1982-02-03 PHA Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on February 3, 1982, at the Town Hall, Mill Street,
Village of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York, on an
Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger.
Supervisor Diehl opened the Hearing at 6:48 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice Mills, Councilwoman
Frank Versace, Councilman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. (These Affidavits
are attached hereto and made part thereof of the minutes of
this hearing).
Supervisor Diehl asked if anyone wished to comment on this
rezoning.
No one spoke for or against the Amendment.
Mr. Johnson moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by
Mrs. Mills and unanimously carried.
The Hearing closed at 6:51 P.M.
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER AFFIDAVIT OF
POSTING
OF
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes
and says:
That she is the duly elected, qualifiedand
acting Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County
of Dutchess and State of New York.
That on January 13, 1982, your deponent posted
a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing on
an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of the Town of
Wappinger, on the signboard maintained by your deponent
in her office in the Town Hall of the Town of Wappinger,
Mill Street, in the Village of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess
County, New York.
arn0A4_
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
Sworn to before me this
day of 4-Z" 1982.
• Notary Public
111.
' "f •:'J.4 3.t*
County
C,,miuJ,n az,iras And 30, ../"( t1
14. Cati
• NEWS-
DISPL 44 Y
ADVERTISING . CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914-297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET • WAPPINGERS FALLS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE hist the Town
Board, of thesown of Wappinger will
conduct a Public Henri al the Town
Hall, Milt ,Street, Wappplagers Falls,
New York on'February 3, 1 at 5:45
P.M. EST, on- an. Ordinance Amending
the Zoning Map of the Town of Wapp-
Inger as follows:-- . - ...... ..-- -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP OF
" THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
1.
' The. following, ordinance wan in- .
troduced by Councilman Johneon,o/ho
moved its adoption:: ,+ 3 :' - .-
BE IT RESOLVED and ordained- by
the Town Board of the Town of Wapp-
Inger,,Dutchess County,'New•York, In
pursuance to the authority conferred by
the laws of the State of New York, as
follows:
SECTION t. Th. -Town ofWappppinger
Zoning Map adopted March 10 1980 as
amended from time to tlme, (a hereby
further amended by rezoning he follow -
Ing described parcel of land from "R-20
(Residential. ,'Zone) _ to -NB
(Neighborhood Silliness), said tract of
land being on the Went. aide of- Al?
Angels Hitt Road, and mon particularly
described as follows:
Tax Maps No. 148357-03.190015 -
Lyndon C. -Hickman
No. 19.8357.03.185004
Deeds Recorded In Uber 1232 Pg. 298
Bounded on the North by 1y0P Po: 7�
Drive: East .b AIL A i I R :
Road:
West by FortySlxtyllve Club; Southby
Texland Properties Corporation and
John and Susan Nardeltl -
SECTION It. This amendment shall
become effective • upon adoption,
posting and publication, as proscribed
by Town Law: -
Elalne H. Snowden
• Town Clerk
Dated: January 13, 1982
Date of Publication: January 20, 1982
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Suite of New York.
-Couhty of Dutchess.
Town of Wappinga.
Giseic Stri jtj..l z. of the
Tparn of Wappingcr. Dutcbess County, New Ya
being duly swan. says tbzt ':e Is, and it the several ..
times bercinafter was, tie...PQPJS epe,L or
W. &$.D. NEWS. n newspaper printed s:nd 17 bl:shed
every Thursday In the yeas in the Town cr Wa? !ager.
•Dutcbcst County, New York, and that the sri:exed
NOTICE was duly published in the said news;aper fcn
....or ei.week successivelyon.a 3....1n each week.
commencing cn the2 Qth.... dky of.. January • • •
19.8 a.nd on the following dates thereafter. namely on
• •
and ending on the2 Qt?h ....day of...Jan.uary•-
3 .2.. bots days inclusive
..
Subscribed and sw:fn to befc:e me
this 20 tn d:y 1982
Natery Public
M; :ornmas(c.n expires
:
Y _r
1
A Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on February 3, 1982 at the Town Hall, Mill Street,
Village of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York.
