025
to
f
/ '. ()
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ....25.........................
Dated .....................t..
Appellant ..~....A.....a._.....Iw..................................... Address...........,:....v'T ............._
..................... "''-lIlI!'p.. ...IlII&:&a.......:r.............................................................................................................................................:...........
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ............................................................................................................, 19.......:....,
Appeal No......I5.............. waS considered and the following action on the request for: Il1 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applica"tion of the Ordirtance .
D would 0 would not produce undue harrdship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would a would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ...,.....~...JUalM1....aad1ti-... d
.....1a4.........at....:u............_U...IM..........................................................................
b. The hardship created D is 0 is not unique and 0 would is would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ...,......
..........~...It.t........,.................................................
c. The variance 0 wQlUld lJiwould not change the character of the district, because: ...:1*-..'" ..
.....I.........twr:t.I............U..._................14'-'...........1.un1.......I.IIIlI'
,
.,...........'r~.......................................................................................................................................................,......
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 'J!fbe granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed ~ be reversed.
\
2.; SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer D be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
3.. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your.
a~:...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................,..............................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................t:...I!.....~........................................
Chainnan,' Zoning Board of Appeals
\ ,i
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER Appeal No. .....~3..........................
ACTION ON APPEAL ~D t d C'.,.,.,-,...+" "C:~lt
/ a e ......~.'"'.y...v:....J..,.....J..;<.v...r
Appf'.llant l-':l.-'cdG~;.:-j.cl': A& 3:Cl"L1.J"nm fIr Add ' PD 7.; 1i"''''''NI''';'T~.1-",..., 7h~-j "<1".....
- ., .............. ......... ...... .............. ........... ....... ........ ..J!............ II... .......... ...... ......... ....... res::>....... ....,.. ......I.... ..'-'.1.....,1,).'.. "'-....... ,. ....w..... ... ..(.,I............\-'
......................::J3..~').~).i1"j..G.c;;~.c....::.:.a.l1.c ,....li....Y.ti........................................................................................................................................................
At a meet:ng of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ............................................................................................................, 19...........,
Appeal No.......23............... was considered and the following action on the request for: m A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution oof the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
U would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would @ would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
'tt.d d th 0 d' b . The D'cneral nhvsic!'," C,",~'1c1i -4'1 i"l~" 0'<'
use perml e un er e r mance, ecause. .............................................._........................Jr........y.,,"......""..v.~.l,.!."..... ..L
a>~~:~~....1.8~~.lcL...~a.e.8....110.t....all.c:tf~....c.t~.i.c.a>:;...al;Dl.i.cat.io..n..........................................................................
b. The hardship created [J is 0 is not unique and 0 would B would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .o.t....~the
"""'f''':>"'!f"'<.''-.-,-: "-,'tr..........~J':);""'ol -.r.:....../.:~....t....~~.~ -~ .I.." "'t.. ~ d .. J. "
..~~;.\,.~~ ~'~;.:..'~' a... "1.1'1.'1-;;' VJ'~ c'ct,..:t.,;. ...e v..t.'.dl:.;;.' .t.:il: v'';'::'' ...C':.t:..... tiJ:l-e.... .:ta.t.:.:a ....an,.r. ....XO.e.-a.:.... ~t:':l~ -'3:r 01!1IG,:~.......
c. The variance 0 would [}J::would not change the character of the district, because: ....i.t....iz a
n:~~';TI;;~~}.n );;:Il... ..sJ.~~ .j.V:-.g.~G.~}.~.n.:~. ...q;,f;h~l... .~.~. ...~~~.... ~Jh....I;9..@ l~.~..~~G....1I~.~J:+....tJ.:':.~....&9.;Q..sd;.€J:.~....t~.~7.-:X;.Q ny.
c.;,j;.... :-G.~':h G...;:.:t.0. i ~jll:bo l"Ji0.ed................................ . ...... .......... .............. ........................ ........ ..................................................,.............
'Dherefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: . By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
or the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .............................................:..............................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
;;.. p p c:al : ................................................................................................................................................... ....... ................. ............ ........... ...... ............ ...........
....................i\<//........l3r:.c~4.~U~.:..............................................
Chairman,' Z~ning~B9arcf of Appeals
. --7/ 'J- 0/ {. Y
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ",/ .e:::-
TOWN OF WAPPINGER Appeal ~j.'7;'''''":.-:'''''''CJ>-
. NOTICE OF APPEAL Date 7'2c..irf7.'/
A;~ellant ..a~~(i!4~~../:({~~")rJ(I...~.'l.m..m.................. Address..J?p...l.........!!t.!.e.!!.?t"t1:.~.~/J.<I...,
.....~......(7t;}:.1.(~:;l.(.7:!-:::.:........ ..f..:e. ....t.'}.s. ../..... ..:.. .~...... .....~.... .... .... .... ........ ........ ........... ........ ......... .... ................. .......... ..... ... ... ........... ................ ...............
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: -
I (we) ..6},f.Z?F6.f...~.!~.(.1~~~f;;:zre(;)........................................................., appeal from a decision or the Zoning
Inspecto!, dated ....>-;:f72.t...................f..........., I9..Ji..~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals
f
for: b A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper
one), in connection with premises located at t!ftI!:.Il..~r(.dJg,~L.../)f!...:.........................!.f?...............................J?.::...<..9..............
(street & no.) (lot no.) (zoning district)
Town or Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .f7?~.N..T.....~'t~.:~!./}6..~!(
......./~(........................i~2.i~..............................~.............................................................................................................~.i~.~.i~~.~.~..................
article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).*
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application .of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
]:1' v.-t t;, L J j{ eq (,7 i/\ t3 /J1 0'./1""7 t4 ;:::'CUfV .1.1+1'/ o/v h/"J-c.k Tc 7;::;: T
'7~ '
rJ- <J' h~v/o/I y/ff?, 0
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this district because: r Ar;-v IS /i- '5>"'TG~r sJ....oj?cs
To IV'vY //( G/'P/-\, 1-1") I /Jy.1 La c.-t/J-Gl> erN A- IVN/V4.r1-ROt//'./d J c~
M.a.AG 17'\..t+r./ );11-1-. F fVI-'1 /'JtcIJ~'"ty I ~ s VVI5l-JYl./ Y /.rV ME 9~^,r~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character or
the district because: fVl. y IJ (.) '" L d. / ,v 5/ 0."-" /J L c!. /:) p. S E r: 6.--.;- a.J(
r: (./ /! rh IS-A. F.Ji' {} /;1 T h.. E yvl. 1'9-1 IV S" f7~ p /.> T fA f'} tV vv IJ v L d h ~ d tht54.. S
;11.."" J ci,/,,-i3 J""" c!-r9J/3 J /"/1- ri S 17-i /i-I 91'1--;r '- / /V E '" /V iA....c:.s S j;;,'/2~ T
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ....................., section or subsec'
tion ................................., paragraph ................................. of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use
on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: ........................................................"..............................................................................................................................
( . f ) . ::J; /), < h, 0 ~/ / ""rnj g
. Use extra sheets 1 necessary Slgnature../~..f.......l.......~9/...../..:.,(.,..
* The f{:quired plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
.;
APPEAL
APPEAL NO.
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I
I (we) of
(~ame of Applicant)
DATE ~n1.r;'-'-f (...
TOWN7VILLAGE OF
.19 (;-S
, NE.'W YORK
(street and Number)
, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING .
(Municipality) (state)
BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
ON APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT NO ,DATED / .--; , ,19
/
WHEREBY THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DID
( ) GRANT ~
C>, ) DENY TO /'
(Name of Applicant for Permit)
OF.
, .
(
(
(
(
1.
(Street and Number)
) A PERMIT FOR USE
) A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
) A SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR EXTENSION
) A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE
Municipality)
State
THEREOF
.' ". 'v...J I ;;: .
