010
l.l!U
...
:a
- ... ~
APPEAL
APPEAL NO. I 0
c; ~ fO~:~~ j~(h :~; /:,~~~
_. . (:~ame f Applicant)
.-ttJ//, /.,f'v.-1 ....-c~.. -c'teC<U /l-l-j,
(~uni{ pality) (sfate)
BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
ON APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT NO ,DATED ,19
WHEREBY THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DID
( ) GRANT
(vtr>ENY TO
. 19 (0.3
I NEW YORK
j. ~./1 ,./ .hA-'7~.AU ~~
(street and Num /) ~I
, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING . .
(
(
(
1./
OF
THEREOF
R - :J-tJ (Use District
2. PROVISIONS(s) OF.~ ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED.
/) piz:i1(2 d 6- jL ,:2..-z..the Article) g
s~crtonq subsection and Paragraph of the zoning Ordinance
being Appealedq BY NUMBER Do NOT QUOTE THE ORDINANCE.
,
?-<>. /
o other Identificat-
ion
on Zoninq Map)
(Indicate
3. TYPE QE APPEAL, Appeal is made herewith for:
( ) AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOnTJ!NG ORDINANCE
OR ZONING MAP
(~VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR
ZONING MAP
( ) SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OR ZONING MAP
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. A Previous Appeal ( ) Has3 . (WHAS NOT
BEEN MADE WITH RESPECT TO THIS DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT
~~FICER OR WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPERTY. SUCH APPEAL (s)
WAS (WERE) IN THE FORM OF ( ) A REQUESTED INTERPRETATION,
( ) A REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, ( ) A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL
USE PERMIT AND WAS (WERE) MADE IN APPEAL NO._, DATED
19
5. REASON FOR APPEAL. (Complete Relevant Blank. Use extra
sheet if necessary)
a. INTERPRETAtION ~
Because: .-Lt:~ , .//
~ '1-. () tf ./ ;lU
B. A VARIANCE TO THE
these reasons:
(All Reasons must be answered)
(1) TTHE.~'iPROPERTY IN QUESTION WILL NOT YIELD A
REASONABLE RETURN IF DEVELOPED WITHIN THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE DISTRICT WITHIN WHICH'
SITUATED BECAUSE:
(2)THE HARSHIP CREATED IS UNIQUE AND IS NOT SHARED
BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY
OF THIS PROPERTY AND IN THIS USE DISTRICT BECAUSE
(3) THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF
THE DISTRICT BECAUSE:
C.A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS
-------
---~ --~~~
---
,
'11 ~_
-
2.
'"
IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE , SECTION
SUBSECTION PARAGRAPH____, OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, BECAUSE:.
S~TE\~OF NEW YORK )
) 55
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
C{
Sworn to this
DAY OF
t7
19-(-~
'--...
J;;^
...
.,
I!)~JC- \
:'l
ACTION
TO Gerald, J. Anderson. Sr. APPELLANT
SUBJECT: ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF WApr1ngp.~
NEW YORK
REFERENCE:. APPEAL NO. 10 DATED July 8 , 1963
AT A MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ON Au~st 6 ,19-6.1..
. THE REFERENCE APPEAL WAS CONSIDERED AND THE ACTION INDICATED BELOW
WAS TAKEN ON YOUR:
( ) REQUEST OF AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
( X) REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(( ) REQUESTTFOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
1. INTERPRETATION., THE BOARD ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION
WHICH STATES ITS INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AS RE_-
QUESTED Ill' YOUR APPEAL
(USE EXTRA SHEETS WHERE NECESSARY)
20 VARIANCE. BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT
STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD ( ) WOULD NOT (x; )
PRODUCE UNDUE HARSHIP FOR THESE .REASONS:
Ao TI:IE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WOULD (X) WOULD NOT ( )
. YIELD A REASONABLE RETURN IF LIMITED TO THE USE PERMITTED
UNDER THE ORDINANCE, BECAUSEAn A~~it1ou to the rear of the house
1s l>oss1ble and can conform to the ordinanoe..
Bo THE HARDSHI.P CREATED IS ( ), IS NOT ex) UNIQUE AND
WOULD ( ), WOULD NOT (X) BE SHARED BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE
IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AND IN THE SAME
USE DISTRICT, BECAUSE: this proper~y hAS a sidel~~d p~nb'em and the
ordtnanoe is conoerned with health. safety. and oonvenienoe of the inhabitants
Co THE VARIANCE WOULD ( X) WOULD NOT () CHANGE T~ of the ~own.
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT, BBCAUSE: i.'t 'WOuld enarn~ah n'r\ minimum
s1d8yard requirements and be detrimental to health. safety and convenc1ence.
THEREFORE, IT WAS FURTHER DETERMINED THAT THE REQUESTED
VARIANCE BE GRANTED ( ) BE DENIED ( ) AND THAT THE PREVIOUS
DECIS ION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER .mL CONFIRMED ( )
BE REVERSED ( ).
~. SPECIAL USE PERMIT 0 BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD IT WAS DETERMINED
THAT S PECIAL ~B PERMIT BE GRANTED () BE DENIED ( ) ?
4i PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4, SECTION 422.5 , SUBSECTION --
PARAGRAPH -- of the ZONING ORDINANCE, AND THE DECIS ION OF
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BE REVERSED (I> BE CONFIRRED (X),
BECAUSE:
,
(SDlIIlBD) CUT;~,~-L.lA~ ~ 0
A.O~mG CHAIRMAN, ZONING BOARD 0 APPEALS
TOWN OF Wappinger
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
'vv.-/.......-<'.
oJ , (
0~
-=-.