Supervisor Diehl opened the Hearing at 7:00 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice, Mills, Councilwoman
Frank Versace, Councilman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Absent:
Gerard McCluskey, Councilman
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. (These Affidavits
are attached hereto and made part thereof of the Minutes of this
Hearing).
The Town Clerk read the following letters:
Tax Map Parcel No. 625803-278358
To: Town Board
Referral: 82-14, Town of Wappinger
Re: Cornell and Drake Zoning Amendments
In accordance with the provisions of General Municipal Law
(Article 12B, Sections 239-1 and 239-m), the Dutchess County
Department of Planning has reviewed subject referral with
regard to pertinent inter -community and countywide considera-
tions. Upon analysis, this Department makes the following
findings.
This application proposed that land north of Myers Corners
Road be rezoned from a Residential (R-20) Zoning District to
an Office Research Zoning District (OR -10A). The property
comprises over 30 acres of land. This land is adjacent to a
property that is zoned for planned industry uses.
If the proposed action were approved, the result would be a
total of 50 acres of land zoned for office and industry in
what is primarily a residential area.
The Town Development Plan recommends that the subject property
be used for residential purposes. Lands designated for industry
in the Town Plan are located near the Route 9 corridor, along
the railroad right-of-way in tle northeastern part of the Town
and in sites on All Angels Hill Road.
The development of non-residential uses on the 30 -acre site
would have an impact on area groundwater resources, sewer
systems, and the road network, as well as on existing land
uses.
Recommendation
This'proposed rezoning would have a significant impact on the
overall development of the Town and must be considered in terms
of the impact on Town and area growth -- residential, commercial
and industrial. The Dutchess County Department of Planning
recommends that, prior .to a Town Board decision on the zoning
amendment, studies be carried out to determine the impact of
this proposal on roads, water resources and sewer service
capacities and the relationship of this proposed use to
existing and potential development in the area. After
completion of such analyses, the decision in this matter
should be based upon local study of the facts.
The Dutchess County Department of Planning does not presume
to base its decision on the legalities or illigalities of
the facts or procedures enumbrated in subject zoning action.
Dated: January 29, 1982
Kenneth R. Toole, Commissioner
Dutchess County Department of Planning
By Richard Birch, Senior Planner
January 19th, 1982
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
Town Hall - Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
RE: Cornell & Drake - Rezoning Request
Dear Board Members:
At the January 18th, 1982 Planning Board meeting, a
motion was made by Mr. Fahuele, to recommend that the rezoning
request be granted subject to the provisions that the road
known as "Four Fields" tit be used as an access to the site
and that the building sie be limited to 250,000 square feet.
The motion was sedcnded by Mr. Parsons and was carried
by those members present.
Vote:
Mr. Fanuele - aye
Mr. Mills - aye
Mr. May - aye
Mr. Brannen - term expired
Mr. Keller - absent
Mr. Parsons - aye
Mr. Rubenstein - aye
Respectfully yours,
s/ Betty -Ann Russ, Secr.
