1978-06-15 SPM773
A Special Meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
was held on June 15, 1978, at the Town Hall, Mill Street,
Wappingers Falls, New York.
Notice of said meeting was mailed to each Board member on June
9, 1978 calling the meeting for 9:00 P.M. on June 15, 1978 for
the purpose of considering the Matter of an Ordinance to Amend
the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger Amending Section
424 of this Ordinance & An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map
of the Town of Wappinger deleting zoning classification of HB2
to SC and any other buisiness that may properly come before
the Board. Notices were also given of said meeting to the
Poughkeepsie Journal, Southern Dutchess News (W&SD News), and
the Beacon Evening News, and Radio Stations WBNR, WHPN, WEOK,
and WKIP, and a notice was posted on the Town Clerk's Bulletin
Board on June 9, 1978.
Supervisor Diehl called the meeting to order at 9:00 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Leif Jensen, Councilman
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice Mills, Councilwoman
Janet Reilly, Councilwoman
Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk
Others Present:
Jon Holden Adams, Attorney
A Public Hearing having been held on June 15, 1978 on an Ordinance
to Amend the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger, the
matter was now placed before the Board for their consideration.
The following resolution was moved by Supervisor DIEHL:
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD
OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ON JUNE 15, 1978
WHEREAS a motion was made at a prior meeting of the Town
Board of the Town of Wappinger that the attached amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance be introduced and that a public hearing be held
thereon, and
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 239-m of the General Municipal
Law, the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance was referred
to the Dutchess County Planning Defilartment, and
WHEREAS by letter dated the 13th day of June, 1978 the Dutchess
County Planning Department has recommended disapproval of the
amendment, and
WHEREAS a motion has been made that the zoning ordinanee
be amended as provided in the text attached hereto,
774
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the zoning ordinance
be amended as provided in the text attached hereto,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the provision of
General Municipal Law Section 239-m approval to the said amend-
ment is approved for the following reasons:
ONE: That the present provision of the zoning ordinance
allowing shopping centers only on parcels of 30 or more acres is
unduly restrictive, as it does not permit or allow construction
of community or neighborhood shopping centers on smaller parcels
of land suitable for such development.
TWO: The economic and tax base of the town will be improved
by providing for more flexible development of shopping centers.
THREE: There is only one shopping center within the Town
of Wappirlger notwithstanding the presence of a significant pop-
ulation density, Need for more shopping centers exist.
FOUR: The letter of the Dutchess County Planning Department
recognized the need for and desirability of community -type
shopping centers. Its disapproval is premised upon an erroneous
factual premise, namely that the economic base of the community
could be eroded by additional shopping centers. Such fails to
recognize that within the town of Wappinger there is only one
sl -hopping center and the same is a non -conforming use.
FIVE: That notwithstanding the large suburban population
of then :town}y inadequate' provision has been made on the town zoning
ordinance for multi=unit commercial development on a single parcel
of land.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Supervisor DIEHL and
seconded by Councilman JOHNSON
DATED: June 15, 1978
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following Ordinance was introduced by Supervisor DIEHL who
moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Introduced by Supervisor DIEHL
Be it ordained by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
as follows:
Section 424 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger
duly adopted on January 29, 1963 is amended as follows:
Section One: The minimum 30 -acre lot area requirement under
category SC Business is deleted and substituted in its place shall
be the minimum lot area requirement of 10 acres.
Section Two: This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption,
posting and publication.
Dated: May 15, 1978
Seconded: Councilman JENSEN
Motion Unanimously Carried
775
A Public Hearing having been held on June 15, 1978 on an
Ordinance Amending the Zoning map of the Town of Wappinger,
the matter was now placed before the Board for their consideration.
The following resolution was moved by Councilman JOHNSON:
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD
OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER ON JUNE 15, 1978
WHEREAS, a motion was made at a prior meeting of the Town
Board of the Town of Wappinger that the attached amendment to
the zoning map be introduced and that a public hearing be held
thereon, and
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 239-m of the General Municipal
Law, thh proposed amendment to the map was referred to the
Dutchess County Planning Department, and
WHEREAS by letter dated the 13th day of June, 1978 the
Dutchess County Planning Department has recommended disapproval
of the amendment,and
WHEREAS a motion has been made that the zoning map be amended
as provided in the attached resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the zoning map amendment
as attached hereto be wee is hereby adopted, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the provision of
General Municipal Law Section 239-m approval to the said amendment
is granted for the following reasons:
ONE: That the land proposed to be rezoned is contiguous to
lands presently zoned for shopping center use but which have not
yet been developed for such use:
TWO: That the land rezoned is presently zoned for commercial
uses, and the rezoning will be consistent with the said use and
permit multiple commercial use on one parcel.
