Loading...
Carnwath- Full Environmental Assess. FormFULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Town of Wappinger Town Board Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Wheeler Hill Road, Town of Wappinger RECEIVED MAY 2 2 2000 ELAINE SNOWDEN TOWN CLERK MAY 4, 2000 Revised May 22, 2000 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of F=ish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Wildlife Resources Center — New York Natural Heritage Program 700 Troy -Schenectady Road, Latham, New York 12110-2400 Phone: (518) 783-3932 FAX: (518) 783-3916 February 22, 2000 Joseph T. Bridges Matthew D Rudikoff Associates Inc Riverside at Beacon 7-11 Beekman St, PO Box 271 Beacon, NY 12508 Dear Mr. Bridges: AM NNW John P. Cahill Commissioner 24 0�c In response to your recent request we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program databases with respect to the proposed possible Acquisition of the Greystone Property by the Town of Wappinger for public park purposes, area as indicated on the map you provided, including a one -mile radius, located in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County. Enclosed is a report of rare or state -listed animals and plants, significant natural communities, and other significant habitats, which our databases indicate occur, or may occur, on your site or in the immediate vicinity of your site. The information contained in this report is considered sensitive and may not be released to the public without permission from the New York Natural Heritage Program. Your project location is within, or adjacent to, a designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. This habitat is part of New York State's Coastal Management Program (CMP)_ which is administered by the NYS Department of State (DOS). Projects which may impact the habitat are reviewed by DOS for consistency with the CMF. For more information regarding this designated habitat and applicable consistency review requirements, please contact: Greg Capobianco or Steven C. Resler - (518) 474-6000 NYS Department of State Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12231 For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted; the enclosed report only includes records from our databases. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of all rare or state -listed species or significant natural communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environmental impact assessment. -2 - Our databases are continually growing as records are added and updated. If this proposed project is still under development one year from now, we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response with the most current information. This response applies only to known occurrences of rare or state -listed animals and plants, of significant natural communities, and of other significant habitats. For information regarding regulated areas or permits that may be required under state law (e.g., regulated wetlands), please contact the appropriate NYS DEC Regional Office, Division of Environmental Permits, at the enclosed address. Sincerely, a. Teresa Mackey Information Services NY Natural Heritage Program i Encs. cc: Reg. 3, Wildlife Mgr, Reg. 3, Fisheries Mgr. Peter Nye, Endangered Species Unit, Delmar ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM EAF APPENDIX D - SURVEY Town of Wappinger Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Wheeler Hill Road EAF INTRODUCTION USE OF THIS EAF PURCHASE ACQUISITION OF GREYSTONE PROPERTY WHEELER HILL ROAD, TOWN OF WAPPINGER, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action consists of the purchase acquisition in fee simple of the Greystone Property by the Town of Wappinger. The Greystone Property consists of a triangularly shaped parcel of approximately 99.6 acres with extensive rolling fields, Hudson River views, and historic buildings located on the westerly side of Wheeler Hill Road in the Town of Wappinger (Parcel ID 6057-03-487186, Refer to Figure A.1-1, Site Location Map). The property was developed in the mid -1800's by the Willis family as a residential estate, and later was converted in the early 1900's for religious uses. Since the early 1980's, the property has been owned and operated by Greystone Programs, Inc. as a residential care facility for developmentally disabled adults. Following the acquisition of Greystone by the Town, there are no immediate plans to change or expand the existing use of the property, except that the purchase will primarily provide for the conservation and preservation of the existing site resources, open space areas and historical buildings, and secure the opportunity for public access to such. Town acquisition will also provide additional resources and building space for potential Town use, including, but not necessarily limited to: placement of administrative offices; storage of government records and equipment; meeting space; publically accessible passive and active open space and recreational resources; etc. Furthermore, the Greystone Property represents a significant opportunity for the Town of Wappinger to t acquire a crucial component of the Hudson River Valley Greenway (refer to Figure A.1-2, Publicly Accessible Hudson River Viewpoints) and ensure the future protection and preservation of this unique, large parcel overlooking the Hudson River, particularly from the adverse impacts associated with its residential development if left in private ownership and control. The Town's purchase contract allows for continued use of the site by its current owner, Greystone Programs, Inc., for up to 24 months. The cessation of future operations and provisions of services offered on the site by Greystone Programs Inc. is not considered herein, as the current residents will be transferred to similar facilities owned and operated by Greystone Programs, Inc. EAF METHODOLOGY The proposed action consists of a property acquisition by the Town of Wappinger, as contrasted to a construction or development project on a specific site. No construction or change in land use is proposed or planned at this time. Accordingly, many of the questions on the State Environmental Quality Review (SEAR) Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAP') are inapplicable, Therefore, where the questions on the forms do not pertain, the response indicates that the question does not apply ("N/A"). Attachments have been provided to respond to key questions and sections on the EAF forms to properly explain the nature of the proposed action and to describe the specific details and issues associated with the implementation of the proposed Town of Wappinger acquisition action. Following acquisition of the Greystone Property, any applicable change in the intensity or type of use, or any alteration/modification of existing site resources, open spaces or historic buildings, will be required to be evaluated pursuant to SEQR 6 NYCRR Part 617. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property/E'AF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS j USE OF THIS RAF ...........................................................i TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES.— . .................. .................... . iii RAF PART 1, Project Information ............................................... 1 RAF PART 2, Project Impacts and Their Magnitude ............................... 6 ATTACHMENT DESCRIPTION OF ACTION .................................. 12 PROPOSED ACTION .......................... ....................... 12 SITE DESCRIPTION..................................................15 ATTACHMENT A.3, PREDOMINANT SOILS .................................. 18 ATTACHMENT A.6, HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........ 21 ATTACHMENT A.11, NATURAL RESOURCES ................................ 24 i ATTACHMENT A.13, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ................ I ....... 27 ATTACHMENT A.15, WATER RELATED RESOURCES ......................... 34 ATTACHMENT B.13, EXISTING SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ............. 38 ATTACHMENT B.14, EXISTING STORMWATER FACILITIES .................. 39 ATTACHMENT B.16, EXISTING SOLID WASTE ...............1.11.1.......... 40 ATTACHMENT B.21, EXISTING SITE UTILITIES ............................. 41 ATTACHMENT B.22, EXISTING WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES ................. 43 ATTACHMENT B.24, FUNDING SOURCES .................................... 44 ATTACHMENT C.1, ZONING ................................................ 45 ATTACHMENT C.11, COMMUNITY SERVICES ............................... 48 ATTACHMENT C.12, TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT ................................ 51 Town ofWappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property/EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 if TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES TABLE A.3-1, Predominant Soils Properties ................................... ................ 20 TABLE A.6-1, Greystone Property Site Buildings ................................. 21 TABLE C11-1, Town General Fund - Tax Rate Impact ............................ 49 TABLE C.11-2, Bonded Indebtedness Principal .................................. 49 FIGURES FIGURE A.1-1, Site Location Map ............................................. 13 FIGURE A.1-2, Publicly Accessible Hudson River Viewpoints ...................... 14 FIGUREA.3-1, Soils Map ..................................................... 19 FIGURE A.6-1, Wheeler Hill Historic District .................................... 22 FIGURE A.11-1, Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat ....... • .. • • • • • • • . • ... 26 FIGURE A.13-1, Scenic Viewsheds............................................. 28 FIGURE A.13-2, Site Photographs .............................................. 29 { FIGURE A.13-3, Site Photographs .............................................. 30 FIGURE A.13-4, Site Photographs .............................................. 31 FIGURE A.13-5, Site Photographs .............................................. 32 FIGURE A.13-6, Site Photographs .............................................. 33 FIGURE A.15-1, NYSDEC Wetlands ........................................... 35 FIGURE A.15-2, NWI Wetlands ............................................... 36 FIGURE A.15-3, 100 -Year Floodplain ........................................... 37 FIGUREC.2-1, Zoning Map ........................ . .......................... 47 APPENDICES APPENDIX A- Summary Pages of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment APPENDIX B- Soils APPENDIX C- Correspondence APPENDIX D -Survey Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property 1 EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 in 14-16-2 (9195)-7c SEQR 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, In an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to ft a project or action, Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and Information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project dates, it assists a reviewer in the analysts that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an Impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large Impact. The form also identifies whether an Impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3; If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ■ Part 1 ■ Part 2 ❑ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts i and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Name of Action Town of Wappincter Town Board Name of Lead Agency Constance O. Smith Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency May Q 2000 Date Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer) Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TWOOIOO /May 4, 2000 Page I PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. EOFACTIONuisition of Greystone Property (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) oad, Town of Wappinger; Dutchess County BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR (914) 297-2744 Town of Wappinger Town Board ADDRESS P.O. Box 324,20 Middlebush Road STATE ZIP CODE CITv1PO New York 12590 Wappingers Falls BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (If different) 914 297-9127 Greystone Programs, Inc (formerly known as Greystone House, Inc.) (9`14) ADDRESS 24 Delavergne Avenue STATE ZIP CODE CITvrPO New York 12590 Wappingers Falls _ DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Fee simple purchase acquisition of the Greystone Pro ert b the Town of Wa inger. Refer to Attachment Description of Action Please complete Each Question - Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Refer to Attachment Description of Action. Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Rural (non-farm) ■ Forest ❑ Agriculture ■ Other Institutional (Refer to Attachment Descri tion of Action 2. Total acreage of project area: 99.6 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE No changes ro osed PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres 29 acres 29 acres Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres Wetland 2 acres 2 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Other (indicate type) Landsca in 5 acres 5 acres Lawns/maintained fields 62.1 acres 62.1 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Refer to Attachment A.3 Predominant Soils. a. Soil drainage: ■ Well drained 100 % of site ❑ Moderately well drained % of site ❑ Poorly drained % of site. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 7 acres, (See 1 NYCRR 370). t Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property/EAFITW00I00/May 4, 2000 Page 2 i 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ■ No None observed during site visit on 211712000. a. What is depth to bedrock? more than 5 (in feet) Refer to Attachment A.3 Predominant Soils. 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ■ 0-10: 20% ■ 10-15: 30% ■ 15% or greater: 50% 6. is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ■ Yes ❑ No Refer to Attachment A.6 Historic and Archaeological Resources. 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑ Yes ■ No 8. What is the depth of the water table? February through April 1.5 to 2 feet and Greater than 6 feet (in feet). Refer to Attachment A.3 Predominant Soils. 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑ Yes ■ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ■ Yes ❑ No Hudson River ad'acent to site. 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑ Yes ■ No According to Refer to Attachment A.11 Natural Resources. Identify each species NIA 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)? ayes ❑ No Describe Overlooks to the Hudson River which will be preserved. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑ Yes ■ No If yes, explain. Refer to Attachment A.13 Open Space and Recreation 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ■ Yes ❑ No Hudson River views not currently accessible to the public 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Refer to Attachment A.15 Water Related Resources. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Hudson River. 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Unnamed on-site wetlands. b. Size (in acres) Approximately 2 acres. Refer to Attachment A.15 Water Related Resources. 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes ❑ No a. If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑ No Existing connection b. If Yes, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑ Yes ■ No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑ Yes i No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical E=nvironmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑ Yes ■ No According to Dutchess CountyPlannin De artment. 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ■ No B. Project Description Refer to Attachment Description of Action. