Loading...
1983-06-141%0- En %r 0 Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Wappinger was held on June 14, 1983, in the meeting room of the Town Hall, Mill Street Wappingers Falls. Mrs. Waddle called the meeting to order. She then asked if the abutting property owners had been notified. Mrs. Russ replied they had been according to the records available in the assessor's office. Mrs. Waddle asked for the roll call. Members Present: Carol Waddle, Chairperson Charles Cortellino George Urciuoli Joe Landolfi Angel Caballero Others Present: Hans Gunderud, Building Insp/Zoning Adm. Joseph Tinelli, Deputy Building Insp/Zoning Adm. Betty Ann Russ, Secretary Mrs. Waddle gave a brief explanation of how the meeting would run. She stated she would take the unfinished business first, then go on to the public hearings. She read the first appeal. #667 - at the request of Martin J. Stenger, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 421 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to allow for the issuance of a building permit for a 26 foot wide house which will have a 30 foot front - yard setback and a 30 foot rearyard setback where 50 feet and 40 feet are required, on property located on Harbor Hill Road, in the Town of Wappinger. Mrs. Waddle stated the board had received a letter from Mr. Robbins of the Dutchess County Department of Health. Mr. Robbins advised the lot is on an approved map with health department approval and they would have to grant approval for the lot when the building permit is applied for. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to grant the variance. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 4 ayes 1 nay(Mr. Caballero) Motion carried. The variance was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal #670 - at the request of Rino Furlani, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 422 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to allow for the con- struction of a machine shop with a 53 foot setback where a 75 foot setback is required on property located on the corner of Middlebush Road and Old Rt. 9, in the Town of Wappinger. Mr. Caballero made a motion to grant the variance. Mr. Cortellino seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 2 Motion carried, the variance was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. # 672 - at the request of Greystone House, Inc, seeking an interpretation of Section 421, paragraph 5 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Waddle stated the board had been concerned about the definition of "mentally retarded" as against "mental illness". She had a definition from the state which she would read."Mental illness can occur at any age and is usually marked by disturbances in behavior, feelings, thinking, or judgement. Mental retardation, and other developmental disabilities on the other hand originate during the developmental stage of an individual's life, that is prior to age 18, and are characterized by deficits in adaptive behavior, like feeding, dressing. Unlike the mentally ill, whose disability may be either temporary or chronic in nature, the mentally retarded or developmentally disabled person's handicap may be expected to continue indefinitely" She read section 421 and stated she felt it was a permitted use in a residential district. Mr. Landolfi made a motion stating it is a permitted use (a home for the mentally retarded). Mr. Cortellino seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #668 - at the request of Greystone House, Inc, seeking a Special Use Permit pursuant to Article IV, Section 421, paragraph 5 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to permit them to utilize buildings and land to be used for a residential program for Dutchess County mentally retarded individuals on property located off Wheeler Hill Road, consisting of approximately 90+ acres, in the Town of Wappinger. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to refer it to the planning board. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried, Special Use Permit referred to planning board. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #665 - at the request of Raymond A. Menconeri, seeking a Special Use Permit pursuant to Article IV, Section 422 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to permit him to operate a motor vehicle repair and service business on his property located on Route 9D, being parcel # 6057-04-785105. Representative: Raymond Menconeri 0 Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 3 Mr. Menconeri showed the board the site plan. Mrs. Waddle read the response from the D.C. Dept. of Planning which left the decision up to the ZBA. Mr. Cortellino asked what the plans were for the second floor. Mr. Menconeri stated it would be used mostly for storage, maybe an office. Discussion, wet lands status, fence change in map (move fence) Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for or against this special use permit. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Mr. Caballero made a motion to grant the requested Special Use Permit. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried, the special use permit was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #675 - at the request of Peter Tomasic, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 422 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to permit a rental apartment in a district which allows only single-family dwellings, on his property located at 206 Old Hopewell Road, being parcel # 6157-02-637535. Representative: William Close, attorney Peter Tomasic Mr. Close asked if the board had reviewed the information provided. He would like to amend the notice of appeal to appeal the section which allows only single family units, not uses. One important point he would like to emphasize was the density of the area, location of the house, etc. Mrs. Waddle read the.letter from the D.C. Dept. of Planning which recommended the variance be denied. Discussion - County's letter, variance request, etc, notification of meeting, permitted 2 family use in 1972, if there was ever a kitchen previous building permit, court procedure. Mr. Close explained that the purpose from the beginning was to have a self contained living space, however, due to the fact that Mr. Tomasic does not speak english very well, it was written as "living room". Mrs. Waddle stated she had no way of knowing that, what she sees in black and white is living room. Mr. Close stated she also had the testimony of others as to the intent. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 4 Mrs. Waddle stated that those people were all dead, how could she question them. Mr. Tomasic stated that last October, when he came to Mr. Gunderud, he had 2 papers in the file, one said kitchen. The paper should still be in the file. Mr. Gunderud stated you could faintly see, on the original vellum, the word kitchen and also the words living room and they were erased. The original approval was on the vellum, but I couldn't tell at what point the erasure was done. Mr. Cortellino stated this could have been done before the approval was granted. Mr. Close stated all he could say was that the intent was to have self suffi- cient living quarters. We didn't erase the vellum. The kitchen facility has always (from 1972) been in. Mrs. Waddle asked why the problem is occurring 9 years after the kitchen was put in. Mr. Close stated no C.O. had ever been issued. Mrs. Waddle asked why they had waited 9 years for the C.O. Discussion, C.O., size of house 32 x 26. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this appeal. Mr. Gene Hurlin, Hopewell Rd. is a neighbor of Mr. Tomasic and he is here to speak in favor of the variance. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Discussion, completeness of apratment (finished) final inspection. Mr. Caballero made a motion to allow the apartment only as long as Mr. Tomasic lives in the house. The house can not be sold as a 2 family house and must be used as Mr. Tomasic's personal residence. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote 5 ayes. Motion carried. The variance was granted with restriction. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #677 - at the request of Roger and Sylvia Hetherington, are seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 411.7 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to allow for the sale of a lot which will result in a contiguous lot remaining non- conforming as to access frontage and size, on property located on Osborne Hill Road, being parcels # 6156-01-418560 & 440565. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 5 Representative: Tom Hetherington Mr.Hetherington stated he was seeking a variance for a piece of non -conforming :%, property he owns to enable him to sell a piece of property that does conform to the zoning requirements. The property has been established since 1938, the zoning bbtook effect in 1962 and he is zoned as R-40, that does not conform to the size of the parcel. Mrs.Waddle read the letter from the D.C. Dept of Planning which suggested solving the access to Town approved road to prevent creating a land -locked parcel. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone present to speak for or against this variance. James Buckley, Osborne Hill Road, He is in favor of the variance. Mrs. Waddle closed the appeal. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to grant the variance following the recommend- ation from the D.C. Dept of Planning. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote 5 ayes. Motion carried the variance was granted with conditions. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. # 678 - at the request of Granite Homes, Inc. and Mr. & Mrs. Cascio, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 413.22 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to allow a deck to remain with a 17� foot sideyard setback where 25 feet is required, on property located on Stoneykill Road, being parcel # 6056-02-860766. Representative: John Ryan, Granite Homes Mr. Cascio Mr. Ryan explained that in construction of the house, according to the plot plan they were supposed to have 35 or 40 feet to the left side, but because of the rock condition, the house was shifted. He has built in 5 or 6 other towns and wood decks, in some of them, doesn't count. Mr. & Mrs. Cascio love the deck. Mrs. Waddle asked if the deck was still standing. Mr. Ryan showed the board pictures of the deck.. There is 25 feet from the deck to the neighbor. Mrs. Waddle asked why the deck was not put across the back of the house. Mr. Ryan stated there was no sliding door to the rear of the house. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this *ft" variance. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 6 Mr. Cortellino moved to grant the variance. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes. Motion carried. The variance was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #679 - at the request of V.S.H. Realty, Inc, seeking variances of Article IV, Section 422, frontyard setback of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to permit a proposed building to be located within fifty feet of Old Hopewell Road where seventy-five is required and Section 444.1 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to permit a gasoline station to be located at a distance of less than 1,000 feet from a church, said property to be Cumberland Farms facility located on the corner of Route 9D and Old Hopewell Road, being parcel # 6157-01-059624. Representative: Ernest Martin, engineer Mr. Thomas, Cumberland FArms. Mr. Martin presented a site plan and stated the two variances requested. He also stated the applicant is V.S.H. Realty, not V.H.S. The facility they are planning is a food store with gasoline sales. All other zoning requirements have been complied with. The store would operate 7 days a week from 7AM to 11PM. The building is designed to blend in with the neighborhood. Mr. Landolfi asked how many people would be employed. Mr. Martin stated there would be only one person at any one time, several shifts, plus a series of part-timers. It is basically pre-packaged food specializing in dairy products. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was an entry and an exit or an entry/exit. Mr. Martin stated there were 2 entry and exits one of Hopewell Road and one on Rt. 9D. The one on Hopewell Road will be located as far east of the intersection as possible. The one on Rt 9D would be located on the north side of the property. Both proposed vurb cuts have conceptual approval of the State and county. The technical details still have to be reviewed with them. Mr. Urciuoli asked where the septic system would be located. Mr. Martin stated that had not been addressed yer. Mrs. Waddle stated that would be up to the D.C. Health Department. She then asked if there was anhone to speak for or against thsis variance. Mr. Joe Edwards, owner of the Convenient Food Mart Store in Hughsonville. He's been there the past 8 years and if the board allows this store to sell gas, he would like to be able to sell gas. He doesn't think the people of Hughsonville want another 2 gasoline stations. He has gotten along without the gas for 8 years and he thinks V.S.H. should get along without the gas as well. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 7 John, (works in the church) wants to know if the gas had to come with the food. Mr.Martin stated it was pretty much a standard policy. John wanted to know if any traffic studies had been completed. Mr. Martin stated they had talked to NYSDOT and D.C. Dept of Public Works. They have done a lot of changes to make the store work. John stated he did not think it was fair play to set up a store with gasoline right across the corner from the same type store without gas. He felt the question of traffic flow should be addressed before this variance. Patricia Weber, community liason, for Scenic Hudson, Inc.9 Vassar Street Scenic had been given a grant from Dutchess County to do an historic survey of Hughsonville. Scenic Hudson is a not for profit organization concerned with the preservation and enhancement of the scenic historic, and ecological resources within the Hudson Valley, and they are opposed to this proposal for the reasons stated in her letter. (she read the letter aloud) Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak for or against this variance. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Discussion. Mr. Caballero made a motion to deny the requested variance. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried the variance was denied. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #680 - at the request of Murray Ackerman (Stage Door Furniture), seeking a var- iance of Article IV, Section 416.511 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to permit for a sign on a building which will be three feet high and 180 square feet in area where a two foot height and 100 square feet is permitted, on property located on Rt. 9 and Old Route 9, being parcel #6156-02-777824. Representative: Murray Ackerman Mr. Ackerman stated they had come in for the same variance about 612 months ago. In the past 6� months they have found sales are not reaching their expected level. Two of the supliers who were kind enough to come and see how their product was being displayed and sold, felt there was a need for a larger and identifiable sign. It is from their expertise in dealing with merchants through- out the county, that they found that we were falling short of having a sign large enough to be identifiable by passing traffic. We have also found that customers looking for the store have had trouble finding the building, because the sign is not large enough. The wall is 2700 sq. ft. and a 100 sq ft. sign is very small. They do have one of the largest walls in Dutchess County *Awl, and they felt justified in asking for the variance. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 8 Mr. Cortellino asked how large the temporary sign was. Mr. Ackerman said it was larger than the current sign. Mr. Cortellino questioned if the larger sign would actually improve business. Mr. Ackerman felt the larger sign would solve the problems of consumers finding them. They are going through some financial hardship due to the fact that their sales are not reaching the expected levels. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for or against this variance. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Discussion. Mrs. Waddle made a suggestion to leave Furniture off the sign. Mr. Ackerman stated they needed the word furniture. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to deny the variance. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote: 4 ayes 1 abstain (Mrs. Waddle) Motion carried, variance denied. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #682 - at the request of Ronald La Sota, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 422, rear yeard setback of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to allow the main building (Castle Racquet & Fitness Club) to have a rear yard setback of ten feet where thirty feet is required and to have the rear yard set- back of the cabana at twenty feet where thirty feet is required, on property located on Route 376 being parcel #6358-01-296627, in the Town of Wappinger. Representative: Kenneth Russ Mr. Landolfi stated they were familiar with the property but he would like Mr. Russ to explain the situation. Mr. Russ explained that Mr. LaSota is a very creative man, the original approval placed the building closer to Rt. 376, When they started clearing the site, he wasn't happy. He wanted to move the vuilding back. This is not quite the same as All Sport, it will be more of a private family club. He wanted a patio off the back so people could watch. In moving the building back, they had to go back to the planning board for amended site plan approval. They are in a unique situation because they have the central hudson right of way and adjacent to it, they have 250' ConEd right of way, so there's no residential houses near by. The vuilding would be at a higher elevation and in a more practical position. Mrs. Waddle stated there was no hardship. �rrr Zoning Board of Appeals June 13, 1983 Page 9 Mr. Russ stated they would not have attempted it except for the unique situation with the right of ways. Discussion, no hardship. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this variance. There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Mr. Urciuoli made a motion to deny the requested variance. Mr. Caballero seconded the motion. Vote: 5 aye Motion carried, the variance was denied. Mrs. Waddle declared a 5 minute recess. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #683 - at the request of Frank R. Bruno, seeking a determination pursuant to Article IV, Sections 404.32 and 404.33 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance as the whether or not a proposed use is less non -conforming or similar to previous use and to approve structural changes to an existing building located on Old Route 9 in the HB-lA zone, being parcel #6157-02-552940. Representative: Charles O'Donnell Mr. Bruno Mr. O'donnell stated that Mr. Bruno's property on Old Rt. 9 had two commercial uses prior to the zoning change. One was a nursery trype school and the other was a dental office and later a computer type office. The computer oper- ation had ceased and Mr. Bruno had contacted him to see if he could lease the building, to new tenants. The Zoning ordinance stated non -conforming buildings could only be used for the same or similar uses. They have a proposed tenant and have entered into a lease contingent upon the ZBA's approval. The proposed tenant is Dentifax International, Inc. which will employ 3 people, including the principle of the corporation. It is a mai order type of business that caters to dental office and laboratories. It carries items such as plastic tubes, no off the street business, it is all by telephone or by mail Ship- ments from UPS will be received weekly, and from the supplier once every 3-4 weeks. They ship their products out by UPS or occasionallt by small van or truck. The prior uses had more traffic and as many if not more employees. The other problem dealt with the alteration of the building. The only changes would be to widen the doorway by removing the closet and eliminating a lab area and a few other changes. He did not think they were structural changes in the sense of the zoning ordinance but he wanted the boards approval before they were done. Mrs. Waddle asked when the last tenant moved out. Mr. O'donnel stated it would be 2 years this coming December. Mr. Caballero asked if any manufacturing would be done on the premises. Mr. O'donnel stated that there would be none whatsoever. on Now Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 10 Discussion, size of area to be used for storage, hours of operation for nursery school, type of products (all plastics) Mr. Bruno stated the only chemicals that may be used would be paint, to paint models. Discussion, chemicals, receiving it packaged and sending it out packaged. Mrs. Waddle stated the proposed use would be less -non -conforming than the previous one. Mr. Caballero made a motion to that effect. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes. Motion carried, It is determined to be a less non -conforming use. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal # 684- at the request of Hsing Yang & Linda Huang, seeking a variance of Article I Section 526 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to allow additional time to complete building over the two year period permitted in connection with property located on Route 9 and Old Albany Post Road (Sunset Knolls), being parcel # 6157-02-641504. Representative: Hsing Yang Huang Mr. Huang stated they were having economic difficulties completing the building in the permitted 2 year period. Mrs. Waddle asked how much was completed. Mr. Huang stated the plumbing system was finished and only the electric system had to be completed. Mrs. Waddle asked when the building would be completed. Mr. Huand stated they would need another 2 years. Mrs. Waddle asked if he can finish it in 6 months. Mr. Huang asked for at least one year. The money is difficult of get. He has already put a lot of money in it. Discussion, time needed to finish money needed, mortgage on property. Mr. Gunderud was concerned that since the original permit was issued the building code and fire codes, etc, has changed. Mr. Cortellino felt 6 months should be enough. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 11 Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for or against this variance.. There was no one. Mr. Caballero explained to Mr. Huang that the building might not meet the code. Mr. Caballero made a motion to grant a 6 month extension to meet require- ments for a C.O. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried, a 6 month extension was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #685- at the request of Darcel Hungerford, seeking a variance of Article IV Section 421 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to allow for an extension of the time limit to remove a 12' x 60' mobile home from property located on Curry Road, being parcel # 6.157-01-494622 Representative: L)arcel Hungerford, 18 Wenliss Terrace Ms. Hungerford stated she had had the trailer on her parent's property for over a year. It has deteriorated over the past winter with the pipes breaking. (The water and the fuel pipes) She can't touch the trailer because she is in the middle of her divorce. Her Lawyer told her she cannot sell the trailer. She is having financial difficulties because she is the sole supporter of her two children and she does not know when the divorce will go through. All she wants to do is to be granted a temporary variance until the divorce goes through. Mrs. Waddle asked how long that would be. Ms. Hungerford said her lawyer told her it could be up to 2 years, it has already been in for 10 months. Mrs. Waddle asked how many extension had been granted. Mr. Gunderud stated two 6 month extension had been granted Mr. Cortellino asked if the husband is a co-owner of the trailer. Mrs. Hungerf4xd,stated that he was. Mr. Cortellno felt he should be brought down as well, since it is his trailer. Mrs. Waddle stated it was on Mrs. Hungerford's father's property, therefore it is his responsibility to move it. M Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 12 Discussion. Mrs. Waddle asked that Mrs. Hungerford have her attorney write a letter to the board stating the circumstances with the trailer. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to table the appeal Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes Motion carried, appeal tabled. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. # 686- at the request of Robert Deshong, seeking a variance of Article IV, SEction 421 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance, to allow a carport to be constructed with a 16+' setback where 50 feet is required. in property located on Pine Ridge Drive, being parcel #6257-04740087. Representative: Robert Deshong ,Pine Ridge Drive Mr. Deshong stated he was doing some improvements to his house. He is trying to build a carport next to his garage. He has a one -car garage. There had been some vandalisn in the neghborhood and his car has been hit a few times. He can't build a garage on the other side of his house becuase his 2 children'd bedreooms are there. It is currently 35 foot from his garage to the road. He doesn't feel the carport will effect the site distance or anything else. He presented some pictures to the board. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was anyone else to speak for or against the variance There was no one. She then closed the appeal. Mr. Caballero made a motion to grant the variance. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes. Motion carried, variance was granted. Mrs. Waddle read the next appeal. #687 & 688 - She stated that she would conduct the hearing but abstain from voting. 687- at the request of Pizzagalli Development Company, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 476.22 of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordiance to allow for four loading spaces where eighteen are required, on property located off Myers Corners Road, in an OR-lA zone, being parcel #6258-01-278358. 688- at the request of Pizzagalli Development Company, seeking a variance of Article IV, Section 473.2 (472.2) of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance to allow 9' x 18' parking stalls with 24' wide manuvering aisles where 10' x 20' parking stall with 25' manuvering aisles are required, on property located off Myers Corners Road, in an OR-lA zone being parcel #6258-03-278358. ,,W Representative: Doug Schner, Pizzagalli Project Manager Bill Rhode, Hayward & Pakan Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 13 Mr. Schner stated 4 loading docks is his clients desire, 18 would be far in excess of what is needed. Mr. Cortellino asked if 18 could be accomodated in the design. Discussion. Mrs. Waddle closed appeal. Mr. Urciuoli made a motion to grant the variance with the condition that if the use changes, they would have to come back to the board. Mr. Cortellino seconded the motion. Vote: 4 aye 1 abstain(Mrs. Waddle) Motion carried, the variance was granted. Mr. Schner stated the second variance was to reduce the size of the parking spaces. Today's cars are small, and they are trying to reduce the drainage impact and increase the amount of greenbelt available. Mr. Urciuoli read the letter from the Dutchess County Department of Planning which recommended reduction in the parking space size. Mrs. Waddle closed the appeal. Mr. Caballero made a motion to grant the variance. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Vote 4 aye, 1 abstain (Mrs. Waddle) Motion carried, the variance was granted. Mrs. Waddle stated she would entertain a motion to refer appeals numbers 635, 673, and 676 to the Planning Board. Mr. Caballero made the motion. Mr. Urciuoli seconded the motion. Mrs. Waddle felt that since the variance was denied, the special use permit should be denied. Mr. Caballero made a motion to deny the Special Use Permit. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes. Motion carried, special use permit denied. Zoning Board of Appeals June 14, 1983 Page 14. Mrs. Waddle asked if there was any other business to come before the board. There was none. Mr. Cortellino made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Landolfi seconded the motion. Vote: 5 ayes The meeting was adjourned Respectfully submitted, Betty Ann Russ Secretary LC/fh