T/W Planning Board
Mr. Fred Johnston, partner of Pizzagalli Construction Company
from Vermont was present and asked to speak on the rezoning;
he stated that he had met earlier that evening with residents
of the area of the proposed rezoning. He was available, he
stated, to answer questions on specific problems that the
residents felt the rezoning would cause, i. e., traffic,
storm water runoff, esthetics, access, land use, pollution,
effluent, water control, etc. If it was not rezoned, so be it,
he said, they were not going to show up with New York lawyers
3
kie
and try to fight it. If it doesn't fit the best needs of
the community, it won't be done, there are other communities,
but there are particular advantages to this site. Upon the
recommendation of the Dutchess County Department of Planning
to conduct studies and at the urging of the Town Board, they
had conducted a complete Environmental Impact Statement by
the engineering firm of Hayward Pakin which is not normally
required for a rezoning but under these circumstances he agreed
it should be done, even though his firm does not own the
property and have no particular building plan in mind. He then
explained what the statement was and what questions it answered,
and submitted it to the Town Board. Their main concern in
accomodating the residents of the vicinity of that rezoning
was trying to come up with something to answer objections to
people on the immediate road which is Four Fields and belongs
to this parcel and has six houses on the road. He compared
what might be a housing development of 66 homes which could
be built up to that road, with perhaps 2 or 3 cars for each
home with a single office building; their proposal calls for
the elimination of that road as a means of access to that
property and they would establish whatever buffer that would
be required to insure them that the project would not be seen
from any of those homes and they arrived at a figure of 300'
of land that would be left as land forever wild; they were
willing to live with restrictions; they plan only office
research, not testing or manufacturing. They do not have a
definite plan for the building, he repeated, nor do they have
a client; the number of cars could range from about 10 to a
maximum of 590. He then told the public he was available for
any questions they might have; a plan was submitted for them
to view.
Henry Semp, All Angels Hill Road, asked a clarification of why
OR -10A is mentioned in the legal notice as office and research
only, when in fact, according to the Zoning Ordinance, light
industry district should also be included as part of OR.
This rezoning is of great concern to those opposed and their
concerns include 1. added traffic since it has been stated
that between. 300 and 600 cars in addition to the IBM complex
will travel on an already overcrowded bedroom community road
and would create a serious safety hazard especially when
schoolchildren are within walking distance of their schools,
2. a fear of lower real estate value to surrounding homes,
3. excessive noise pollution affecting the bedroom community,
4.=.:_a danger of pollution of one of the Town's aquifer recharge
area, 5. the property contains a wetland which should be
protected. There has been sufficient evidence and concern,
he continued to warrant a request for an environmental impact
study conducted in conformity with the SEQRA law and should be
done before any rezoning of the property takes place. He asked
if the Town Engineer had been contacted to prepare and submit
an environmental assessment form for the state DEC as requested.
Mr. Johnston responded that the zoning classification Light
Industry was not allowed without a special permit; if they
were granted an OR use that would be a very narrow use; if
they wish to build for industry they would have to come back
again and apply for a special use permit, which he said was
not their intention; the building that they do have now are
strictly for office use, not industry. As far as traffic goes,
yes, he admitted, there will be more traffic since there will
be cars in the parking lot due to additional people working
in that building; the purpose of their design including traffic
lights was to put the burden of waiting or having problems on
the guy who is trying to get out of the lot and on to Myers
Corners Road, not on the people who are already on the road.
If they have to stack up and stay in that project until
kingdom come, that's their problem; the intent of having
traffic lights is to control the flow on Myers Corners Road
so that it is a reasonable flow; the lights are adjustable and
if they so desired cbu "`be five minute green on Myers Corners
Road and a 30 second green coming from the project. He compared
it with a basketball game crowd coming out of the school and
the fact that it really took a short period of time for that
amount of traffic to disperse. There would also be the additional
expenditure of $100,000.00 by them to try and satisfy the wishes of
the Town of Wappinger by not going along with the approved access
across from Fenmore Drive, but rather going down the road and
acquiring land from the Humestons. As far as noise, there would
be no noise associated with the building, it would be dry office
usage. Pollution of the aquifer should cause no problem; the fact
that a building is over the aquifer does not mean necessarily that
160 there should be a problem with it. This he said was on record with
correspondence with the state and they are doing it on their present
site. The way it has been engineered will cause no impact to the
environment; their research has shown that it will not create a
problem. They would have to be rotten neighbors to pollute the
aquifer. A complete Environmental Impact Study had been done which
does address in detail the question of the aquifer. As far as
wetlands aro concerned, the extent of the flood plain is actually
off of that property, it belongs to the DWS property, which is
Cranberry Hills.
