004
-slY
· 6 HENRY STREET
BEACON, NY 12508
"C,1i.k"_""",,,-,,_
BEACON FAMILY HEALTH
PAUL C. GARELL, M.D.
Telephone (914) 831-0470
Fax (914) 831-0306
RECEIVED
July 25, 1997 JUL 28 1997
ELAINE S
rOWN NOWOE
CLE'RI{ 1-1
Town Board
Wappingers ' 'I .
New York 12590
Dear Board Members:
This article recently appeared in the
Hudson Valley Magazine. It is being sent to
you as an informational package to acquaint
you with the problem of cell towers in the
Hudson Valley and how other towns in the
valley are handling this problem.
A cell tower recently appeared in my
back yard. It had no authorization from the
zoning officer, the Town Planning Board or any
other town body.
According to Mr. Dan Close, the zoning
officer, no permit was sought and no permit was
issued for this construction. This construction
occured in a residential R-80 zone.
I am calling on the Town of Wappingers
Board to investigate this non-compliance with town
ordinances and develop a policy to restrict this
type of construction to industrial or business zones.
Sincerely,
(J ~ c.~ fl'-r) .
Paul C. Garell,M.D.
PCG/ja
Encl.
e ~ Tl (\d 7 J.Jt:i ~1
. 0
0-
N
0
,
0- <<l
0 0
0 0
u ,
0
* 0
*
=1-
: a::
-0
=(1)
= -D
:::~
-,
: lIC>
= -c::
=u, ~
-: = ~
-::* U N
....::~~
-* (1)>0
-= *> -cCCUI
: *0 N
-=:Z~
-= * Ll\...K.Jt-4
-*~
-:: * C\IQ::Q:I:Z
~:~
:*0 11..0
- * 0CL::l<: U
-:: * D::_
-= :==
06>
II
"l
t'i
fl
--~~--
ENVIRONS
"
The Tower
"
Inferno
THE CONTROVERSY OVER CELLULAR
PHONE TOWERS HEATS UP
Everyone, it seems, loves the idea of talking on cel-
lular telephones while they're out cruising in their
cars. More than 10 million new customers signed
on with wireless telephone companies last year. Over
the past 10 years, the number of cell phone subscribers
soared from less than 500,000 to an estimated 38 mil-
lion. Currently, more than 40 cell phone companies
operate in New York State. But the price to pay - envi-
ronmentally speaking that is - may be more than what
some people have figured on.
Cell phones need antennae to relay signals. Since
cellular frequencies do not tolerate obstructions, in
many cases the antennae must be placed on towers.
Applications from companies seeking to construct cel-
lular phone towers - averaging 150 feet in height
although some can go as high as 350 feet - are crop-
ping up all over the place, especially along the Thruway
corridor between New York City and Albany.
Some are less objectionable than others, says Den-
nis Doyle, principal planner in the Ulster County Plan-
ning Department, but there is concern over their visual
impact, such as when they show up in the middle of an
apple orchard in Plattekill. "When you're driving up the
Thruway, and you have the Catskills as a backdrop, it's
kind of disconcerting to all of a sudden be looking
through a monopole," notes Doyle.
Besides Plattekill, Ulster County has ten other wire-
less phone towers either under construction or in the
planning stages, including two in Rosendale, two in New
Paltz, one in Kingston, one in Hurley, two in the Town of
Ulster, one in Saugerties and one in Rochester. Cell
tower construction is booming because,
~ generally, antennae must be placed
every five or ten miles to make sure
the cell phone user doesn't get cut off
or experience problems. (Spacing
. ,
BY MEL HYMAN
Mr. Hyman is a writer
based in Albany.
ILLUSTRATION BY STEVE DININNO
depends on height: the higher the Need high tech mean high
antennae, the further its range.) towers?
Greene County is under the same ~_~~_~__~_~_
pressure from cell phone companies
as Ulster County, according to Ronald Roth, director of
the county planning department. "Just about every town
along the river has them," he observes, including New
Baltimore, Coxsackie and Catskill.
One town that took the bull by the horns is Wind-
ham, where a 350-foot tower was proposed for the top
of Mount Hayden in the Catskills. 'That's a pretty huge
structure, and was a big concern in the Town of Wind-
ham," says Roth. The purpose of this particular tower,
whose base would have had an elevation of 2,910 feet,
was to serve the local area and interior sections of the
Catskills. But its impact would have extended far
beyond. "You would have seen it in the Valley, too," says
Roth, especially in the lower elevations of Greene
County and southern Albany County.
Windham officials decided to declare a moratorium
on wireless transmission towers. "They realized their
site plan process wasn't designed to handle this," Roth
explains. During that time, they amended their site plan
review law to include cell tower site specifications,
which the Mount Hayden applicant was unable to meet.
