002
~:...
....
.
i . ..,..
APPEAL
'Ji /_ / ,)
APPZI>.L NO. "),/ DATE ,;/ (',' i -.{..:::: . 19~-J
TO T:f->~ ZONING BOARD OF A1;'PEALS I TOWN':'VILLAGE OF I!:-.'"EW YORK
(T.,_ ) " i.l' \':"" j " J'\, /' 'i il.. ti ,
I ~~ ,I"'.... 1 , ?\{ l }-(.;! ....'f of, ," \'-;'';"1-'';:// /--""'/i/\ ,'-:: ..~r~/t
(Na~e of Applica,nt) / (street and Number)
I '/ ,. \" v
. '('I"' ",< ~(1f,\ ,lV, ! . I HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING -
.. i (lvlunicipality) (state)
BOA.~ OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
ON APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT NO // ,DATED i(/ i', 2( ,19 /,)
WHEREBY THE ENFORCE~~NT OFFICER DID
~')(~~~TTO n~//l:r.,{ L .S~:'\t'~1i-ijjr ~) i).x;r;'('1 I, S~v.)~rLf
OF~;> (n/'f/( iJ)/\ .?:~,a~id~~/\~~~'~i~~a~/I~r \P.eim~t) )j.}/ ,,;
(Street and N~ber) /~uWlcipality) State
( ) A PEfu~IT FOR USE
( ) A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
( ) A SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF
( ) A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE,
{'.. ",_ ~',..i.., "",' /"" ('.; ,." /1' //<< ;>' / /1 1.,,_, ,.'" -, I /
1. i.:::'-'\; ',\r(/':-, ./"r- ...l.J (ili'V;"",?_ /'~-'J?l~.) ,/t./ _ .;/",/lrl/"/cJ':'~r\ ,~'~/I/ /1/ I
Location of the property,' Street ~nd-NVmbe'r or other Identificat-
'7 I
'\, :?c-.L--, \.~/i/\
ion
on Zoninq ~-1ap)
(lndicate
/1 . / 0, .i
--~, /!t~ I (j I (Use District
2. PROVISIONS(s) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED.
the Article)"
Section, Subsection and Paragraph of the zoning Ordinance
bei~g Ap~ealedQ BY NUMBER Do NOT QUOTE T~ ORDINANCE.
3. TYPE OF APPEAL, Appeal is made herewith for:
( ) AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOBlJlNG ORDINANCE
OR ZONING MAP
(''0 A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINA.i~CE OR
ZONING MAP'
( ) SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OR ZONING MAP
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. A Previous Appeal ( ) HasQ ~Z) HAS NOT
BEEN r~E WITH RESPECT TO THIS DECISION OF THE ENFORCE~mNT
C3FICER OR WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROPERTY. SUCH APPEAL (s)
V~;S (WERE) IN THE FORM OF ( ) A REQUESTED INTERPRETATION,
C,) A REQUEST FOR V.z:.R1ANCE, ( ) A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL
USE PERMIT AND WAS (WERE) MADE IN APPEAL NO.___, DATED
19
5. REASON FOR APPEAL. (Complete Relevant Blank. Use extra
sheet if necessary)
a. INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS REQUESTED
Because:
B. A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS REQUESTED For
these reasons:
(All Reasons must be answered)
(1) TTHE,iPROPERTY IN QUESTION WILL NOT YIELD A
REASONABLE RETURN IF DEVELOPED WITH~N THE
REQUIREr~NTS OF THE DISTRICT WITHIN WHICH
SITUATED BECAUSE:
(2)THE EA~SHIP CREATED IS ui~IQUE N~D IS NOT Sl~~ED
BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE IN THE I~villDIATEVICINITY
OF THIS PROPERTY AND IN THIS USE DISTRICT BECAUSE
(3)THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT ,CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF
/ ,'._ _~" {_ _I ,..:....\
THE DISTRICT BECAUSE: ( ::,_I.:.<.~ n.'.'.V,cL:_<, r/ :)i,-~....-\ '
C.A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS
,
:J6 Go. rr,~o =-:i -:. 1. ~ ~~c;s.c.
).pril 12.,
., ,"""C""
-'- vvv
c,
t,",,___
~).~~d cl--;3 :'0~:e;J,
3rt:
:~t cc:,.,a i:::.ted
".r-;+;-,
. ~ ...:... ...: - .I.
t::.e
::?la~ s
o r D on9. 1 d
L.