Mr. William Rohde, Engineer with the firm of Hayward and Pakin
then spoke and noted that this localized aquifer was not connected
to the two main aquifers in Wappinger---Sprout Creek and Wappinger
Creek; this is an isolated aquifer located between Myers Corners
Road and Widmer Road. A telephone survey of local officials in
Dutchess County including the Planning Department, Health Depart-
ment, New York State Department of Transportation, the Soil Con-
servation District and others to ascertain if there were any cases
of aquifer contamination in Dutchess County and they were assured
that there were no such cases in a complex suite as the one planned.
Linda Carman, 18 Fenmore Drive, presented a petition with over 100
signatures against the proposed rezoning of the Cornell -Drake
property from residential to office research. They were opposed
because of the increase in traffic which would occur and the fact
that the area contains a wet aquifer and a wetland which is vital
to the Town's water resources. She also reminded the Board of
Article 1, Section 108 of the zoning Ordinance which purpose is to
prevent the pollution of water sources and wetland and safe guard
the water table.
Mr. Johnston then addressed the public and said he would be
happy to meet with a group of interested people at any time,
no matter how many, 10 or 100 and go into further detail with
them. This hearing did not have to be the only time they could
get information and speak their piece. They wanted to show the
people what they intended to do so that the causes they gave for
being against it would not exist.
Benjamin Kaufman, 6 Sachson Place ----heard a lot of talk tonight
about minimizing the inconvenience that they have with the roads,
and talk about no problem with the aquifers but what bothers him
is that they have no usage right now; they want to build a building,
but do not know what building or for whom it would be built or why.
He saw no advantage to rezoning it right now if it is going tojust
sit. Why not wait to rezone until you have a plan to show us, what
you are building and who will be occupying the building.
Mr. Johnston replied that he could not wait, he would go someplace
else, he does have plan but could not tell them all of his plans;
it was not in his best interests, he said to spend thousands of
dollars in acquiring the property, getting it rezoned and flying
from Vermont several times if he did not have a specific plan in
mind. Furthermore, he went on, he had shown a plan, a drawing had
been exhibited and they know exactly what it is going to be, the
fact that there isn't a billboard with a name on the front is
immaterial; the use is for offices and it will be used with all
restrictions.
Mr. Dick Bickerton, Primrose Court, asked if the Town Board would
enforce the codes if this is passed; he then brought up the subject
of the trees in his subdivision which was supposed to be planted
on each lot. He was reminded that the Town Board attempted to
use whatever leverage they could but acceded to what the people
wanted and accepted the roads without the requirement of the trees
being planted ----this, however, was the wish of the residents in
that subdivision. Next time, they would treat it differently.
Mr. Leif Jensen, 46 Widmer Road was for the proposal and asked
if they had compared the difference if homes were built with
driveways and land coverage with their complex. He felt the Town
needed this type of complex, it was no burden to the taxpayers;
they would not get services from the Town, it would help the
water and sewer districts financially; there are many safeguards
under the new Zoning Ordinance in this Town against anything going
amiss and there were many developers who did not want to build
homes in the Town of Wappinger due to the restrictive Ordinance.
Jeannette Fitch, 4 Rosewood Court, disagreed with the previous
speaker; it would lower the value of their homes; it's a nice
residential area now, the buildings will smother it out, definitely
against the rezoning.
William Gindel, Town of Poughkeepsie, one of the abbtte¢rs_ to
Four Fields Road, original owner and developer of the road until
it was sold to Cornell and Drake, he still has one acre and
wondered what will become of the road. It was intended to eventu-
ally become a Town road, will it be a private road, will the
residents have to plow the road, can his lot get a building permit
on a private road, were some of his questions. This, he was told
was a matter for the Zoning Board, however, the developer has said
they were willing to dedicate the road to the homeowners or to the
Town. If it were dedicated to the Town it would have to be brought
up to Town specs, and the developer was asked if he was willing
to do this. Mr. Johnston then stated that at an earlier meeting
that evening with residents, some of them felt this was not a
good idea when the suggestion was brought up; he was willing to
cooperate with the homeowners on that road. The meeting that he
spoke of had nothing to do with the Town Board; they did not call
it and had nothing to do with it. Mr. Johnston stated that what-
ever was done concerning this road had to satisfy all parties
concerned. The residents there have to be happy, the first step
on the part of the developer is to give up usage of this road and
they are willing to do this, beyond that, is something that will
have to be worked out to the satisfaction of the residents and
the Town officials. There is no limit on how far they are willing
to go; Mr. Diehl commented that Mr. Johnston had previously stated
that they would do most anything to satisfy the homeowners of that
road.