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate): a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 99.6 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: NIA acres initially; NIA acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped NIA acres. No construction proposed d. Length of project, in miles: NIA (if appropriate). e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NIA. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 60 ; proposed No than e. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour Refer to Attachment C.12 Traffic Assessment h. If residential, number and type of housing units: Existing 30 Residents One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium institutional Initially NIA NIA NIA NIA Existing Res Care Units Ultimately NIA NIA NIA NIA No Change i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure NIA height; NIA width; NIA length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is.' 1.920 ff. Town of Wappinger l Acquisition of Greystone Properly l EAF/ TWOOI 00 / May 4, 2000 Page 3 2. How much natural material (i.e„ rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards No Construction Proposed 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ■ NIA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NIA . b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ■ NIA c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ■ NIA 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from the site? None. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes ■ No 6, if single phase project: anticipated period of construction NIA months (including demolition), 7. If multi -phased: NIA. a. Total number of phases anticipated NIA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 NIA month NIA year (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase NIA month NIA year. d, is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No & Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No ■ NIA 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NIA after project is complete NIA. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑ Yes ■ No If yes, explain Town's Purchase Contract with owner provides for its continued use of the site for up to 24 months. Use beyond this period is undetermined at this time. 12, is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes ■ No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount NIA b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged NIA 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes ■ No Type Existing Septic, Refer to Attachment B.13. Existing Sewage Disposal Facilities. 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑ Yes ■ No Refer to Attachment B.14 Existing Stormwater Facilities. 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ■ No Refer to Attachment A.15 Water Related Resources 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑ Yes ■ No Refer to Attachment B.16 Existina Solid Waste a, If yes, what is the amount per month NIA tons. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑ Yes ❑ No NlA c. if yes, give name NIA ; location NIA . d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No N/A e. if yes, explain. NIA 17, Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑ Yes ■ No a. If yes, what Is the anticipated rate of disposal? NIA tons/month. b. if yes, what is the anticipated site life: NIA years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑ Yes ■ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑ Yes ■ No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑ Yes ■ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑ Yes ■ No If yes, indicate type(s): Refer to Attachment B.21 Existing Site Utilities. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 38 gallons/minute. Refer to Attachment B.22 Existing Water Supply Facilities. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day Refer to Attachment B.22 Existina Water Supply Facilities. gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? ■ Yes ❑ No If yes, explain Refer to Attachment B.24 Funding Sources. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property / EAF / TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 4 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date 6i#sr, Town, V"fte Board ■ Yes ❑ No Purchase/Bonding City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑ Yes ■ No { City, Town, Village Zoning Board ❑ Yes ■ No City, County Health Department ❑ Yes ■ No Other Local Agencies ❑ Yes ■ No Other Regional Agencies ❑ Yes ■ No State Agencies ❑ Yes ■ No Federal Agencies ❑ Yes ■ No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1, Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑ Yes ■ No Refer to Attachment CA, Zoning If yes, indicate decision required: NIA ❑ zoning amendment ❑ zoning variance ❑ special use permit ❑ subdivision ❑ site plan ❑ new/revision of master plan ❑ resource management plan ❑ other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-80 One -Family Residence District; Refer to Attachment C.1 Zoning. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 43 to 46 sinale-family residential lots. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No Change. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NIA. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ■ Yes ❑ No Refer to Attachment C.1 Zoning 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 114 mile radius of proposed action? R-80 R-40 R-20 One -Family Residential Utility Uses Railroad River. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin inglsurrounding land uses within a 114 mile? ■ Yes ❑ No Refer to Attachment Description of Action 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NIA. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? NIA. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization (s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? O Yes ■ No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ■ Yes ❑ No Refer to Attachment C.11, Community, Services a, If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ■ Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑ Yes ■ No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ■ Yes ❑ No Refer to Attachment C.12 Traffic Assessment D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Constance O. Smith Date Signature Title Supervisor. Town of Wa in er If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with the assessment. Town of Wappiuger /Acqulsitiou of Gr¢ystone Propertyl EAF /TWOOIOO /May 4, 2000 page 5 Part 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form, the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer Is not expected to be alt expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger < response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question, • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term, and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact, b, Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers, c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1, d. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant, Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance, Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3, f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1, will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑YES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), orwhere 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project................... Change ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%, .................... ..... I............................................................................❑............I...❑...........❑ • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet, ......................................................................................................................................... Yes ❑ No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ............................................................................................................................................................... ❑ ❑ ................... ❑ Yes ❑ No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO surface. ....................................................................................................................................................... • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. ........................ ................ ...................... ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ... Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material ...... .............. ❑ .... .......................... ❑ I ....... ............... ❑ Yes ❑ No (i,e., rock or soil) per year. ............................................................ ............................. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ............................................................ ❑ .... ............ I ... ❑ .... ....... ................... ❑ Yes ❑ No • Construction in a designated floodway. .............................................................................. .. ❑ .................... ❑ ..... ...... ❑ Yes ❑ No • Other impacts .................................... .................... ......................................................................... ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 2, Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i,e„ cliffs, .... ................ ❑ ... ................. ■ ... I.... ...... .................. ❑ Yes ❑ No dunes, geological formations, etc.) ❑ NO ■ YES BENEFIT • Specific land forms: Overlooks to the Hudson River will be preserved and open for public access. Large, undeveloped parcel will be Preserved, Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00I00 /May 4, 2000 page IMPACT ON WATER 1 2 3 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, Small to Potential Can Impact Be 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Moderate Large Mitigated Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO 0 YES Impact Impact By Project .....................................................................I.... Change ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Developable area of site contains a protected water body. .......................................................................................................❑ Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. .................................................................................. ❑ ................�.�,.. ❑Yes❑ • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body, ............................................................................................... ........... ......... ❑ ............. .................. ❑ I........... I.......... ❑ Yes ❑ No Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ................................................ ................................................................................I.................... .......................... ❑ ❑ I ................... ❑Yes ❑ Other impacts: Large, undeveloped 12arcel will be preserved, preventingits residential ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No development and Potential adverse stormwater impacts to the Hudson River. BENEFIT ........................................................................................................................................................... 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES ............................................................................................................................................................. A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No increase or decrease. ............................................................................................................................................. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ................................. ................................................... ............................ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Other impacts: .......... .......... ❑ ... ................. ❑ .... I............................. ❑ Yes ❑ NO .........................................................................................................•---............................................... 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO ■ YES .................................................................................................................................. • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. .................................................................................................................................... ❑ ❑ .................... ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No proposed (project) action. .................... ....... ............................. ........................................ ............... • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute ...... ❑ ..... I............ I. ❑ ..... I................ .., ❑ Yes ❑ No pumping capacity, .............................................................................................................................................. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. ............................................................................................................................I-- ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. .......................................................................................................................................... ❑ ❑ .......................... ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. .................................................................................................................................................................... ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO inadequate capacity, .................................................................................................................................. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. ........................................................................................❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to ....... ............. ............. ❑ Yes ❑ No the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions, .......................................................................................................................................... • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO gallons, ................................................................................�.........I......❑...........❑ • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. ..................................................... Yes ❑ No•. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or ............. ❑ .... .... ....... I.... ❑ ................. ................ ❑ Yes ❑ No expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. ................................................................................. ....... ...................................... • Other impacts :Large, undeveloped parcel will be preserved, preventingits residential .............. ............................ ❑ N .... ............................. ❑ Yes ❑ No development and potential adverse surface and aroundwater im acts thereon. BENEFIT Town ofWappinger/Acquisitlon of Greystone Property/EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES Impact Impact By Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO .................................. • Proposed Action would change floodwater flows. • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ . ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns, ❑ ❑ .................... ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will allow development In a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ... ................. ❑ Yes ❑ No • Other impacts; ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON AIR 7, Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES • Proposed Action will Induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs, per hour or a heat source producing ❑ . ❑ . ............ ❑ Yes ❑ No more than 10 million BTUs per hour, ..................... ................ • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed action will allow an Increase In the density of industrial development within existing ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No industrial use. • Other Impacts; ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS S. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO N YES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO purposes, ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... • Other impacts: Large, undeveloped parcel will be preserved substantially in its current ❑ 0 ❑ Yes ❑ NO state. BENEFIT 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non -endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish, or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No of age) or other locally important vegetation. Town of Wappinger/Acyuisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 1 2 1 3 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO N YES ..................................... Impact Impact By Project Change • The proposed action would sever, cross, or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc,) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. .......................................................... .................................................................................................. .................... ................. ......... I........................... • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO systems (e,g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g„ cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runam. • Other impacts: Although not actively used as agricultural lands, proposed action would ❑ E ❑ Yes ❑ No preserve 7 acres of prime agricultural soils from residential development. BENEFIT IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO 0 YES .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contract to ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ., • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resources. ............................... ........................................................... .................................................................. .................... .................... ............ I.................... • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: Preservation and provision of public open space and access to ❑ E ❑ Yes ❑ No significant aesthetic resources, including the Hudson River, BENEFIT IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre -historic, or paleontolgical importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO ■ YES ............................................................................................................................................................................................. • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: Continued preservation of existing historic buildings and site ❑ 0 ❑ Yes ❑ No provision of public access to said resources. BENEFIT IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ NO 0 YES • The permanent foreclosures of a future recreational opportunity, ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Other impacts: Preservation and provision of public access to significant open sace ❑ E ❑ Yes ❑ No and recreational opportunities, BENEFIT Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00I00/May 4, 2000 Pag IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 1 2 s 14, Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical Small to Potential Can Impact Be environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(8). Moderate Large Mitigated Impact Impact By Project ■ NO ❑ YES Change .......................................................................................................................................... List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA, Examples that would apply to column 2 ................. ..............,..................................... .... .......... .................. ....................... .............................. . • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function, or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES ........................................................................................................................................ • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. .......................................................................................................................................................... • Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16, Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase In the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ..................................... ........................................................ ......... ............................. I....................... • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17, Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO ❑ YES • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school, or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • Other impacts: ..................................... ❑ 1""J, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X 8 0 .................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ......... .............................. ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No .......................................... ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ 1""J, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ X 8 0 .................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ......... .............................. ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No .......................................... ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ 1""J, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property / EAF / TWO0100 /May 4, 2000 Page IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 1 Small to 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Moderate Large Mitigated Examples that would apply to column 2 ■ NO [DYES p...................................................1...11.1.. Impact Impact By Project Change • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (Le., oil, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No ❑ pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc,) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. .......................,......... ........ .............. ........................1111.......................... • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e., toxic, ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, Irritating, infectious, etc,) . .................................................................................................................... Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable • q ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No liquids.......1....1.11 .................................................................................................. .. ........................ • Proposed Action may result in, the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste..... .1111 ....... ..........................1...........111............, ........ ........ ......... ............ .......... ............ ........................................................................................ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO • Other Impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ❑ NO ■YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ............................................ ..................... .................... ..................................................................... ........................................... • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No growby more than 5%,........................................................................ ............................................................................ ..........................................1111. .................................... The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ NO 5% per year as a result of this project. ............................................................ ........ .................................................................. ............................................................ ............................... .. • Proposed Acton will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑ YeS ❑ NO ................................................................................................ • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑ YeS ❑ No i .................. ..................................................................................................... • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No importance to the community . ..................................I.........111........1............... ........................................................................................................................................................... • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g., schools, police ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes U NO andfire. etc.).... .................................................... ..............................................I......................... ........................................................... .......................................... • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ 1111.❑1111.. ❑ Yes . .. 1111° ..............................................................1111... ...................................................................................I........... ............ • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No .. ...................................................................... • Other impacts: Preservation of existing neighborhood character b recluding the ❑ ■ ❑ Yes ❑ No development of the property for residential uses. BENEFIT 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ■ NO ❑ YE: If any action in Part 2 is identified as a potential large impact or if you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3, Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Paf ATTACHMENT DESCRIPTION OF ACTION PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action consists of the purchase acquisition, in fee simple, of the Greystone Property 'b the Town of Wappinger for its recreational and governmental needs, while preserving the historic character and resources of the property, its panoramic vistas, and the Town's historical and geographical association with the Hudson River. Currently, the Town does not own any property from which the public can access Hudson River views. The Greystone Property consists of a triangularly shaped parcel of approximately 99.6 acres with extensive rolling fields, Hudson River views, and historic buildings located on the westerly side of Wheeler Hill Road in the Town of Wappinger (Parcel 1D 6057-03-487186, Refer to Figure A34, Site Location Map), The Town has no immediate plans for the use of the property except that the purchase will primarily provide for the conservation and preservation of the existing site resources, open space areas, and registered historical buildings. Town acquisition will also provide additional resources and building space for potential Town use, including, but not necessarily limited to: placement of administrative offices; storage of government records and equipment; meeting space; publically accessible passive and recreational resources, etc, Furthermore, the Greystone Property represents a significant opportunity for the Town of Wappinger to acquire a crucial component of the Hudson River Valley Greenway (refer to Figure A.1-2, Publicly Accessible Hudson River Viewpoints and Attachment A.13, Open Space and Recreation,) and ensure the future protection and preservation of this unique, large parcel overlooking the Hudson River, particularly from the adverse impacts associated with its residential development if left in private ownership and control. SEQR Classification The proposed action is classified as an Unlisted action pursuant to SEQR 6 NYCRR Part 617. It is noted that the Type I Action list (those actions which generally are expected to result in significant impacts) includes Unlisted actions that occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any historic building, structure, facility, site or district listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, but not if the action is "designed for the preservation of the facility or site". As such, the proposed action is classified only as an Unlisted action. The proposed action does not include construction or other physical impacts to the site. Only the acquisition of the property is proposed or planned at this time. The future use of the property and its buildings by the Town has yet to be determined, with the exception of preserving the property from potential residential development. The existing residential care facility use will continue following the purchase of the property, while future use of the property by the Town, and the potential environmental impacts of any such changes in use, will be evaluated prior to changes in the current use of the site. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystane Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 12 City of New Delaware Watei 55 5j 3 3, SOURCE USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle, dated 1956, photo revised 1980 NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC, RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 271 BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TEL (914) 831-1182 • FAX (914) 831-2596 SITE LOCATION MAP GREYSTONE PROPERTY TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK DATE May 2000 SCALE 1" = 2000' FILE # TWO0100 FIGURE A.1-1 BASE MAP SOURCE USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle, dated 1956, photo revised 1980 MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLEDAT E May 2000 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON HUDSON RIVER VIEWPOINTS SCALE NTS 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 —.- BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 GREYSTONE PROPERTY FILE # TW00100 TEL (514) 831-1182 . FAX (91.4) 831-2696 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FIGURE A.1-2 SITE DESCRIPTION The approximately 99.6 acre site overlooking the Hudson River consists mostly of rolling fields interspersed with some heavily wooded segments, located in the southwesterly portion of the Town of Wappinger. The approximately 2 acres of the developed area of the site (consisting of buildings, roads, and parking areas) are concentrated in the level southwesterly portion of the property. The westerly portion of the property also contains steep wooded land (greater than 20 %) sloping towards the Hudson River. The remaining terrain is mostly maintained sloping fields (up to 25% slopes) providing significant area and river views. Surrounding Properties To the south, the Greystone property adjoins lands owned by Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation which include utility -related improvements. To the west, the property adjoins lands owned by the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) which include active train tracks. West of the MTA land is the Hudson River (Refer to Attachment A. 15, Water Related Resources). To the north and east, the property is adjacent to single family residential properties, all significantly smaller than the Greystone Property. Existing Site Uses The subject property was developed in the mid- I800's by the Willis family as a residential estate, and later was converted in the early 1900's for religious uses. The property is currently in use by Greystone Programs, Inc., as a residential care facility for approximately 30 residents. The site contains several buildings (Refer to Attachment A.6, Historic and Archaeological Resources), including a multi -person residential structure with an attached former chapel (the Chapel/Dormitory Building), a 19'h Century mansion, a barn, and other buildings used for administrative and site maintenance purposes. With the exception of the original residence (the Mansion) which is not in use, the site buildings are used for the operation and maintenance of the above -noted institutional residential care facility. Existing on-site recreational facilities include a ballfield, swingset, outdoor swimming pool, basketball court, and fields for passive recreation. Pursuant to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution by Greystone Programs, Inc. may continue for up to 24 months. According to Greystone Programs, Inc. facilities personnel, the number of residents is expected to decline during the lease period. Eventually, all residents will be transferred to similar facilities owned and operated by Greystone Programs, Inc. POTENTIAL SITE USES The primary purpose for acquiring the Greystone Property is to ensure its conservation and preservation, thereby preventing the residential development (and related adverse impacts) of this unique, large parcel overlooking the Hudson River. Generally, the Town expects to make the property accessible to the public for passive open space and recreational purposes (it should be noted the property includes some existing provisions for persons with disabilities). Town of WappingerlAcquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/4fay 4, 2000 Page 15 Other potential uses may include storage of Town records and equipment, active recreational facilities, administrative offices, meeting spaces and other uses as may be needed or deemed appropriate by the Town in the future. Future use of the property and the potential environmental impacts of such uses will be evaluated prior to any changes in the current use of the site. Revenue generating or self supporting public uses which might be considered in the future include a museum, interpretative center, or an art center similar to the Torpedo Arts Center in Alexandria, VA. Appropriate financial analysis and projections to evaluate the feasibility of the development and its operating costs (including determination of the appropriate party to incur such responsibilities) would be considered as part of the environmental review associated with changes in the current use of the site. Maintenance of Property During the ongoing lease period by Greystone Programs, Inc., the Town will determine the immediate use (if any) of the site's structures, and prepare a transition schedule along with an interim management plan. Following the cessation of the lease period, the Town will implement the predetermined transition schedule. This may include properly securing and/or closing buildings for which no immediate use has been determined, in order to protect the public and the historic integrity of the buildings. Heating and other maintenance costs would be minimized during the period it takes the Town to determine a feasible future use. A maintenance budget which includes insurance, quarterly inspections, periodic repairs, electricity for j the operation of fire and security systems, exterior and emergency lighting, etc., is likely to be less costly then continuing to maintain the buildings in their existing state. As maintenance needs are related to the building's conditions, it should be noted that (according to Greystone Programs Inc. facilities personnel) the site's largest structure, the Chapel/Dormitory Building, includes such infrastructure improvements as a new heat/hot water system (1992-`93), replacement windows (1993), roof repairs (1994), and a new well (2000). The scope of this EAF does not include the preparation of operating budgets or cost projections of that detail. However, the conclusion that a professional and efficient interim management program is feasible for the Town of Wappinger, in its' consideration of the action is reasonable from the perspective of the size of the Town, it's professional and efficient management of it's current facilities, the probable modest and controllable costs involved, and most importantly the permanent environmental and public benefit of the proposed action. Additional Analyses As part of the Town's evaluation of the subject property, a building assessment was completed entitled, The Greystone Report, dated October 26, 1998. This report was prepared by the architectural firm of Cerniglia & Swartz to evaluate the conditions of the existing site buildings and to suggest possible adaptive reuses, including use as a senior center, which was a consideration at that time. Town of Wappinger / Acquisition of Greysmne Property 1 E'A F/ TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 16 While no decisions on ultimate reuses have been made, the report evaluates the conditions of the buildings in light of prospective reuses, but does not address the costs of operating or maintaining the buildings in any capacity. The Greystone Report indicates that the buildings are in generally fair overall condition. However, since no specific building reuse is being considered at this time, development and 1. operating costs associated with possible adaptive reuses are not evaluated herein. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by the Chazen Companies in April 2000 evaluated the extent to which the Greystone property and its buildings contained environmental and/or hazardous materials conditions which might create legal or financial obligations for the Town. With the exception of various floor tiles and mastic containing asbestos, surfaces painted with lead-based paint, and both above and underground oil storage tanks, the assessment revealed no signs of recognized environmental conditions. Refer to Appendix A for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Summary. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TWOOPOO /May 4, 2000 Page 17 ATTACHMENT A.3 PREDOMINANT SOILS In accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service's Soil Survey Sheet for Dutchess County, New York (1984-85 aerial photography), the predominant soil type within the subject property site area is Bemardston silt loam. Other site soils include Dutchess-Cardigan complex and Nassau -Rock outcrop complex. Refer to Figure 2, Soils Map; Table A.3-1, Predominant Soils Properties; and Appendix B, Soils. Bernardston Silt Loam Bernardston silt loam soils are present on approximately 74 acres (or approximately 74%) of the site. These soils are well drained, loamy soils formed in till, with moderate permeability in the solum and slow permeability in the dense substratum. Slopes associated with these soils on the subject site range from 3 to 25 percent. Approximately 4 acres of the Bernardston soil indicated in the eastern area of the property is classified as prime farmland (New York State Land Class 2) soils. Haven loam is another prime farmland soil (New York State Land Class 1) present on approximately 3 acres in the northern area of the site. However, no agricultural activity presently occurs on the site. Haven soils are nearly level, very deep, well drained loamy over sandy soils formed in outwash, with moderate permeability in the surface and subsurface layer, and very rapid in the substratum. Dutchess-Cardigan Complex Dutchess-Cardigan complex soils are present on approximately 13 acres (or approximately 13%) of the site. This complex is composed of approximately 40% Dutchess soils, 30% Cardigan soils, and 30% other soils and folded shale rock outcrop covering approximately 0.1 % to 2% of the surface. Dutchess soils are very deep, well drained loamy soils formed in till with moderate permeability. Cardigan soils are moderately deep, well drained loamy soils formed in till, with moderate permeability, underlain by folded shale bedrock. Slopes associated with this soil range from 1% to 15%. Nassau -Rock Outcrop Complex Approximately 10 acres (or approximately 10%) of the site running parallel to the Hudson River consists of Nassau -Rock outcrop complex. This complex is about 45% Nassau soils, 30% folded shale rock outcrop, and 25% other soils. Nassau soils are shallow, somewhat excessively drained loamy soils formed in till underlain by folded shale bedrock, with moderate permeability. Rock outcrops are common exposures of folded shale bedrock or areas with soils to thin to support plant growth. However, it should be noted that no exposed bedrock was observed during a site visit conducted on February 17, 2000. Town of Wappinger/Acquisillon of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/M9y 4, 2000 Page 18 P } � d Pi { f pOno MR WOOFu K� A�`a' s All 7-, X�K' fill rk A 7d� r y(Cl key ✓' "."''3q 9xlr '4� C 1L� -., 4 � y - gee' � • ji' 1 s c-�� � 1 •~� w r; sk � ,� :rg r vg 11 lit '�4. 'n X `i• �! +$ - F �P �� M �' A�'� aR" :} WF �-p :�Sy C. (� 1 T vi° ` ,.� .r 4 �� g ., 1 �. � .M^9 .�. _ �f -r f -:�� �s�a r� �• r��fe.�,�. tr �'ie�� ` s litt�e,car"�....p !. i i_6 `�: .a'f - . ..—._'"� U N N 6U,1 id U � W y U4 kn h O U -+t Y Y Cd � ,)ip m 2 A �U QU c. 0 �1�all�ID Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0w w w +2I �pp N N cd ro i .� ljl� kr) Y Y Y Y a 0 aR 53�" U � � � O fikn Vl W O qu F LQ. M O U 90 N � c u Gr y � [n w , M m M G o e o � a b4 aki y ski U18 U > o A� 0 op b h b c� 3� U en,� w nq ��.� p G an ° C b b v O06 C 0 1:3 `n Pr U U O> Z h O 'a AL 3 3 L ATTACHMENT A.6 HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Historical Historically referred to as Carnwath Farms, the subject property is one of six estate parcels listed on the State and National Historic Register as part of the 1991 designation of the Wheeler Hill Historic District (Refer To Figure A. 6-1, Wheeler Hill Historic District). The property features a number of buildings representing various architectural styles from the 19`h and 201h centuries (Refer below to Table A.6-1, Greystone Property Site Buildings). According to the National Register of Historic Places, the Italian Villa style brick residence at Carnwath Farms "best epitomizes the Romantic Period in the Wheeler Hill Historic District". The Carriage House, Administration Building and a small brick storage building are considered as "contributing buildings", while the remaining site structures are considered "non- contributing". The property's designed landscaping features including the stone pillars, winding drive, and randomly planted specimen trees are considered contributory features to the site's historical designation. For further information regarding the existing site buildings, refer to The Greystone Report, dated October 26, 1998 as prepared by the architectural firm of Cerniglia & Swartz for the Town. TABLE A.6 -I GREYSTONE PROPERTY SITE BUILDINGS Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property, Wheeler Hill Road Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County k7I;NG riAT 'IT IJ 1rYIST(yRTCAT,EP;T''t' $UiT�T STYLE DE&xf�NA£i'�?1�l �T;�E .r. Mansion 1850 Italian Villa, Romantic Period Contributing Vacant Carriage House 1873 Second Empire Contributing Maintenance. Building Cow Barn 1876 Second Empire Contributing Removed* 2 -Story Brick 1927 None Specified Contributing Administrative Building Offices Chapel 1950 Contemporary Non -Contributing Recreational Dormitory 1958 Contemporary Non -Contributing Residential Care Facility * This buildins was destroyed by fire The acquisition of the property by the Town will allow for the continued preservation of this historical Hudson Valley estate. No construction or renovation of any buildings is proposed by the Town at this time. Prior to any such action, the proposed activities will be evaluated and subject to additional environmental assessment. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 21 i+ SITE 00 Wheeler Hill Historic District wheeler Hill Road, Wappinger Dutchess County New York r SOURCE Map 2 - Tax map ehnwlnq houndt►riea of the Wheezer Hill III" or rt hlbt,r ttt:, ryanlw - 1 Inch aQ%inlm nOo raptpf New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Presentation NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEELER HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT DATE May 2D00 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY SCALE NTS BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF VIIAPPINGER, NEW YORK FILE # TW00140 TEL (914) 831-1182 • FAX (914) 831-2696 FIGURE A.6-1 Archaeological Recent correspondence from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) indicates that the subject property "may contain an archeological site" and that "a Phase I Archeological Survey is warranted if ground disturbing activities are planned for the property (Refer to Letter from OPRHP, Appendix C, Correspondence). At this time, no construction activities are under consideration. Thus the recommended study has not been completed as part of this evaluation. Should a construction project be proposed in the future, an archaeological survey will be conducted as appropriate. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 23 ATTACHMENT A.11 NATURAL RESOURCES The approximately 99.6 acre site overlooking the Hudson River consists mostly of rolling fields interspersed with some heavily wooded segments, located in the southwesterly portion of the Town of Wappinger. Existing site improvements consist of approximately 2 acres of buildings and paved areas, concentrated in the level southwesterly portion of the property. The westerly portion of the property contains steep wooded land (greater than 20 %) sloping towards the Hudson River. The remaining terrain is mostly maintained sloping fields (up to 25% slopes) providing significant area and river views. The majority of the site's woodlands are located along the bluff area overlooking the Hudson River. This woodland, a relatively closed canopy deciduous hardwood forest, contains the following representative woody species: Trees Sugar maple (Acer saccharum) Norway maple (Acer platanoides) Red maple (Acer rubrum) Tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) White oak (Quercus alba) Black cherry (Prunus serotina) Black birch (Betula lenta) White ash (Fraxinus americana) i Red elm (Ulmus rubra) Shrubs and Vines Maple -leaved viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium) Honeysuckles (Lonicera spp) Black haw (Viburnum prunifolium) Grape (Vitis sp) spicebush (Lindero benzoin) Tree species generally range in size from approximately 10 - 16 inches diameter -at -breast height (DBH) with a substantial number of larger individuals of tulip tree and oaks with DBHs of 24 to 30 inches. Relatively undisturbed stands of large trees along this reach of the eastern Hudson River shoreline and adjacent uplands are uncommon. The site's fields are mowed each growing season by a local farmer. As a result, large areas of upland slopes, including the site's high point, are maintained in an open condition. These open grasslands Provide unobstructed panoramic views of several miles of the Hudson River and its western shoreline, as well as habitat for a broad spectrum of wildlife which utilize open grasslands. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition ofGreyslone Property 1EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 page 24 In addition to the above forest and open field resources, approximately two acres of freshwater wetlands have been identified by Joseph T. Bridges, PhD, Senior Biologist with Matthew D. Rudikoff Associates, Inc., during a site visit on February 17, 2000. Identification of the precise limits of the wetlands and their component flora, particularly the ground -cover herbs, was not possible on the date of the site visit because of the season and extent of snow cover. Since no construction or site alteration is proposed, a formal delineation and wetland survey were not conducted. The Town's purchase of the Greystone Property will not have any adverse impact on the site's natural resources, as no construction or development of the site is proposed. Furthermore, the Town's acquisition of the property will preserve the site's resources, as well as provide increased opportunities for public appreciation of such resources. Significant Habitats An area of the Hudson River (west of the site and adjacent to MTA property) is designated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) as a Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat (Refer to Figure A.11-1, Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat). The designated area includes the New York Natural Heritage Program's Wappinger's Creek Mouth (located north of the subject property) and extends along the shallows of the Hudson River, parallel to the subject property (Refer to Letter front the New York Natural Heritage Program, Appendix C, Correspondence). The Wappinger's Creek Mouth habitat has been designated as a protected area due to the presence of such rare wildlife as osprey (during spring migrations) and plant species including grassleaf arrowhead, subulate arrowhead, kidney leaf mud plantain and Maryland bur -marigold. Also present are important spawning areas for anadromous fish including alewife, blueback herring, white perch, tomcod, and striped bass. Resident fish species include largemouth bass, bluegills, brown bullhead, and red -breasted sunfish. The area is also a productive feeding area for herons, waterfowl, and turtles. The Town's purchase of the Greystone Property will have positive impacts on this habitat in that the property and its habitat resources will be protected and preserved in substantially their current state. Purchase of the property by the Town will prevent the potential adverse and irreversible impacts associated with the residential development of this unique, large estate parcel if left in private ownership and control; the potential environmental impacts associated with the residential development of the property could have significant adverse effects on the Hudson River and the designated Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat therein. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property 1 EAF/TW00100 /May 4,1000 Page 25 MAP LEGEND Co"asltY T}pe D :g-epwater S > ajiows F --Ld and sand flats B xndy beach Features AR L marsh U =per marsh W =cal swamp forest C ---shwaier creek Exotic Plants WC «alar Chestnut CR :,.moron reed PL axple loosest&e Major Features AR �.:andoned ruins RH a rkhead RL =cat launch ramp BR `rdge DA :;-m or barrier DB :v* Wind DR -edged reach DS credge disposal site EL iOechic lines FJ Ulsam and jetsam IN rdv5Ltalbuilding LF Widf>ll or junkyard MA r wina PI pier or causeway PK Ixrldng lot PP power plant RB F+l bridge or culvert RS radio antenna or tower RV recreational vehicle trail SC slipping channel SP sewage plant TF tang farm TH seasonal residences Wi vaderintake Land Uses AG agriculture CP axuuy parkIN try MR ' miitary reservation NA natural area PA picnic or camping area NH National historic Side QU RH resi� housing TP town, park SK gate park r, � scrap Oanskammer 02 a Point w omeyor K+ ss / Moth Coun" SITE of 11rw Yaj water Si WI r SOURCE New York National Heritage Program, Fish and Wildlife Service NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. WAPPINGERS CREEK DATE I May 2000 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON SIGNIFICANT COASTAL FISH AND 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 271 WILDLIFE HABITAT SCALE NTS BEACON, NEW YORK 12506 TEL (914) 831-1182 • FAX (914) 831-2696 FILE # TW00100 GREYSTONE PROPERTY TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FIGURE A.1 1 -1 ATTACHMENT A.13 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION The majority of the site includes expansive scenic views of the Hudson River, including substantial undeveloped acreage of unprotected open space land which has been privately held since the mid 1800's with no public access. The subject property also includes passive hiking trails and open playing fields. Greenway Connection and Future Opportunities A primary benefit of the proposed acquisition will be the preservation of a significant open space parcel, as well as the establishment of increased public access to scenic views of the Hudson River, and additional areas of passive and potentially active recreational resources. Given the open space, natural, and historic resources on the site, in combination with the property's focus on the Hudson River and its location in an area of Dutchess County with limited existing publicly accessible Hudson River viewpoints, the Greystone Property represents a crucial component of the Hudson River Valley Greenway. Refer to Figures A.13-1 through A.13-6. Immediate outdoor recreational uses would include potential picnic areas, access to trails along the Hudson River bluffline, and low -impact recreational activities such as sledding or cross-country skiing. Other outdoor recreational opportunities potentially include ballfields, basketball courts, and a swimming pool. Site buildings will provide future opportunities for indoor recreational use as well. However, Town use of the facilities will not be possible during the ongoing lease period with Greystone Programs, Inc. However, once the facility is no longer leased, the indoor recreation areas could be made available for public uses as determined appropriate by the Town. Recreational Opportunities for the Physically Disabled Improvements made to the property to accommodate the current site use of a residential care facility provide unique future recreational opportunities for the Town's physically challenged citizens. While no ADA accessibility evaluation has been conducted, an existing gazebo overlooking the Hudson River is apparently accessible with no modifications required. Additional potential outdoor opportunities could be provided with the construction of boardwalks, or other suitable paths, along existing wooded site trails leading to other Hudson River overlooks. Future indoor recreational opportunities are significantly in place, as the Chapel/Dormitory Building includes wheelchair -accessible recreation and meeting areas and restroom facilities. Future Town uses of the property could provide additional passive recreational facilities which preserve and enhance the property's scenic and recreational value. Future indoor and outdoor opportunities, active recreation facilities and other uses of the site, and its existing facilities will be determined according to the Town's future needs, and upon further determination and study. Acquisition of the subject property by the Town also prevents the possibility of a substantial residential subdivision (up to 45 single family homes) which would forego the opportunities noted above, while placing increased demand for such services on the Town. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property 1EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 27 =-��i jii➢''1 f �. 5 $ ' Oji' SEE NosSUb�� Danskammer c� FIGUREA.13- Pon t Lights HUDSON RIVER SEE / FXGURE A.13-5 lK> , SEE SEE FIGURE A.13-4 City O N prk FIGURE A.13.3 Delawar ter Supply. _J BASE MAP SOURCE USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle, dated 9956, photo revised 9980 NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. SCENIC VIEWSHEDS DATE May 2000 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON SCALE NTS 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FILE # TW00100 TEL (914) 831-1182 T FAX (914) 831-2696 FIGURE A.13-1 O t4} W Q Q X Q co N O co ^ /Z+.� O W Q W w Q� c,hQ X Q L `9 Z © G) Z GCS p_ P°1 U) Z .K... Q w, Uj W LU ED LL W Loi � W J_ 0 W W Z CL o w W 0 0-0 F— W Z 0 I' 0 CL LLJ LL ICS' 0 Z 3 0 4.-. t4} W Q X Q co T M C) co ^ /Z+.� Q W w Q� c,hQ X Q L w>- d = 3: W n © G) Z GCS p_ P°1 U) Z .K... Q w, Uj W LU ED ':3 m LU _ F- 48.8 F - Q This highly nccessible gazebo site DfTcrs signii'lcant vic%vs Nvest lowards the fludsoll River. view 11,0111 o lie 01 1 Ile :� I te Is tup po In Is I ot% I ll� wm uuross HIC I I HOSOIl K I VC I IOWZRIS: N Y,>L)I-'(--Coll I I llllC(] L3"flcl Ljg' I C rooSkJjjll 'llid lbecling arrow MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TEL (914)'831-11'.82 - FAX (914j 831-2696 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS GREYSTONE PROPERTY TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK DATE May 2000 -SCALE NTS I I FILE 4 1 TW00100 I FIGURE A.13-5 View looking west,,I[ flic existing SNV1111111i2g pool WIL11 Me M10soll nivel Of "'. ...... - I 'ookill", South wvc'sj OVcl the uxl5llll' DallilMls t(MIMM el y"l,.... MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS DATE May 2000 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON SCALE NTS 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FILE # TWO0100 TEL (914) 831-1182 - FAX (914) 831-2696 if FIGURE A-13-6 ATTACHMENT A.15 WATER RELATED RESOURCES The Hudson River is located approximately 150 feet west of the property boundary, beyond the MTA lands adjacent to the subject site. According to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Freshwater Wetlands Map relating to the project area (USGS Wappingers Falls Quadrangle), the closest NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland (NYS Wetland F-10) is east of Old State Road, approximately 1,500 linear feet east and upgradient of the project site. Similarly, according to the National Wetlands Inventory Map prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, no freshwater wetlands or watercourses are shown within the project site area. Refer to Figure A.15-1, NYSDEC Wetlands Map and Figure A.15-2, National Wetlands Inventory Map, respectively. Notwithstanding the above, approximately two acres of on-site freshwater wetlands were identified by Joseph T. Bridges, PhD, Senior Biologist with Matthew D. Rudikoff Associates, Inc., during a field visit on February 17, 2000. Since no construction is proposed, a formal wetland delineation and survey were not completed, and no impacts to the wetland areas will occur. The Town's purchase of the property will help preserve and protect these resources. 100 -Year Floodplain According to Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map, (Panel #361387 001 OA, June 15, 1979) the subject property does not lie within an area mapped as 100 -year floodplain associated with the Hudson River, which is located to the west of the project site. A substantial change in grade occurs from the adjacent MTA lands up to the subject property, which grade change confines the limits of 100 -year floodplain along this section of the Hudson River. Refer to Figure A.15-3, 100 -Year Floodplain. Town of GGappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 34 C LS HG Co ,NTY, Awful PA .T+W,S--c Oil -01F TH NEW ,E r H NEW Cedar Cliff TidalB WIRONIA41E T A L it Lady offKerc T, 56 SITE m* Mother. Counsel iia V, 3 -M 60 Rm City of NewWater York Delaware supilif 55 '�Subslalion a+` ateho' SOURCE NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Map, Map 4 of 14, October 7, 1987 USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle, Second Edition, 1973 MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. NYSDEC WETLANDS MAP RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK TEL (914) 831-1182 - FAX (914) 831-2696 mo NORTH DATE May 2000 SCALE I"=2000' FILE # TWO0100 FIGURE A.15-1 Ced ar Bluff s mond " 1Ree 11 Pile,, Soap Hill SubDanskammer li ` 82 Point onveyor Lights it Lady offKerc T, 56 SITE m* Mother. Counsel iia V, 3 -M 60 Rm City of NewWater York Delaware supilif 55 '�Subslalion a+` ateho' SOURCE NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Map, Map 4 of 14, October 7, 1987 USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle, Second Edition, 1973 MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. NYSDEC WETLANDS MAP RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK TEL (914) 831-1182 - FAX (914) 831-2696 mo NORTH DATE May 2000 SCALE I"=2000' FILE # TWO0100 FIGURE A.15-1 E,-R3FCG Wful 7S Cedar Cliff Tidalls Cedar Bluff Piles W, A A U PFM A Qu Point 'A PFUC "rf SITE Mother i. F 1VOL6 PG F, City of New York DelawareWatt, Suppi tion !Toe IYW sic fF Puss, SOURCE U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory 1995 USGS Wappingers Falls, NY Quadrangle NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC, NATIONAL WETLANDS DATE I May 2000 RIVERSIDE AT BEACON INVENTORY MAP 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 SCALE 1"=2000' BEACON, NEW YORK 12608 GREYSTONE PROPERTY TEL (914) 831-1182 - FAX (914) 831-2696 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FILE # TW00100 I FIGUREA.15-2 SOURCE Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map Town of Wappinger, NY, Panel #381387 0010A, Effective June 15,1979 MATTHEW D. RU©IKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN MAP RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET • P.O. BOX 271 GREYSTONE PROPERTY BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK TEL (914) 8311182 - FAX (914) 831-2696 DATE I May 2000 SCALE 1" = 1,000' I FILE # TW00100 FIGURE A.15-3 ATTACHMENT B.13 EXISTING SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES The existing sewage disposal system for the subject property serves all buildings currently in use and consists of a 10,500 gallon per day flow galley subsurface sewage disposal system (SSDS) with manholes, distribution boxes, and on-site leach fields. The system is entirely gravity fed and has been regularly maintained. The system was installed approximately 10 years ago and is of adequate capacity for the current on-site use of the property as an institutional residential care facility. Pursuant to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution by Greystone Programs, Inc, may continue for up to 24 months. According to Greystone Programs, Inc. facilities personnel, the number of residents is expected to decline during the lease period. Currently there are approximately 30 residents. It is expected that the rate of use for the existing SSDS during the continued lease period will be the same, or decrease proportionate to the reduction in residents. Immediate uses by the Town during the lease period (such as passive recreation or storage) will not contribute additional wastes to the system. Prior to any change of use on the property, the existing system will be reviewed and evaluated for compatibility with any proposed use by the Town. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Properly /EAF / TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 39 ATTACHMENT B.14 EXISTING STORMWATER FACILITIES The site is improved with a fairly extensive curbing and storm drain system. According to Greystone Programs, Inc, facilities personnel, all of the existing drains empty to the west into several subsurface dry -wells located on the property, As no construction is proposed at this time, no changes to the existing stormwater drainage control facilities are needed or proposed. Prior to any change of use on the property, the existing stormwater drainage system will be reviewed and evaluated for compatibility with any proposed use by the Town. Town of Woppinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property 1EAF/TK'00100/May 4, 2000 Page 39 -j < Ull C) V) FL ci Z LLI X < 0 co (-) 0 z 0 C'4 LU C� co 0 U -LL Lu >- < W cr., ui ui (f) z Z < 0 u l U ly- LU Lij Lli co ca uj — 17 ATTACHMENT $.16 SOLID WASTE Solid waste generated onsite is picked up by Royal Carting of Wappingers Falls and disposed of at an approved landfill. According to Royal Carting personnel, solid waste generation from the existing residential care facility consists of approximately 8 cubic yards per week, or approximately 1,400 pounds (at approximately 175 pounds per cubic yard). The facility currently recycles all materials accepted by the carter. Royal Carting estimates that approximately 2 cubic yards of cardboard is recycled weekly, as well as approximately 285 gallons of mixed recyclables. Pursuant to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution by Greystone Programs, Inc. may continue for up to 24 months. Thus, it is expected that solid waste generation will continue at its current rate during the continued lease period, or decrease proportionate to the reduction in residents, as noted elsewhere in this EAF. Immediate uses by the Town during the lease period (such as passive recreation or storage) are not anticipated to contribute significant increases in the amount of solid waste generated at the site. Recreational users will be expected to carry out all solid waste upon completion of activities. Potential solid waste generation from future potential Town uses will be evaluated during the environmental review of any such future proposed uses. Town ofWoppinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May4, 2000 Page 40 ATTACHMENT 11,21 EXISTING SITE UTILITIES Existing site utility services include above ground telephone, electric and cable. On-site provisions include heating oil, propane and diesel. Pursuant to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution (including approximately 30 residents) by Greystone Programs, Inc. may continue for up to 24 months, with the number of residents expected to decline during the lease period. It is anticipated that utility usage will continue at its current rate during the ongoing lease period, or decrease proportionate to the reduction in residents. Immediate uses by the Town (such as passive recreation or storage) will not significantly affect existing site utilities. Furthermore, utility usage from future potential Town uses will be evaluated during the environmental review of any such future uses. Any need for on-site improvements and upgrades will also be determined prior to any subsequent change of use proposed by the Town. Telephone and Cable Overhead wires provide telephone and cable service. The existing multi -line telephone system serves all buildings except the Mansion. Cable is provided only to the Chapel/Dormitory Building. No changes are planned at this time. Electrical Power Service All buildings and outbuildings on the site are serviced by electricity. The reported peak demand for the facility under its present use and configuration is 69kw. The existing demand will remain unchanged during the term of the residential care facility's lease. Any need for on-site improvements and upgrades will be determined prior to any subsequent change of use proposed by the Town. The "Greystone Report' prepared by Cernigha & Swartz for the Town of Wappinger, indicates that the Chapel/Dormitory Building has a 400 amp, 120/208 volt, 3-phase system which has been adequate for the existing residential care use, according to the facility's maintenance personnel. The building is also serviced by a 100kw, 120/240 volt, 3-phase diesel -powered generator that is mounted in a weather protected housing and located east of the building. The Administration Building has 200 amp 120/240 volt, 1 -phase electrical service which is adequate for the current residential care use, according to the facility's maintenance personnel. It was noted in the Greystone Report that the distribution panel is full and upgrading would be required if additional circuits were to be installed within the building. The Carriage House is serviced by a 125 amp, 120/240 volt, 1 -phase electrical service which is adequate for the current residential care use, according to the facility's maintenance personnel. The distribution panel can accommodate additional circuits. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 41 The Mansion is served by electric, but no further information is available at this time as the Greystone Report did not provide a detailed review of the building's existing conditions. The Mansion is currently not in use, and the Town has no immediate plans for its use. Heating Oil The Chapel/Dormitory Building, the Administration Building and the Mansion all include facilities for oil heat and hot water. The fourth building, the Carriage House, is not heated. According to the Greystone Report, the Chapel/Dormitory Building is heated by means of two oil -fired boilers each with a gross output of 1,904,000 btuh each, with an oil input of 16.6 gallons per hour. Both are in good condition according to the Greystone Report. Greystone Programs, Inc. maintenance personnel have indicated that only one boiler is required at a time, so complete backup exists. Hot water is provided by three oil -fired hot water heaters. Oil storage for the Chapel/Dormitory Building consists of a 10,000 gallon underground tank installed in 1959 (located below the parking area between the Chapel/Dormitory Building and the Mansion). According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment conducted by the Chazen Companies dated April 20, 2000, this tank passed a tightness test conducted in March of 1998, but needs to be brought into compliance with NYSDEC Petroleum Bulk Storage Regulations, including leak detection, corrosion protection, and spill/overflow prevention. Refer to Appendix A for the Summary of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Heat and hot water are provided to the Administration Building by an oil -fired hot water boiler with a gross output of 180,000 btuh. Fuel storage consists of two 275 gallon above ground tanks located in the building's basement. There is also a 12 gallon domestic electric hot water heater installed as a back-up - for this building. There is a 3,000 gallon partially -buried fuel tank which has not been used since 1995, located within the basement of the Mansion. Propane Gas A 500 gallon above ground propane tank located west of the Chapel/Dormitory Building is used to fuel the building's kitchen equipment. No other propane provisions exist on site. Diesel Fuel A 275 gallon above ground diesel tank with a hand pump is currently used for maintenance vehicles and equipment located behind the Carriage House. The Chapel/Dormitory Building's back-up generator includes a 75 gallon diesel storage tank mounted at its base. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /BAF1 TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 42 ATTACHMENT B.22 EXISTING WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES The subject property includes a private water supply system consisting of six wells, with four (Wells 92, 4, 5, and 6) in use at this time, ranging in depth from 400 feet to 1,050 feet. Refer to Appendix D, Survey, for well locations. According to the Greystone Report prepared by Cerniglia & Swartz for the Town of Wappinger, the two pump houses located east of the site buildings are in generally good condition, as well are the fairly new pumping and control systems (with the exception of one well depth meter which is inoperable due to a lightning strike). There are two below -ground storage tanks with a total capacity of 20,000 gallons that provide gravity -fed water to all of the site buildings. According to Greystone Programs, Inc. maintenance personnel, the system's static water pressure is approximately 40 PSI. The newest well (Well #6) located in the southwesterly portion of the site was recently installed. According to the facility's maintenance personnel, the well is approximately 400 feet deep, with a pumping capacity of 38 gallons per minute. Given the other known well capacities of approximately 3,000 gallons per day (Well #2), and approximately 8,000 gallons per day (Well 45), a more than adequate water supply exists for the current residential care facility. Pursuant to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution by Greystone Programs, Inc. may continue for up to 24 months. Water supply demand is not anticipated to change during the ongoing lease period. Prior to any future potential changes in site use, the water supply system will be evaluated by the Town and modified as deemed appropriate or necessary, Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TWOO100/May 4, 2000 Page 43 ATTACHMENT B.24 FUNDING SOURCES The proposed action involves the issuance of Town of Wappinger serial revenue bonds, and funding under the Environmental Protection Fund (EPF) 1999 Acquisition Grant Program. The acquisition price is $2,000,000. An award of $350,000 is anticipated from the EPS'. The remaining costs will be financed through generation of Town of Wappinger serial revenue bonds. Funding Opportunities The Town can continue to pursue additional private foundation and public grants to support improvements or programs at the Greystone Property (such as funding available under the Environmental Bond Act or the Hudson River Investment Fund). The extent to which the facility is accessible to the physically disabled will create a funding prioritization which can be significant, if not instrumental, in securing outside financial assistance for the future uses. Funding opportunities for potential future uses on the site would fall under a number of different categories including open space funding, historic funding, HUD Community Development funding, ADA funding (or other disabled persons service agencies), etc. Town of Wappinger /Acquisition of Greystone Property 1 EAF1 TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 44 ATTACHMENT CA ZONING The subject property is located within an R-80 One -Family Residence District. Refer to Figure C2-1, Zoning Map. Land Use The existing use "institutional" use of the site is considered a non -conforming use that pre -dates the adoption of the Town's Zoning Law (1990) and is therefore a "grandfathered" use. Future "municipal use" of property by the Town is a permitted principal use of the underlying R-80 One -Family Residence District, pursuant to §420.1 of the Town's Zoning Law. Additional future site recreational uses such as municipal parks and playground facilities are also permitted pursuant to a Special Use Permit Approval from the Town Board. Additionally, as the subject property is listed on the State Register, any "construction alterations, additions or restorations" on the subject property requires advisory review and approval by the Planning Board pursuant to the Architectural or Historic Advisory Powers set forth in §410 of the Town's Zoning Law. Off -Street Parking Existing off-street parking facilities consist of two paved parking lots separated by a grade change, as well. as a number of individual spaces immediately adjacent site buildings. The upper lot consists of approximately 25 individually -striped parking spaces, while the lower lot provides approximately 35 individually -striped parking spaces. Both lots have provisions for storm water drainage and are sufficiently lit by commercial -type, shoe -box style street lights. These parking areas include stair access only to the road, and no additional formal provisions (i.e., sidewalks, crosswalks, etc.) for pedestrian access to the buildings are in place. The Administration Building provides approximately 4 parking spaces, with one designated handicap accessible space. There is also an informal parking area located outside the Dormitory Building which appears to support parking for approximately 6 cars, as well as l handicap accessible space, which appears to be used as short-term parking. This area could easily provide designated handicap parking, although the sight distance is limited and current users have been observed to sound their horns to warn any approaching vehicles before pulling onto the site road. A loading area is provided to the rear of the Dormitory Building and appears to be of sufficient size to accommodate the current use and facilities. Master Plan Consistency The Town of Wappinger's acquisition of the subject property will firmly satisfy the goals and recommendations set forth in the Town's 1988 Comprehensive Plan by preserving the site and existing historic buildings from future residential development. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00I00/May 4, 2000 Page 45 Furthermore, acquisition of the Greystone Property by the Town will `preserve environmentally significant features" and provide a significant open space/recreational resource. Steep slopes and ridgelines located parallel to the Hudson River will be preserved. Consistent with the Town's { recommended Open Space Plan, purchase of the property will provide an opportunity to create open space corridors that will be established and preserved to provide visible access to the River. Future Town use of the property will provide "recreational activities that meet the needs of the Town residents ". The acquisition of the property will also provide appropriate locations for community facilities and recreation areas in anticipation of the Town's future governmental and recreational needs. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition ojGreysione Property /E'AF/TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 46 SOURCE Town of Wappinger Zoning Map NORTH MATTHEW D. RUDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. RIVERSIDE AT BEACON 7-11 BEEKMAN STREET - P.O. BOX 271 BEACON, NEW YORK 12508 TEL (914) 831-1182 • FAX (914) 831-2696 ZONING MAP DATE May 2000 GREYSTONE PROPERTY SCALE NTS TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK FILE # TW00100 FIGURE C.2-1 ATTACHMENT C.11 COMMUNITY SERVICES According to the Town's purchase contract, the existing use of the site as a residential care institution by Greystone Programs, Inc. may continue for up to 24 months, during which time Greystone Programs, Inc. will maintain the site and buildings. While no decisions on ultimate reuses have been made, the Greystone Report evaluates the conditions of the buildings in light of prospective reuses (including a senior center), but does not address the costs of operating or maintaining the buildings in any capacity. Following the cessation of the lease period, the Town will implement the predetermined transition schedule. This may include properly securing and/or closing buildings for which no immediate use has been determined, in order to protect the public and the historic integrity of the buildings. Heating and other maintenance costs would be minimized during the period it takes the Town to determine a feasible future use. A maintenance budget which includes insurance, quarterly inspections, periodic repairs, electricity for the operation of fire and security systems, exterior and emergency lighting, etc., is likely to be less costly then continuing to maintain the buildings in their existing state. As maintenance needs are related to the building's conditions, it should be noted that (according to Greystone Programs Inc, facilities personnel) the site's largest structure, the Chapel/Dormitory Building, includes recent infrastructure improvements such as a new heat/hot water system (1992-`93), replacement windows (1993), roof repairs (1994) and a new well (2000). Since no specific building reuse is being considered at this time, development and operating costs associated with possible adaptive reuses are not evaluated herein. However, subsequent to the lease period, an increased demand on Town maintenance department resources is expected in order to t maintain the site and its buildings. Fiscal Impacts As the facility is currently owned by a nonprofit tax exempt organization, there is no loss of property tax revenue to the relevant taxing jurisdictions as a result of the proposed action. However, three potential areas of fiscal impact to the Town of Wappinger as a result of the proposed action were identified as follows: The financing costs of the purchase acquisition; The cost to the Town for future operating and maintenance costs of the subject property and its buildings; and The impact on municipal services as a result of the proposed action. Town ofWappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF/TW00100/May 4, 2000 Page 48 The increase in the tax rate to support a Town General Fund cost of debt service to the Town of Wappinger