1977-04-11 RGMAGENDA
TOWN BOARD
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
APRIL 11,. 1977
1. SUPERVISOR CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. ACCEPT MINUTES Feb. 28, 1977
4. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
Supervisor Town Justices Rec. of Taxes Bldg.Insp. Zng. Adm.
5. RESOLUTIONS
a. Payment of Expenses - Dara Lane
b. CATV Rate Increase
6. PETITIONS & COMMUNICATIONS
•
a. Peddling License Applications - A. Dyson & A. Rheden
b. Notice of Public Hearing - NYSPSC re: Wappinger Park Homes, Inc.
water rate increase request
c. Wm. Horton re: Flooding, Naro Subdivision
d. R. E. Lapar Reports:
1. L & A STP - wear on drag chains & collector Sprockets
2. Plot Plan Approvals - Roof Gutter Drains
e. Request of Recreation Comm. members to attend Con erence at
Nevelle April 25th thru 27th
f. S. Anderson, Zng. Adm. re: Shapiro, Mid Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc:
g. Audria Cardascia re: reimbursement for pressure regulator Valve
h. Rob't Abecasis re: Well problem due possibly to Hidden Hollow
Apts.
i. Ketchamtown Road residents petition for reduced Speed Limit
j. Jon Holden Adams re: Town of Wappinger Appeal on M & G Sanitation
k. Jon Holden Adams re: Premises owned by Bruce Stotz
1. Notice of Public Hearing, Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeal
on Stotz Variance
m. E. Hawksley, Conservation Advisory Council
1. Request Council be designated a reviewing agency for S.E.Q.I
regulations. j
2. Request authorization for expenditure for performing
Chemical test samplings.
n. Charles M. Brown W.F. Chamber of Commerce re: Formula for
Down Stream Drainage Fees
o. Acceptance of appointment letter from R. Ruit
•
1
P. CATV Franchise renewal
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. SPCA
b. Chiarenzelli drainage problem
c. Lombardi
d. Truett
e. Bids on Various Sewer Improvements
f. A. J. Bodney - Valley View Farms Subdivision Fee
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT
193
The Regular Bimonthly Meeting of the Town Board of the Town of
Wappinger was held on April 11, 1977, at 8:00 P.M. at the Town
Hall, Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York.
Deputy Supervisor Clausen called the meeting to order at 8:16 P.M.
Present:
Louis Clausen,Deputy Supervisor
Leif Jensen, Councilman
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Frank Versace, Councilman
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
(Absent for Roll Call: Supervisor Diehl arrived at 8:27 P.M.)
Others Present:
William Horton, Highway Superintendent
Allan Rappleyea, Attorney to the Town, and Jon Adams
Rudolph Lapar, Engineer to the Town
The Minutes of the February 28, 1977 Regular Bimonthly Monthly
Meeting and the Minutes of the March 7, 1977 and March 15, 1977
Special Meetings, having been previously sent to the Town Board
members, were now placed before them for their approval.
Mr. Jensen noted that in the meeting of February 28, 1977, there
was a slight error in the roll call vote in regard to the Local
Law repealing the exemption on Real Property. As it reads Diehl
abstained and Versace voted Nay - it should correctly read ---
Councilman Versace ---Abstain, Supervisor Diehl ---Nay.
MR. JENSEN moved the Minutes of the February 28, 1977 Regular
Bimonthly Meeting, with the correction of the above stated Roll
Call Vote; and the Special Meetings of March 7, 1977 and March 15,
1977, as submitted by the Town Clerk be and they are hereby approved.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson.
Roll Call Vote: 4 Ayes 0 Nays
Reports for the month of March were received from the Town
Justices, Building Inspector, Zoning Administrator and Receiver
of Taxes, and also an amended February report from the Receiver
194
of Taxes.
MR. JOHNSON moved the reports for the month of March, and the
amended February report, be accepted and placed on file.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Roll Call Vote: 4 Ayes 0 Nays
As Mr. Diehl was not present, the following memo from him to the
Board was read:
Memo To:
Town Board Members
William Horton, Superintendent of Highways
Rudolph Lapar, P.E., P.C.
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk (April llth agenda)
From: Louis D. Diehl, Supervisor
Date: March 29, 1977
Subject: Authorize payment to private contractors ordered by
myself and Mr. Horton to have corrective measures
taken at Dara Lane (freeze -ups) and the calling in
of other private contractors by the Town, of which
you are all aware of.
My resolution is to authorize payment for work by said
contractors from the Capital Fund of the Central Wappinger Water
Improvement Area to protect the credit and the name of the Town
of Wappinger.
This payment, in no way, commits the Town to the responsibil-
ity for this work done.
The action taken will be referred to the Town Attorney, Mr.
Rappleyea, for his direction in following up previous bills sent
to Schoonmaker for his payment and to negotiate a method of re-
payment from Schoonmaker to the Town of Wappinger, If an agreeable
method is not resolved then the Attorney to theTown will take the
necessary legal actions to recoup said money.
Please resolve any and all questions regarding same prior to
the meeting (April 11, 1977) so that the credit of the Town will
not be injured.
s/ Louis D. Diehl, Supervisor
cc: Allan Rappleyea, Attorney
Wilson Excavator's Inc.
