020
~'--
..
l
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal N o. .........~....................
Dated ..............,.."...............
Appellant .................~.~...~~...~~.~.~:~..~.!.~.............................. Address.........~....~....~................................................
......................~~'.I~..~'.~...~...~..~.~....,................................................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .....................P..H.J......................................................................., 19.......,
Appeal No........................ was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF TIdE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was detem1ined that strict application of the Ordinance
[~would 0 would not produce undue haJrdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would EJ would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under ~~ ~nmlll&,. ~~HIU. ,~.~~~..~.,.~~.....~~..~..~...~~........~.~~~.........
.111 ... .....lll1Tt J-,n." allJ... II [........ .....1_ ....
.......11'......".._,................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created [Jis 0 is not unique and D would ~ would not be shared by all
properties a1ike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
rlL 1 ~.. ..1Jd1lirnl ~ ..........f.... ..... .. ..If'.'UI,....
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....... ....ltdq _ "II 11 . II A 11,I .. _ Ie ..~ .,.... - Ji......
....I1.Iil.11IIiii...jj.~ ........ .... ......... ... ........... ....... ................. ....... ................... ... ........ ......... ....................................................................................
c. The variance D would ~would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
...... ...... ... ... ... .:d'j I' .. 'IJIIIIIIII .1.. .......... ..
...................................................................................................,..............................................................................................................................
.....~.~.~~.~~..~.~..~.!..~.!~.~...~.~!~.~.~~.!........:................................................................................................................
"Dherefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be ~a:nted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed C!'be reversed.
2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pUlJ"suant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....,...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................,....................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ................................................................................................... ............................................................. ...............................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
;/~. /1 j!
.........................................(. .......................................
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
/ I"W~ ~9...
~
-,
-~
:....,
~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .......?,.'?.................ou..
Dated ...........~.!.??.!.?.:f...............
A p p eHan t ...... ... .................. ........... .'?::~-:~.. \~~:? ?~~~~... J?)~? .??... .... ... .... .......... .... ..... Address... .... ~~~. ...P.~. ...:~... .... ........... ... ............ ... ..............
.., ....... ........ ....~-~~.:~ ~:~~--: ;.;; :;.':;':.;:.~.. "~~~~~~"~,;,,,, :.';:~~~;!.. ..~Z 9 .~.;~.... ...... ..... .,.. .., ......... ,.. ...... ..... ...... ............ ... ........ ..... .... :.................. .......... ......... .... ... ..... ...........
. f . B d f A I -....",,, C, F..L
At a meetmg 0 the Zonmg oar 0 ppea s on ....................\-~.:-.7.~~:-:-:...I......................................................................, 19,,'":'.:::....,
Appe:al No.,.....i.~)............... was considered and the following action on the request for: G}:A VARIANCE,
o A SPECL'l,L USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
CD would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would g would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under :t-!~ ~~~::~r;:;iy.c~5;::t1:t::\I~:: $.~.~t.~.9;~. .f.9.Q~\:... ..~.9:~~.:~... ~~::;;~~:!.~..... ..;;~.;:.~.~.~.~ q..........
.. .~:.~?~. ......... ...... ..~.... ?:~ .c:::.~~;.~ ~ ~.7.~~~..r~ ~~ ~:;:..?~~~.e...~:~~~. .9.~~~~!~~:::.. .~~~~~~..~7:~.~..~~?~:::~~..~.7:.:::...;~::~.~.?.~.~~.~Z..~~.?:.
:,.,..:.: :.:-~.~(;:::.::.(~~ \lCC.
b. The hardship created rn is 0 is not unique and 0 would lZJ would not be shared by all
properties alike in the-vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: "........"......
or c~ilc:i::.~g c::cc-'::2:d ::):'io:'" to Z.U.Ol~tio:n. 0: S-~'ltel::..,2ilili:~J code
...................................................................................................................................................................40.............................................................
... :~~.'? :::~.~~~':. ..~~ ~.~~~~~.~.:~!:~.G. .~~.~. .:2.~. ~:~~:.~:~.~... ....~ \~~.~~~~.~.2..~~.?~~4~...~~.~~..!?~...~.~:::::7.~~'~.~.~:::.~~..~.::..~.~~~~.~.~~~~.
~~:l::.....52ti(.~~1.