Location of the Property, Street and Number or other Identificat-
ion
(Use District on Zoninq Map)
2. PROVISIONS(s) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED. (indicate
the Article) 3
Section, Subsection and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
being Appealed, BY NUMBER Do NOT QUOTE THE ORDINANCE.
3. TYPE OF APPEAL, Appeal is made herewith for:
( ) AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOmlING ORDINANCE
OR ZONING MAP
~ ('\) A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINA..."'ICE OR
~
ZONING MAP
( ) SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OR ZONING MAP
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. A Previous Appeal ( ) Has; ( ) HAS NOT
BEEN MADE WITH RESPECT TO THIS DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT
~BFICER OR WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPERTY. SUCH APPEAL (s)
WAS (WERE) IN THE FORM OF ( ) A REQUESTED INTERPRETATION,
( ) A REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, ( ) A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL
USE PERMIT AND WAS (WERE) MADE IN APPEAL NO. , DATED
19
5. REASON FOR APPEAL. (Complete Relevant Blank. Use extra
sheet if necessary)
a. INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS REQUESTED
Because:
B. A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS REQUESTED For
these reasons:
(All Reasons must be answered)
(1) TTHE~)PROPERTY IN QUESTION WILL NOT YIELD A
REASONABLE RETURN IF DEVELOPED WITHIN THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE DISTRICT WITHIN WHICH
SITUATED BECAUSE: .""J
(2)THE HARSHLP CREATED IS UNIQUE AND IS NOT SF~ED
BY ALL PROPERTIES .ALlKE IN THE I~willDIATEVICINITY
OF THIS PROPERTY AND IN THIS USE DISTRICT BECAUSE
.---
(3)THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF
THE DISTRICT BECAUSE :.... .
/:,J
, ",,' ~J '-'..
II >1 )), }
C.A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS
SUPERVISOR
TOWN CLERK AND COLLECTOR
SUPT. OF HIGHWAYS
RICHARD H. L.INGE
HEL.EN L.. TRAVIS
ROBERT L.AWSON
TOWN
CLERK'S OFFICE
MILL STREET
,JUSTICE OF PEACE
VINCENT FRANCESE
WIL.L.IAM BUL.GER
COUNCILMEN
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ASSES.ORS
OP'P'IC& HOURS
VERNER CHRISTENSEN. CH.
JOSEPH FUL.TON
BERTHA RECCHIA
GEORGEA. ROBINSON
MAL.COL.M I. HAlT
WAPPINGERS FAL.LS. N. Y. 12590
TOWN ATTORNEY
JUDSON C. WIL.L.IAMS
8 A. M. TO 12:30
1:30 TO .. P. M.
September 3, 1964
PLK~E T,A.,KE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the 'l'o-vm
of ~'Tap:pinger, New' York, lnll hold a public hearing pursuant to SE:ction
422 of the Zoning Ordinance on the following proposition:
AppezJ. No. 25
Request of Fredrick ..u... Klumpp, Jr. fO'r a variane.e of the regulations
of the zoni."1g ordin2,nce, to :permit the construction of a residential gara.;;e
to within two and one half feet less than required minimltm for front set-
back being a variance of Article 4, section 422-4, for property ovilled by
him situ['.ted as follov1S:
Lot kJ.O VandeHater Drive, Happin&ers Falls" 11.F.D., N.Y.
Said Hearing 'Hill tal(e ,place on the 8th of September, 1964 at the
loJappir:ger Tovm Hall, Beginning at 8 :30 0 'clock P .1'1.
~y Resolution of the Board dated Sept. 1, 1964~
~~
rJ:1~ f.D.-J-.:-I'
~~[~
Kermi.t H. Becker
Chairman
i'/
l
J
k"
. ~:;"
'"
. .;~~~~::.
CASE HISTORY AND FACTS
1. The property was purchased in December of 1962.
~
~
4.
Leveling of the spot for the traUer was completed after the frost
left the ground.
2. The property was advertised as lots for trailers for approximately
two years prior to purchase.