P..~:.Q
?c:.~~~y
.':,. c, 'f/Z:' ...""'~l, -~..~~-_ 0 2 ,:::;:
::"'e s ~:..c.:. :;"(2.Ce
lS
OY'.;. t:'le
east side
o J~ :u Po ~~:~ Y-.-~""..' 0 ._~ T_, ~ l ~,:;:.~ -:> '"' -
....,. ~'''''- ---..; :\.-...;::;,C,
f""':.'~{~'.
(' .,
J'
",:.:-S ~ ~}iY':Z6 r' J
to
t:ll1r=.rge
the ~r
ilouse
by
COYlstr1J.cti~.:.; 8.~
aG.Cii ~':'G!"~
tlO
e'
. ." J
""C~-. 0 t.; :'"'~d :~ :::'" S ~ ~~~H3 d ,
l1Y'l.d. (~r::::+::.l -_".'~ + r" ... - -.-' 1
---'-'~' ..... v:..!:;.~ ~ne proT-osee. additio~'1
is
:lC:-:-CO~:'-.:.. -.... O:-:t:.:.. t....,
~~..- - r,
.. - .....-.:..
l.,__'v
Z o:::i ':_~~
-....., .....
1....'l"Cll T.:.E~::::.ce ,
,..,
J. 0: i..:1
o~ ~,"';-ar..lpinger,
sdc~-ted
<..T8. :--~'l:8. :''':l
-')0
-',
- -./\,..,
'- c' -,
-.... ,-,'v J
.~".j -:
.:::. -:,Aee
~.::e
p~o~osej addition vlould
i:T~p::--O\;e
tr-2.e
Sa "'v8.. ry prope:,t~r ;:.::~-: 'V.~O',: l.c.
'=~::~~'~2;'.;.C':: '"c '~e ~~e;::e ra 1 che..ra. cte r 0 f' t~'1e ne iZ;h tJOrflOcd .
':; 11
t:T,;.C -:;Y' signed,
a 11 ov.r::l"' :r;ro:?e it Y" S::".ld
~es~cde 0"''> ::::'e
G6. r':"t.:.O :'7 ~ ; 1 c:
..:\.cs. C.
"
~;-:. :~::--.;. O"J'~:. Ct=-
e'ur l:'eFs0~c~al approlTal
o 1~ t:-...e
:':;2."lT::"~Y pl-3:1. .s.:nd .,q~~~
',.I . ~ J ~ C n l -C-.:. ~~. ~) 08. rd
o f ...~... i._,peal s ~.ra ......_.1~-:: +:1....:,Q. ~ Y'l~ .-"' .L.' 7
_ '__ ~ v~_~ v~~:~nce 00 v~e ~o~in[ Cr~i~~~ce
re~u6stej by ~cnald
1..;. and
PeSgy
']'1
- .
SavBry.
r
f/ // ;/ ._/,-
I ~ /I.. :j' f/
,..(Jvy/'-"'.-<....~/i... \...
/-
J
/;,
//J 'r.
.-, Ij C:' (., -- L, ~t c.Gt. /'
.~
/ .
/; . ;' ;/'i--
.;.----......- /(_ ...........-(.....- v;,
/ / i
, .~ .!/-- -- ''-<'\''/
/,.......""
-",
, /
r(.'-/'/~~~::--
/'~j
c.. __ "- /....
(
I
/;;
\....... L...
7.1,
, -,--'" "- - -......._---~...~
,..;
/;'
/1 f"/,
,'/( ;::I'J-~-.// ,,~, ,J-c- {/'
. / . I
J/( ,<71 , r//-'
/ J' ./~L...t:i,{./1../ J-C'--<-i:-'
L. , ,;t' '---'"'
/. ,.1 /
.<,/ //, / (,
..,.., ----::>
.-;,...----:...---'
. J<.:-~'/ '/'-'-,.!...,
1
/)-<<:V;'...----C:
. ,
(... ~
'}'/-": -,-
,"r-;~.
// ; ....-.-....:.
,.:..---
\ ,,/
\ .""_..-"'.-_.",-~
,~-
"/Y." j /
/"-~-X' f;" .'(/
/_':'. " ~/ '/ L/';/ i...-
--- ~ ./"__J
,,/; ",/1
- -
//
, ,
/ ,.(' 1--/ /',...- '
t./ L / ,"-'''-,,-~,
''-,(, '
(/-
,
'-
?/ /;c~/,~-
- /. /--
I / // d
/(/V..--;;j~/}:/;,~Z~:30 .
c:%
(;.
--....,
I
7.
ft
f"
\.c.
j:) //~
L-ff'Y!-rvv-.:r<--r
0.
L-,;-V--~7
~ ,
;.>--,,:, / L..'
t.
/,:
L-LL~Ll'
..:./",
/) j'/.'