THREE: That the land rezoned is situated on heavily
travelled traffic arteries and is well located for such use.
FOUR: That the land rezoned has remained undeveloped for
many years and there are indications that the rezoning will lead
to immediate development thereby improving the economic and tax
base of the town.
FIVE: That the land rezoned will facilitate development of
shopping centers, none of which are located within the town
presently.
SIX: That notwithstanding the large suburban population of
the town, inadequate provision has been made on the town zoning
map for multi -unit commercial development on a single parcel of
land.
SEVEN: That the land rezoned is within a heavily developed
commercial zone and rezoning will not have an adverse effect on
surrounding lands.
EIGHT: Thtt the rezoning will concentrate shopping center
use in existing high intensity commercial areas.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilman JOHNSON and
seconded by Councilwoman REILLY.
Dated June 15, 1978
Motion Unanimously Carried
776
The following ordinance was introduced by Councilman JOHNSON
who moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING
MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Intoduced by Councilman JOHNSON
Be it ordained by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
as follows:
The Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger duly adopted on
January 29, 1963 is amended as follows:
Section One: The zoning classification of "HB2" for that
area bounded on the west by Route 9, on the south by Meyers
Corners Road and containing all the lands of Astarita, Babcock,
Central Valley Concrete and Niessen contiguous to either said
Route 9 or Meyers Corners Road is deleted and substituted in
its place is the zoning classification "SC".
Section Two: This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption
posting and publication.
Dated: May 15, 1978
Seconded by Councilwoman REILLY
Motion Unanimously Carried
A request was received from Mr. Logan, Assessor to attend a
Seminar at Cornell University from June 25 to June 30, 1978.
MR. JOHNSON moved that permission be granted to Mr. Logan to
attend the Seminar at Cornell University from June 25 to June
30, 1978 and all legitmate expenses be a town charge with the
condition that the town policy of allowing one overnight con-
ference per year per person be adhered to.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly.
Motion Unanimously Carried
MRS. MILLS moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Johnson
and unanimously carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:06 P.M.
Spl.Meeting-June 15,1978
73-444,(Ak'A ak-OkAikA..
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
A Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on June 15, 1978 at Town Hall, Mill Street, Village
of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York, on an Ordinance
to Amend the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger, (SC 30
acre to 10 acres).
Supervisor Diehl opened the Hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Leif Jensen, Councilman
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice Mills, Councilwoman
Janet Reilly, Councilwoman
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Others Present:
Jon H. Adams, Attorney
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. Newspapers and radio
stations had been notified. Notification was sent to the Towns of
Poughkeepsie, Fishkill, East Fishkill, LaGrange, Lloyd and the
Village of Wappingers Falls. Notice was posted on the Town Clerk's
Bulletin Board.
Recommendations werereceived from the Dutchess County Department
of Planning and the Town of Wappinger Planning Board. Both recom-
mended against this Ordinance.
The following letter was read:
June 13, 1978
Louis D. Diehl, Town Supervisor
Town of Wappinger
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, New York
Re: Ordinance Amending SC Business District
Dear Mr. Diehl:
We have reviewed the letter of the Planning Board dated June
6, 1978, objecting to the "blank change" of the acreage requirements
for the SC district from 30 acres to 10 acres.
Under the provisions of Article VI of the Zoning Ordinance, the
negative response from the Planning Board requires that the proposed
zoning amendments be passed by at least two-thirds vote of the Town
Board to be effective.
While the considerations which lead to the objection appeared
to be those of a planning nature, I would note that any shopping
center would be subject to the site plan requirement of the zoning
ordinance, such review would presumably take into account and re-
quire adequate provision for road systems, connector roads if
necessary, suitable setbacks, and appropriate provision for traffic
control. These considerations would require a more limited develop-
ment on a smaller parcel. The reduction in size of the minimum acre
762
requirement does not necessitate that upon site plan review,
these considerations be minimized or given any less weight in
terms of the proposed development of the site than they would
on a larger site. I would also note that it is my understanding
that the impetus for this amendment is also attributalbe to the
fact that under our zoning ordinance as presently constituted,
azo owner of any sizeable area of land would not be permitted to
have more than one principal use for his parcel without becoming
a shopping center. It is my understanding that theimpetus for the
shopping center district reduction is attributable to this situation,
with the objective being to permit more than one retail outlet on a
parcel, subject to the appropriate planning considerations that
would apply upon site plan review.