Mr. Versace pointed out that any restrictions the Town Board wished
g
to be put on this rezoning should be included in the resolution
before it was referred to the Planning Board and in addition they
would put the normal restrictions on their referral back to the
Town Board. Mr. Johnston would not be bound by anything that
was said tonight; it'must be officially included in all reso-
lutions and notices.
Benjamin Kaufman was curious about the sewer system, what do they
intend to do. Mr. Johnston answered that it would not be disposed
of on sight. He compared a subdivision versus an office complex
of that sight with approximately 700 employees which would generate
10,500 gallons per day, 50 lot subdivision 400 gallons per day,
which which would total 20,000 per day for sewage. The complex
would use the Town sewer system, subject to recommendation and
approval of the Engineer; if a favorable recommendation does not
come forth, they would own a nice piece of property with no place
to put the sewage.
Henry Semp, All Angels Hill Road, then asked Mr. Johnston if he
didn't get the rezoning, would he pull out and where would he go,
would he stay in
under utilized.
on Myers Corners
located on Myers
the area; he then suggested Rt. 376 which was
Why, he asked, was everything being concentrated
Road. Mr. Johnston answered that when they first
Corners Road, it was the ideal sit uation, it was
zoned for their use and had water and sewer facilities, and the
land in back of the present structure would be ideal if they could
acquire it as it was contiguous to the first parcel and they felt
it would be a success.
Jonah Sherman, Myers Corners Road, Four Fields----Pizzagalli is
building a 20 million
taxpayers of the Town
parcel may also be an
dollar
structure which is an asset to the
of Wappinger, and
asset, but that's
rezoning the additional
not where it stops. He
listened to Mr. Jensen talking about the beautiful Zoning Ordin-
ance the Town adopted, but
everytime someone wants to
suit their needs. In this
he says "what for", why have one if
make a buck, we change the zoning to
case we have unusual circumstances,
we have a handsome building, a well regarded developer with a
mysterious plant who may be interested in going into an office
L
building in a 30 acre parcel and he could see this favorably
as long as there are a number of guarantees and benefits locked
in. What troubles him is the Town Council's attitude about
further rezoning. It's like a cancer, one little spot here and
another one there ---there's Humeston's property and Diesing's
property and 5 acres at the corner of Myers Corners Road and
All Angels Hill Road with a sign up for sale. Wha twould go
there, would it be housing, or is the Town Board going to rezone
that as well. He could easily find his way to endorsing Mr.
Johnston's request with restrictions to rezone this property,
but he could not easily go along with the precedence this might
be setting. The area has struggled for 15 years to restrict
commercial development, but he sees it starting to sway and he
doesn't think he wants that kind of development to continue on
Myers Corners Road. He was thinking about the intersection at
All Angels Hill Road with the traffic problem and the fact that
the Engine Company is there and what impact will it have on
Cranberry Hill, a major proposed housing development. If they
are going to be drawing over 10,000 gallons of water a day, there
should be some kind of guarantee for those who do not have the
privilege of having Town water that they will have sufficient
water. He gave his support on the present building because he
felt it was right for the area, but he has questions on the one
they are now planning. He concluded by saying will Myers Corners
Road be another Route 9.
Mr. Jensen reiterated that the wording of the new Zoning Ordinance
put a lot of teeth into zoning laws and how they effectuate a
development. You cannot close the door on rezoning, each request
must be considered; many years ago when the present building was
rezoned PI, everyone was against it, yet after the XYZ building
was put there, we had no problems and it has helped the tax base.