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ......".............
....;?'~.~.~:~~...~~"~'~...~.~~:.?~~..~~~;~:~.~~...(~.?:.~..~..~~.~:~~ ..~.~.~.~~.~.~..~.~~.~..~~~~9~.~..~.~.*?~~.~..~.~~~=.~~:?:..~~..........
.... :;- ~.:.:;::~ ~:-::.;~~:..:~~ ~.\:..} ~~. ..+.:: ;~) .(2)';t~.~;. ::2 ;:.~..J::: y.. ~;.:;''''.~~.;.:~:~;;}~.~:;. ~. ~................:...........4O"""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''' .......... .......... ........... ....... ...............
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance r;:g be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer D be confirmed ill be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article .."'".........."...,,, section or subsection
.............,......., paragraph ............................'......, of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .................................."."........_................................................
/-~
1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ........."..............................................................'...................................
. 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
appeal: ........,.;;;::::::...'""'.,........................................ -,., . _ ___, ..._~.._____.._._.......Hm.r.-.~'.-,. .....................................................,...... ,...............,.....:==:,
i4/1"<L:~m..
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
?-~(~~_7-~J
-"~
}
~
.
I'-
to
.U~ERVISOR
TOWN CL.ERK AND COL.L.ECTOR
SUPT. OF HIGHWAYS
RICHARD H. LINGE
HELEN L. TRAVIS
ROBERT LAWSON
.JUSTICE OF PEACE
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
MILL STREET
VINCENT FRANCESE
WILLIAM BULGER
COUNCIL.MEN
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
A..EBBORS
OFFICII: HOURS
VERNER CHRISTENSEN. CN.
JOSEPH FULTON
BERTHA RECCHIA
GEORGE A. ROBINSON
MALCOLM I. HAlT
WAPPINGERS FALLS, N. Y. 12590
TOWN ATTORNEY
JUDSON C. WILLIAMS
" A. M. TO 12:30 1:30 ~o 4 P. M,
JUNE 1, 1964
PLEASE TAI(E NOTICE THAT THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF
THE TOvm OF WAPPINGER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PURSU-
ANT TO SECTION 280 A OF TOWN LAW.
APPEAL # 20 BY ARTHUR AND SOPHIA DYSON TO PER-
MIT CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENCE ON A PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHT
OF WAY, WHICH ENTERS ON HOPEWELL JUNCTION ROAD.
THIS HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE NINTH DAY OF
JUNE 1964 AT THE WAPPINGER TOWN HALL BEGINNING AT 8 P.M.
D.S.T. AT vlliICH TIME ALL INTERESTED PERSONS WILL BE GIVEN
AN OPPORTUNITY TO ~E HEARD.
SIGNED KERMIT H. BECKER
CHAIRMAN
ZONING'BOARD OF APPEALS
'It
~
I
-'
~,
,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ....................4.0........_
DateI:1.~Y.....~.:?,......;!;.??.9.4...........
Ap p ellant .?::E.!:!:?:~E....~....~.9.p.h.;h.~....p'y~.9. n............. ... ..... ........................ Address......gll... ..P..l\.....4.J.....W~l?p.i.ng.e. .~$......:f. all s ,
N. Y.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I (we) ...b.;I;::.t.h.'9.*-....~....$..QP..h.;i,,~....p.y.?.9.n................................................................, appeal from a decision of the Zoning
(name of appellant)
Inspector, dated ..M~y....4..?.,............................, 19....2.4....., and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for: U A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at ...............~9.P~~~.~.~....~:?:~.~.~~.?~.....~9..~9.:........~:.~.9................................
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ..~9..~....9.?....~9.~~?.....~.<?.~.~......
(indicate
Town Law Section 280A
.................................\..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce Wldue hardship because:
Foundation erected in 195~-House was not completed due to death
in family. Plan to use part of original construction.
Lot not usable except for residential purpose
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because: .
This lot is on a private road OVliJ.;e,d jointly by Dysons and two
other residents~ and this road has direct access to Hopewell
Junction Road.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would. not change the character of
the district because:
b. pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion ................................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3.. OTHER REMARKS: ........................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................... .... .. .... ...... ........,.......... .......................................................................................................................................
. (Use extra sheets if necessary) sigmture..~kI......)'f.l~-:::::::.........
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. (l