Very truly yours,
Corbally, Gartland & Rappleyea
s/ Jon Holden Adams
Supervisor Diehl asked if anyone wished to speak for or against
this change.
Mr. Albert Roberts, Attorney with the firm of Rosen, Crane and
Wolfson, represented the Myers Corners Development Corp. and the
proposed developer of the subject site. The proposed change would
affect this site and one other area in the Town of Wappinger. This
would be an attractive site and would bring tax revenues to the
Town. He asked the Board to consider this change carefully and
hoped for a postive vote.
George Angels, 72 Pye Lane - the Town of Wappinger needs a broader
tax base to carry the Town and a shopping center would be helpful.
Herman Osten, Old Hopewell Road-- recently got a raise in assessment.
At the present time he is paying $55.00 per week for taxes, the new
assessment will raise this 65%. An increase in commercial taxes
and putting this SC in will help keep taxes down, he was, therefore,
in favor of this Ordinance.
Vincent Brancato, Lake Oniad Drive --he had received a call from
Van Cunningham today, attorney from VEndeWater and VandeWater's
Office who :;represents Central Valley and asked him to indicate
at tonight's hearing they were in favor of this Ordinance, also
his client has been a substantial taxpayer in this Town for a
number of years and hoped this would be taken into consideration,
plus the fact that the area to be rezoned has been lying dormant
for quite awhile and ha$ been used for dumping. His client,
Central Valley, was in favor of the Ordinance. Speaking for himself,
Mr. Brancato said he had been advocating development on Route 9 for
X63
fifteen years and it would be foolhardy if this was turned down.
The firm applying is a wholly-owned subsidiary and a family oriented
group, they are willing to do a fine job and hope the Board acts
favorably on this. They will render a service to the public,
provide our area with jobs and last, but not least, they will
contribute considerably to our tax base.
Since there were two public hearings on this night, one changing
the SC requirement from 30 acres to 10 acres, the other followed
kof and was on rezoning a parcel from HB2 to SC in a specific area,
L
the public was speaking on the specific rezoning, not the change
requirement. Since the two were related, Mr. Diehl did not limit
the public to the subject hearing.
Norman Nussbickel, President of the Wappingers Falls Chamber of
Commerce, represented the Chamber, agreed with the former speakers
that we do need more of a tax base in this Town - there is no
reason why this should be turned down - it should be given serious
consideration.
Mrs. Zak, Dorothy Heights spoke against the Ordinance. Most of the
people present were businessmen, but she was speaking as a homeowner.
She has been in this home twenty years when it was quiet and rural.
She invited anyone to visit the area and listen to the noise from
Imperial Plaza. She didn't feel they needed more shopping centers.
Traffic is bad, on Saturday you just don't get out. There should be
some consideration for the homeowner when they take action on this.
Shirley Poillucci - lives on a major highway, realize that is where
businesses should be and she is in favor of this.
Robert Levine, Director of Architecture and Design for Myers Corners
Development Corp, stated that they propose an orderly development,
unlike Imperial Plaza, orderly flow of traffic, anchored by two
1110 major tenants, will provide numerous jobs for all range age groups,
supermarket will provide jobs for high school students on part time
basis. The center will be residential in appearance - they will do
whatever they can to accommodate the community and abide by require-
ments.
Michael Hirkala--agrees with this type of zoning but would like the
Board to consider the past. There was a proposal for this type of
SC, a portion of a larger parcel and at the time the Planning Board
764
had difficulty coming to an agreement with the developer regarding
traffic control. There was supposed to be an access road and a
service road. While he does not disagree, he can't help but wonder
why not do it in theproposed Zoning Ordinance, rewrite the HB zone.
Is this a "spot -shot? The Town has to protect itself in the future
since this is what has been happening in the past. He feels they
should go by the overall plan, not just one rezoning, then another
and so on.