Dave Alexander, Inc.
L&A Blacksmith Shop, Inc.
John Steinberg, Schoonmaker Homes
Matthew W. Ryvn, Comptroller
Mr. Versace asked Mr. Adams if a meeting had been set up yet with
Mr. Steinberg concerning this. Mr. Adams indicated he was not
familiar with this matter.- Mr. Rappleyea was otherwise occupied
at the moment, therefore, the matter was temporarily tabled.
195
The matter of the requested rate increase for CATV was again
placed before the Board. Mr. Clausen reiterated the three choices
the Board had open to then denial, acceptance, or, if the Board
couldn't conclusively decide, a request could be made to the
State Cablevision Commission for their decision. Mr. Jensen
voiced his opinion that the request should be denied, based on
imput from the Public Hearing which bore out poor service. This
matter also was tabled temporarily tabled for comment from the
Attorney.
Applications were received from Arthur Dyson and Arthur Rheden
for Hawking and Pcbddling Licenses. The applications had been
referred to the Dutchess County Sheriff's Department, and re-
turned indicating no criminal record on file.
MR. JOHNSON moved to approve the applications and grant Arthur
Dyson and Arthur Rheden licenses for Hawking and Peddling in the
Town of Wappinger.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Roll Call Vote: 4 Ayes 0 Nays
Notice was received that the New York State Public Service Som -
mission would conduct a public hearing on May 5, 1977 at the
Wappinger Town Hall on the matter as to the rates and charges of
Wappinger Park Homes Inc. Petition had been filed with said
Commission for water rate increases in the subdivision known as
Indian Ridge Development.
MR. JENSEN moved that the notice of Public Hearing be received
and placed on file, and further, that a copy of said notice be
sent to the president of the Wappinger Park Civic Association.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson
Roll Call Vote: 4 Ayes 0 Nays
196
(Mr. Diehl now present, took his -place with the Board)
The following report was received:
March 25, 1977
Town Board, Town of Wappinger
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Re: Flooding-Naro Subdivision
Gentlemen:
The recent heavy rains of March 22nd created a condition
in the Naro Subdivision that I feel is worthy of your considera-
tion. Part of the cul-de-sac on Joan Lane was under water, as
were lots 32,33,34 and part of Lot 35.
Although the maximum flood plain for Sprout Creek is shown
on the filed map as being a considerable distance from the above
lots and cul-de-sac it was obvious after Tuesday's storm that
the flood plain encompasses a much greater area.
No construction has been started on these lots as of this
date and I call this matter to your attention so that possibly
a future major problem can be avoided.
Very truly yours,
s/ William P. Horton
Mr. Versace asked if Mr. Horton had any recommendations to the
Board.
Mr. Horton explained that the problem is that Sprout Creek itself
comes up and comes back that far, and he doesn't know how you
would ever build a house so you wouldn't have water in it (on
lots indicated in report) or if it was built up it would be on
an island if flooding occurred. Mr. Jensen asked if building in
a flood plain area doesn't come under a different set of guide-
lines. Mr. Lapar agreed, but pointed out that this area was not
shown on the HUD Flood Plain Maps. Mr. Clausen asked if this area
then couldn't be added to the HUD maps, and Mr. Adams thought
possibly they could be extended or modified. Mr. Versace asked
if the Board could ask the Building Inspector to not issue building
permits for these existing lots until the Board can eome up with
a solution of some kind. Mr. Admas doubted they could. Mr.
Versace asked what action then could be taken to prevent building
L
197
until a solution could be found. Mr. Jensen pointed out that it
would still have to meet the criteria of the buck sheet, even with
subdivision approval it doesn't mean each lot is buildable, and
each has to have approval of the Engineer to the Town and Highway
Superintendent. He would presume in this case they would recommend
against a building permit being given, if there was a drainage or
flooding problem. He also suggested reminding the Building Inspector
to watch for those lots. Mr. Adams cautioned condemning the lots,
it may be more prudent to place certain restrictions, such as those
for flood zones on building the houses. Mr. Clausen asked if Mr.
Adams could follow this through, maybe through HUD, and find out
if this area could be incorporated at this time in the Flood Plain.
MR. CLAUSEN moved that, lack of further solution to this problem,
that at this point we refer the matter to the Attorney to the
Town and see if possibly what might be able to be done in the
future.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Diehl took up item 5a - Payment of expenses for the freezing
up of water lines on Dara Lane, and to answer Mr. Versaces's
original question as to whether Mr. Steinberg was receptive to
a meeting. Mr. Diehl stated no, at this point, he hasn't answered
i either Mr. Diehl's or Mr. Rappleyea's letter. Mr. Diehl felt the
k✓ problem was that the Town directed the contractors to do the work,
and in order to protect the credit of the Town the contractors
should be paid, and the Town then take the necessary action to
recoup the monies. Mr. Jensen would agree that the bills the Town
incurred because of the emergency situation should be paid, but
he would like a little more strength in the request from the dev-
eloper thSxt within 30 days we want some kind of response so that
what we pay out will be refunded within a reasonable time.
