Loading...
Wappinger Town Hall Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc. 1610 Route 376 Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 rame of Public Water System I Program Code --r - - Federal Reporting Mont"Ne.. j LYJapPingerS Town Hall ___~____L~~_____ __1339026___ __ _ June __ 2011 Water Systems Operation Report Microbiological Sam pie Results Location: TOWN OF WAPPINGER Source of Supply: If surface, is filtration provided? Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system? Does the system have a disinfection waiver? r----~T--....--....- CHLORINATION I Am,"",", Gaseo US Liquid Treated Chlorine Hypo- Free Water Weight of Used chlorite Chlorine Date 1,000 Gals. Cylinder Lbs. per Used Residual pH Per Day Lbs. 24 Hrs. ats. mg/l --T 1-- 0.36 2 0.7 -- 2 . ---------..--=- t--------- .-. ---- -------- --'--2 --.- 0.4 0.52 L..___.__ -~---- ------ -- r 3 0.44 2 1.4 4 -- 5 ---6 ----- .--.- 2 1.3 .. 0.55 7 0.28 1.4 ----s 0.59 .-- --.-----"4 -. 1.4 -- --~~. 9 0.33 ,,---.------- 1.4 10 0.67 2 1.1 ~ 12 --'" "'- .._.~--_..- -,,- -- 13 0.34 2 1.4 14 0.26 ---~_._. ---_..~~ 2 1.1 --15 0.41 1.5 16 0.93 ._n....___.____ 4 0.5 ..,--- 17 0.79 2 0.4 18 19 -.---------.- ... - 20 0.31 .m._ 2 0.4 ""2f -- 0.25 0.3 22 .__0-..__- --- --. 0.24 2 0.3 23 0.49 2 --- 0.2 24 0.19 - 0.2 '25 -__-0 _____.._._ .--- 1--26" ---- ---.-- -- 27 0.48 2 0.3 "2"8 _._--~ 2 0.3 -- __n --- 0.18 29 . --_._-,-._----', 0.5 .-.--.- 0.36 ~ 0.38 --..------. 2 0.3 .- 31 -- .-- --~- -.- Total 9 36 _L~_ 17 -- 1------- L~ 0.3 ,---, ----1.2 0._5_ "'-. --..~. Reported by: Title: CAMO Pollution ~ontrol,' Inc. Operator JUL 1 ;j I I I L..____._____.__._. County: DUTCHESS Ground - No .~----- No No ------ --..--'_._.-.',-_.---- u._.'O Population served: 25 Number of required routine samplE 1 Number of actual routine samples 1 Does a M&AR violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: _ Actual number of samples fewer than required. _ Failure to analyze for E.coli if there was a positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or high turbidity (hiturb) sample? _ Failure to analyze repeat samples. Does an MCL violation exist? NO If yes, check reason(s) below: _ Two or more positive total coliform samples for systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. _ More than 5% positive total coliform samples for systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or hiturb) per month. _ When a positive total Coliform sample is positive for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive, OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and also is positive for E.coli. . Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month following a repeat sample collection. I Date: 7,/'3/1 ( ,~L~\~ Grade Level: IIA Cert. No. 12947 Distribution System Analytical Results Sampling Date of Sample Total Coliform E.coli Free CI- Raw Location Sample Type Positive Positive Residual Turbidity (1,2,3)- mg/L NTU Sink-Mens Roor 6/3/11 1 No No 0.6 - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - Yes No Yes No - - - - *1 = Routine sample 2 = Repeat sample 3 = Hiturb sample COMMENTS and/or REMARKS ENVIRONMENTAL LABWORKS, INC. PO Box 733, Martboro, New Yor1l12542 (845) 236-7823 Fax (845) 236-3911 ELAP 10# 10824 RECEIVED JUN 0 7 2011 DATE AND TIME RECEIVED - ?--fl :).Ph PWS 10# 133 Db..< RESULTS FOR LAB USE ONLY CHLORINE RES. ppm~ BODLE NU'-ltlER c()(p 0 -"5 {\ 10-- BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER PRIVATE SUPPLY 0 TELEPHONE # ~ low; REPORT TO BE MAILED TO RESULTS OF EXAMINATION HPC-SM1892158 TOTAL COlIFORMS /lClOML ABSENT METHOD OF EXAMINATION REMARKS TOTAL COLI FORMS SM1992238 6 t 3 2: 50prn LB Date_Time _Analyzed_ INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS COUML AT35-C E.coli/100ML ABSENT THESE RESULTS INDICATF.THATTHE WATER WAS OF A SATISFACTORY SANITARY QUALITY IN RESPECT TO THE ABOVE TEST, WHEN THE SAMPLE WAS ANALYZED REPORTED BY ~tf;ltJli'<,~/tNVi DATE 6/6/2011