1986-04-17 SPMThe adjourned April 7th, 1986 meeting of the Town Board of the Town
of Wappinger reconvened on April 17th, 1986 at the Town Hall, Mill
Street, Wappingers Falls, New York, for the purpose of conducting
public hearings on the proposed use of Dutchess County Consortium
Funds, and a proposed Local Law to amend Local Law #2 of.1977
relating to Environmental Quality Review.
The Supervisor opened the meeting at 7:02 P.M.
Present:
Irene Paino, Supervisor
Joseph Bracone, Councilman
David Reis, Councilman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Absent:
Vincent Farina, Councilman
June Visconti, Councilwoman
The meeting was recessed at 7:03 P.M. to conduct a public hearing
on the proposed use of Consortium Funds and at 7:30 P.M. a second
hearing on a proposed Local Law to amend Local Law #2 of 1977,
Environmental Quality Review.
The meeting was called back to order at 8:15 P.M. and all five Board
Members were present.
The Board chose to table their consideration of the subject matter
of the two public hearings and address these items at a future
meeting.
MR. REIS moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Farina and
unanimously carried.
The meeting adjourned at 8:16 P.M.
aine H Snowden
Town Clerk
/ (J
A Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on april 17, 1986 at the Town Hall, Mill Street,
Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York, on a proposed
Local Law Amending Local Law #2 of 1977 entitled Environmental
Quality Review.
The Supervisor opened the Hearing at 7;33 P.M.
Present:
Irene Paino, Supervisor
Vincent Farina, Councilman
Joseph Bracone, Councilman
David Reis, Councilman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Absent:
June Visconti, Councilwoman
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. (These Affidavits
are attached hereto and made part thereof of the Minutes of this
Hearing).
The Supervisor noted that the Town is commencing a strict
application of S.E.Q.R. regulations to require a thorough review
of all projects prior to approval. The list of Type I actions
requiring environmental impact statements as presented in the
State S.E.Q.R. has been strengthened by this proposed Local Law
and the Engineer was requested to explain the thresholds proposed
by the Town.
The Engineer explained the new Type I thresholds listed in the
Local Law, using the Dutchess County Soil Map recently adopted
by the Town Board, to illustrate the type of soil stated. The
Type I actions are those most likely to result in an adverse
impact on the environment and will, most problably require a
thorough environmental impact statement. In residential projects,
there are two categories listed; construction of two or more units,
not connected to central utilities and located in thick glacial
tills areas; twelve or more units not connected to central utili-
ties in thick sand and gravel areas as shown on the Soils Map;
any construction of 50 or more units connected to central utilities.
In non-residential areas of 5 or more acres, using 10,000 gallons
of water per day, parking for 500 vehicles or more than 30,000
square feet of gross floor area. The last two categories listed
refer to an action on or adjacent to a historic site and one
involving a certified agricultural district. All of these are
proposed Type I actions which the Town Board will consider after
listening to the comments of those present.
Mrs. Paino opened the Hearing to the public and asked for their
comments/suggestions/questions.
Bill Parsons, resident of the Town and member of the Planning
Board, recommended a few changes ---the residential category of
two or more residential units would be unfair if "Johnny Jones"
wanted to split up his acre of property and give his son or
daughter a parcel, why put him through that process; this
would be a burden in some cases up to and including 5 units.
He suggested that it could be an option of the Planning Board,
whether they're dealing with a developer who's going to develop
property or a homeowner who's splitting up his parcel for a
family member. The 50 or more residential units connected to
central utilities, should be reduced to around the 35 range.
Parking for 500 vehicles is a big area and would make a
significant environmental impact --50 units would be more
practical, 100 units would be the screaming limit.
Dave Redfield, Cedar Hill Road, concurred with Mr. Parsons
on changing the 2 residential units to 4 or 5 since he was in
that position himself and wanted to split up his five acre
parcel.
Victor Fanuele, resident of the Town and member of the Planning
Board, agreed with Mr. Parsons.
The Engineer noted that the lead agency designated on these
environmental impacts, which would probably be the Planning
Board, or in some case, the Town Board, has the power to add to
these Type I actions; the list presented are the suggested
minimum, but if they feel that in some cases they should
require a full impact statement, they are empowered to require
this.
Further discussion brought forth another suggestion from Mr.
Fanuele to lower the threshold from 5 acres relating to
commercial facilities. Mr. Parsons agreed with this suggestion.
Hans Gunderud, Zoning Administrator, asked if there is an
overlay of the soils map on the tax grid map and Mr. Paggi
replied that the maps were all on the same scale and it can be
overlayed.