•
1,1iii11111111.11.1,11.1411114111114/01i1
198
MR. JENSEN moved that the bills that were incurred for the
emergency on Dara Lane be paid as submitted by the Supervisor
dated March 29, 1977.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
MR. JENSEN moved that the Attorney to the Town work with Mr.
Steinberg and that a reply be available to the Town Board within
thirty days.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Diehl took up item 5b - CATV rate increase. Mr. Clausen
commented he didn't believe they would go into any problem if
the Board denied it and it was an automatic referral to the CATV
Commission, but the Board should probably just vote to refer it.
MR. JOHNSON moved that the CATV rate increase request be referred
to the New York State CATV Commission to study the rate and ask
for their opinion.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
The following report was received:
Motion Unanimously Carried
March 25, 1977
Memo To: Town Board
From: Rudolph E. Lapar, P.E.
Subject: L&A Sewage Treatment Facility
Date: March 25, 1977
On March 22th, this office was notified and subsequently
inspected a report that the drag chain on one clarifier broke
and caused damage to the rest of the machine.
Our inspection revealed excessive wear has been experienced to
the drag chains and collector sprockets. Repair can be made,
however, it will only be a temporary situation. It must be
noted that this problem area was not included in the contract
recently advertised by the Town of Wappinger.
s/ Rudolph E. Lapar, P.E.
199
Mr. Lapar noted that temporary repairs had been made.
MR. JOHNSON moved to direct Mr. Lapar to prepare a stet of speci-
fications to obtain an estimate on a permanent replacement of the
sprocket and chain, and also ask for Camo's recommendation as to
just what would be needed and/or offer a recommendation for repair.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letter was received:
March 23, 1977
Town Board, Town of Wappinger
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Re: Plot Plan Approvals
Specifically Roof Gutter Drains
Dear Board Members:
During the last several years, Mr. William P. Horton and myself
have been approving plot plans wherein the Engineer for the
developer indicates that roof or footing drains have not been
or will be installed. Subsequent to said approvals, my cursory
review indicates that 3 out of 10 houses either do not put in
the roof gutters or have legally tied into the storm drain as
per the Highway Specifications. This leaves 7 out of 10 houses
in most developments that are putting in their roof gutters
immediately upon obtaining the C.O. This to me, has absolutely
circumvented the law. In my professional opinion, it makes my
signature on the Plot Plan a travesty.
At your direction, I will be happy to document each and every
plot plan wherein this occurs. My own personal opinion, although
I am sure the Town Board must get legal advice, is that the home -
builder, who has done this should be issued an order to remedy.
And, if it is not done within a certain amount of time, then the
C.O. issued should be revoked. Again, this is my personal opinion,
and of course, we must receive legal advice in this matter.
The reasons for tying in the roof and footing drains to the storm
drain is evident by the many problems that we had in this Town
within the last ten years. Roof and footing drains were able to
discharge across roads causing ice patches and serious hazards
to the road during the winter months. This also started under-
mining the roads during heavy rains, causing damage by ruts,
potholes, etc.
This, hopefully, can be resolved by the mandatory requirements
for the builder or homeowner to install roof and footing drains
and tying them into the storm drain. The circumvention of this
law, in my opinion, is not to the best interest to the Town and
should be stopped immediately. All violations must be immed-
iately remedied for the safety of all residents of the Town of
Wappinger.
Very truly,
s/ Rudolph E. Lapar, P.E.
200
Mr. Horton observed that it was in the Highway Specs that they
have to hook into the storm sewers, but there is nothing in the
Building that they have to have them on the buildings, and there
lies the problem. It would appear that it should be mandated
the gutters and downspouts be part of new construction. Mr. Jensen
commented that he didn't see how you could mandate having someone
put on gutters and down spouts on their houses, although we could
mandate that the provision is in the ground so when gutters and
down spouts are put on said dwellings they must hook into the
underground drainage, and what has happened is the builders are
not laying that piece of pipe in the ground which goes to the
storm sewer, so when gutters and down spouts are put on the water
just washes off on the property. He does feel the footing drains
we've requested is a reasonable request of any builder, and the
vehicle that takes the water from the footing drains to the storm
drains is also a reasonable request, and that should be mandated.
MR. JENSEN moved that underground drainage be part of the subdi-
vision regulations and further direct the Attorney to draw up
said regulations for us.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Versace questioned whether or not it would be appropriate
with these underground drainage pipes be marked so the homeowner
would know they are there if they aren't put on the house initially.
Mr. Jensen believed it should be shown on the plot plan and should
be part of the C.O. Mr. Clausen asked if the homeowner was getting
a copy of the Blot plan. It was generally agreed they didn't.
Mr. Clausen suggested a letter be sent to the Building Inspector
asking whether it's normal procedure for a plot plan to accompany
a C.O., and if not, should it or shouldn't it. It was noted that
it would be the recommendation of both the Highway Superintendent
and Engineer to the Town that a plot plan should be included, and
this also be told to the Building Inspector.
201
A request was received from the Recreation Commission for permission
for its members to attend the 1977 Recreation and Park Society
Convention at the Nevelle Country Club in Ellenville April 24th
through April 27th, 1977.
