
~
......', "-
''''''._-~ ':"
',' ",
..... ", r""
"';:; /-
\..:,
,'.I
~'
'0
-', :"':'"
\.....:,.T
. \. ~-:: "I
C :):....." '-,
"\;'..~ i
.~-~,...~.. j"';; J::-:;;
-....;
--
"
r',
;:;
-,..
'-
,'7-
r
'-...I .;
,-'
. "~,,-
<,
'i
~
,~
~?
, '-
....~
~
(:..;
;-
.""
"',
.;c,
--
..:....~...~
r', r
....;
;.~I
-.: .:.
....,1
"" '.....
, , ;:~."(
'.Y.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
-, ---:.
Appeal No. .................................._
Date .~1?:~.y....??.~.~.;!.....~.~.9.5
E:'~L(;.Im J 0 TI-IOTh"E, JR 0 and
A ?pelhnt .I:!.~~q:0.~.~.~.~.~....~..~.....~~9..~~~............... ................................... Address..Gh~J.~.~9:...R9.?:.4..,.....~.~..f..~.P...~....J,
\'Ja'npinO'ers Falls, Dutchess County, New Yorko
....................................K'..~..........Q........................................................................................................................................................................................................
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
ED~~~1D Jo THOR~~, JR. and
T ("ve) '."^.'D,'"'TW'D77'7 'j:;' TLl'OT'lN1"C' appeal f om a de~I'^:o'" of t'ne Z ;no-
.:t '( .....L"J..i:.-:;;...:.":......:;:\J~~_.J....l....u<>......;._ ..lX.J..S,J.:.L....................................................................) r \""~.I........l. Oill.;::>
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ......~~~X.................................., 19~.?........, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, lRl AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at' ....~?:~.~.~..~.~....~?~~..~....~.~EO~~No~.~~.g~l~.?................~~.~.?.......
(street & no.) (lot nOo.) . (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
(indicate
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF ii.PPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because:
3) The vJ.riance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the chlracter of
the district because:
b. /).. SPECI~~L USE P'ERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion.........................., paragraph .. ....................... of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
(See Attached)
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
" ....................... ... -................................................................................................................... .........................
,; 7 ~///. , ";j~r f}
T~", .,.-., ",c>," '<1 'cr 1 ~../.,;-.//j/:~;7,/ r: :!:-:--".>.~.-.' {-i.l-.
(, ,U~.... CXLr", sh........b If necess",ry) "Slbnatur___..ty ,', ..,..-'-~.~-r..~/'....L"'~0. ~"(.."'::':;:-"',',:';' ................
" , .,'~ , ", , /:." ~....... ::./~'_.1.
* The required phn must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ,/7;t..'r~,J::, J' ,'". ," ,7'7 . ,.t"';:; "-"'?': ,J
.... /- v ," -.....,.~~ U.. I...--'"C-, ~' I;':.r'-<.,..--"
/
I
/
.JOHN L. PALISI
ATTORNEY ANO COUNSEL.L.OR AT L.AW
BEACON, N. Y.
{ 831-04Z8
BEACON
831-04Z9
August 2nd, 1965
Mr. Joseph E. Ludwig
Zoning Inspector
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
"'
Dear Mr. Ludwig:
Enclosed herein please find original and two
copies of the following:
1. Letter requesting a hearing to determine an interpreta-
tion, dated August 2nd, 1965.
2. Notice of Appeal dated July 26th, 1965 with explanation
why interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested and
3. Map of Lands, dated May 23rd, 1951.
Trusting this is satisfactory, I remain,
Very truly yours,
~~ :t:C?~
JLP/ee
Encls.
JOHN L. PALlSl
P.S.: If there is a filing fee due and if you will let me
know the amount, I will be pleased to remit.
.JOHN L. PALlS!
ATTORNEY ANO COUNSEL.L.OR AT L.AW
BEACON, N. Y.
{ 631-04..26
BEACON
631-042'"
August 2nd, 1965
Mr. Joseph E. Ludwig
Zoning Inspector
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Dear Mr. Ludwig:
Enclosed herewith is a map of certain premises,
one parcel of which is presently owned by Edward Thorne, Sr.
and his wife, Florence L. Thorne, the balance of the premises
having been conveyed by Mr. Thorne and his wife subsequent to
the date of this map.
On behalf of my clients, Edward J. Thorne, Jr. and
Marguerite E. Thorne, the proposed purchasers of the property,
I respectfully request a hearing to determine whether the
division of this property constitutes a sub-division under
the present regulations, or whether it was subdivided some
years ago when the roadway, buildings, etc. shown on the map
were constructed, making it a subdivision prior to the various
Town regulations.
\
Very truly yours,
;/tt:-.-.o( C?~,
JLP/ee
Enc 1 s .
JOHN L. PALISI
. .
SUPERVISOR
RICHARD H. LINGE
,jUSTICE OF PEACE
VINCENT FRANCESE
WILLIAM BULGER
COUNCILMEN
GEORGE A. ROBINSON
LOUIS D. DIEHL
TOWN CLERK ANI) COLLECTOR
HELEN L. TRAVIS
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
MILL STREET
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 12590
OFFICE HOURS
8 A. M. TO 4 P. M.
SEPrEnSER 9. 1965
PtEtiSE TA!\E NOTICE THt\T THE: ZCl~:nm BO:.1RO OF A??~'\LS
OF TUE TCtlti OF ,,!~.P?It1GER). iJEW YC1H, \JILt HOlO p, PU3t!C
z.;s:,,~:r::G mJ f.?PEt'.t. If 37, pmst1'\trr TO SECTION 51.13 OF TH~
ZC::Ii,;G mDI:~~~~~~CEAT -r~IE REQ.U~Sr OF EOt!~~RD J. Tt:C~r'~E, JR.
r.~:) H~.RGUERrrE E. THORNE, CHE:tSt\ RC'\D, tr.F.O. 1.
U'.?P!::CERS mt.ts, N~J VC.t::K, fOR P.B IhTEf~Pi1ET,'\TICH OF' TH:!
ZCN!;~G C2i.i!;.gnCE Of" THE TO't{1'~Of' UiWPIHGa In co;'mECTICN
U::TH rl-iZ ;';P?L!C,;n!LrrY OF THE SU3DI\JISICN RECUIfl.TICNS
TO 1:.;;; D!V!SImJ OF TPtEIR PROPERTY I!ITO TWO PARCELS.
S.A!D HS'\RING WItt.. BE HELD m: THlZ 21st O:W OF
SZr-TE!!0ER, 1965, AT THE \l\PPINCER Tct.lf: PALL BEGINN!!~G
{'>.y D:!.~S ?t1. ~.T WHICH TItlE AtL I!.rrCRESTED PERSONS WILt
s: GlVE~,J TliE O?P0i1TU:"J!TV TO DE !"lZ~\~O.
O)~TEJ: SEl'Tl::13ER 9. 1965
SIGNED: OAlII3 N. fcorfSXV.t C!t\IRtf.'iN
ZONING OC.\RD OF APt'EP.LS
SUPT. OP' HIGHWAY.
ROBERT LAWSON
ASSESSORS
VERNER CHRISTENSEN. CH.
JOSEPH FULTON
BERTHA RECCHIA