003
-.
ACTION
TO ....1.... ..... APPELLANT
SUBJECT: ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF tbe f... ., ....laa.~.
NEW YORK
_11 -. , 19 ,)
ON .,.11 t& ,19-'1-
ACTION INDICATED BELOW
REFERENCE:. APPEAL NO. J DATED
AT A MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
THE REFERENCE APPEAL WAS CONS IDERED AND T~
WAS TAKEN ON YOUR:
( ) REQUEST OF AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(I) REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(( ) REQUESTTFOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION
THE ZONING ORDINAN RE_-
20 VARIANCE. BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD,IT WAS DETERMINED THAT
STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE ..... ( ), WOULD NOT (I)
PRODUCE UNDUE HARSHIP FOR THESE REASONS:
Ao THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WOULD (I) ( )
YIELD A REASONABLE RETURN IF LIMITED TO THE USE PERMITTED
UNDER THE ORDINANCE, BECAUSE l' .. M .... I.. ...al...... _1\1,1.
...111... e.... la ......... WI. _ .. Na_" UN.......
Bo THE HARDSHIP CREATED II ( ), IS NOT (J) UNIQUE AND
... ( ), WOULD NOT ~) BE SHARED BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE
IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AND IN THm SAME
USE DISTRICT, BECAUSE: tide ....... ...... .. . ...,.ntaa.
...l..'tal ..... .
Co THE VARIANCE WOULD ( .& ) ~ () OHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRt\~ B8C1\UpE: it ._u. la..- . .....at'.nb&
aM .. ..'1I.aM ill _ 4'1.02
THEREFORE~~~URTHER DETERMINED THAT THE REQUESTED
VARIANCE ~ ( ) BE DENIED (~ AND THAT THE PREVIOUS
DECIS ION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BE CONFIRMED (I)
~ ( ). -
i. PECIAL ERMIT 0 RES UTION HE OARD IT
THAT AL DSB BB GR' ( t..BE DE ) ?
4,.' PURSUANT TO' ARTICLE tit , SECTION.... , SUBSECTION 1
PARAGRAPH'" of t~~INANCE, AND THE DE~SION OF
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ~ ( t> BE CONFIRRED (."
BECAUSE: .t ................ .. _H'... ...... 1& ,......a_. .t'. _.
t '"', '. tr_ r . t!'t ~ !
\
A~HAIRMAN
. ,
TOWN OF
."'b&.~