MR. CLAUSEN moved that any member of the Recreation Commission,
who has not attended a major conference this year, be granted
permission to attend the Recreation Convention at the Nevelle
and their legitimate expenses be a Town charge, and also realizing
that they will not be able to attend another major conference this
year.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Incoronato, being recognized by the Chair, made a recommenda-
tion that the Recreation not be allowed to go anywhere until they
square up things in the Town. Six or seven months ago they put
in a patch of blacktop, after a years requesting, in the Fleetwood
Recreation site, presumably for a basketball court. They are
supposed to also put in a post and net but it still isn't in.
What are they doing besides Little League? Recreation is woefully
lacking, he'd like to know what they're going to do.
MR. VERSACE moved that the Town Board send a letter to the Recrea-
tion Commission asking them what their intentions are on the bas-
ketball court in the Fleetwood area.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letter was received:
March 30, 1977
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
Dear Sirs:
Through a newspaper recounting of an allegation made by
Mr. Jensen at the last meeting of the Town Board, I learned that
there is apparently a 'misunderstanding of the facts surrounding
Mid -Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc. and their violations.
I am enclosing just a fraction of the pertinent correspondence
202
with reference to this situation.
I approached the Board in the winter of 1976, with the
information concerning the repeated violations at this site.
In view of the neverending cycle of violations versus correc-
tions of same, I have felt for quite some time that revocation
of the license is the only answer.
The Town Board is the only one capable of this.
For the matter of court action, you can see by the enclosed
correspondence, that the Town Board directed the Town Attorney's
to "implement approrpiate actions": because, to go to court, I
require the assistance of an Attorney in matters of this magnitude.
The attorneys finally concluded that it is necessary to pursue
all avenues open to the Town to insure that the courts would not
throw the matter out because all avenues were not exhausted.
The Board was made aware of the necessity for a public hearing
to be held, and approximately two weeks ago, Mr. Adams wad directed,
according to Mr. Diehl, to draft a resolution to hold said public
hearing (please see enclosure marked in red)
That is precisely where the matter stands as of today. If
you have any questions, my office is always open to you.
Yours truly,
s/ Sylvia J. Anderson
Zoning Administrator
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HEARING ON JUNKYARD
PERMIT OF MID -HUDSON AUTO WRECKERS, INC.
WHEREAS, investigations conducted by the Town Zoning
Administrator and other officials of the Town indicate that
there is reasonable cause to believe that the junkyard or
auto wrecking yard belonging to Mid -Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc.
operated by Sid Shapiro is in violation of the junkyard ordinance
of the Town of Wappinger as more fully described hereinafter, and
WHEREAS, the said junkyard operator has applied for renewal
of his annual permit as provided in the junkyard ordinance of the
Town of Wappinger, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has been advised that it should not
deny issuance of the permit until a hearing has been afforded to
the operator of the junkyard upon the question of his alleged
violations of the junkyard ordinance,
NOW, on the motion of SUPERVISOR LOUIS D. DIEHL, seconded
by COUNCILMAN LOUIS CLAUSEN, be it resolved as follows:
That pursuant to Section 5 of the junkyard ordinance of the
Town of Wappinger, a public hearing be held before the Town Board
at which time Mid -Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc. shall show cause and
present evidence as to why its application of renewal of its junk-
yard license should not be denied upon the following grounds:
1. That the applicant has enlarged a -non -conforming use
kw
2. That construction of the fence along the boundary line
with the chained property is in violation of the variance granted
by the Planning Board, said fence not being constructed in accord-
ance with the provisions of said variance.
3. That the landscaping required by the junkyard ordinance,
the zoning ordinance and the variance approval has not been
implemented.
4. The applicant has stacked automobiles in violation of
the provisions of the junkyard ordinance and the zoning ordinance.
5. The applicant has operated his junkyard without a license.
6. Automobiles are parked outside the fence line in violation
of the variance granted by the Planning Board.
7. That said public hearings shall take place on the 17th day
of May at the Town Hall, Town of Wappinger, Mill Street, Wappingers
Falls, New York, at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
That a copy of this resolution shall be personally served
upon the applicant, Mid -Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc. by the Town
Constable on or before the 18th day of April, 1977 and a further
copy shall be mailed to his attorneys, Gellert & Gellert, Esgs.,
54 Market Street, Poughkeepsie, New York on or before April 18th,
1977.
That the Town Attorney is hereby appointed to present evidence
on behalf of the Town with respect to this matter and to provide
the applicant with further particulars as to his violation upon
written, demand for the same.
That for the purposes of this resolution any reference to the
junkyard ordinance of the Town of Wappinger shall be deemed to
include those applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance of
the Town of Wappinger insofar as they relate to the use of the
premises of Mid -Hudson Auto Wreckers, Inc.
Roll Call Vote:
Councilman Clausen Aye
Councilman Jensen Aye
Councilman Johnson Aye
Councilman Versace Aye
Supervisor Diehl Aye
Resolution Duly Adopted
The following letter was received:
March 29, 1977
Dear Mrs. Snowden;
On February 17, 1977 a guest of mine was taking a bath and the
faucet popped out of the wall due to water pressure behind it.