for issuance of $2,500,000 of serial bonds at an estimated interest rate of 5,75 % amortized over 20 years is summarized below in Table C.11-1. TABLE C.11-1 TOWN GENERAL FUND - TAX RATE IMPACT Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property, Wheeler Hill Road Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County � A 1r §� 7 Years 1-2 $ 0.11 per $1,000 $0,22 per $1,000 it Years 3-20 0.19 per $1,000 1 L138 per $1,000 11 Annual debt service is estimated at $214,000 per year. An income from Greystone of $ 90,000 per year is assumed for the first two years. These figures are exclusive of operating costs. An additional important factor in evaluating the impact of the project is the current rate of debt retirement. As of April 15, 2000 the Town's debt limit is approximately $ 86.5 million. Current indebtedness is $ 21.5 million. Outstanding principal reductions for the years 2001 and 2002 are summarized in Table C.11-2 below. The analysis of future capital investments to the property by the Town and the costs of operation and maintenance are not included. TABLE C.11-2 TOWN OF WAPPINGER BONDED INDEBTEDNESS PRINCIPAL REPAYMENT YEARS 2001-2002 Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property, Wheeler Hill Road Town of Wappinger, Dutchess CountyON .G.». p .; 4 A Fund 2001 $ 170 425 2002 170 425 BAN 70,000 B Fund 2001 385,500* 2002 135,500 Highway Fund 2001 10,200 2002 10,200 BAN 151,500 TOTAL $ 1,103,750 * Includes $ 250,000 Landfill Bond retirement Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /EAF1 TW00100 /May 4, 2000 Page 49 Recreation The Town's purchase and control of the property will make available currently inaccessible and private passive recreational facilities and open space areas to the public. Subsequent plans for on-site recreational activities will be evaluated to determine the capacity of the Town's Recreation Staff as well as any impacts on the Town Budget. Even passive recreational uses would necessitate proper grounds maintenance, snow removal, insurance, signage, etc. Refer to Attachment B.24, Funding Sources. Education The proposed action will not generate any increased demand for educational services, and in fact will prevent the residential development of the site which would generate substantial increases in new students. Preservation of the property and its historic and scenic resources will also make available these unique and important resources for student programs. Police and Fire No significant changes in demand for services is anticipated during the ongoing lease period, except to the extent the Town would have shared responsibility for the property in conjunction with Greystone as a tenant. As no specific uses are proposed, the extent of involvement of the Town Police Department and it's impact on Department operations was not evaluated. Increases in demand for police patrol services of the newly -acquired public property following public acquisition will be mostly to discourage unauthorized use, particularly after hours. An on-site caretaker (or other Town employee) could reduce i the need for such services. According to the Greystone Report prepared by Cerniglia and Swartz for the Town of Wappinger, the Chapel/Dormitory Building, the Maintenance Barn, and the Administration Building are equipped with an existing fire and smoke detection system which provides comprehensive coverage and manual pull stations, and appears to be in general conformance with the NYS Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code requirements for such an installation. The Chapel/Dormitory Building also contains a sprinkler system (which is limited to heads in the boiler and laundry rooms in the lower level), and a standpipe system in the stairwells. The system is supplemented by a siamese-type connection to the Dutchess County Bureau of Fire for alarm transmission. All buildings, whether in operation or secured down, will include appropriate police and fire alarms. Future demands will be evaluated at the time of any proposed change in site use. Town of Wappinger l Acquisition of Greysione Property / EAF / TW00100 / May 4, 2000 Page 50 ATTACHMENT C.12 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Site Location and Existing Conditions The subject property is located on the westerly side of Wheeler Hill Road, off of Old State Road, and west of New York State Route 9. A portion of Wheeler Hill Road, located east of the property, is of varied width, has sight limitations due to a significant hill, and includes various signage indicating "Limited Sight Distance", "Keep Right", and "Speed Limit 15 mph". The site's access on Wheeler Hill Road is approximately 30 feet wide, and is marked with bluestone pillars. The majority of the roadways within the site are paved and provide a width of approximately 20 - feet, in good condition. Site roadways are improved with concrete curbing and storm drains along the east, and wood guardrails along the west. Once the internal site roadway passes the Dormitory Building, it continues past the Administration Building with a width of pavement approximately 12-15 feet wide. The on-site speed limit is posted at 15 mph. Future Conditions No significant changes to site traffic is anticipated during the ongoing lease period. Initial Town and public use as a passive recreation facility will generate minimal and intermittent weekend traffic. Frequency of Town use for storage and type of vehicles are expected to be minimal. Capacity limitations on Wheeler Hill Road due to limited width and vertical curves, are a significant factor in planning the property's future use. Prior to any changes in the site uses, an appropriate traffic evaluation will be conducted. The cost of any required improvements to Wheeler Hill Road (and its intersections) would be addressed as part of the costs and feasibility analysis of such future uses. Town of Wappinger/Acquisition of Greystone Property /E4F/TWO0100I May 4, 2000 Page 51 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM EAF APPENDIX A -SUMMARY Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by The Chazen Companies Town of Wappinger Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Wheeler Hill Road ,ase I Environmental Site Assessment Report page - 1 eystone Programs, Inc, Property wn of Wappingers, Nein York 1.0 SUMMARY The Chazen Companies (TCC) have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope and limitations set forth in ASTM Practice E1527-97 of the Greystone Programs property, located on Wheeler Hill Road in the Town of Wappingers, New York. Any exception to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.0 of this report. The assessment, performed during March and April of 2000, was comprised of interviews with the property owner, local officials familiar with the site, regulatory and historical information review, and a site reconnaissance by TCC personnel. The site reconnaissance was performed on March 14, 2000 by George Minervini. Except for the following, the assessment has revealed no signs of recognized environmental conditions regarding the subject property: • Asbestos containing materials (ACM) have been identified in materials of construction in the Mansion and in the Maguire building. ACM include various floor tiles and mastic on the first, second and third floors of the Mansion, and in floor tiles and mastic in the kitchen area and facilities maintenance office in the Maguire building. • Lead-based paint was determined to be present on certain materials in the Mansion and Administration buildings at levels that exceed Regulatory Limits as established by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). The following surfaces were identified as containing lead: door casings, window components, baseboards, walls, stairwell components, and exterior components (railings, header, porch, etc.) • Above ground storage tanks (AST's) and underground storage tanks (UST's) for fuel oil are present on the property and the facility is properly registered with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). The active 10,000 gallon UST was tested for tightness in March of 1998 and passed the test. This UST is due for testing in .March of 2003. This tank is reported to have been installed in 1959 and needs to be brought into compliance with NYSDEC Petroleum Bulk Storage Regulations including leak detection, corrosion protection, and spill/overfill prevention. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this site assessment is to reasonably identify potential or known sources of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, and petroleum or chemical d The Chazen Companies April 20, 2000 Job # 20010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM EAF APPENDIX B - SOILS Town of Wappinger Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Wheeler Hill Road NA0001 S O I L I N T E R P R f T A T 1 0 N S R E C'0 R D CERNARDSTON SERIES 9 mt. AAISI' 142, 1---, la■A, 1{S REV. KNL, 2•9I TVP IC OYS TAOCNREP IS, COAASE-LOAMY, MIXED, MES IC THE sERNAA0f70N SERIES CONSIST OF VERY DEEP WELL ORdINEO UPLAND SOILS VMOERLAIN BY DENSE GRACiAt SCNSST`LTY►ICALLYpTHEY FHAyE asOUT 25 INCXCS. THEY FORMfO [N GLACIAL TILL DERIVED MAINLY fRaN PHYLLITE, MALE, SLATE, A Yl RY PARK GRAYISX BROWN Slll LoaM SUA' ACE LAYER, s 1NCN Ez THICK. TME SILT L01N SU85011 FROM t TO IO INCHES IS OAAK Y ELLOWiSH 3RDWN IN TME UPPER PARI AND OLIVE LROWN IN THE LOWER PART. THE SUSS iRATVM, IRON 2O TO LL INCHES. lY OLjYE GRAY CI1aNNERV SILT LOAM, SLOPES RANCE FROM P TO So PERCEMT. 1 i LANDSCAPE ANO CL1Nn7E ►ROPER(IES DRAINAGE SLOPE) 1 ANMUiI ASR fAOst FREE ANNUAL ELEVATION ; PCT Days TRE CI'ITATION fi I LLA45 e•s0 OfPTH FRAC(. FRACT. PERCENT or MATERIAL LESS CLAY it IN.1; USDA TE■TUR[ 1 UNIFIED = AAS 11 110 IN i3•t01M� THAM 3" PASS14G.5 IEVE HO, 1 ' ' PCT ►CT 1 l l0 O 290 ICT O -t IFS' EHL, CL •NL A-4, ■•s, A-7 O•S O•S AO.70p 70.15 LS •9S SO•dL 7.171 O -t 1[N•SIL. CN -L, GR•f i1 ML,CL•HL,CM, GM•CC IA•2, A•a, A-$, A -TI 0-10 1 0-10 1i6•[p $o To 4L•70 3o•LS 1 2.121 1 i-IO�CN•SEL. ill, L =ML,CL-ML,SM, SC•SM 1A•2. A-■ ` 0.10 I o•1O 1GS-1S SO -10 45-10 ]0-30 ` 2.1]; ;P-LSiCN+I IL. L, CM -1 =HL.CL-HI,sM.SC-SH �A•2. A-4 i 0.10 i O•f0 iLS-SO so -as 4S•a5 ]O -T4 , 1.1;' 1 MOIST SULK PERMS A• AYAILALLE TOIL , ;ALINIYY 11 SAR = CEG ' cn[D7 = GY►IUM ,0f►TH Li0Ul0 ,►LAS- ; 1 1 �(IM li LIMIT ;T I CI TY 01 NSI TY 1 EILI TY 1WATER C0.PACITYI REACTION - '1MOEX 1 C CM] 1 IN MR = IX IN I PN ' HMHOS CH ; ' ME 1000 PCTI 1 IPCT O•T 2a•a5 a•la 1 oo•Its O,6-7.0 O. IS•0,22 a,S-c.0 1 I ; 0•c ; i 1? ; o22 . t7 =aa,..sss---css...o S.2os - c 2L 74.1So P,o,_0,2 s;xe•ssi 1032 - ;OC/THIORGANiCj SNRINN- S_ -M WINO 1 t0ARDS IY I TY 1 {IN.J;MATTER SWELL ,FACTORS; EA DO.i ERGO. IPCT POTfMr1Al' GRDUP' [HOER I STEEL CONCRETE' O -i x•S ` tCW ia; ] 4 Ss LOW HIGH_, D -i ;•S toW ]1 ] t a.2P; i LOW 2T, ;2 •444 LOW 74; •fLOOOlMC 1 NIGH WATER TABLE 'CE MEMTED PAN sE0A0CK SUBSSDEN[E NYO'P07EN o EPTx KENO IRON TNS ;O EPTH'NAAONE SS DEPTH , XAROHESz' 1 HNT. Tp T.1 CAP: FROST _ ... _... ... ,�.. lN1 1 iN 1 IN AC719X :0. is-, SEVER[-►ERCS ILOWtT _ ;SEIT ICTAMK i15•:�SIYE RE►FRCS fLOWLY.SLOfE -ss ORP, IDM FIELDS ; O.I,. sL16HT 1 SEW, o �2•"L MO D[AATE-S LoFE LAGOoN ;7•='fEVERE•SL DOE AREAS 10•■:.MOOFRAT!-W[TN[fS SANT TAAY 4'1St.M000 RATE•wErNFIS,SIDPE LANOf [LL =14•: fEY[R[-SLOPE (TRLNCMI i o•■:. H00[Rli[-WITNESS 54NITARY 18•IS :.MOO[RafE•wET NEss'sLDPE LANDFILL SIS.' SEYERt-$LOPE IAREA I 'p•■:,FAIR-$MALL fTONES,WETNESS DAILY 18•IS:',la1R•SNaIL SiOMCS,YI D►E, WE HESS COYER Fol i Lf•L:PDOR •SLOPS IAMDF ILL 1 . 10.1L'MDD[RAT[•OENfE LBYFA,WETNE45 SM4LLOW 'A•IfL MDO[AAiE•PEMSE iAYER,WlI Hf SS,SLOPE ,E%CAVAT[ONS 11f•L_ SEVERE•SLOP[ i 10•IL.MOOf AAIE•Wf TNTSS DWELLINGS B•IfL MOD[RATE•wETNEfS,St [IPE WITHOUT =1s•t SEY ER!•SLOPf iAi[MEMTS ' o•■t ••DOE Ui[•W[7 NEST DWELLINGS 1s•1i: HDofA►T[-WET MESS,IlO►E WITH �IS•L SEVERE•SL DP[ !►SEMENTS 1 O•aL MODEBA TE•W" "ESS SMAII 14•■:. NOD[R♦ TE•W[iN[SS,ILP►E [014NERCIaI 's•i Sf Y[RL•SI OPE BU lLO1NG5, ' p•It . MD O ER A T[• WE TN E S S. f R O ST ACTION LOS. 15 1*%,.o DER A7 E•WLT MESS,S LD PC,FRD ST ACTION AO AS AND 'If •L SEVERE•SLOPE S T RE E7S 1 LAWNS, O•atil L,L,Yffl:SL1GNT �LANOSCIPING =B•Iit11L,L.1 $1,M00E RATE -$LOPE ' aN0 GOLF O•■LCy,GA-NOO[AAT[-SMALL STONES f11RWAYS 1y•IStCM,CR: NDOCRA T E• SMALL STONES.SLOPE 1 11f•i:SCYE RC•SLOPE Dutchess County Soil Survey )SO- - C MDOER4 TE1 C ONS TRU[TION MATERIAL, el ,o•YS%:6009 15-25X:FAIR•SLO►E 1 ROADFILL '2S♦%;POOR•SLorE 1 � =IMPROSABLE•EXCEss FINES SAND 'EMPROOASIE•EXCESS FINES 1 ; GRAVEL ` DOR-SMALL STONES �IS•%:►DDR•;M►Ll ITONES.SLOIE ! TOPSOIL = i o•3%tSLIGMT POND =]-AZyMODERATE•SLOrt Rf SERYDIR ii*%:S[YERE•ILOPE AREA 15EYERE-►i►INC EMBANKMENTS i DIKES AND 1 ♦EPEES 15EVf RENO SV►TEA EXCAVATED PONOS ' AOU]TER FED i! 10EIP TD WATER �i DRAINAGE • 10•]X:►FRCS SLOWL Y,RODTING DEPTH IS �]•t'IERCS SIOWLY,RDOT{NG DEP T M, SLO►E ;i IRRIGATION 1 TO•iXt►FRCS SLOWLY TERRACES iL•I:SLOPC•►ERGS SLOWLY AND 1 DLY EAS ION$ 1 q.s%:ROOTING DEPTH.PEACSSLOWLY GRASSED IL�t:SLOPE,►[RCS SLOWLY, ROOT INo OLPTM WATERWAYS DRAFT, September, 1991 Page 56 14 0 CAR03CAN SARI%$ N T[ R P R C. T A T[ O N S R E C a R S O i L I NHOo22 MLRA[S1; 144A, 1{46 KEY. MRM, aLY, 3.66 NES[C TY►lC DVSTROCNRlr T,S, COA1ls !-iOAMY, HIKFD, FORMEa IN GLACIAL TILL VNDERLPIN ■Y ■EOROCK. TNES! of OWN CONSISTS TS OF MODFRA TCIY DEEP. WELL ORAL NEO SOILS THICK. YNlS Vi5014 FROM ♦ TO I2 INCHES IS DARK YELLDWisN li DARK G#AYI4N GROWN THE CARDIGAN S[RIlS P 0►R% BROWN TILT LOAM SURFACE LA YlR 4 INCHES VE A iOD►E RCEVTHEs SOILS NAYC CHAEOROCKSILTATa 70 1NCHasNDSLO►�SGR►NG(xF1N10 MRONTO S"LS LOAM- CR AVE P IIYLWRO'l CHAN"h • LAHaSLA►[ AMA CL[ ATE IRO►ERT !S gRAIHAGA S SLOPC ELEVATION SCT PNNVPL 1--7 NNUAL PIR FROSSTYFREE I I ►R!C ► YAT10 1 CLASS S FT 0-i0 W I IRE [MPCRATU t ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERl ES 1 P F RACT. ►RPC7. PCRCCNT 9► MATERIAL LESS SCLAY I S[EYE N0. I>io IXi7 ] IXi TNAX 3` /ASSING S 10 {O 70o AASITYO 0lPTN iI[N.1S TE%TVRC i T/M 1F IE0 I USDA CT I PCT{ L•141 fp•1O0 64-75 is•6S 4S - i Ml. SM A -s I I p.S 16o -5T 7o-fs tO-Ys 3S•7P i 6•la1 to5-a-la IAO-$% 70-36 tO-YS 3%- O -a SIL• L ISM, ML A-{ iA-4 -a ICK•L, CN -51L, GR -L IML, 0-10 io-tO `Ao•6S 6O•fo 40-75 20-70 SM NL `A-1. A-2, {-22i51L. L. CN-Stt 1 p A'4 i 'SM. 22.3oS.L. L, [11'SIL I =VW■ I { S 54R CEC I CAc03 I CYPSVM 1 70 , AVAILABLE SOIL SRIINITY I I i I �OL►TV,LIOVID /LAS- I MOST ■UL K_ ►ERMEA- I SILITY REACTION ►CT NCT i MMNof CM I i MF IOOG i iwAY[RNC'„ACITT i11M.I` LIMY iiNOE YY DGNC141 I r I I I ; 4.5 •i.0 I I I.00•I.xO I o.s-2.o tt o. I p.l7o•.00..2 I= 1i; 11,O50. Ii I [A..pO "1311 —S 0S0a O..5.2,0 p40 1.3DlII4Nwj/1-•sS 1. T0D o1 2.31 <2 i 30 IPF►TN ORGANICS SNRIN K- EROS[ONIWINO WINo S CORRDStr I TY E0.00.I I 111>+.I�MPiiCR SWILL �F4CTORI [ROD, 'C SPOTENTIAL� ^ScROUP= INDEK S STEEL CaMHYE PCI LOW 3.A LOW -OT, 2 O•a i LOW .261 2 i {•723 S LOW 27 ---------- tow `'17I L l0 I eEDROL% sues [OE CE SNYn TOT CNT•L; CEMf NYEO ►AN TR OST INP0.DNC5511X1T.,7oTAE1GRr; S HIGH WATER TAeIE S S I TOE►THSMA0.0NESSIaErTH lN) IN ACTIPN ►LOODIXc , DEPTH KING SHOHTVS S IN IN , e 'MoO ERATES I 9U R.ATIDM HdN7Ns PT IRlOVEXLY y6.o 112 HARD CONSTRUCTIDN MATER 1A e NON[ 'S AK TTPRY fPC[L[T f5 f �p•3SY ;►9oR'ARE♦ RECLAIM S R•AREA RELLAIN,5LOPC I :SFr[RE•OC/TM Ta ROCK �Zf*i;►oO S �p•1B ,4E►ilC TANK �IS�%sSlVER!-O[/TH TO RO[K,SLDrE ROADFILt I I I A6FI.,DsaN S ii I I I FINES S I o•TY:SErERF-•DEPTH TO ROCK �IMrRD6A6LE-EXC[SS in RaCK,SLDYE SAND S S[WACE IT•Y:SEYER!-9EPYN Si I S LAGOON I AREAS S i 1µ/R6/ABLE-I KCESS FINES I 1 O-ISY:Z[Y ERE-PCFTH TO ROCK TO ROCK,SLOPE GRPVEL I 5►NITART i Is— S I LANOf ILL S SS (TRENCNI S y►AIR•nRlP AECLAIM,SM4LL STONES i I 13:SEYlRL•Da►TH TO ROCK �O-6YSIl.i R-SMAII I& -AREA RZCLAl M,SLOPI SAXITARi ;O[SaY:YEVRE-OEPTM TO RO[K.SLOPE •L TOPSOIL I A►OFItI ls.11[L,L:►OOR-SLn►! OXLSLOPE 1S.%CN GK;►OOR•SMALL ST 1N`. REAS WATER MANAGEMENT 6 ' O -If%SPOOR-PAFA RFCLAIM RECLAI►1.5LnFE IS II O. 3 Y: MO D E RATE -SEE►ACE,OE►TN TO ROCK ; TO ROCK,3LOIE LY i1S�%:►90R-AREA I CODA., EOR POND 1]-9%!MGDE RATE-SEE►ACE,DE►TM I R[SE RYOIIt Is.