:/V/.' .;.:...--1.. I !
(/ - p ,-,,'/v
1,/
"
-';..' ,
/'1' '!
>(J~lll
q;
\' /. .
/<:::::':::"''''':'=:7'':'z..;
L^....
i ~
ACTION
REFERENCE:. APPEAL NO. 2 DATED
AT A MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
THE REFERENCE APPEAL WAS CONSIDERED AND THE
WAS TAKEN ON YOUR:
( ) REQUEST OF AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
( X) REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(( ) REQUEST'l'FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO T1'iI2?U1 i",. ~']..:YJSlry J .Jr. APPELLANT
SUBJECT: ACTION OF THE ZpN+NG BOARD OF APPEALS OF the TCliffi of Frq;plnger
NEW YORK
J~~cb 2S , 19-E}
ON ~pri' 1h g19~
ACTION INDICATED BELOW
20 VARIANCE. BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT
STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD <x) lwnW!C(X~'cm ( )
PRODUCE UNDUE HARSHIP FOR THESE -REASONS:
Ao THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WOULD ( X) MP:r:s:JID:}!NC~'E: ( )
YIELD A REASONABLE RETURN IF LIMITED TO THE USE PE&~ITTED
UNDER THE ORDINANCE, ~.iE{
Bo THE HARDSHIP CREATED 1E. (X), xrrSC~'FtJ{OC ( ) UNIQUE AND
T~J"7IJ1){ ( ), WOULD NOT (JO BE SHARED BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE
IN THE I~~DIATE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AND IN THE SAME
USE DISTRICT, BECAUSE: nf t:hp. :pr.e~A'YlCA of ~n ~d j(')irti'YI~ "rmsed
~O :foot. 1r.,';-'..
Co THE VARIANCE jVO,t'.OOZ( ) WOULD NOT (X) eHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT, mtCAUSE: i To "\r('mlo 'not. be em"i", o~
(,7"-'";"'rl~-rr;~~ "(.r"i"r,h AY1s=t+.1'Yle nnTi1A~ 1'YI t.he t'lT'e~T
T}~REFORE, IT WAS FURTHER DETERMINED THAT THE REQUESTED,
VARIANCE BE GRANTED (X) EfXDElhTO:SIX ( ) AND THAT THE PREVIOUS
DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER~~ ( )
BE REVERSED (X ).
0. \$PECI SE PERMIT 0 BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD IT WAS DETERMINED
THAT'-s-P=J:;CIAL E P R ED) ED
4/ PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4 , SECTION 41l!.~ ()f) , SUBSECTION
PARAGRAPH -- of the ZONING ORDINANCE, AND THE DECISION OF
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BE REVERSED ClC G> B'EOOOt!'i'XJ.'(!';.')i;'!::iDC ( ) g
BECAUSE: hi~ ne~1~io'YI W~s=t n~~en on ~~p.~e'YICA n? T'n~o wn1~h onPR 'not
0?ip~ ~~ ~'YIy ?11PN p'~'YI ~~ pA~ A~+';clA ?, Sect.ion ?20 o? t.ne Zon5ng
Ord:ln~"-'~Ct') n thu.s e11 minatlng olassification of property as corner lot.
,
Go \ [, (. ", \~' \ ((
(SIGNED) I :~ \:' ^' ,. 'J ) "vi' <> ..,". J
AOTING CHAIRMANg ZONING BOARD '9F APPEALS
TOWN OF W~:pplnger
'i... ..
" -.,.
. ..
2.
IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE , SECTION
SUBSECTION , PARAGRAPH____, OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE I BECAUSE:
S~TE\ ~OF NEW YORK )
)ss
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
Sworn to this
DAY OF
J1!~
19-~J-
..,,( h tI.
~Jr~L
. .. NOTARY PUBLzC
HOlCard P .Hayden
:>lo/cry Public, Dutchess Co., New York
Commission Expires March 30, 1965
~.
. .
l\.DD:'i:I'-.IDUk'l! TO ZONING APPEAL NO. 2
I .. El~~CI'~G~:lOUND
(a) Application for huilding pern\it to allow construction of ' addition was denied
in accol'da;.1.ce with Section 416.04 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(b} 'The specifics of. non-conformity are as follows:
(1) The house in question is located in a R-40 zone which requires
miniJ.'l'1urn tide yards of 25 feet.
(2) A rizht-of-way exists between the Sava.ry houce a..."ld the Short house
which opens the question whethe:; the Savary lot is a corne;;: lot.
(3) The proposed plan~ if the lot is considered an interior lot. would
be non.-ccniornnng witl'l the Zoning Ordinance by 3 feet.