I had to shut the water off in the entire house and call my
repair man. The faucets were installed a year ago and I couldn't
figure out why this happened. My repair man told me that the
pressure in the house was entirely too high and that I needed a
pressure regulator. Well anyway, I had the pressure regulator
valve installed and also two adapters. Upon cleaning out my desk
03
4
several weeks ago I came across this letter from Louis Diehl in
regards to the town providing the pressure reducing valves. After
having gone through the expense of this plus the aggravation of
being without water I was wondering if I could be reimbursed for
the pressure regulator valve?
Will you please bring this to the attention of the Town Board,
I would like this request OM the Agenda for the Town Board Meeting
as soon as possible.
Enclosed is a copy of the letter dated May 11, 1978 from Mr. Diehl
and also a copy of the bill I paid for the adapters and the pressure
regulator valve. Will be waiting to hear from you.
Thank you,
s/Audria Rose Cardascia
MR. JENSEN moved that Mrs. Cardascia be paid for the pressure
regulating valve, upon submission of a bill and voucher for
purchase of said valve, payment of installation not to be included,
and that the reimbursement be charged to the Central Wappinger
Water Improvement account.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letter was received:
Robert H. Abecasis
McFarlane Rd.
Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590
March 25, 1976
Mr. Lou Diehl, Supervisor
and Town Board of Wappingers Falls
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Dear Mr. Supervisor
I have been a resident of Wappingers Falls living at my
present residence on McFarlane Rd for over five years taking
up residence in December 1971.
For over a year now I have been having troubei. with my
water system. I have had a entirely new pumping system installed
and have had it checked out several times and have been assured
that it is functiAing perfectly. In spite of this fact my well
keeps going dry and I am left with no water.
Last spring and again this spring I have experienced this
problem with my well going dry. It appears according to the
experts that I have called in to check out this problem that it
is caused by the water tabu::. being excessively lowered by the
draw off taken by the Hidden Hollow Apartments which are my
next door neighbors their property adjourning mine.
As I was a resident before the Hidden Hollow Apartments
were approved and errected and I had no such difficulty until
their errection I feel that the town has a responsibility to
me to see that this problem is corrected.
I have made inquiries and have been told that the residents
of the Hidden Hollows Apartments have complained of excessively
low water pressure and at times a complete lack of water. I
would note that these complaints all coincide with my difficul-
ties.
I have spoken to the Town Engineer and he informed me that
the White Gate Apartments had a similar problem which was solved
by their hooking up to the Town Water. He further advised me to
write to you and inform you of my problem.
The present situation is completely intolerabel as it must
be evident to yourselves that a lack of water for any length of
time is not only an inconvience but a serious health hazard.
As I was a resident before the errection of the Hidden
Hollow Apartments and such errection has caused this problem I
now appeal to the Town Board to correct this situation and if
necessary I request that you order Hidden Hollow Apartments to
hook up to Town Wa ter.
I sincerely hope you will come to my assistance so that I
may be spared the unecessary expense of having to engage Attorneys
and instituting Litigation.
Thanking you very much for your consideration and awaiting
your reply I remain,
Respectfully yours,
s/ Robert H. Abecasis
Mr. Jensen noted that this was part of the Ardmore Hills Water
Improvement Area, which has been held up several years, and
therefore, recommended a letter be sent to Mr. Abecasis indicating
that the Ardmore Hills project will be starting very shortly.
Mr. Versace ssked Mr. Lapar, when the Ardmore Hills Contract was
approved, we were supposed to have a Change Order as far as the
blacktopping after the construction - you know - the blacktopping
being done by the Highway Department - the same procedure as was
followed in Central Wappinger Water #1 - did we ever get a Change
Order on that, relieving that cost to the district on that, in
transferring it to the Wighway fund? Mr. Jensen observed there
had been no Change Order yet because the contract was just signed.
Mr. Lapar was to check into the matter and %port back to the Board.
2O6
The following letter was received, along with a petition for a
reduced speed limit for Ketchamtown Road.
April 1, 1977
To the Wappingers Town Board:
We, the residents of Ketchamtown Road respectfully request
that the speed limit on our road be reduced to 30 mph.
Our road is being used as a short-cut and speedway for
many vehicles, trucks included. This situation has worsened
considerably since the road was re -surfaced some time ago.
There are numerous hazards on the road such as blind
corners and driveways and school bus stops. The excessive
speed limit of 55 mph only increases the risk to life and limb.
Also there are no shoulders on this narrow, winding road.
Therefore we have a very dangerous sitaation for children and
others who walk, ride bikes, ride horseback, jog, etc.
We would like to avert a serious and tra4ic accident
before it happens.
Thank you.
MR. JENSEN moved to request the New York State Department of
Transportation to establish a 30 mph speed limit for Ketchamtown
Road.
Seconded by Mr. Versace
Motion Unanimously Carried
A letter was received from Jon Adams concerning the litigation
with M&G Sanitation. Mr. Adams recommended an executive meeting
for further discussion due to the fact the matter was in the
courts.
MR. JENSEN moved to table the matter of the Town of Wappinger
appeal on M&G Sanitation for an executive session.
Seconded by Mr. Diehl.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letters were received:
:207
March 31, 1977
Town Board
Town of Wappingers
Town Hall
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Re: Bruce Stotz
Gentlemen:
A controversy has arisen with respect to the premises
owned by Bruce Stotz in which the Town Justice Court is situated.