The County taxes have now risen considerably and the Town of
Wappinger keeps trying to hold their taxes down and this rezoning
would help. If the plan was wrong he would not want to see it
there, that's why he asked if a comparison had been made with a
possible subdivision on that parcel. The road will be widened,
not because of Pizzagalli, but because it is part of their
long range plan and gradually safeness will be accomplished
because of this plan; this is an opportunity for the Town.
He reminded Mr. Sherman that he was in the Economic Development
Corp for the County and not that much business has come into
the County for the last few years, now here is an opportunity
to bring a project into the Town to help offset the taxes.
Mr. Johnston added his comments to this reasoning by saying that
he would hate to have the merits of this project judged solely
by the number of dollar bills they contribute although that is a
good point, but long range it has to make sense. That will not
do anything to make people feel happy over what havoc it will
cause with traffic, pollution or what it will look like. They
are willing to take the time to make sure that what they build
will be attractive, with quality, without pollution and will
incidentally contribute tax dollars.
Mr. Sherman reiterated that the EDC of which he was a member
and which was approved by the various Town Boards and supported
by the Chamber of Commerce brought in some $25 million dollars
in construction in the County in the last two years. What he
was trying to address was this was a very unique company doing
a very unique job---he could remember not too long ago when the
Town Board was trying to put in a roller skating rink in the
same place when they were so hungry for tax revenue----this must
meet the total interest of the Town not just one very narrow
interest. That's his concern, are they going to get so hungry
that they will keep rezoning and then the attitude will be
negative on everything.
Benjamin Kaufman felt the Town Board has an obligation to the
people already there---he came up from the city and thought he
was really in the country, all green. He was afraid it would
turn into an area where his kids couldn't play on the street, it
would be full of traffic, too much density of population, too much
industry and that's not the reason he moved to Wappinger; he might
have to sell his house and move out further and he would hate to
do that.
Renata Ballard, Hilltop Drive, concerned about the traffic flow
\�
at Myers Corners Road and All Angels Hill Road, since all the
developments come down through that intersection and the traffic
now is getting horrendous and the building isn't completed yet,
referring to the first building and is not occupied and they yet
to see the impact that will have on that intersection. Her question
was why rezone now, why not wait to see the impact of the first
building and how it is handled as far as the impact study, widen-
ing the road, traffic lights, improving the road making it a three
lane for four lane road or whatever. Would the Board consider this?
Mr. Johnston noted that the first building was to be completed in
July and they would see the impact before they were ready to pro-
ceed with the new building, there were many steps to be taken
before they would be ready to go ahead; Mrs. Ballard argued that
they could come to the Board after the first building was occupied
and ask for this rezoning and then could point out how well the
situation had been handled, they could then illustrate how the
problems had been handled. She asked him to consider it and Mr.
Johnston answered that they already had.
No one else spoke.
MRS. MILLS moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Mr.
Johnson and unanimously carried.
The Hearing closed at 8:24 P.M.
P.H. Cornell -Drake Rezoning
2/3/82
‘.0
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
ancl S. D.
NEW-
VISPL.AY
ADVERTISING . CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914-297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET - WAPPINGERS FALLS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town
Board of the Town of Wappinger will:
conduct a Public Hearing at the Town
New, Mtlt S Wappingers.le.
New York on 3, fill82*17'00. TOa
P.M. EST, on an ordinance Amerman}
the Zoning Map of the Town of Wapp-
Inger aafollows: .-
The following Ordinance thrall Introduc.
ed by CouncilmanJohnsenwhomoved .