James Mills, resident of the Town and Chairman of Planning Board
asked if they're giving latitude on commercial, why not give it
on residential. They are really restricting them on 12 acre
units not connected to central utilities in "thick sand and
gravel", if Planning Board becomes the lead agency.
Councilwoman June Visconti arrived at the Hearing at this
point (8:00 P.M.)
In the discussion that followed, the Attorney and the Engineer
explained what was involved in preparing an environmental
assessment form pointing out that part 2 of that document
was the responsibility of the lead agency, not the applicant;
also, the applicant was not required to retain a professional,
they could do it themselves.
Mr. Parsons added that he felt that the Planning Board Members
were in favor of the S.E.Q.R. process which would provide
better environmental reviews, however they were not in favor
of creating a bureaumatic nightmare for someone who's pulling
2 or 3 lots off of their property, so if they could figure out
something that would work both ways, he had no problem.
Don Keller, resident of the Town and member of the Planning
Board asked about the cost to the applicant for having someone
fill out the environmental form on a 2 or 3 lot subdivision.
He was referring to the Mom & Pop giving a gift to the kids.
The Engineer responded there is no additional cost to them
now than it was before unless their review determines that
there is a problem. This process allows an easier process
for the Planning Board to determine if there is a problem.
Mr. Fanuele was under the impression that all Type I actions
require an environmental impact statement, if that's not true
than all applications should go through the S.E.Q.R. process.
The Engineer informed him that they are already going through
that process, he just doesn't realize this.
There was some confusion with the Planning Board members and
Mr. Fanuele suggested that action be tabled until it could
be discussed by Town Board and Planning Board.
The Attorney noted that this is a proposed Local Law until the
Town Board votes to approve it. They will review the comments
made tonight and then determine if modifications should be
made or if it should be adopted, as presented.
Mr. Parsons asked the Engineer for his rationale on selecting
50 units connected to central utilities; Mr. Paggi replied
that the line had to be drawn and he felt this was a practical
limit if central utilities are available; however, Mr. Parsons
felt more comfortable setting it within the 25 to 35 range.
Both the Attorney and the Engineer pointed out that if the
Planning Board suspects a problem with a 35 unit construction
relating to drainage, traffic or whatever, it is within their
power to request submission of the long form environmental
assessment for or even a draft environmental impact statement.
There were no other comments made at the Public Hearing either
for or against the proposed Local Law Amending our present
Law relating to environmental impact.
MR. REIS moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by
Mr. Farina and unanimously carried.
The Hearing closed at 8:16 P.M.
CihAkA
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER AFFIDAVIT OF
OF POSTING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A
PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDING
LOCAL LAW #2 OF 1977 ENTITLED
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
STATE OF NEW YORK )
ss:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes and
says:
That she is the duly elected, qualified and acting
Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess
and State of New York.
That on April 8th, 1986, your deponent posted a
copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing on a
proposed Local Law Amending Local Law #2 of 1977,
entitled Environmental Quality Review, on the signboard
maintained by your deponent in her office in the Town
Hall of the Town of Wappinger, Mill Street, in the Village
of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York.
Sworn toA:,- fore me this /7
day of 1986.
r
Notary Public
CLUtit
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
NNW WM
Notary P18tmo of 111.10-11011
tn Outohi*
Commission Eapawr Ninh"
IL
T
2„
. and C.
NEWS
DISPLAY ADVERTISING
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914 297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET—WAPPINGERS FALLS s NY 12590
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thurs-
day,
April 17,1988 at 7:30 p.m. at the Town
of Wappinger Town Hall, Mill Street, Wap -
pingo Falls, N.Y., the Town Board will
hold a pudic hearing on proposed local law
number "2" of the year 1988, entitled: "A
local law supplementing the list of Type 1
Actions under Part 817.12 of the State En-
vironmental Quality Review Regulations
and establishing standards for com-
pleteness proposed al l
eapplications."
would amend
Local Law #2 of the year 1977 of the Town
of Wappinger entitled "Environmental
Ouality Review" to provide that the follow -
int would be Type 1 actions under
S
1. The 'cdrafn5itiion-of two Of ries
residentW units not connected to central
< utilities in the "hick glacial tills" areas and
twelve or more units not connected to cen-
tral utilities in the' "thick sand and gravel"
areas of the Soils characteristics Map;
2. Any construction of 50 or more units
connected to central utilities;
3. Construction of new non-residential
•• facilities which involve the physical altera-
ton of five or more acres; would use ground
or surface water M excess of 10,000 gallons
T per day; would have parking for 500
vehicles; or would have more than 30,000
square feet of gross floor area;
4. Any non-agricultural uses In an
agricultural district meeting ten percent
(10% 01 annyy ootther applica�blleenthreshold;
cent ( %) of the applicable thresholfive ds
within or contiguous to any publicly owned
•. or operated park land, recreation area or
designated open space. "
al
: law amid existing Local Lcopies of Laaw #2proposed are
available at the Town Hall for inspection.