3. The lot is approximately 1.5 acres of woodland and clearing and
partial construction Qffootings was accomplished in the months of
December and January. Construction was abandoned due to frozen
ground.
5. If a variance is not granted, the value of the land would be ap-
proximately $1000 which is hall of the original purchase price.
6. I cannot afford to keep the land and also live in a trailer park. I
bought the land with the plan of moving my trailer on it and having
the the park rent used to pay for the land and my income would meet
my expens es.
7. I think that this ordinance is unconstitutional because it inhibits
the free will of the people, decreases the business of trailer
dealers, and in other townships with the same type zoning allow
trailers in an R-20 zone as long as they are not restricted in the
deed.
I respectfully submit this list for your evaluation and hope, you will see
Ir.lY existing hardship and point of view.
, .
" ,
.
C>
2.
IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE , SECTION
SUBSECTION , PARAGRAPH____, OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, BECAUSE:,
'4/
L.A ///;/1" ;.,/) ,/f: f///. > . ,...,,/;),j r
' . SIGNATURE /i;/ / .
SU'JEE\~OF NEW YORK )
)ss
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
Sworn to this
,
DAY OF
);7
19.h~
\
ZONING IN~PJ!;~TO~
<JOSEPHE', L'tJDEo/IG
'Tel'. AX7-99~1
~lh 11 Stree,~' , .
,N.. 'V,
'~~pingar6 FaIls~ N. Y.
'. .(:, .;'\""/.
1 t...J.. .
. \.... -'
/" "
.,'\ ). /
SUPERVISOR
TOWN CLERK AND COLLECTOR
SUPT. 0.. HIGHWAYS
RICHARD H. LINGE
HELEN L. TRAVIS
KENNETH CROSHIER
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
MILL STREET
JUSTICE OF PEACE
VINCENT FRANCESE
WIL.L.IAM BUL.GER
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
WAPPINGERS FALLS, N, V,
ASSESSORS
8 A. M. TO 12130
1:30 TO 4 P. M.
KENNETH THORNTON. CH.
.JOSEPH FUL.TON
STANL.EY RIES
COUNCILMEN
GEORGE A. ROBINSON
MAL.COL.M I. HAlT
O....ICII: HOURS
TOWN ATTORNEY
.JUDSON C. WIL.L.IAMS
t<41 22. 19!}'
..::it~ "~~~tJ'.",3 ...'. ~"11', ,."
f. ..... ::... ",\,.j...;~ ,s,v.;'4 -n. .t. U:r..s-?P
~ .n' .. t 1 .... ...... n..,. .. 1 " ""-
4.>1.. ~ .Q 4','!i1..J;,.., li:4. a... er .i;'a.r~
~':lTI::1Ufi~J.t"a ~~slla. li~fof Xork
... ... "-ti
:;;;:crr ?r. Klu,'~PPI
as;) a r~'cult of Qurr.:<:}otlng on. ?<'~tY 21 ~ taGtl~~1on1 t:3.[~on
at th,~t tlr:G tjhlch 'Ot:'o"Gd eonOltH')l-;,talYt'b.at c~:wtr~ct1cu
0;::' YO'..l1:' tr:~11e~ alta h.ad cot'~.l.Qnee'lprior to io'he eff'cct.i..~e
.~h:.t'3 01'> 2cn1nii. tEll!:! ;?CQ.I"~ teela ~0.t :i^O'V'J!' &t;.nG!ll t.or a
\r~lauce lu not n~ces~)l.Y ~d ti1St by vlrtue*of tals letter
you ara hGl"'eby clat1s1f1ed as a les;alncn-con.fo~w~ uze.
VrtJrI tru11 1oure,
~ ./J LIJ
// ./ /
~-r/ :N-.. /:).t:~e/. t,[\-/
!terrw:lt E. :&:'ec;'cer.Chalr~
~ou..baS foa.ra of Appeals
a !r; r: ~;)
co: JooerJh Ludewts
:; G ..:n I:o.:u'd
i'1$u,111~ lScard