(.1;) Th.e proposed p:'an. if the lot is considered a corner lot. would be
non.-confo:::ning v.ith. the Zoning Ordi.nance by 28 feet.
:u ... CORNER LOT
{a} !t is contended that the Savary lot is not a comer lot but an interior let
al16 is. t1.cl'efore. subject to the side yard restrictions of a R-40 zone dwelling
(25 !,-:;ct; fer the iollbv.ring reasons:
(1) A search of the records in the offices of both the Town Cle;;:l~ a..'1.c1
Com:ty Cb:L"k reveal no evidence that a. sub-division plat for De Carmo HillG Road.
has eve:: b~cn filed.
{2) The right-oi-way between the Savary and Short houses serves only
a.s a ~e:::vlcc road to th,e driveways of the respective hous,cs and there is no evidc.."'lce
that it vIa::::: intended for any other purpose.
(3) There is no other evidence to indicate t..Tut the Savary lot was intended
to bo a CCZ':'1cr lot -e. g. the orientation of the house on the lot.
IIi - !:\fl'tE~~..IOR LOT
(2.) '\:fith the understanding that the Savary lot is an interior lot. it is stipulated
th:.t b,~ pre-paoed addition is in non-conformance with the Zoning Ordinance by .3 leet.
ii,/" - V.l-1.iUJi.NCE
(a) It is requested that the ZonL"1g Board of Appeals grant a variance to the
Zocing O::.-dinance to permit the construction of the addition to the Savary house.
(b) A hard::;hip is claimed for thefollowmg reasons:
Page 1 of 2
: :.
~
. .....
/~
;{ i) i'"~'~_...::; ascs oi .,11.c :~avar:y c11i1dren al-'C sucl1. that tllel.e is a t"0~11:.(:G2
::::;:,:;:'l:;:;::..' ~""C::"'Ci:;Y;'''l. '"1';"(; cy~ "'till(\! hou"'e '01""'1 v:,~H ""r:t ,....,"'......,..,..,~{. a .~o_a.-~7"C' "'rve'-~"'c"'"
~~- "" - - . .............. ii..:I ii;;J '" ~ ".._oil, oii..L_ J...1""'- ....._.~ ~ \,j,ot . .. w ....-...:.~ 4.._.............
::. 2::$!'~r tr~J.s neo6..
, .~. ~;"
...~-~
) Ly l~,.:;ic a:i: Deputy Director of Civil DcfeuL?ie cC::::'::l:tlds th::t.:::..n ofiice
',,::..,'.'7 'C'./"lOl ':~:"" .",-,;{3pd 1-,,,, 0"1" he. U"'''' T''''e e..r~"'tl'nf1 ho"''''''' :__.1..,~.... \"'11 '"C''' "";"'1'''''<:'., .~~-,{~ npopr'l.
~-.... -~ -- J L...... -- .....- {,;...:..\o..:...~_....."wI...... ...__.14 .....-.1 o' ~.,..... L...;--~"'" ..'w. ....."-.~ ""'-J-') ....."-"-:;..' ______
,;2) ':':-0"-' a ia:c'lily of 5, having only one useable bath r':iakes io'z a c:ificult
?:::c::'lc::::;. ,/!:~n "'2 oi the r.nembers have to depart for Debool or wci:k at t::.e: sar.::.c ti:.:r_~s
es.::l:. :::..:;:....:.::.:.:.:.Z. 'l'l1.~ e:r..istu1g house provides no space to permit the a2ili-;;::'cn of tt.l;,:)
:~:.:2f-:::':'2 i:::dui.k:.;J. in the p::'oposed alteration.
(":) T:.:.c existing house plan requires that half of the full baser.::.cr..t be u~ed
.-. ::;2.::~.'<~z; Gpacc. This fact prohibits the utilization of the basement a:.-ea to alleviate
fuc Zl'):J.CC ~:;::oblc!:.1..
C0) The alter:n<ltive of selling and moving into property having ilia space
::-:::(:<.:.:.- \;ould put a prohibitive financial burden on the Savary family.
bccau::e:
(c} :::'<J2.sonable use 01 the property will be denied unless a variance is gro..nted
(2) The lets as ordginally sold al"e so narrow as to prorJ.bit the erecting
of a ::'O':":SO c1 tb.;c "be one would reasonably expect in a R-40 zone and still conform
"'0 I.;';" ., ,,~.::-. . oar" ". ':i> ""t ''"1 c~~o'" ",
-.. (......- "-'-\""'\.,;1 ';J 7 ~.. c.... .... ~ .L.~.