The Zoning Administrator has determined that the landowner is
is occupying the second floor without a certificate of occupancy
and that the premises have three principal uses rather than the
two permitted principal uses.
I am advised by Mr. Stotz's attorney, Al Roberts, that
although a permanent certificate of occupancy has been requested,
the same has not been granted in view of the violations, rhilably,
use of the premises for three purposes rather than the permitted
two. He further states that when the lease was signed, it was
the intention of the parties that the presence of the Town
Justice Court would not preclude Mr. Stotz from using the rest
of the premises for those uses which would otherwise be permitted
in the absence of the Justice Court. Unfortunately, the language
of the lease does not reflect that, the same stating that the
landowner shall be subject to the zoning ordinance.
In view of the fact that the Town is not subject to its
own zoning ordinance, a question exists as to whether or not
the presence of the Town Justice Court can be counted as one
of the permitted uses on the premises. This legal question
could be further explored, but if the Board wishes to indicate
at this time that Mr. Roberts' interpretation of the intent of
the parties was correct, his office could recommend to the Zoning
Administrator that further consideration of this issue should
not be pursued in view of the Town Board's intent.
Would .you please provide us with direction with respect
to these questions.
Very truly yours,
Corbally Gartland & Rappleyea
s/ Jon Holden Adams
April 7, 1977
Town Board, Town of Wappinger
Town Hall, Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, New York
Re: Stott
Gentlemen:
The following is to supplement on my letter of March 31,
1977 with respect to the lease between the Town and Bruce Stotz.
•Av 208
To avoid future confusion with respect to this matter,
and if the board is in agreement with the substance of my
letter of March 31, 1977, it is proposed that paragraph "38th"
be modified as follows:
The premises shall not be occupied, in any part thereof,
by any facility, store, tavern, bar, or other entity
selling beer, wine, liquor, or cider, and the remainder
of the building occupied by the Justice Court shall be
utilized by the landlords solely for those =purposes
established and permitted by the present zoning ordinances
of the Town of Wappinger. Occupancy by the Town of the
premises described herein shall not preclude the landlord
from utilizing the second floor area for a permitted use,
it being the intention of the parties that the occupancy
of the first floor by the Justice Court shall not be
considered a principal use as such term is defined in
the Town of Wappinger's zoning ordinance.
If the foregoing is acceptable to the Board, a simple
resolution moving that the lease be amended as provided will be
sufficient to resolve this problem.
Very truly yours,
Corbally, Gartland & Rappleyea
g/ Jon Holden Adams
Mr. Diehl commented that he believed it was the intent of the
Board that when the Justice Court did go in the Stotz Building,
that it would not prevent any future use of the building because
of Justice Court being there.
Mr. Clausen asked Mr. Adams if any uses could be foreseen that
would interfere with a trial or open court such as far as noise.
Mr. Adams hadn't considered that aspect, just those uses that
would be incompatible with court proceedings. Mr. Clausen noted,
that the Board had been mindful that they wouldn't want anything
there that would interfere with court proceedings.
MR. CLAUSEN moved to refer the matter of amending the Stotz
lease back to the Attorney for clarification with the Zoning
Administrator.
Seconded by Mr. Diehl.
Motion Unanimously Carried
209
Notice was received from the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of
Appeals which pertained to the subject Stotz Building for an
additional permitted use. Mr. Adams indicated this matter would
likely be adjourned pending the Town Board's consideration of the
matter of the permitted uses of the remainder of the building.
A request was received from Ed Hawksley that the Conservation
Advisory Council be designated as a reviewing agency for the
SEQR regulations.
MR. CLAUSEN moved to refer Mr. Hawksley's request be referred to
the Attorney to the Town for recommendation.
Seconded by Mr. Versace.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letter was received:
1 April 1977
Town of Wappinger Town Board
c/o Town Clerk
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Gentlemen,
The Conservation Advisory Council is planning to cooperate
with the Town of Fishkill in performing chemical test sampling
of Sprout Creek.
The First samples will be taken in April and May, and will
be concluded sometime during the fall months.
The cost will be approximately $100, of which 50% will be
reimbursable from the Dutchess County Environmental Management
Council.
I hereby request authorization for this expenditure, as
funds for this project have not been allotted in our 1977 budget.
sincerely,
s/ Edward S. Hawksely, Chr.
Con. Adv. Council
MR. VERSACE moved that the Conservation Advisory Council be
awarded $50 from General Funds Contingency to undertake these
tests.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried
210
A letter was received from the Wappingers Falls Chamber of
Commerce forwarding recommendations from the Chamber concerning
legislation on the Down Stream Drainage Fees, and also a letter
from the Town of Wappinger Planning Board requesting they be
advised as to the status of this subject, as this Board has
several matters before them pending the Town Board action on a
revised formula.
MR. JENSEN moved to table the matter of the Downstream Drainage
Fees in anticipation of further information being forwarded.
from the Chambers.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following letter was received:
13A Wildwood Manor
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
March 30, 1977
Town Board Members
Town Hall
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Gentlemen:
I am pleased to accept the appointment to the position of
Building Inspector and I am available to begin duties on April 1,
1977.
I wish to thank you for the expression of confidence in my
ability to assume the responsibility of the position. I will
make a conscious effort to effectively perform all duties involved.