One community still grappling with the cell tower
Hl"DSON VALLEY JUNE 1997 . 41
s
CAll 914-339-8382
'ATIONAl POND SOCIETY
issue is the Town of Bethlehem. Over the
past several months, the Zoning Board of
Appeals has approved three towers in this
relatively affluent suburb of Albany, and
the town board asked town attorney
Bernard Kaplowitz to draw up a local law
regulating the structures.
The proposed law stipulates that the
tower must be "light in tone" and cannot
reasonably interfere with the view from any
public park, natural scenic vista, historic
building or historic district. Moreover, all
obsolete or unused towers must be
removed within 60 days of cessation of oper-
ations and no new cell tower can be
approved unless the applicant demon-
strates a "good faith effort" to share tower
sites or mount equipment on existing struc-
tures, such as water towers or tall buildings.
Doyle explains that there is no legal
precedent for barring cell towers altogether,
although municipalities can regulate where
they are built by amending their zoning laws
so that they are 0 I allowed in industrial
and commercial areas. "I've got a co
I1ere iiithe-l own of Hilrley that's proposing
one on a 30-by-30 lot that's only 50 feet from
someone's house," he notes. (1be town cur-
rently has a moratorium on cell tower con-
struction while it considers zoning.)
The time for municipalities to take actioG
is now, says Doyle, because the exploding
cellular phone market will create a demand
for service along secondary roadways as .
well. In Ulster County, Rosendale has regu-
lations in place and a Plattekill proposal is
now on Doyle's desk. "Municipalitipc> fled
to carefully craft their regu]atic'ns in
response to the Telecommunications f \ct of
1996," he emphasizes. That law says .that
personal communication services (Pc'S)
companies must be allowed to provide s "r-
vice in an area, provided they meet sta te I
\emiSSions standards, while .~nicipalitit~:.. 1
have the right to regulate the 10ca1ion oftI1e
facilities, provided they make decisions in a !
timely fashion. It is, Doyle says, "a balanc-
ing act."
The Town of Guilderland in southern
Albany County has a request from Sprint
PCS to build a cellular tower next to
Thruway Exit 25. According to town attor-
ney John Bailey, Guilderland had consid-
ered a moratorium on construction but
ended up taking more concrete action. "We
decided to bite the bullet and enacted a
local law," he said. "We're better off having
a law on the books so that we could meet
the challenges of these companies." ~
)1' most silmificant asnect of the law is the pro- .
hibition of towers on land zoned residential
-and agricultural; they WIll be permItted in
commercIal and business areas. The law
also aggressively promotes the concept of
co-location (sharing an existing tower);
':~I'1icants "must demonstrate that they've
'.cnt over backwards to co-locate."
"Municipalities across the state are just
starting to deal with this," Bailey says.
"Right now everyone is flying in the dark
until it's clear what we can and cannot do.
There are some towns in Westchester
County - like Mt. Kisco - that have
enacted some very stringent ordinances,
and they've been aggressively challenged
hy the industry." Under the Telecommuni-
l'ations Act, he says, court review favors
PCS companies: expedited court proce-
dure specifies that pes cases against
municipalities go directly to federal court
and to the head of the court calendar.
Doing battle with local governments is
not the modus operandi that Sprint PCS
employs, according to Wayne Nanna, com-
pany vice president for the upstate New
York area. "We want to work with local
,~'overnment whenever possible," he
declares. "Our primary objective is to put
antennas on as many existing structures as
possible - on buildings, billboards, silos.
We want to erect antennas rather than tow-
ers, because they're much less expensive
and they're more acceptable to people."
I r' In the opinion ofLoseoh Ross, real estate
manager for Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile,
, III mClpa lIes are owmg e pro em wayjl
i out of proportion. "It's unbelievable," he
i says. "I think it's a political issue, because
it's just not warranted. It annoys me that it's
taken such a political direction considering
how benign these things are."
Politicians have indeed entered the fray.
Assembly Majority Leader Michael Brag-
man, D-Cicero, is proposing a package of
guidelines aimed at developing an inven-
tory of all cell towers in the state, encour-
aging co-location of antennae on already
existing sites (such as buildings and struc-
tures owned by the Thruway Authority and
the state Department of Transportation)
and creating an issue advisory group. "We
~want to encourage the location of new cell
I phone towers on appropriate state-owned
(lands," said Darren Dopp, a spokesperson
'\ for the majority leader.
\ The administration of Governor George
Pataki is also focusing on the problem.
According to Dopp, "They're looking to
get one of the cell phone companies to
manage the cell tower sites. We think the
state should be the site manager."
There are currently between 15,000 and
18,000 cell towers in the U.S., says Dopp.
'The estimates are that there will be more
than 115,000 towers in the year 2000."
Companies will compete by promising bet-
ter reception. "Better reception, meaning
more towers," asserts Dopp. "If nothing is
done, just think of what that can do to the
landscape." &
ACCEPTIl'I
49 CLINTON.
THE MA
Imagine.
As sa
V Your ov\
ease lat
V Water th
V Board CE
midwive
V Accredit
Childbec
For a TOI
Call 914