%tSEVERC'SLa►E S L PNOFItI i AREA i _ I eV I'LOING SITE OEYELO►NEXT e SEVERE-PIPINC I I O•If%.SlVCR[•O..TN YO ROCK SIEMeANKMENYS 1 I :51Y[RE•OFPTH TO ROCK, SLOPC ..KlS AMD i I SNALLOY i1S�7 IfFCAVATtON4 S Ii IErEES = I � I WATER ` p-6Y:NODCR ATE-DEPTK TO ROCK ISEYERE-NO EXCAVATED I I '6•SLY:M40ER►T[-3L0I[,OEPTN TO ROCK IS S Ow[iLINGS WlTNOVT ISYY:S[V[R[-SLOPC ;�AOu1FIR SED ` i S = EASEMENTS 1 E► i0 WATER S O-IBY:SEY[RE.•OEPTM S9E aW[tLINGi ilS.%'SEVER[-D[►TN To hOCK.SLOPI i� DRAINAGE ; _ wtTN 6ASEMlMTf I S14.L;0[►TN TO ROCK,SLO►!,GROPES EA$Ilr i S 3Y;NOOERPTL•0lPTN TO Rock IS ICM.GR:OE►iH TO ROCK,SLO►E 1 o . S I3.6'L:MQOERPTE-SLOP E, PAPT N To ROCK II IRRIGATtOW ; I SMALL CONMlRC UL S I I6.Y:SEVLRf-iLO►E BV It01ND5 I O-AkSIL.L :01/Tµ TO ROCK,ER09[S EASILY i 0•lX:N100 FRATC•OE►TN 10 ROCK.►RDST ACTION II TERRACES IO.6%CN,G ILt DE►TN TO ROCK ` i6AXS[L,L!St o►C,OEPTN To ROC14.E BODES EASILY I LOCAL ;B•1%%MDA 0[R►TE-D[►7V To 40CK.5L0►E. IS ANO I iI SLDPE,DEFYV t0 ROCK I ROA Of ANO I f#OST ACTION eSEV ERC-SLO►C DIVIRSIONS II LPSILY,OE►TN TO ROCK I ZiRElYS I1f O-6YSSL,L:CRORES S 10-;YCN,GR:9L►TN TD ROCK TO ROCK I LAWXS, 0•61LZIL,L:M00£RATC•iNI I LAY[R STONES i6�Y5[L,I:SLD►[,CRO DES EASILY, DEPTH S ii GRPfSE0 ItN95CA►IXG '0-67SCN,GRc M. IN IL.L:N000#A1!-S LO►L. THIN LAVER WA TCRWAYS Si S6a%CN,.A:SLO►E,DE►TM YO ROCK I 4 ANO Cell Sl-iYYf j S Si0►[ SiONFi, iS I fAtRWAYf S`{jS%CO3ER%MGia►[TE-SMALL . --temberF DRAFT, Sep 1991 Page 58 Soil Survey'"'., Dutchess- Gounty' S O I L I N i E R r R F TAT 1 0115 R E C O R D OUTCHESS SERIES YTOOs7 MLRA(S); 142, 144A„ REV. GWS, A•!O MESIC TYPIC OY570.0CNREPTS. COARSE -LOAMY, MIXED. AT YHE OUYCHESS SER TES CONSISTS OF VERY DEEP, WELL DRAINED SOILS fORMEO IN GLPctAI TIIL0A4RICERLA[N EY [N Sa TERAEEK 0 EOLAY pNYLI[TE AND SLATE. THESE SOILS ARE ON UPLdNOS. DVTCNf SS SOILS TYPICALLY MATE AN DRLA7 MAT 7 INCISES THICK OYER : VERY ER Lt S AI LT L OAM[STH ER SVBSO]LT7 LOAM0 SURFACE 26Y ICN ES IS[Y E L L OWI SHTe ROW Ne ANOFBROWN•S IL RANGE MFAN0 CNANNERY ERCE TOgµRATXSN 60.aWh SILTTLEI FROM 14 i0 is INCHES 15 OLIVE VERY CHANNERY FINE SAHOY LOAM. SLOPES RANGE FROM O 70 10 PERCENT. L 4NOSCAPE ANO CLIMATE P A 0 P E WE TES DRAINAGE I SL 04E I ELEF771aN I [LASS P[Tk 1 FROST FREE ANNUAL W 0-70 j ANNUAL AIR I GAYS PRECIPITSTIDN SO -1000 TEM! CRATV0.E 120-1ao 30.50 - I 45 •S2 ETTMA T ED SOIL PROPERTIES • FRACI FRACT.IFE0.CENi OF MATERIAL LESS SLAY VH[F1E0 A45HT0 I>l0 INI 3-lO1N THAN 3� PASSING TIEYE N0- I(lNTll USDA TEXTURE ; j 1 PCT I PCT to t to 40 Too ' ICT) A•a O 0'.IS 95-700 !O.1S 40.9! SS•85 5.10 j O -a SIL. L HT ; ; p i .15 Ii0•AS si•90 5o -AO ]S•7c .. to IML. sM, cM A-4 ( O.4 'IC CN -SIL [NAL, CR -L O 5.25 X70-100 LS•95 SS•95 a0.9S 14,IA j ML, SM. LM A-4 j 15-75 ISS -40 50.75 75 -ES I♦-xiITIL, CN•SIL, cR•L IA -4, P-2-4. 8-1-e I p j GAY -SL TML, SM, GM ; I14.5S T CN -SIL, CNV•F11- j I j j 1 CEC j CACD] :rFSYM AYAILPBtE SOIL I SALIN STY I TAR jOEPTH LIOU10 PAPS- MO 1ST A4LK PERME4' I i I A[t ITT WATER CA AC REACT IDH ME/1ooGlj PCT vCfl IIIH. Il L[M1T jiNDE%YI DENSE CM]I I iN M0.1 = IN. IN IN j MMMDS/CN - j 5.14 0,20.0.2.4 4.5.6.0 ; j S•15 p•4 <13 ,NP -4 7.00.1,x0 I O.6 �'0 0.1E-0.11 1 4.5.6.0 _ j j 1•S = " I1 T n :HP -4 1 0o-1.70 o.9 0,7.•O.zq s,s-9.o 1 s I 14.261 533 jIP•4 ' 1.40-I.cO j 0.9.2.0 ; O.lo•O 1A j24•SSj (2S =NP•4 E I ' j 1I EROSION WINO W11,0 =I CONROS IV I TY I DEPT H, ORGAN I CI S—H.RINK- jIH,I;HASYER SY4.TEONCRETE ELL jFACTOf EROD, EROD, IPCT 1 jPDT ENTIALI K—�-'CROUP' INDEX I SEL C; 3 LOW MOOERATEI O-4 l.a LOW .32, i I j LOW 71 3 LOW `. 3T! j + 4 x6j o 1 1 3Tj X76 -5j O -i j LOW j 1 CEMENTED PAH REDKOCK +SUE5IDENCE 'Hr D,'='ENT FLOODING HILN WATER TADLE jTOTPL;GRP 'i rROSi DEPTH KiHO IHONTHS ,O EPTH iNPR0µE5SiDEPTH jNAROMES5jIN1Y. _CT ID+ IH IIH1 'LIN} -ERA1 ' 0.1Y:MOOERATE•PEKCS SLOWLY !SEPTIC TANK ,6-15%:MOOERATE-PERCS SLOWLY-St0 i ABSORPTION '�154X:SEYER£•SLO PE 7E FIELDS 1 10.2X:MOOE0.0.TE•S EEPdGE.LAAGE S70HE5 SEWAGE 2.7Y;MODER47E•S EEP PGE,StOr E,LAACE ITCHES LAGOON 'T.1;sEYiiRE-SLOPE AREAS ; j o 8% :MOOERATE-LARGE STONES I SANITARY 16.1S%:M ODERATE•StOPE,LgRSE STONES I LANDFILL I154%;BEY ERE -SLOPE ` JTRENC41 j o-A%:SLIGHT 1 SANITARY !B•IS%:H ODERATE-SLO PE LANDFILL I IS'%:SE YE AE -$LOPE i IAREAI I 0-15%:PDDR-SMALL STONES j OPILY I154%:POOR-SM•Lt SVONES,SLOPE j COYER FOR I LAHOFILL q-6%:SLIGHT = SNALLOW .9 -IS Y;HDOf RATE•$LOPE '.E%CAYATtONi �151'%:SE YERESLD►E [N )SO A - ,CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL O•IS Y;000D it II 5.15Y: F AIR -SLOPE + ROADFILL I25FY:►OOR-SLOPE 11 j IMPROBABLE- EXCESS FINES (j SAHO E iIMPROSABtE-EXCESS FINES �i GRAVEL i Ij I0- 15,4. PDDR- SMAL L5rCNES.AREG RECL PIM I 1, 5,Y;POGR-s MALL STONES, AREA RECLAIMS +PE �j TOPSOIL iI jj WATER MAN4GEMEN? I; O.7Y;MODER4TE•SEEP AL`- LOPE POND j3-IY :HD DER-TE•SEEPAGE.S jj RES Ft 01R 6" ;SEVERE -SLIT PE �i AREA I S l Y E It E• 5 E E P A O E. P I P I HO jIEMe ANKMENT$ I ;i DIKES AND I jj LEVEES I �_ ISEVERE-HO WPTER OWELLINCS s-ISY:MODERATE•SL9 PE EXCOAYPTEO jl PNOS I WITHOUT IIS 1%:SEYERE•SLOPE I;Roulf ER FED I BASEMENTS I 1 TO WATER p-A%ISLIGHT ii ,DEEP DWELLINGS jA•15%:MODERATE•St11PE I� ORd1NALE I t WITH IISFY ISE V ER -SLOPE jj I BASEMENTS ' to-4%:SLIGHT , O-7 --FAYORA6tE =3eY;SLOPE SMALL �a-8%;MODERATE-5LOPE II IRRIGATION i COMMERCIAL 6•Y:SEVERE-SLOPE Sj I BUIL OINLS I 1T 0.4%: LARGE STONES .ERODES EASILY EA$It' -6Y:MDOERAiE•F ROSE ACTION II TERRACES IA+%:SLOPE. LARGE STONES, ERODES LOCAL ,0 E•IS%:MODERATE-5LOPE FROST ACTION �j AHO I ROADS AND 115+X; SEVE RE -SLOPE ii DIVERSIONS I STREETS E o•6%:LARGE STONES,ERODES EASILY EAll" 0-A%SIL.c:KQDERA TE•LARGE STONES Ij GRASSES LAI%:LARGE STONES.S tO PE,ERCOES LAWNS, iA•IS%SIL,I:MDCERA TE-LPRGE STONES, SLOPE WATERWAYS ;LANDSCAPING STOME5 ,LARGE to-AYCN STONES '� j AND GOLF ,GR:MO1111TE•SMALL MALL STONES I FAIRWAYS 1a5�YYSEYEgEMSt DpETE-S DRAFT, September, 1991 Page Dutchess County Soil Survey L. NY0002 S O I L INTERPRIETAT I OHS R E C O R D HAVlN SERIES ML RA(i): IA AA, 172, 140, 145, 1476 7:, EYNEW.JWW, S•a TP1C OTSTROCHR EFTS, COARSC•L GAMY OYER IAND Y OR SANDY• S KE LE TAL, M1 Kf D, MES IC TME NAYEM SER1E5 CONSISTS DF WEEP, Well DRAINED SOIL5 ON OUTWASN PLAIMi, VALLEY TRAINS, AND MORAINES, THEY FnRHED IN WATLA SORTED LOAMY MgTER[PL VERA ITIFIEO GRAVEL ANO SAND. TY/I CALLY TNES£ SOUS [X A WDOOEO ARE• M0.YE A OA AK !RAVISH AROWN !DAM SUR f PCE LAYER 7 tRCNES THICK. THC SUBSOIL FROM 7 TO 10 IMCXCS 15 iR2WN LOAM. FROM [o i0 If INCHES 15 STRONG ARDWN LOAN, AND FROM 1/ TO 24 tNCMES [S YELLOW[SN BROWN CRAVELLY LOAM. THE SVESTRATUN FROM 24 TO Eo IN- i5 STq:TLFRI GRAVELLY SAND, SLO►ES RAMGE FROM O TO Is PERCENT ED iLANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES PMNUAL 0.18 FROST FRE! ANNUAL ELEVATION DRAINAGE SIo'e i tEMPERATURF ! DAYS ■RECIfITATION •{FT� CLASS i_, IPC�1 t W O•IS €[IN - Ii USDA TEXTURE UNIFIED i AASHTO i]10 INS) ] INi THAN ]' PASSING s[!Y! N0, i IPCTI j1CTi 4 l0 40 2. DICT) E o-77tL, SIL, VFSL ,ML, SN A-{� � I8-{• 0 � d f0•lvv 75.100 is-lOO i0•f0 5.10= ale-IaiGR•L, SSL. GR -SL SHL, SM •-2. 1-1 I O 0 00I S5.2S AO.75 SP -BS 2.161 =Ia-6015R•LFS•L �SY, SW, GF, SM iA•1. 4-3, A•2 i IOEPTN, o-20 �70-fo 25 15 10•BO 1.21 ! 0.3 LiOUID �PLAS• k MOIST aULK 'ERMEA• AVAILABLE SOEL SAL {METSAM ; CEC [PC07 G+PSUM 2 ;l[N, 1' LIMIT YICI TY' 0EHII TY BIL ITV IWA TER CAPAC[TV REACTION ' { 1 k ' 1 SMALL INDEXILlCM71 LIN/MRI ; {IN/[NI (FHL !(MMHOS/CM)� �IHE[10oG1� [IC T.I_. Trc TI L 0-1 c 5 jgr-a I Io -1.40 0.S-].0 0.15.0,25 4 I' 'I I I If -2■ [35 NP -a 5,25-I, SS ; 0.4.7.0 I O.Oa-O-IZ ` 4-5-c,o I I I • I ' X24-50; (10 I ` NF 1.1S-1 65 i i I I I i I E I { I i I I I E I I OEPTHI ORGANIC` iIIN.I.MATTER SHRINK- EROS[nX'WINO WIND I SWELL IFACTDASI ERaO.! E. CORROS I V I TY s i� C T� IPOTENTI a L; �T ?GROUP; IND'% STEEL ,CONCRETE; i ;i 0.11, 2•c f LOW .72 ] - LOW NIGH O-aY^SLIGHT 19,1S%:MOOERATE•SLOPE 11 jlf -24 lOW .24� , iia-Boj k i I E Low ;17' i ; I 1 GOLF WATERWAY! fL0001N6 I HI GN WATER TABLE C£MEN T EO PAN BEDROCK 'S a5 V IOENC£ NYD�P07[N1•L; DEPTH KIND MONTHS DEITNiHAgOHE55 Of PTN iNa MONESs�yw$T.�rOTaL�PRF' I PR92r FPEOUENCY OURATlON 'MOH THS {FTS' I iM I IN IIw IX I +CTIDN NONE SANITARY FACILITIES 1 B - CO NS T RVCT ION MA TEAI =SEPT ,S EVEgE-POOR FILTER ' 'I GOOD Ic TANK I I PBSORPT IOM t I' ROAOFILL I F[ELOI ' ,O-]Y:SEVERE•SFEPAGE 3PROe4alE - SEWAGE 74Y :SEYE RE-SLOFE,SEEPACE II �I I L4000N I SAND i AREAS II I SEVERE•SEEPACE,TOO SANDY �PROeAaLE � SANITARY i �I ' LANDFILL ii GRAVEL j [TREMCN) I I ,SEVERE -SEEPAGE SANDY, AREA RECLAIM � SAMI TART li kP000.•TGO ' !ANO FILL ' TOPSOIL I (AREAL I II I I ,► O D R . S E E P ACE,SMALL S70NES,TDO SANDY 'I I GAILY WATER MANAGEMENT I B I_ COYER FOR ,0- BX:SEVERE•SCEP ACE LAXOf IIt i s POND �B+Y:SEVE RE •SE EPA CE,SLCPE 1 RESERVOIR AREA eU1LDING SITE DEVELOPMENT B) I I i S E Y ER E- C U T a AN Ks CAVE ('E :SEVERE -SEEPAGE k SHALLOW MBANKMENTS EKC AVAT IONS i A ai OEKES ND i I { li L[YEES I O-BX:SIiCNf IB ,SEY'ER.. NO WA ER DWELLINGS I -I SYtMOOEA Ar E -sLOFE = `I EKCAVATEO 11 WITHOUT FONDS BASEMENTS = 'AQUIFER FED Dutchess County Soil Survey DRAFT, September, 1991 Page 72 '� '-,O-aY:SLICHT 70 WATER DWELLINGS k1•IS S �HOOERATE-SLQ*E ` (DEEP WI TN 11 DRAINAGE k I BASEMENTS ,o•AY;SL II " ,O•]Y'.EROOEs k I I GMT ,I EASILY SMALL I4 -a Y ! MDOEA0.7C•SIOPf , I31Y:SldrL,CP00Es CAsllr ' COMMERCIAL 44X;5! YERE-SLOFE { I' 'I 1RRIGAT ION ` BVILOIMCS II i0-1%;MOOEKATE•FROST ACTION �I ,O-IY'[RODES E.ASILY, 100 SAN Dr IOC AI S-ISX:MODERATE-SIOPE,FA05T ACTION TERRACES a1X:fL0PE,ERODES EASILY.'I' SAN9Y ROADS AMD i� AND 117+ Y:SLOFE,E RO O ES EASILY I STREETS i ;i DIY.R,IGR. I LAWNS (LAM O-aY^SLIGHT 19,1S%:MOOERATE•SLOPE 11 P-4 Y:FRODES EPS I[V OSCAPiNG GRA55E0 I4•Y'SL Of E, ER DOES EASILY GOLF WATERWAY! FAIRWAYS Dutchess County Soil Survey DRAFT, September, 1991 Page 72 NYoOfi 5 0 L L T N T E R• R E T A T I O N S R! C O R D MIRA(S1: 100, 101, 140, 142, 144A NASSAU REV. KAW. /-44 ' LI TN TC 0 V TROCHREPTS, LOAMY -SKELETAL, NIXED, MESIC THE NASSAU SERIES CONS1sTs or SHALLOW, SOMEWHAT EXCESSIVELY DRAINED SOILS ON UPLANDS, THEY FORMCO IN SILTY CL6CIA1 VER 9 TYPICALLY IS YEL LOWISHEE ROWNq A KO A DROWNRK A VERY CNANHERYASILTY LOAM. HARD SMgLELOAM tANO AS LATE 4EORDCK THICK.IS AT HEINCNEi[t1 RANGE FRaM O 70 as PERCENT. 1 i I OEl TMI ;IMA1EO SOIL PROPERTIES R (IN.(; USDA TEXTURE I UN;F{E0 c 1 AaSHTO IFRdCT,IFRACT.IPERCE NT Of MATERIAL LESS I 1 1 >lo IN 3 7 IN TNAX 7• PASSING SIVE ND, 1 IS [l, L ML, SM A,A 1 •CT I PCT 1 1 10 ao 700 1 0•3 ICN•Stt, CN - L IML, GN, SM IA -3, q -a I I 0"s aO-!o TI•as as•ao 45.75 ; 0-7 CNV-s{L. CNY-t ICM 1 2 A.a, A•1 I I S 2O 1 3-ITlCNV•sIL, CNY-L 1 :A- S- 155•as ai•a0 30.75 25.70 20 70 - GN, CM•GC Go 25-5s 20-55 IS•SO 1 17 luwe 1 iA'2. 4-a, q-1 �i0-26 =70.10 25 -ss I0 SS Ix -so 1 'OEPTH;LiQUID ,PEAS- MOIST BULK ►ERMEA- gYA1L86LE I 1 1 (IH. Ji LIMIT iTICITY� DENSITY 0II ITV 1WATER C4►4[17X' REALM.. ' SALINITY I SAR CEC Edta3 i GY 1NOEY ' ' o•] = 25-]7 • 1.10 ' I,IOCM]aO O1i Hot RO I 13. IF a, S1,H I MMHOI M ' ' ME IooG 1 PCT ' P ] 1-10 I. to-I.ao 1 1 a,5-s.s 1 0.7 1 25-]s 1 1 -Ip 1 1.1O•Ia0 1 O,F-7.0 1 o,Oq-O. 11 1 3-IT� 3o•3s 1 -l0 20 - s0 o.c-z.o 0.07-o,lx s•s.s 1 7 1,I.o,a-7.o f o,ol•o.lT ..s-S.s 1 i 1 1 OEITH,ORGANfCj SHRINK- ERDSIOH W[Np WINO 1 CpRRaS 1 I ! (IN.1IMATTER , SWELL lFACTORS'£ROD. 1 EROO. 1V[TY 1 0 -3 sC.s 'POTEN TIAI'�K T iGNOUP1 INDEX STEEL LCONCRETE OW 32' 2 0.3 i ]-5 ; Low 1,301 2 i _ Low N1cN , 0.3 ]•S Low ,.201 7 - 1 7-n' I Law iiof 17 1 1 r 1 C NI OE•TN 6TfON 0-15%:SEVERE•OEPTN TO•RQCK !SEPTIC TANK `IS+X; S EYE RE -SLOPE, OEP TN To ROCK I ASSOR►TION FIELDS jo•7%:IEYERE-OEPTK To ROCK I SEWAGE �7+%;SEVERE-SICIE.OEI TN TO ROCK LAGOON ; AREg2 1 ! O-t5%:IEYERE•O EPTk TO ROCK I SANITARY 115+Y:SEYERE•SIOPE,OEPTN TO ROCK LANDFILL 1 (TRENCH! I 0-1SY:SEYERE•DEITH TO ROCK SAkITAAV �15+%:SEVERE -SLD►E,OEPTX TO ROCK ! LANDFILL ! (AREA) 1 1 1 O-IS:IODR-AREA RECLAIM,SMALL STONES COYER FOA OAILT i1S+X%:►a 0 R•SLOFE.ARE4 RECLAiM,SMALL STONES I LAIIOFILL 0-Is;;SEYERE•OEPTN TO ROCK £XCA SAt;IL+%:SEYERE-5 LO PE,OEPYH TO ROCK VAYIc NS NTHS ;Df PTHIMARON ESS DEPTH IH4 '�•' cnLe •nTD �FOTT 'IlM 1 IN ROHES4=INIT.�TOTA4' LRP' fAC IN IN 1 ACI '1O-20 HARD C �HOpE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL e 1p-25.:PODR-TNIN LA YEq,AREd RECLAIM �� 125+%;POOR-FLOP E,iN iX LAYER,AREA RECLAIM ROADFILL ; .i (i �IMIRDA4elE-EYtESi FIMEs SAND li I 1. 11MPR064etE-EYCESI RENES ii GRAVEL 1 I o-ISX:POOR-AREA 0.E C[PiM,SMALL STONES T DPS OII IIs-%:PoQR•SLOPE, AR £A RECLAIM,SMAtt ;TONES it it t1 WATER MANACEMENT ! li ,Q•aX;SEY ERE•OEPTN TO ROCK II POND ia+%:SEVERE-OEf TH TO ROCK,Stopf II RESERYOIq II Aq.A 11 ? EMBANKMENTS SEYERE•SEEFg6E, T N IN LATER '1 DIKES AND � LEVE[f f I 1sT.�5EVERE•DEITH 10 RACK 175+%:SEVERE•S I DWELLINGS LD►E,DCPTN To ROCK ! SEVERE -NO WATER WI TNOUT . EYCAY:TED 1 eASER1ENTs I PONOS 11AOUIFER 1 fED ! 10-TS%:SEVEA£•p[ITN TD ROCK I ! DW[w'TNGI DEPTH TO it `DEE• TO WATER 115*%;SEVERE.-SLOPE, ROCK EASEMENTS ` DR61N4GE 1 ( 10-4%:SEYERE.OEITN TO ROCK I SMALL 1 [6MME RCIAL ,S+%;SEVERE-SID►C,D ElTH TO RDCK O.7%:OROUG !]+Y,O HTT,OEliX fa ROCK eu1L0 [ryCF ; ii IRRICATION RCUGNTY-DEPTH TO ROCK.SLO•F t1Q•IS%:SEYEAE-DEPTH TO ROCK ,! LOCAL 11s+%;SEVE RE•SLOp E. EPTX TO ROCK '= O•ii:LARGE STONES,DEP7H TO ROCK 14•%:SLOPE,LARGE ROA02 AND TERRALEI STONES,OEPTH TO STR[ETSAND 1 ROCK 1 II 01VERS lONs F ' LAWXf, �LANOLCIpING O•SSYS IL,L,CN:SEYC RE•TNSN LAYER 115 +XSil,t,CN:FEYER Ij 1 AMO GOLF AN E -S LO E, THIN LAYER 10-15%CNV:SEYERE•SMALL CRASSED i0 RDCK FAIRWAYS FTONES,TNIN L4YER �I WATERWAYS 4* COROUGNTYH 1 ili+%C NV; SE YER£•s MA L L STONE 5,S LO p E, THIN 4AYER ii Dutchess , County Soil Survey DRAFT, September, 1991 Page f ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM EAF APPENDIX C - CORRESPONDENCE Town of Wappinger Purchase Acquisition of Greystone Property Wheeler Hill Road Letter form New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, dated February 25, 2000 Letter from New York Natural Heritage Program, dated February 22, 2000 AIS" a rli $ New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau J NEW YORK STATE Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 Bernadette Castro Commissioner February 25, 2000 Hilary Smith Planner Matthew D. Rudikoff Associates 7-11 Beekman Street, P.O. Box 271 Beacon, NY 12508 518-237-8643 Re: Info. Request (MDRA file TW00100) Acquisition of Greystone (Carnwath Farms), Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger, DutchessCounty OOPRO609 Dear Ms. Smith: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). It is gratifying to learn that this historic property will be preserved. The Greystone property was listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places in 1991 as part of the Wheeler Hill Historic District. Please see the enclosed registration form (sorry about the poor copy - it is the best one I could find). It refers to the property by what is apparently a historic name - Carnwath Farms. It appears the dormitory and chapel are considered non-contributing buildings, Regarding archeological sensitivity of the property, OPRHP has determined that a Phase I archeological survey is warranted if ground disturbing activities are planned for the property (see attachment). If any state or federal agencies are involved in future work at the park, a review of the project by this office may be required in accordance with section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Please let me also remind you of the grants available from a variety of sources that may be of interest to the town (see enclosed brochure). For further information about the grants available through the Environmental Protection Fund and Clean Water -Clean Air Bond Act, please contact Ron Rader at the Taconic Regional Office, 914-889-410 _ An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency j pOnted on recycled paper W L 13200 hIATTHCVV'J D.1RJDIF,QFF; H. Smith page 2 Please call Peter Shaver 518-237-8643, ext. 3264, if you have any further questions about the National Register nomination. For questions about archeology, please call Cynthia Blakemore at ext. 3288. Sincerely Ruth L. Pierpont Director, Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Enc.