..-
Appeal No. .........1.5.....................
Dated ~~.p.;:!;,~.qJ;'y....l.1..,.....1964
A p.I 1-:1 ...,,".....{:') -, 1\", ]3. ~."" ,.., Add .;.".yo...."" 0"-('''''''1'''8 Road.
pp,J ant .........:r.'-......"',......~.......i...... .:t.""'O.......................................~........................ ress............ .................. "",_..u.IJ..:.. ... .........
'i,,"..,.~.. i YlRC'Y""" ";!:I110 .:j'o:vr YQr.k
.... ....... ..... ............. .... ....... .......~ ~.'f;~.{l~.w.f.1-~.. ..........'9 H .*.~ .~.,..... *"..~. ..... .. . .......................... ....................... ............................ ..........................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ................................r~.r.cll....1.Q..............................................., I 96.~L.,
Appeal No.......t5.............. was considered and the following action on th.e request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
[Z] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question O' would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
prope~ties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................h.......
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
"
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ........ .........................................................................................h...................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................,.............................................................
3.. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of th7 Board, the following decision was made on your'
a p peal: .,.;. ;? :~.;:l9..~. ..iT;0/.~1.0.. ..:by... ;~~Q J;. .G.~.t... }.,tl.x.ob.:o.Vo. S.q,llC.,... ..s.a .C.O nil e d.. ..by.. ...;j~o ;.. YL...Z :ZJ":.:2Cll.01U" g
PYLA Y'l,.,:.,..",,~,(~ U..'1;1,Y....P."\'1r-"'..... b'\l" thr> '"tl.o.....,...o... 0'<:> {\,...u"'''''.... <:lC'! ....0110.......... ::~,r...-t -!-
"""....""..........'v;',.;;.M.'w......... ........._.....I4l:;l~..... "(}...... """............ ........ ... ..l....."'"".!.~:.. _...:..I....................;L.. .\,,;;,;+...........C1.........J.r..~ue
o.f....t.he....~ac.t....tlw.t....th.e....sub.jac:t...llse....:tIas....l.a:t!ful...a:t....the....e~;feoi;1ve....d.a.te....ot
(cant. on back)
.........................!L~~~::.~-::::&:.:~~..~.....................................
. Chairman>Zoning Board of Appeals
f"
t
~
"-
~
A
f'
?
~
~ .
f~ 'GI~ia O:r(1i:uallCC, l?ebruary 21}, 1963, (based on definition of non- , ".
~ ctjUfOl~Y1i:lg US(~ in "'chis ordinance 'which established the time period
~o~ ~2 Eanths r:roill the effective date of'the ordinance) and since
1. -G~~_.'O use "!12.S :i:o-established prior to 1'ebrua.ry 23, 1961~, I nove "'Ghat ue
b;;r coufirn -'Glle decision of the Zoning Inspector and that tl"ds appeal
"" bq, .thc:cef'cre, denied. .
) -
here-
",
. ..~~ "
"
,',
" '.
. "i;~
': ':" a" '~
i
t,"
. ~ '\
':;',. ;.;.:~t
.^
.
d~~+ 3:
, .
(?. cJ-/:_j.J.~ .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF 'APPEAL
/
Appeal No. ""..!.;;{.......""....
Date ,,,:&...:j.l.::.,,4.;/..,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,.
Appellant ,.,....F,r.1'?J1Qs;.12...M",..JH,f2.Qffi."".""."....,,,.........,.......""'''''''''''''''''' Address.,,,,My..er.s.,,c.ar.ner.s,,Road.,,,,.,,,,..
..".."..,.".."............:\Cilap.pinger.s..F alls.,....New...Yar.k....,........................................,...............................................................,..................."...
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I ~ ".."Fr.ance.s"M....Bis.om""....."..."..........."................."..""............"..........", appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant) .
Inspector, dated ...".J,an.ua:ry...~.3........".."..., I 9...9.1....", and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, lliJ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED P~RSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at ..My.~.r..$.....G.9.;J;.:9:.~.~.~...B:9..~q,..9.w..pgg...p.yJ~);:s;.g~...G9.Jgp..~r.g~r
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .....S.ection..4.l.6~"03.4T......",,.
(indicate
Ar.ticle.,.lV..a,ud...Arti.c.le..lL....S.e.c.tiQu..2'O.O......s.ub.$..~,c.t~.9.n...3.,.....g~f.:i.mt.i9.n..9..f....'.~,U$..f;;.~.~..".."....................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
2.) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article .."."..."......"., section or subsec'
tion ."."""""".".""""""., paragraph """""""""'"'''''''''''' of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises: '
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: there has been an erroneous
interpretation of the ordinance--particularly in view of the fact that the use to
which the building had been put had been abandoned and had ceased on November
14,1962 and such abandonment has continued for over a year.
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: this case is not applicable
under Section 416. 01 relating to continuing existing uses. The use claimed by
Goldberger was not in existence at time of adoption of ordinance and therefore
cannot be permitted as a Non- conforming Use.
3. OTHER REMARKS: .....Entire"pre.mi.se-s-..of..Goldberg-er...previ-ously-"us.ed..a:s..-fa'rm'~""'"
.... :L\II.~ Y...~?~.. ~.~.'? ~.~~ .~.. .~!1.0.~ y.~<:l.~~~.1.y.~. ....~ ~.~~.?:~~k~.. .~'?..~ ~,~.~.. P..~ ~.~~.~~.~,~..~.~~.~.~9.~s?'~~~p',g..g.~.~.~.......
. (Use extra sheets if necessary) Sign:ture.~~~.;<;1;-;....,....~..,.........(b~
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
.../~/