Sincerely,
s/ Robert G. Ruit
MR. CLAUSEN moved to accept Mr. Ruit's letter and place it on
file.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson.
Motion Unanimously Carried
211
An application was submitted for the renewal of the Town of
Wappinger CATV Franchise by Howard H. Ericksen, General Manager
for U.S. Cablevision Corp.
Mr. Jensen agreed the application should be referred to the
Attorney, but he thinks they were back to the service that this
firm has been giving the customers and he would be quite hesitant
to renew their franchise until he finds out exactly what they are
going to do. Mr. Clausen questioned whether this franchise was
for a ten year period. In his opinion ten years is too long,
five years would be more palatable, and asked the attorney to
look into that.
MR. CLAUSEN moved that the CATV Renewal Franchise application be
referred to the Attorney for recommendation.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Under Committee Reports, Mr. Diehl approached the subject of
Spring Cleanup Days. Mr. Horton had estimated an approximate cost
of $10,000, and assuming this figure is correct, it would be
necessary to appropriate $7,000 from Federal Revenue to cover
expenses to conduct a Spring Cleanup.
MR. DIEHL moved to appropriate a sum not to exceed $7,000 from the
Federal Revenue Sharing Account for the purpose of a Spring Cleanup;
this will not include any metal objects, and the dates will be
published upon confirmation by Mr. Horton.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Versace reported that there was a proposal in front of the
Tri -Municipal Commission from Quartoraro & Quartoraro and Corbally,
Gartland and Rappleyea to represent the Tri -Municipal Commission
as Attorneys, and, as the Town Board is aware, for the past six
months or so he has repeatedly stated that the Town of Wappinger
does need representation on this Board concerning Tri -Municipal.
12
Each municipality involved has this representation other than
Wappinger, to handle the financing, easements, and whatever work
there is involved within its own boundaries. He feels that at
this time they are getting into this type of a proposal and he
feels legal advice is needed on the Town level since the Town
was going to get into much more legal involvement and again he
intends to make a recommendation.
MR. VERSACE moved that Vincent Cuccia be appointed to represent
the Town of Wappinger for Tri -Municipal.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen
Roll Call Vote:
Councilman Clausen Aye
Councilman Jensen Nay
Councilman Johnson Nay
Councilman Versace Aye
Supervisor Diehl Abstain
Motion Defeated
Mr. Diehl qualified his abstention by stating he was not aware
this matter was coming up tonight and he was not prepared to
vote, he would want to speak first to Mr. Cuccia, evaluate it,
and evaluate any other possibilities.
Mr. Jensen, under Committee Repots, confirmed that there was an
agreement before the Tri -Municipal Commission for legal services
and also both Mr. Quartoraro and Mr. Rappleyea, have been down
to the EPA per the direction of the Commission to review both
the new engineering proposal and the legal proposal. The final
forms of these proposals will be before the Commission at their
May 21st meeting. He also added that in the proposal for legal
services there is a provision for the work that is within the
Town to be handled by the designee of said Town, each Town to
decide whether it would be the same attorneys or other attorneys,
and further there will be certain legal fees which may or may not
be eligible for aid and this is something the Town Board will have
13
to consider at that time, what they want to spend for additional
legal services.
Under unfinished business, the matter of the SPCA's proposed
contract offer was again discussed. Mr. Diehl believed the Board
should answer one way or another, and it was his belief that the
Town has a contract with Dr. Hannigan for the remainder of this
time year, and he does have reservations as to what might be assured
through the SPCA, assurances were given also in the past. It
would be his recommendation to stay with the contract with Dr.
Hannigan in handling our dog problems.
Mr. Johnson stated that after reviewing the facts and figures
submitted by the Town Comptroller, the financial review does not
indicate that a move to the SPCA would necessarily be of any
advantage to the Town.
MR. JOHNSON moved that a letter be directed to the SPCA thanking
them for forwarding a proposal, but the Town at this time wishes
to remain with the contract presently effective with Dr. Hannigan.
Seconded by Mr. Versace.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Upon Mr. Diehl's request, Mr. Chiarenzelli's complaint of a
flooding driveway was placed before the Board. It was so noted
that at the last Town Board meeting, Mr. Horton had indicated he
had spoken to Mr. Chiarenzelli, and would put in a dry well to
alleviate the problem.
MR. DIEHL moved a letter be sent by the Town Clerk to Mr. Chiarenzelli
informing him that Mr. Horton is going to put in a dry well to
correct the problem of flooding.
Seconded by Mr. Clausen.
Motion Unanimously Carried
214
Information was forwarded to the Board regarding Contract #1
for Wappinger Sewer Improvement ##1 on the number of yards of fill
used by the contractor Frank Lombardi. Mr. Adams cautioned the
Board to discuss this matter in executive session since the matter
was still in litigation.
MR. CLAUSEN moved for a recess.
Mr. Diehl called a ten minute recess at 10:05 P.M.
Supervisor Diehl called the meeting back to order at 10:18 P.M.
All Board members wereagain= present.
MR. DIEHL moved to table the subject, no action to be taken.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson.
