Robinson Lane
Submitted By: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc.
1610 Route 376
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
Federal ---r~porting MonthiY~;;~-J~
1330219H_~L__uJune______?_Q"--1
Date: 7 /8/' r
~ I'
". 1.....-.,,~
Water Systems Operation Report
Microbiological Sam pie Results
r Name of Pub'lic Water System
ROBINSON LANE
jProgram cO~I
100
--- ----~_. .
Location:
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Source of Supply:
If surface, is filtration provided?
Did an emergency occur in any part of the water system?
Does the system have a disinfection waiver?
-rA~ -.-.-. -
CHLORINATION
--
Amount of__~aSeo US Liquid
Treated Chlorine Hypo- Free
Water Weight of Used chlorite Chlorine
Date 1.000 Gals. Cyiinder Lbs. per Used Residual pH
Per Day Lbs. 24 Hrs. Qts. mg/I
1 -----O~32 -- ---- 1.0
-~ C-- 2 1.0
2 0.39
---~ - --- ----- I--~ -
3 0.35 1.0
-4 I-----~~ --~~ --- 2 0.7 --- --
0.62
-------- 1-------- -----~ ---- -- t---- ----- -- ---
5 0.44 0.7
I------~ 1---- 0.39 _._-~ --- I------ 1.0 ------
6
f----- --- ---
7 0.37 1.0
-- ---- --
8 0.50 2 1.0
1-- __ 1-----
9 0.26 0.8
-- ----- --
10 1.04 1.2
11 0.40 _.~._- 2 1.0
- ----- --- C-- 1.0 _n
12 0.33
13 0.33 -- 1.0 ---
---~- C-~--- 1.0 --
14 0.27
--
15 0.24 1.0
---c~ 1-- --
~--~ 0.21 2 1.2
1.27 --- 2 -- 1.0
--.- --- - 1---
18 0.81 2 1.0
--
19 0.36 0.8
---~ -- - ~-
20 0.23 0.8
0.17 -- --~ -- 2 0.7
21
22 0.05 -- 0.8
0.05 - ~- 0.5
23
1--- 1---- - -- -~--
24 0.20 0.9
---- -_.~- ----- ----
25 0.23 2 0.8
f----- 0.38 -- -~- 1--------- 1----- 0.8
26
--~I-- - --- /----- -~ --.- ---
27 0.28 0.9
C--- ---._- 0.32 ---1--- 0.8 -- --
28
-- .--.-- --- -- -- --
29 0.15 1.2
-- 0.39 -- t----- ------ 1.0 ---
30
-~- ---- ~--
31
.!.otal 11.35 18 27'IT=
-- t--- ------ LD.S8 _ ----
-~~:. 0.37 0.60
_n -.---.--
Reported by: CAMO Pollution Control, Inc.
Title: Operator
County:
DUTCHESS
~1~~~ ~=
E==_~_ ~__-j
Population served:
25
Number of required routine samplE
1
Number of actual routine samples
1
Does a M&AR violation exist?
If yes, check reason(s) below:
NO
.' ~. ,
_ Actual number of samples fewer than required_
_ Failure to analyze for E_coli if there was a
positive result for total coliforms from routine, repeat or
high turbidity (hiturb) sample?
_ Failure to analyze repeat samples.
Does an MCL violation exist? NO
If yes, check reason(s) below:
_ Two or more positive total coliform samples for
systems collecting fewer than 40 samples (routine, repeat
or hiturb) per month_
_ More than 5% positive total coliform samples for
systems collecting 40 or more samples (routine, repeat or
hiturb) per month_
_ When a positive total Coliform sample is positive
for E.coli and a repeat Total Coliform sample is positive,
OR, when a positive Total Coliform sample is negative for
E.coli, but the repeat Total Coliform sample is positive and
also is positive for E_colL
. Must collect a minimum of 5 routine samples the month
following a repeat sample collection_
Grade Level: IIA
Cert. No. 12947
Distribution System Analytical Results
Sampling
Location
Date of
Sample
Sample
Type
(1,2,3)*
Total Coliform
Positive
E.coli
Positive
Free CI-
Residual
mg/L
Raw
Turbidity
NTU
ENVIRONMENTAL LABWORKS, INC.
po. Box 733, Marlboro, New York 12542
(845) 236-7823
Fax (845) 236-3911
ELAP ID# 10824
RECE I VED JUN 0 7 2011
EXACT COLLECTION POINT
a.6f/1sPll l/l-tl of'
NAME ANo.OR LOCATIONS OF WATER SOURCE:
--r /d,
PRIVATE SUPPLY 0
SOURCE OF WATER
eil
TELEPHONE #
. S 3o::J. I
BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF W A TEA
REPORT TO BE MAILED TO
... /.1 of, oj/\.
J
C. J(}rvto
COUML AT35-C
E.coli/100ML
ABSENT
METHOD OF EXAMINATION
TOTAL COLIFORMS
SM1992238 6/3 2: 50prn
Date_Time _Analyzed_
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
THESE RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE WATER WAS OF A SATISFACTORY SANITARY QUALITY
IN RESPECT TO THE ABOVE TEST, WHEN THE SAMPLE WAS ANALYZED
\...
REPORTED BY
~j 'Fm{1LNL1'
6/6/2011
DATE
../