015
~' ..
~-
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
/1:/.--c
~0(
~
Appeal No. .........15....................
Dated ~9..p.~~.~y.....1..1..,.....1964
A ,,11 t l-:1r.au........-. ;-"; 13, 00 c ~ Add '.",
pp... an .........:. . '",.-..'=J....,...!...... .:L""OE.................................,.......................... ress.......l....y.e.r.s....C.o.rners...Raad..........
... ........ ..... ........... ... ... ...........Ii.aD.P. .i.n..G.G.r.~ ...j;' all.s..,.. ... U e.ll....Xo.r.k
. .......................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ................................Iar.ch....1.0..............................................., 196.4.....,
Appeal No.......t5.............. was considered and the following action on th,e request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
G:l AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question o would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The h~rdship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
'Dherefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed D be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
3.. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution whi-ch stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .............................................,..............................................................
.......................................................................... .......... ~.............................. ........ ...................................... ..... ....... ....... ...... ..... ...... ......... ..... ............... ..................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of. th~ Board, the following decision was made on yow
a p peal : ~. :.;? ~~.~Q.~~... ;:l~~I.~1.o. ... tI. Y.... J.~~Q.~ .G.~.t.. ..~~.'s.;r. .01:-;..Q.V.C S.(l11e.D.....S.C .C.Qlla..e d....by. ...dO }1 Yi....Z :I~(.rl.e1l.b.1U' g
@.d...~.::.4;J.S.e.d...uJ' rmiEo.u.sly....by.....the....:B.aar.d...o.f....l.Ilp.e.a1S...a.s...:r.Q.llo:tls.:........JSy....:vir.:tue
o.t....:th.e....:f.ac.t....that....th.e....snb.jact...llse....IIas....l.a:viful...a:t...:the....e!:t.ec:tlvG....date....of
(cont. on back)
~/
. .: /'. .
......Je.:.... ...:..... ...~.::.c-::::d::..::.~~~....................................
................... Chainnan;-Zoning Board of Appeals
,--~-(
"'!I!f":"i
~
~-
'-
I
"~tl~is o:rdi:uallCe, l?ebruary 21j., 1963, (baced on dei'ir.t.ition of non- ,
IC6ufoxning use in this ordinance whioh established the time period
0$ 12 Bonths from the efi'ective date or'the ordtn:~uce) and since
,tl~c use 1;2.3 x'c-established prior to l'ebruary 23, 1964-. I move -l;hat us hors-
ts confirn the decision of the Zoning Inspector and that ttda appeal.
cq. the~efcre, denied.
. .~t "t.~
C'
"
,',
"
"
.t );
'.: '>; ~. ''I
I'"
i
I
!
i
L,," . .
. , ~
. ,",.
t;.:;i"
.
d/~~+ ~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF 'APPEAL
. .
~ cr.1 :_.J2.,"") ..
I
7-'"
.....
Appeal No. ......!~...............
Date ...:f.:....-::!.!.::...~.:/..................._
Appellant .......F.r.srl}.Q.~.~...M,.....B~.~.9.m.......................................................... Address.....My.er.s...c.or.ner.s..Road............
..............................Wap.pinge.r.s..Falls.,....New...Y.o.r.k.......,..............................................................................................................................
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I ~ ......Fr.ance.s...M....Bis.om................................................................................, appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ......J.an.ua:ry....2.3................., 19J?1......, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: 0 A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, lliJ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED P~RSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located 'at ..My.~.r..~....G.9.~.:f:l:.~.:r~...B9..?A...9.w.P.~.g...p.y..F.r.~.49:...GQlgp..~r.g~r
. (street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .....s.ection..4.1.6..'03.4,............
( indicate
Ar.ti c l.e.. . IV.. a.,nd.. .A.rti.c.le. .IL. ...S.e. c. tion..2 'O.Q......,S.ub.$..e..c..t.t.9.n...3.,.....4e.f.w:U QP ..Q.f...!.~.U!?g~.~............................
article, section or subsecti'On and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance woul~ produce undue hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because:
3) The variance would 'Observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of
the district because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec..
tion ................................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises: .
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: there has been an erroneous
interpretation of the ordinance--particularly in view of the fact that the use to
which the building had been put had been abandoned and had ceased on November
14, 1962 and such abandonment has continued for over a year.
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: this case is not applicable
under Section 416. 01 relating to continuing existing uses. The use claimed by
Goldberger was not in existence at time of adoption of ordinance and therefore
cannot be permitted as a Non- conforming Use.
3. OTHER REMARKS: .....Entire..pr-e.mi:ses..of..Goldber-g-er-...pr-evi-ou.sly..us~d..'as..-fa'rm~""'"
.... :L\iI.~ Y...~?~.. ~.s..~~.~ ~~.. .~~.~~y.~ ~.l!:~~~.Y. ~.... .~.~.~~.~.~~.g,. ..~.~...f$.~~.~. .P..~E.~~.~~~.~ ..~.9.~.::.~9..~9.!:P:!:~P..g...~.~.~.!.......
. (Use extra sheets if necessary) Sjgn:ture.~~~.:'?;;.........~...........~:::::---
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
,...(':~~.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .........11....................
Dated ~...U.U....,.t......t-
Appellant ........ n 1II1r......... 'as .. .......................................................... Address............~...._.........
............................................~I_......M.................................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...................................1....................................................., 1914....,
Appeal No........,.............. was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
IJJ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution ()If the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue ha;rdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limit~d to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties a:li~e in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
...................................................................................................................................u.............................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance D be gra;nted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................,.................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.;1- INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolUltion which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: .~~.~...~.~...........~~.~.~...~~~.~.~.~.~~~~..~~....~~..~.~~~~...~....~.'~~.IJ.............................
~.~.~....~~.~.~.~....:~..~.~.~.!r..f.J..~...~...~.J....~~...~....r.!~~...~..........~..~~........~....~.....
~...~.!....".........~I.....~~.....~.~"......~...~....~.,....~..\.M;..~....,.~....~.........~....,
C.... __I
......................l~~...........................................
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
I....,. r 1111. ... . It.. ... .,.,. ('-I" _ .......... .. __ .
:r-J~" .. ...... .U-llmlll._ ._I'..IID .. .....1:'. .
.. .. lala" flll'wllw.... d .. .ramrnlJ.I. ...
- .. - ..- '.lJ'''_ ... .. .... IT)"'IM;. I.....: _ ...~
I. .. II..... _,..1"'1." .. I'T'" ~...... ... .. ........1
.. . ..Ida.. IT1'''. \,
',./"
~-... .,
.: ;~':;.
': l '.
~.') . \
.' \ /'
.
. .7 ..;.. .~.