(2) 'i'he owner may be denied a reasonable return on the prope:::ty ii he
r.c.ms:; ;.>.::.:' i:: the future, despite the fact that tr..e property generally has a.ppreciated,
if t::8 ';c::~:ic'r of t~c e:-dst".uO' house is restricted as described above and there is no
# ~..
po:; ,~_~"~:..'] oi ir,,:,pl.oving it.
(<:) '"":::'0 EP..2.ll'ting of the adjustment will be in harrnony with. the general pUl.p.:H:;.zS
..::::d. it::::':;:;:::::; of. the Zoning Ol.dinance and will not be injurious to the neizhbo:.:hccd. or
ct~c:'1.~';.:I.i~_:.::: c;:,tri:cnental to the public welfare.
',-; request is a special circumstance, unique in the neighbol"hood, "bl'OUZ:"-'t
;::,,~;:;.:..- ';;;"j loc::.ticn of the right-oi-way which serves as a sel.vice roacl to the cirive-
V/:::":/8 0: t:.;:; ::or_'lCS of th.e Savarys and Shorts. The presence of this right-oi-way
p::\".:,'v:],;,;s <:::"!. tl..1'.l.usu;:lHy large space between the Savary and Short houses wlUch will
1~:;::;:C-_:'~'::: -':;:'_8 ~';:?;crc.cztcd addition without the risk of ovezcrowding.
.v - ~:;~':/l~I':rrON
{::.} A::.:.:..u indication that our neighbors ap:n.ove of our plan, a petition with. the
. ~ .. . bo . 'T... 40(, d.
slg:-..4tU::';;;:; ci oUJ;:' neal"cst nelgn rs lS SUi.ir.:l1~e
It#-
day of -~ljill.
1963.
1"-
(\ ,(\, \:
l \ "'. I
I '; rX1 V Ii
!~I\ l : 'I~ 1)1; ~ \/~n}>(). L2(f" .....1..- ;~
1 '. . vtv-<LJ(. \. ~'-^" . \
I \ \
\,
I
,
SWO::::1 tv :.:.:::.::1 subscribed before me
t.."U c
_%~~fi-
fS.v'!G.TJ "Public, Dutchess Co., New York
lC.vmmi~:on. Exp'ire.l .Harch 30, 1965
Page 2 of 2
~... ~ ..
ACTION
TO .....W ~ .._~."'. APPELLANT
SUBJECT: ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF ... II.. ., ....laa..
NEW YORK
~eh as , 19-.0
ON ....1 " 019-'1-
ACTION INDICATED BELOW
REFERENCE: APPEAL NO.' DATED
AT A MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
THE REFERENCE APPEAL WAS CONSIDERED AND THE
WAS TAKEN ON YOUR:
( ) REQUEST OF AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
( I) REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(( ) REQUEST'rFOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
ING RESOLUTION
INANCE AS
20 VARIANCE. BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT
STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD (I) ( )
PRODUCE UNDUE HARSHIP FOR THESE -REASONS:
Ao THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WOULD ( I) ( )
YIELD A REASONABLE RETURN IF LIMITED TO THE USE PERMITTED
UNDER THE ORDINANCE,'tJIWN1lJI(
~!~"'~!'~1:-
Bo THE HARDSHIP CREATED IS (I), ~ ( ) UNIQUE AND
tcCIII ( ), WOULD NOT (~ BE SHARED BY ALL PROPERTIES ALIKE
IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AND IN THE SAME
USE DISTRICT, BECAUSE: .,... ........, - ,,_Sa'" -...
50 ,.., ~,. ............ .
Co THE VARIANCE G1IIiIlt ) WOULD NOT (I) CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT, B8CAUSE: it ...u ..,. ft' .t
...... d. _It.... ..... Sa.... .....
THEREFORE, IT WAS FURTHE~NED THAT THE REQUESTED
VARIANCE BE GRANTED (I) ~ ( ) AND THAT THE PREVIOUS
DECISION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ( )
BE REVERSED (I ).
a: S PE USE PERMIT 0 D INED
THA SPEC )
4,.' PURSUANT T6 ARTICLE 4 , SECTION.'" , SUBSECTION - 0
PARAGRAPH - of the ZONING ORDI"AN~Jm.J>ECISION OF
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BE REVERSED ~ 0> ~ ( ) Q
BECAUSE: Ide. ...t.lea .. ..... _ ......M .S' .... _1._ .... ..,
.dat. .., I'll" ,1M .. ,., .....u).. Hn"" AU .1' ..qat.Bc
un..... ... .11........ .-.Ul_ttB .1 ......." _ ..... lot_
~~~~~P~ALS
TOWN OF ...,.......