Jonah Sherman - it has been mentioned that this Ordinance would
apply to two parcels in the Town. Is this true? He was told
there are only two SC areas in the Town and the Ordinance would
apply to these two. Based on this and based on the fact that
there has to be realism, business people cannot wait indefinitely
for us to change our zoning laws and although he is opposed to the
spot zoning technique method for this change, it would seem appro-
priate for the location for this type of business. So, in essence,
he is in favor of it.
Mr. Hirkala felt that while there were only two parcels now in
that category, this could change, even tomorrow. He was reminded
that each change must come in front of the Board.
Don Keller, member of the Town Planning Board, remarked that they
had received a referral from the Town Board on this change and they
felt it could be handled by a variance and they acted negatively be-
cause of this fact -- assuming it could go to the Zoning Board of
Appeals. If he had realized this, he would have voted differently.
Don McMillen, member of the Zoning Board was in favor of this change
because the Town needs it. Zoning changes are needed to accommodate
business people. We have to make changes, keep up to date. The
new trend is toward small shopping centers. Make the change, have
a "mini -mall" in the Town, maybe even a few more, you can still have
restrictions, control it at Town level so we do not get saturated.
Our Town can be both a bedroom community and a business community.
Presently it's 92% bedroom and 8% business - not enough, balance
it more.
Mrs. Zak - now it looks good to you - that's what the Village
thought when Imperial Plaza went in, but take a walk and look at
the empty stores. You talk about a good tax base, but the Village
hasn't been paid taxes by the Plaza in years.
iG5
Don McMillen - if you do nothing, you have nothing. You can re-
possess and sell if taxes aren't paid. Because a store is empty
is not a total loss.
Janet Hirkala - she would be for this Ordinance if you can give
her Saks, Altmans or Bloomingdales, she's sick and tired of junk
stores.
Mr. Levine - this will be a quality center, it will be maintained
in proper fashion, you don't have to worry about anyone going out
`r of business or unpaid taxes
Mr. Brancato - nature of the breed is not a high class shopping
1111, center, but something that is needed like a super market that
would be highly competitive and would hold prices down.
No one else spoke.
Mr. Jensen moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Mrs.
Mills and carried.
The Hearing closed at 7:40 P.M.
acaoak„,
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
kw
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER
OF
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS )
says:
AFFIDAVIT OF
POSTING
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes and
766
That she is the duly elected, qualified and acting
Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess
and State of New York
That on May 31, 1978, your deponent posted a copy
of the attached notice of Public Hearing on an Ordinance
to Amend the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger,
on the signboard maintained by your deponent in her
office in the Town Hall of theTown of Wappinger, Mill
Street, in the Village of Wappingers Falls, Town of
Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York.
Sworn to before me this
day of tJ 1..SA k. _ 1978.
�v
titiutaxf /
Notary Public
CFN,
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
s�
DONALD G. BUCK
Naar FoSI': ut tiers York Stito
HesW:up Outchesa County
Commission expires Murch 30, 181'0
767
W. and 5. D.
NEWS
DISPLAY ADVERTISING
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET • WAPPINGERS FALLS
•
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE than the -
Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
will conduct a public hearing on June 15,-
1978 at 7:00 P.M. EDST at Town Halt -
Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York
on, an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning
Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
T- TOWNONINGFWAPPINGERRDINANCE FTME.
Introduced by Supervisor Diehl '
Be it ordained by the Town Board of
the Town of Wappinger as follows: `
Section 424 of the Zoning Ordinance of
the Town of Wappinger- duly adopted on.1
January 29. 1963 is amended as follows:
Section One:
The minimum 30 -acre lot area
requirement under category SC
Business is deleted and substituted in its
place shall -be the minimum lot area
requirement of 10 acres.
Section Two:
This ordinance shall take effect upon
adoption, posting and publication:
Dated: May h. 1978
Seconded: Councilman Jense%
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes Gladys Ruit
Deputy Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
Dated: May 25. 1978 /
AFFIDAVIT OP PUBLICATION
State of New York.
County of Dutcheu.
Town of Wappinger.
�Y. ♦ tr:LGe..Qtall of the
Town of Wappinger. Dutcheu County, New Yak.
being duly swan. says that he is. and *t the several
times hereinafter was. the .Gs..4.1u13 j.kshat
W. & S.D. NEWS. a newspaper printed and published
every Thursday in the year in the Town of Wappinger.