Motion Unanimously Carried
The following report was received:
April 7, 1977
Town Board
Town of Wappinger
Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
Re: Cost Estimate on
Truett Easement
Gentlemen:
As per your direction, Wednesday March 23, 1977, the following
estimates have been developed.
1. *From Alpert Drive to headwall on Truett's property.
180 if of 60" CMP C $85.42/ft
2 IB $2,000 each
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$15,375.60
4,000.00
$19,375.60
2. From southend of Truett's property where 60" 0 pipe
meets 2-48" $ pipes in an easterly direction across
Granger Place to open stream.
180 ft of 60" CMP $100.00/ft
1 IB and 1 headwall C $2,000 each
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$18,000.00
4,000.00
$22,000.00
It should be noted that if either or both of these proposals
are constructed, it is my professional opinion that the problem
will be shifted to another area.
Very truly yours,
s/ Rudolph E. Lapar, P.E.
L
215
Mr. Truett, being recognized by the Chair, commented that the
problem he was talking about is only four sections of pipe and
not connecting'it to Alpert Drive. He felt Mr. Lapar had overdone
the estimates, and Mr. Lapar stated he had given the Board what
they wanted. Discussion continued on how much of a:problem would
be created by solving only part of the problem now, expense, where
to start and where to stop, and the consequences of shifting the
ihre
problem. Mr. Johnson commented that the subject of drainage had
been prominent most of the evening, and he feels that sooner or
later the Town does find itself involved in the middle, we con-
tribute to the problem when we put drains in the streets, put
the water into the sewers, or we don't contribute when we move it
from one street to the next. Somehow we're in the middle and cant'
get away from it, and it bothers him that they can't do a patch -up
job which might turn out worse than what they have, maybe the
answer does come down to the Town recognizing its obligation and
responsibility in the whole area of downstream draingge and put it
right where it belongs, take a bond issue that would solve our
problems, with enough money to complete our second phase of down-
stream drainage study and to the project properly. Mr. Clausen
agreed with Mr. Johnson that eventually this has got to happen, but
Mr. Truett may not be able to wait that long before his house might
collapse, his is an emergency that can't wait for that eventuality
to occur. Here it': just a matter of scaling down Mr. Lapar's
cost estimate to prevent an immediate disaster and doing the best
for all concerned.. Mr. Jensen asked Mr. Truett if his indication a
while ago to contribute to this still holds true, and Mr. Truett
answered that it did. Mr. Diehl asked Mr. Truett if he would be
receptive to a proposition to move his house to another location,
to which Mr. Truett said he would be.
Mr. Clausen recommended this matter be tabled again in order to
meet one more time with Mr. Truett, and the whole Board with one
proposal and if we don't come up with a solution that time, so then
Mr. Truett, one way or another, can make his decision. It was
agreed to hold a work session with Mr. Truett on April 25, 1977
at 7:00 P.M. prior to the Town Board meeting.
The letter from Fred J. Lafko regarding the Bid'on Improvements
to Various Sewage Treatment Facilities was again placed before
the Board, and again ordered tabled to the next meeting. Mr.
Johnson asked Mr. Lapar that, with reference to that bid, to
check with Camo Pollution to see how the bid of $7,000 for the
sandbeds at Mid -Point Park, as it came in a lot higher than
estimated and see if that portion of the project couldn't be
done on a time and material basis.
The request of Allen Jay Bodney regarding the return of subdivi-
sion fees paid for Valley View Farms was again placed before the
Board, and also ordered tabled due to the fact that an opinion
had not been received from the Attorney to the Town. Supervisor
Diehl asked Mrs. Snowden to remind Mr. Rappleyea of this matter.
Mr. Johnson, under unfinished business, noted that, with respect
to the drainage problem on Martin Drive, he had spoken with Mr.
Lapar and Mr. Rappleyea. They have been investigating but have
not yet come back with enough necessary information so that the
Board could make any kind of an intelligent decision. He requested
the matter be placed on the next agenda.
Mr. Versace indicated to Mr. Diehl that he would not be able to
attend the special meeting called for April 13th, to consider
the Bonding Resolution, but asked that Mr. Ryan be asked what the
cost of the insurance would be versus the percentage that we would
save on this bonding.
Mr. Clausen asked Mr. Lapar where they stood with respect to
cost estimates for the water testing in Fleetwood. Mr. Lapar
reported he had nothing as yet but would have them for the next
Town Board meeting.
Mr. Jensen asked that the attorney check ordinances for noise
problems since he has received numerous calls recently on the
noise from motor bikes. He asked Mr. Adams to investigate whether
it would be possible to have some sort of an ordinance regulating
the noise in the Town, and what would be necessary to implement it.
There was a brief discussion from the floor regarding the use of
motor bikes and trail bikes.
Mr. Diehl reported that the Sheriffs Department had completed the
surveillance in Angelbrook, had issued warnings for a matter of
ten days or so, and the officers will go into the Rockingham Area
with radar next. He added that it was quite remarkable the success
he might have had with it (if tickets rather than warnings were
issued).
There being no other business to come before the Board, Supervisor
Diehl entertained a motion for adjournment.
MR. DIEHL moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Mr. Johnson,
and unanimously carried.
The meeting adjourned at 11:01 P.M.
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Reg. Mtg. 4/11/77
217