Its adoption: -
BE IT RESOLVED and ordained by
the Town Board of the Town of Wapp-
Inger, Dutchess County. New-Yoprrk-in—
pursuance to the authorty conferred by
the taws of the State of New York. as .T
follows:
SECTION L The Town
Zoning Map adopted 1Narclr. 1
and as amended from time to me is
hereby further -amended by• rezoningl
the following_ described-parcN.oHan&
from "R-20! (Residantlagnto Oftke4
Research-10A
classification, said nal
• t-wa: a
BEGINNING st a nt'-on the Nor. -
Overly side of )(Ant being the �rWming
ands of nowr
hence along the Easterly line of lands
�f said Reis and lands of now orhxn sr- -
y Canter and Healey the following;
North 77-30400 West 80.00 -feet -to a -
point; North 000840 West -136.00 -fest -
toe point North 140920 East-1-71.29-
feet
ast1-71:29-
feet to a point North 22.1820 East'
558.54 fest to s point -theme North 71
• 0640 West 377.00 feet to a point on the •
Northerly line of the herein described .
property thence along the Northerly
Easterly Southerly bounds of said
propetty, the following; North -182410
East 24.779 fest to a point; North Z019-
30
34830 East 237.28 feet to a point Nadir*.
20-30 East 458.28 feet to a pont North
52-23-20 East 121.19 -test to a point ,
North 1300-10 West 184.12 fest to a -.
point North 1-2330 West 100.84-festto_
a point North 123230 East 61.42 festa
to a point North 12-0600 East 74.32
feet to a point North -8846.23 East •
390.02 toot to a point South 24 3.100"
East 12603 fest to a point South 7604-
00 East 99.59 feet to a point North 50-
,
5160 East 320.54 South 20-17--20: East
: 870.56 feat to a point South 4054.40-
West 54647 fest to a point South 44-08.
20 West 47229 fest to a point North 70
W279.29 est .atSouth
West 7.-0-feet
point South Ea409-20 West lst�8&6�Nea -to-
a.polnt;South 7736.40 East 111.75 feet-
to a point on the Nalhary line of Mrin.
Corners Road; thence long said Nor
theny line of said Myers Comes Road,
South 0353.50 West 80 fart more or
less to the point or pia:sof Beginning.
Containing 31.43 acres of land be the
sen* mora or less.
Present owners: Mlehaa D. Cornell
and Ronald R. Drake
Tax Grid Numbs: 525803.278358
Deed recorded: Uber 1488- Pg. 454
Bounded W the fnlIv M - •
sped •3 PIO
IDOSO1 o1 PUO CIPS *
•660 LS
114A019 st44 uo BADS *
1E14 GIDS UO -
DS S.1W1'1>i
int int aoud_..--
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of New York.
-County of Dutchess.
Town of Wappinger.
Gisela §cA:.;ni,I.4 of the
Tpwn of Wappinger. Dutchess County, New York.
being duly sworn. says that he is. and it the several ..
times hereinafter was. the Bookkeeper of
W. Lc S.D. NEWS. a newspaper printed and pf;blitbed
every Thursday in the year in the Town of Wa:; Inger.
-Dumbest County. New York. and that the annexed
NOTICE was duly published in the said new:paper for
. week successively... Ai►Ae. in each week.
commencing on the..21th .. day 0!.... f.an uary..
ita. and on the following dates thereafter. namely on
and ending on the2 Q th
19.$2 both days inclusive.
day of.� �.►ac:...
J
Subscribed and sworn to before me
ileo....«Ati. day of "'.tzlLla tg$2
My commission expires
Notary Public
it
11
ij
11
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER
OF
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
STATE OF NEW ,XORK )
) ss:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
AFFIDAVIT OF
POSTING
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes
and says:
That she is the duly elected, qualified and
acting Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County
of Dutchess and State of New York.
That on January 13, 1982, your deponent posted
a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing on
an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of theTown of
Wappinger, on the signboard maintained by your deponent
in her office in the Town Hall of the Town of Wappinger,
Mill Street, in the Village of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess
County, New York.
auto (k SWn.a&QA.,Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
Sworn to before me this Et-cq
day of1982.
Notary Public
VIRC!ti'J ..''.;".':^•:Z JR.
NCtery io)'G :: r:,;, 1[:±; Mete
tammtaaten eeetrea *larch 30. 1 ¶ p J