-Dutchess County. New York. and that the annexed
NOTICE was duly published in the said newspaper for
....iD:.e.... week succeuively... cane C.. in each week.
commencing on the 31st..day of....r.y
197.8 and on the following dates thereafter. namely on
and ending on the....3ist.day of
197.8 both days inclusive.
E_vi r r�
• a/
-moi
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 312t ....day of .Nay 19..7 8
Notary Public
My commission expires
ALBERT M. OSTEN
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE CF GEW YORK
QUALT1ED IN lj! la;E.SS C3UNTY
414-3240763 a t>
COMMISSION E: ?iRES 11AflCH
7138
A Public Hearing was held by the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger on June 15, 1978 at Town Hall, Mill Street, Village
of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County, New York, on an Ordinance
to Amend the Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger (HB2 to SC
Myers Corners Area).
Supervisor Diehl opened the Hearing at 7:41 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Leif Jensen, Councilman
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice Mills, Councilwoman
Janet Reilly, Councilwoman
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Others Present:
Jon Holden Adams, Attorney
The Town Clerk offered for the record the Affidavits of Posting
and Publication duly signed and notarized. Notices had been sent
to newspapers and radio stations. The Village of Wappingers Falls
had been notified of this Hearing.
Referral had been received from the Dutchess County Planning which
recommended against the rezoning. The Town of Wappinger Planning
Board recommendation was in favor of the rezoning.
The following letter was received:
June 13, 1978
Re: Public Hearing rezoning
Route 9 Meyers Corners Road
Gentlemen:
The undersigned is a son of Elsie Astarita, deceased, who
owned a parcel of 11.9 acres from 1937 to 1968. Elsie Astarita
passed away in December 1968 and the estate is now the owner of
4.37 acres on the easterly side of Route 9 and has been paying
taxes on this vacant land for ten years.
I regret that I am unable to attend the meeting on the evening
of Thursday, June 15. However as an owner and taxpayer I am heartily
in favor of rezoning the area in question, namely the easterly side
of route 9, for a commercial and retail complex.
I believe such rezoning will represent a significent increase
in the tax base of the town and will benefit all the resident tax
payers of the town, plus the town itself.
I respectfully request that the proposed rezoning to commercial
business and retail use be approved.
Very truly yours,
s/ Rafael Astarita, co-executor
with my brother Raymond
Astarita of the estate of
Elsie Astarita.
769
P.S. This letter has been read to my brother and has his complete
approval.
Albert Roberts, member of the firm of Rosen, Crane and Wolfson,
representing the proposed developers, Myers Corners Development
Corp. stated that he is a resident of the Town and lives about 1 to
11 miles from this
major tenants, but
firm's name. They
proposed development, further that there are two
at this time he is not at liberty to disclose the
are quality tenants and will bring to the com-
munity a substantial increase in tax revenue, jobs for our high
school and college age students and will be developed in complete
accord with zoning regulations. He was enthused about the project
and hoped the Board would consider it favorably.
Vincent Brancato spoke on behalf of Van Cunningham who represented
Central Valley, and respectfully requested the Town Board to rezone
this parcel from HB2 to SC.
Don McMillen --he was all for this rezoning. Show people that the Town
of Wappinger is interested in business; this 10 acre parcel is presently
paying very little taxes to our Town, make it into a good tax base
and a good taxpayer. This particular parcel has been dead, let them
develop it and make it look decent. The County Planning Board may
be against it, but it doesn't affect them, we have to make decisions
to benefit our tax base.
Shirley Poillucci--if we don't have business zoning on our major
highway, we're going to lose out. We have centers to the north and
south of us, but our Town has nothing. Fishkill has centers along
Route 9, why are they against ours. (a letter had been received
from Ronald Brown, Chairman of the Town of Fishkill Planning Board
recommending against the rezoning as follows):
June 14, 1978
Mrs. Elaine H. Snowden,
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
Wappingers Falls, New York
Dear Mrs. Snowden:
This letter is in response to your letter of May 25, 1978 giving
the Town of Fishkill notice of the Town Board's intention to amend
Section 424 of the Town of Wappinger's Zoning Ordinance. We respect-
fully request that this letter be read at the public hearing to be
held on June 15, 1978.