An environmental assessment form has
also been prepared which indicates that the
proposed action will not have a significant
effect on the environment and will result in
a negative declaration. The local law would
take effect Immediately upon its filing with
the secretary of State.
At the public hearing, all interested par-
ties will be heard, with respect to the pro-
posed, local law and the environmental
assessment form.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that
the regular meeting of the Town Board of
the Town of Wappinger
has been adjourn-
ed until Thursday, April 17, 1986 at 7:30
p.m. for the purposes of conducting this
hearing and considering final action on the
pro�rlocal'wat the close thereof.
Dated: April
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of New York,
County of Dutchess,
Town of Wappinger.
Gisela Schmitz
of the
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York,
being duly sworn, says that he is, and at the several
times hereinafter was, the Bookkeeper
of the W. & S.D. NEWS, a newspaper printed and
published every Wednesday in the year in the Town of
•Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, and that the
annexed NOTICE was duly published in the said
newspaper for one weeks successively once
. in each week, commencing on the 9th day of . APro
. 19. AO. and on the following dates thereafter, namely
on
and ending on the
9th
19..8A both days inclusive.
day of. ..APr'il....
e
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 9th day of. .4P a.... 19.86
Notary Public
My commission expires
ALBERT M. OSTEN
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE CF NEW YORK
QUALIFIED 11 Iii ROSS COUNTY
014.-C24.0760 pCj
COMMLSSlCN EXPIRES M44044 .30, lgt?
ThAl
A Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on April 17, 1986 at the Town Hall, Mill Street,
Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York, for the purpose
of hearing public comment on the us of Community Development
Funds, particularly for the purpose of funding the master
plan and zoning.
The Supervisor opened the Hearing at 7:33 P.M.
Present:
Irene Paino, Supervisor
Joseph Bracone, Councilman
David Reis, Councilman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Absent:
Vincent Farina, Councilman
June Visconti, Councilwoman
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. (These Affidavits
are attached hereto and made part thereof of the minutes of
this Hearing).
The Supervisor noted that the County Consortium monies for
1986 will be approximately $34,000 according to the Dutchess
County Department of Planning. The Town Board has suggested
that these funds be used for the purpose of funding the master
plan and zoning, specifically, for payment of a proposed contract
with the Dutchess County Department of Planning, in the amount
of $23,900, for the services of a professional planner during
the process of addressing the master plan and implementing
changes to the zoning ordinance.
the following
to base maps,
The contract will include
services: Section I - Basic Studies pertaining
community values, economic base, population skudy,
land use and housing study, natural features, transportation and
community facilities and public utilities. Section II - Compre-
hensive Plan, pertaining to land use plan, transportation plan,
community facility plan, public utilities plan; Section III -
Implementation, pertaining to zoning ordinance revisions etc.
Section IV - Meetings and Publications, including 18 meetings
with the review group over a period of 12 months, 25 copies of
draft zoning ordinance amendments, and 200 copies of revised:_
comprehensive Master Plans. Mrs. Paino continued her explanation
of the proposed use of the funds, explaining that the remaining
$1,100 would be use for other related costs incurred during the
planning and zoning process, including attorney and engineer's
fees.
Mrs. Paino asked if there were any comments or questions from
the public.
There were no comments made either for or against the proposal
for the use of County Consortium Funds for 1986.
MR. REIS moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Mr.
Bracone and unanimously carried.
The Public Hearing closed at g:04 P
CLUuL
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Section I - Basic Studies
1) Base Maps
a) 1" = 1000' roads, drainage
and parcel boundaries
b) 1" = 1000' topography and roads
2) Community Values
a) review and analyses of
existing community
value survey
3) Economic Base
a) regional orientation;
b) economic profile
c) participation rates
of the Labor Force
d) commuter patterns
e) projections of income
and employment
4) Population Study
a) population changes
1900 to 1980
b) population changes
1980 to 1986
c) analysis of factors
influencing population
change
d) population characteristics
e) population projections
5. Land Use and
Housing Study
a) land use inventory
by parcel
b) projected land
use by category
c) description of
housing stock
d) projection of housing
needs
Technical Specifications
6. Natural Features
a) compilation of data
on physical features
and their distribution
• soil classifications
• regulated wetlands
• 100 -year floodplains
• surficial aquifers
• bedrock and bedrock
aquifers
• steep slopes
• slowlypermeable soils
• shallow soils
• drainage basins and
water features
7. Transportation
a) description of rail service
and regional transportation
links
b) analysis of highway systems
c) traffic volumes on state and
county roads
d) analysis of local roads and
road conditions
e) intersection condition
analysis
f) review of existing special
transportation studies
g) traffic volume projections
for state and county roads
h) highway capacity analysis
8. Community Facilities and
Public Utilities
a) description, distribution and
analysis of recreation space,
schools, municipal buildings,
fire fighting facilities,
libraries and refuse disposal
b) description and capacity
analysis of central water and
sewer facilities
c) projections.of public utility
and community facilities needs
Technical Specifications - 3
d) description of historic
landmarks and landscapes
e) review of existing scenic and
historic district studies and
plans
Section II - Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan
a) Delineation and description
of proposed land use by
category in each geographic
area of the town
b) descriptions of revised
development policies
c) summary of recommendations
including suggestions for
addressing moderate income
housing needs
2. Transportation Plan (presented with
Land Use Plan)
a) proposals for links between
existing transportation
features
b) recommendations for improvements
to existing roadways and
intersections
c) description and locational
criteria for pedestrian and
bicycle paths
d) recommendations for special
land use corridors and
intersections
3. Community Facility Plan
a) delineation and recommended
locations for future recreation
areas, parks, greenbelts, trails
and open space areas
b) development of locational and
capacity criteria for educational,
cultural, health and public buildings
c) historic, scenic and coastal plan
composite
4. Public Utilities Plan
a) delineation and description of
service areas for central water
and sewer systems
Technical Specifications - 4
b) recommended densities of
development for areas outside
of existing and proposed central
water and sewer service areas
c) recommendations for plan
implementations
Section III - Implementation
1. Zoning Ordinance revisions -
prepared in conjuction and
concurrently with the
comprehensive plan
2. recommendations for new plan
implementation tools
3. special regulations including
wetlands law, floodplain management
ordinance, and soil mining law
Section IV - Meetings and Publications
1. Meetings -18* meetings with plan
and zoning ordinance review group
over a period of 12 months
2. Publications
a) 25 copies of draft zoning
ordinance amendments (100 pgs.)
b) 200 copies of revised compre-
hensive Master Plans (150 pgs.,
2 colored maps)
*Any meetings in excess of 18 (90 hours)
will be charged at a rate of $35/hour
PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
AND
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
L
AGREEMENT, made the (date and between the County of
Dutchess, State of New York and the Town of Wappinger, State of New York.
WHEREAS, the Town of Wappinger is desirous of employing the services of the
Department of Planning of Dutchess County for the purpose of developing a
comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations; and
WHEREAS, Section 239-d, Article 12-B, General Municipal Law, enables the
County planning agency to furnish communities with such services when
requested to do so by the municipality; now
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter
set forth and the parties hereto intending to be legally bound hereby,
agree as follows:
1. That the Dutchess County Department of Planning will develop a
comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance for the Town of Wappinger
according to the technical specifications which are attached hereto and
made a part of this agreement.
2. That the comprehensive plan and draft zoning ordinance, including all of
the materials and services listed in the technical specifications, shall
be delivered to the Town of Wappinger within twelve (12) months of the
date of this agreement.
3. That the Commissioner of Planning for Dutchess County will assign
fully qualified members of his staff to perform such services.
4. That the Town of Wappinger agrees to pay the Dutchess County Department of
Planning a fee of $23,900 in accordance with the method of payment
hereinafter stated. Invoices will be submitted every six (6) months for
work completed during the previous six (6) months. The Fee Distribution
Schedule which is part of this agreement, will be the basis for the
progress billings and for determining the work completed.
S. That the Town of Wappinger, upon receipt of such invoice, shall make
payment to Dutchess County for the total amount due.
6. That the Town of Wappinger agrees to save harmless and indemnify
the County of Dutchess for any damages, suits, claims, causes of
action, judgments or debts whatsoever, which might or which do occur
as a result of such employment.
7. That in the event either party hereto is desirous of altering, revising
or revoking this Agreement in whole or in part, said party shall give
thirty (30) days written notice to the other, in advance, of the
expiration date of this agreement.
IT IS UNDERSTOOD that the aforementioned agreements and conditions shall be
binding upon the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have set their hands and seals the
day and year first above written.
THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
BY
THE COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
BY
I. MASTER PLAN
II. ZONING ORDINANCE
GROSS PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOTAL
$17,910
5,990
$23,900
CONCEPT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & LAND USE REGULATION STUDY
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
General
The work program is designed to simultaneously review and refine the
comprehensive plan while preparing proposed amendments to the town's zoning
ordinance. The process will be completed in 12 months and the final products
will be: (1) a revised comprehensive plan, and (2) proposed amendments to the
town zoning ordinance. Other recommendations for local action may be
included in the plan.
Zoning Ordinance
The present town zoning ordinance will be reviewed as the comprehensive
planning process proceeds. The review process will initially focus on those
sections of the ordinance with an indirect relationship to town land use
policy; more specifically, administration and enforcement, standards for
special permits, site plan approval procedures and standards, non -conforming
uses, and miscellaneous regulations. At the latter stages of the planning
process, as prospective land use policy is more clearly defined, the more
substantive sections of the zoning ordinance will be reviewed and prospective
amendments developed. Those sections deal with the zoning map, district
regulations, supplementary regulations and the schedule of bulk regulations.
The work of the existing town zoning committee will be reviewed. A working
committee should be formed by the town for this plan and zoning ordinance
revision process. This committee could include representatives of the
Planning Board, Board of Appeals, Conservation Advisory Council, Town Board
and Zoning Enforcement Office. Its functions should be to identify current
problems, offer ideas for problem solving and to review the text of proposed
amendments.
Master Plan
The present town plan will be reviewed. Information presented in that plan
will be updated for 1980. Available data to the present will also be added.
Each chapter will consist of a description of the topic, a statistical and
geographic analysis of the topic's characteristics, and their implication for
planning. Updated information, new data, new planning technology plus
information gleaned from reviews of plans, corridor studies, scenic
designation studies, area transportation studies, and similar studies prepared
for the town will be included. Their implication for current land use
decisions will be assessed. Each chapter and its recommendations will be
discussed by the same group constituted to review the town zoning ordinance.
L
Concept - 2
After all chapters are complete, all the recommendations will be accumulated
and described in a single "Comprehensive Plan Section." This section will
provide detailed recommendations for the Master Plan, the town's regulatory
documents and other governmental and private actions. Those recommendations
that are amenable to being portrayed geographically, will be mapped to create
a new "Comprehensive Plan Map."
Summary
,The outcome of the processes described above,- will be an integrated system of
plans and regulations using state of the art planning techniques and tailored
to the needs of the Town of Wappinger.
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER AFFIDAVIT OF
OF POSTING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON PROPOSED USE OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, PARTICULARLY
FOR FUNDING THE MASTER PLAN
AND ZONING
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes and
says:
That she is the duly elected, qualified and acting
Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess
and State of New York.
That on April 8th, 1986, your deponent posted a
copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing on the
proposed use of Community Development Funds, on the
signboard maintained by your deponent in her office
in the Town Hall of the Town of Wappinger, Mill Street,
in the Village of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County,
New York.
Sworn to(
oo before me this
day of1986.
Notary Public
1� tcbtAL
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
Malt NOS,
NOW, Pone, Von el Me OM
tap. 401194
Qua ma M wow.OIM
cmmbelotl IitpkM 1410101,
;
:
•I
:„
DISPLAY ADVERTISING
ond S. D.
NEWS
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914 297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET—WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town
Board of the Town of Wappinger will hold
a Public Hearing on Thursday, April 17,
1980 al 7:00 P.M. al the Town H* Mill
Street, Wappingers Falls, New York, for the
purpose of hearing public comment on the •
use of Community Development Funds,
particularly for the purpose of funding the
master plan and mktg.
All interested persons ars Invited to a1 -
tend and will be heard.
Elaine H. Snowdon
Town Clerk
' .Town of Wappinger
Dated: April 8, 1988
' Date of Publication: April 9, me'
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of New York,
County of Dutchess,
Town of Wappinger.
Gisela Schnitz
of the
Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York,
being duly sworn, says that he is, and at the several
times hereinafter was, the BookketttPqr
of the W. & S.D. NEWS, a newspaper printed and
published every Wednesday in the year in the Town of
Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, and that the
annexed NOTICE was duly published in the said
newspaper for oneweeks successively once
. in each week, commencing on the 9th day of .4PT1
. 19.86. . . and on the following dates thereafter, namely
on
and ending on the 9th
19. I*. both days inclusive.
day of. 41M4-1
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 9th day of April 19 86
Notary Public
My commission expires
ALBERT M. OSTEN
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK
QUALIFIED IN D COUNTY
14-3240700
COMMISSION EXPIRES *lift 30, 19E5
734 N