In our opinion, the proposed amendment is
Town of Wappinger's Town Development Plan
the area in which the Shopping Center (SC)
inconsistent with the
(1974), which designates
District is located as
770
"Regional Shopping". Decreasing the minimum lot area of the SC
District from 30 to 10 acres will result in smaller Shopping Centers
which will not be large enough to support commercial establishments
of the Regional variety; and will result in a less holistic design
of the District in question.
Respectfully yours,
s/ Ronald C. Brown, Chairman
Town of Fishkill
Planning Board
Angel Caballero, Ervin Drive --in agreement with rezoning this area.
He is involved in building and just took an order for a laundromat
in Fishkill, he would rather have seen this in Wappinger.
Joseph Manadi, Cady Lane --at the present time, this parcel is an
eye sore and bringing in very little taxes --use it, get the benefit from
it, in favor of this rezoning, it would benefit the community,
Mrs. Zak --must the area be zoned for SC, what about offices or
professional offices.
Shirley Ranieri - she has a business in Wappingers Falls, there are
few of them and as for doctors, we can't get doctors in the area,
we need a lot more business, it's about time we got some.
Mike Hirkala - more consideration should be given to long range
planning; not just for today, the hell with tomorrow.
Don McMillen - long range planning is in effect if we open up mini
shopping centers. This is long range, it's nothing but a plus for
the Town, with no burden attached. Services will have to be rendered
by the State, not the Town.
No one else spoke.
Mr. Jensen moved to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Mrs. Reilly
and carried.
The Hearing closed at 7:54 P.M.
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk'
DISPLAY ADVERTISING
an _ 5.
NEWS
ti~
4•
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
914-297-3723
84 EAST MAIN STREET - WAPPINGERS FALLS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that •the
Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
will conduct a public hearing on June 15,
1978 at 7:00 P.M. EDST at the Town Hall,
Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York
on en Ordinance to Amend the Zoning
Map of the Town of Wappinger as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
THE ZONING MAP OF THE
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
l.:troduced by Councilman Johnson
Be it ordained by the Town Board of
the Town of Wappinger as follows:
The Zoning Map of the Town of
Wappinger duly adopted on January 29,
1963 is amended as follows:
Section One:
The zoning classification of "H B2" for ,
that area bounded on the west by Route,
9, on the south by Meyers Corners Road
and containing all the lands of Astarita,
Babcock, Central Valley Concrete and
Nielsen contiguous t0 either said Route 9
or Meyers Corners Road is deleted and
substituted in its place is the zoning
classification "SC."
Section Two:
This ordinance shall take effect upon
adoption, posting and publication.
Dated: May 15, 1978
Seconded: 'Councilwoman Reilly
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes
Dated: May 23, 1978
Gladys Ruit
-Deputy Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of New York,
County of Dutchess.
Town of Wappinger.
Beatrice Osten
771
of the
Town of Wappinger. Dutchess County, New York.
being duly sworn. says that he is, and it the several
times hereinafter was. theCo-Editor-Published
W. & S.D. NEWS, a newspaper printed and published
every Thursday in the year in the Town of Wappinger.,
-Dutchess County, New York. and that the annexed
NOTICE was duly published in the said newspaper for
- "one week succeuively onq g.. in each week.
-- commencing on the 31st day of May
197.9 and on the. following dates thereafter. namely on
and ending on the 31st day of
1978 both days inclusive.
May
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this.... day of Y t97$
My commission expires
Notary Public
p,__E=RT M. OSTEN
? c; rV-521
HG"�, JU STY
Cutttt;SSlu3 LXPt LS 6.1AaCH 30,19.)
I,
•
TOWN BOARD: TOWN OF WAPPINGER
DUTCHESS- COUNTY: NEW YORK
IN THE MATTER
OF
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING
MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER
says:
AFFIDAVIT OF
POS TING
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, being duly sworn, deposes and
That she is the duly elected, qualified and acting
Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess
and State of New York.
That on May 31, 1978, your deponent posted a copy
of the attached notice of Public Hearing on an Ordinance
to Amend the Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger, on
the signboard maintained by your deponent in her office
in the Town Hall of the Town of.Wappinger, Mill Street,
in the Village of Wappingers Falls, Town of Wappinger,
Dutchess County, New York.
Sworn to before
day of
7,) (, &J
Notary Public
me this J S
1978.
L
7:::NAD , GUC^l
..
eft Y cw N ��t � •��n►.
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Town of Wappinger